Butch back middle of March

Butch back middle of March

Butch James will miss at least the first three games of the Sharks’ Super 14 campaign.

There has been confusion over the comeback date of the former Bok flyhalf, but speaking to keo.co.za, James has clarified the situation.

“Recovery is going well,” James said. “Unfortunately though I won’t be fit for the start of the competition. I’m aiming to be back by the end of February but I think it’s more realistic that I’ll be available for selection halfway through the team’s away leg.”

It means James will miss the Sharks’ opening two fixtures at the Absa Stadium, against the Chiefs and Cheetahs, and probably the two daunting away clashes with the Crusaders and Waratahs.

A return against the Brumbies on March 11 seems the most likely scenario.

“There’s been a bit of confusion about when I’ll be fit. The problem has been my other leg has been playing up a bit now because of compensating for the other one. It’s frustrating but I will ensure I’m 100% before attempting to play again.”

James’ extended absence through injury and Tony Brown’s through club commitments in Japan means Percy Montgomery seems destined to wear 10 for at least the first month of the competition.


100 Comments

Pages: « 1 [2] Show All

  • 51.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    got busy sorry.

    mongril, your opinion, yet again – thats fine. butch was the form flyhalf in the Super 12 in 2004 and was basically picked by every single newspaper’s rugby panels as the first choice flyhalf in the same year for the boks.

    the reason he was never JW’s first choice, is because he got injured BEFORE JW picked the squad – does that make more sense to you now – he CANNOT be first choice if he WAS NOT selected which he could not have been since he got INJURED.

    if he folds under pressure or gets provoked too easily, why was he intrumental that same year for an inspirational win over the highlanders (i think) on the away leg on their tour? same for most of his Super 12 that year, he had a great season.

    did he receive any cards that year? i dont know but i can easily check up on that.

    opinions carry more weight when backed up by fact – try it on sometime.

  • 52.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    oh yeah, he is also very highly rated by nick mallet, guess he is an idiot too when it comes to coaching.

  • 53.pierre: Reply to this comment

    bigg, right on.

    PissAnt, why are you getting so bloody emotional about this? Yes, I said that Butch is ****. We can’t afford to have a Bok flyhalf who is afraid to tackle (the shoulder-charging bullsh**t is born out of FEAR, no more and no less), who lacks BMT and who concedes a flood of penalties.

    I’ll say it again: ****.

  • 54.pierre: Reply to this comment

    sharkgirl, so you spoke to Butch James. My f**king hero. You could have given him a hand job as well, and he would still be a **** player.

  • 55.pierre: Reply to this comment

    p.s. sharkgirl – before you get on your high horse as well, that was a joke.

  • 56.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    pierre who is getting emotional you stupid tank?

    you are the one that says, let me quote:

    “Yes, I said that Butch is ****. We can’t afford to have a Bok flyhalf who is afraid to tackle (the shoulder-charging bullsh**t is born out of FEAR, no more and no less), who lacks BMT and who concedes a flood of penalties.”

    no please explain or prove to me how he was ****, BMT-less and received ONE yellow card for play like that?

    study your facts you ****** ****. you are entitled to an opinion, but to blatantly defend it by useless ****** statements like that when he clearly was the BEST flyhalf in SA in 2004 before his injury just shows your absolute stupidity by trying to substantiate an argument on PESONAL EMOTIONAL views.

    i like to discuss and debate – you are clearly not capable.

  • 57.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    it should have read:

    “i like to discuss and debate facts – you are clearly not capable.

  • 58.munkiboi: Reply to this comment

    butch’s last S12 season was the sharks most competitive for some time. the moment he got injured their chances of a semi place evaporated. since he has been injured they have failed to make the semi’s of the currie cup.

    his play in his early career was plagued with silly stuff. but he has grown up, and he is the best option the boks could hope for at no 10 in the next world cup. imo

  • 59.pierre: Reply to this comment

    Thy praise or dispraise is to me alike:
    One doth not stroke me, nor the other strike.

  • 60.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    i rest my case

  • 61.pierre: Reply to this comment

    You have no f**king case, moron.

  • 62.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    nice,

    just the type of response i would expect from you if you were to be judged on year earlier posts.

    do you try or does it come naturally?

  • 63.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    btw i am still waiting on some facts to support your statements…but i reckon i have a better chance of getting world peace first.

    either way, one is allowed to have dreams.

  • 64.The Bill: Reply to this comment

    Pierre, nice joke bud! That is a great way to talk to a lady (?) on her 1st post.

    I think you have shown us a bit about yourself, you strike me as a low class, low iq, dumbass!

