He’s said it before, and he’ll say it again. Which is why Tackler is a liar and a racist.

Habana is good. no questions. Now he is on merit the whole says so. Habana has one bad game, which every player is allowed to have. If you’re white, hey sorry dude bad game. But if your a bit more sunburned voila, a quota player who doesn’t cut it.

I would lioke to think that should quota be scrapped and players only get there on merit that we will have the three colored players there in any way. They feel better and no one can say anything.

Of course, every player “of colour” would desperately like to believe he’s there on merit and not on quota. And nobody in the team camp will ever tell him he’s only a “quota” and not a “merit” because such a shattering revelation would undoubtedly cost the tactless revealer his six-figure income job.

And so we all agree to play this cutesy-pie little smoke-and-mirrors game of let’s just pretend it’s all hunky-dory…

That’s the cold hard truth of it, pilgrims!

“My solution is to do away with the race quota and to pick the entire team on merit and nothing but merit. And so what if it’s a 100% white team? Tough bikkies. And so what if it’s a 100% nonwhite team? Tough bikkies too.”

But nothing Tackler says can be trusted, because he lies and wriggles his way around his own words. He blatantly contradicts himself at almost every step. And, if Tackler is to be believed, then non-white = quota, and quota cannot = merit, so therefore non-whites cannot get into a team on merit.

So Tackler is not only a douchebag, but also a racist.

– TheTackler, from post 43 on this thread

From the horse’s mouth. Let it be known that Tackler is a liar AND a cheat.

What I have averred is that there is no way on earth that this quota player can even know absolutely 100% for sure whether he is in the team on merit or on quota.

Of course, everyone will TELL him he’s there “on merit”. That’s just being nice and polite and politically-correct, of course.

And the reason for this is that there IS a race quota.

And as long as that race quota exists, for that long it will continue to be impossible for any nonwhite player to know absolutely 100% for certain that he is a merit player rather than a quota one.

See?

My solution is to do away with the race quota and to pick the entire team on merit and nothing but merit. And so what if it’s a 100% white team? Tough bikkies. And so what if it’s a 100% nonwhite team? Tough bikkies too.

The melanin just doesn’t matter.

Merit matters.

Actually, we completely agree, if you read my posts.

Tackler is the one who is claiming that quota cannot equal merit, and therefore Ashwin cannot be there on merit.

I am telling him that this logic is flawed. Funnily enough, I gave exactly the same reasoning as you did. I quote myself here:

“You see, [Tackler,] I explained to you months ago how it works. A player gets into the team by merit (best in his position). That player is non-white. That player fills a quota position. You see how simple it is for quota to equal merit?”

The point is that Tackler FIRST claimed that quota is necessarily bad, and then he tried to backtrack and tell us that quota is simply quota (see post 35). But even when BACKTRACKING he had the gall to tell us that quota could never mean merit.

The reason I don’t “give it a rest” is because Tackler is all air and no argument. He needs to be shown up for the weak troll he really is.

That, and I’m swotting, so I’ve got plenty of time to kill. hahahaha

That is the only reason why i call them quota players. Or would you prefer “bloodyGoodPlayersThatCanBeUsedAsQuota” players? Last one is probably more correct but one bloody long name.

Lastly. If you looked at players that messed up their knees as Ashwin they don’t return. Speed is gone, Sidestep is something of the past. Chester was a damn good player until his knees packed up. bob skinstad was never the same after his knee bust up.

I’m afraid Marud3 has got you pegged. I am delighted to see that some one taken the time and late night effort to put you back in your pram. Jy is ‘n kakmaker en ‘n lafaard. Dwelling on this site 24/7 is a poor substitute for having friends or a life for that matter. You are a short sighted wanker and hope that the burn of the buttfuck that Marud3 has given you makes you think twice before stirring again (yeah right)

Look a *** in this way.
If you need three quota players in your team and ashwin is there with thow other players of color then th equote is filled. correct, thus Ashwin is a Quota player. Most of these forced selections back fire, look at Eddie Andrews battle week after week, yet he stays there because of quotas.
Not all quota are bad. Habana is an excellent player and i will choose him if he was green, pink, yellow whatever. But he does take the place of an Quota player in the team.

“Quota CAN occasionally equal good… There’s probably no accurate way of telling because quota NEVER means merit.”

But you established earlier, via your own logic, that merit = good. Now you’re saying that, despite the fact that you ADMIT (for the first time) that quota sometimes = good, quota never = merit?

That’s logically inconsistent. Following your OWN reasoning, it should read that quota sometimes = merit. And, indeed, this is the truth.

You see how you’ve worked yourself into a corner? Can you huff and puff without blatantly contradicting yourself?

You see, I explained to you months ago how it works. A player gets into the team by merit (best in his position). That player is non-white. That player fills a quota position. You see how simple it is for quota to equal merit?

But of course you do! Because you just admitted it via your own logic. Yet on the surface, you try to claim otherwise.

What, are