    Most important thing to remember, that if all our no 10′s in the country are fit & on top form, Butch is the guy to be wearing the Green & Gold, no questions.

    Ig, the guy used to be hotheaded, in the same way you used to be not ***! He is (as of his last season), a level headed player that plays well under pressure.

    No one is doubting that he was the form player in 2004 & would have walked the Boks, when he got injured JW had a panic attack & looked abroad for a flyhalf, ’cause only AP could do the job here & he was crocked.

    With MB being played as 10 on the tour last year, looks to me like JW will be giving Butch a hand job to play for the Bokke!

  • 65.Patrick: Reply to this comment

    I think Jake White knows about the same ammount of how to select and coach a rugby backline as I do about the finer points of Afrikaans grammar.

    To even consider Butch as a current No.10 would be pure garbage. Butch was only classed as good (no more) when he was the only fella blowing oppos off the ground with his shoulder. And someone said he was a 75% goalkicker – my arse, try 60% and you’d still be doing him proud,

    Patrick.

  • 66.bliksem: Reply to this comment

    keo,front and centre.What happened to the Dan Queque fund?Who benfitted?Where is the link you used to have to it?Answers dwarf answers.

  • 67.sharkgirl: Reply to this comment

    The Bill, thank you! :-)

    Pierre, honey, listen, I’m REAL SORRY if you aren’t getting enough or any at home, but please don’t make that our problem. In afrikaans there is a frase that goes: ‘tannie palm en haar 5 dogters’, maybe you should get to know them.
    But like the Bill said, your low class.

  • 68.RedCard: Reply to this comment

    Howzit Sharkgirl, long time.

    I hope he proves me wrong but I have never really rated old Botch. He just doesn’t give me the feeling that he can produce the goods week in and week out.

  • 69.pierre: Reply to this comment

    sharkgirl:

    It’s “phrase”, not “frase”.
    It’s “you’re”, not “your”.

    And in response to your childish and irrelevant little jibes, let me just say this: I could get laid every night of the week, or I could be celibate for the rest of my life, and it wouldn’t make one iota of difference to the fact that Butch James is ****.

  • 70.pierre: Reply to this comment

    As for you, The Bill (whatever the f**k that is supposed to be): you’re obviously the newbie here, falling over yourself to impress the “lady” (can’t get any nookie in real life and have to go trawling rugby sites in the vain hope of some cyber-action? Shame.)

    I have been around this site for a while already, posting under my real name (unlike you and sharkgirl/boy/transvestite/whatever). If you had been around, you would be aware that sharkgirl is also a regular, and yesterday’s posting was by no means her “first”, as you seem to think.

    You enjoy having these wet-behind-the-ears little puppies fighting your battles for you, sharkgirl?

  • 71.RedCard: Reply to this comment

    Pierre really who gives a ph#ck. :-)

  • 72.pierre: Reply to this comment

    RedCard: wow, someone actually wants to talk about the topic. Welcome, dude.

  • 73.pierre: Reply to this comment

    Whoops, spoke too soon.

  • 74.RedCard: Reply to this comment

    Its a joke dude!

  • 75.RedCard: Reply to this comment

    Pierre, I thought that Butch was really awesome in the Cats/Sharks semi-final many moons ago. IMHO he has just never played that sort of rugby again.

  • 76.pierre: Reply to this comment

    Ja Red, I’m not denying that, but even when Butch was “good” he was plagued by inconsistency – hence my earlier comment about BMT.

  • 77.RedCard: Reply to this comment

    Everybody is saying that his tackling is now above-board and blahdie blah, blah…

    Dont know if Schalkie has work on his defensive running lines in the off season, but can you imagine your flyhalf and opensider in the bin for 10 mins? Ouch…

  • 78.pierre: Reply to this comment

    Red, on what do they base this?

  • 79.St.Petersburgbok: Reply to this comment

    An on form Butch James would be my preference.

    Weather his tackling has genuinely improved…….who gives a toss about what the Kiwis think? Didn’t we see the Kiwi captain spearing an oke last season? It was all hush hush and brushed under the carpet.I can name a couple All Blacks that are far more dangerous…..and quite frankly, bigger cheats in my opinion.

    Also,he is 5 year more mature now than he was when he first started. He’s also been through the grinder a few times now with injuries,etc as well and has had plenty of time to gain some perspective.

    I think he WANTS it again.

  • 80.Oranje Orakel: Reply to this comment

    Good point St Pete

    Anyway he will play so he will have a chance to shut up the critics

    Pierre- who do you support again?

  • 81.The Bill: Reply to this comment

    Pierre re: no 70

    Sorry boet, I have been an infrequent visitor for the last year, but am unable to spend quite as much time as the rest to strike up relationships!

    Thanks for the concern about my *** life, but it is fine & healthy, not as great as yours who can if he wants to get laid every night (must cost a lot).

    Anyway back to rugby, lets remember this & if Butch finds any type of form, he will make the Bok set up & you will be having to eat humble pie.

    Wa%&er! (that doesn’t count as having ***, you know that?)

  • 82.RedCard: Reply to this comment

    Do you mean the defensive lines Pierre?

  • 83.x-fire: Reply to this comment

    Bill,

    I agree, I am just so worried about his knee never being right again. I have faith that he can get up to speed soon.

  • 84.pierre: Reply to this comment

    Oranje: I support the Stormers and WP – embarrassingly.

  • 85.pierre: Reply to this comment

    But I would keep Jaco as my first-choice Bok flyhalf until someone better comes along. Don’t think it will be Butch, though.

  • 86.St.Petersburgbok: Reply to this comment

    Pierre

    Long before you told us you supported the Stormers……..most of us had you figured.

  • 87.sharkgirl: Reply to this comment

    RedCard, it’s been a long-time. :-)
    I think we still owe each other a beer, so I guess we are even. I see things are looking a bit bleak with the cats.

    Pierre, sorry if i don’t have time to double cross my spelling and grammar.
    One Question: Why are you fighting with me?
    I just responded to something that pissed me off. If you have been on this site so long, you would know that i always admit when i was wrong and then i apologise. :-|

    Anyway, back to Butch and his game.
    Butch is going to be his own biggest critic, and that is why i believe he is going to give 110% every time he sets foot on a rugby field, but i may be wrong. Only time will tell.

  • 88.pierre: Reply to this comment

    sharkgirl, I made a joke, at which you (and some other self-righteous males who were trying to impress you) took offence. It was never my intention to fight with you or anyone else.

    I still think Butch is absolute ****, though.

    Given a year or two, Ruan Pienaar may turn out to be the real deal at flyhalf. Until that happens, we must stick with the guy who was there when we won the Tri-Nations title: Jaco. The Pretorius experiment has failed. The dude can’t tackle (although at least he uses his arms when he attempts to tackle).

  • 89.pierre: Reply to this comment

    StP, I’m not quite sure what you mean by that. Are you saying it’s only WP fans who think Butch is useless? The whole Cape Cabal thing keeping him out of the Bokke?

  • 90.CoffeeshopBok;-): Reply to this comment

    wow all this hostility and it’s not even a quota thread…whats up wif dat?

  • 91.pierre: Reply to this comment

    Apparently Butch James still commands some rather strong feelings from his supporters. I haven’t encountered such hostility since the time I mentioned that I think Star Wars is boring.

  • 92.CoffeeshopBok;-): Reply to this comment

    Pierre, you can say what you want about Butch but don’t diss Star Wars… (the 1st 3 anyway) ;-)

  • 93.sharkgirl: Reply to this comment

    Pierre, i agree that Ruan is going to turn out a great flyhalf in time.

    So no more insult towards each other.
    We call it a truce, is it a deal?

    And by the way, star wars is boring!

  • 94.CoffeeshopBok;-): Reply to this comment

    Hey sharkgirl, I was just starring to take a liking to you…

  • 95.pierre: Reply to this comment

    sharkgirl, peace.

    CSB, did I mention that I slept through Lord of the Rings as well?

  • 96.CoffeeshopBok;-): Reply to this comment

    Ha-ha Pierre, thats funny cause I did too.

  • 97.junior77: Reply to this comment

    Boys I hear Sharks boss Mr Hoskins is writing a column on http://www.durban365.com about womens rugby players. Should be interesting lads.

  • 98.Onlooker: Reply to this comment

    He was strong and fast off the mark and suited the Boks’ play style better than most, but is he the same player he was in 2001 season?

  • 99.Groen_en_Goud: Reply to this comment

    Agree Onlooker… Does he still have the same intensity? We’ll find out in over month!!

  • 100.Zinto: Reply to this comment

    1. BJ Botha
    2. John Smit
    3. Deon Carstens
    4. Johan Muller
    5. Albert van den Berg
    6. Solly Tybilika
    7. AJ Venter
    8. Daniel Firani
    9. Ruan Pienaar
    10. Tony Brown
    11. Cedric Mhkize
    12. Butch James
    13. Gobani Bobo
    14. Henno Mentz
    15. Percy Montgomery

    Bloody powerful!!!

Pages: « 1 [2] Show All

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.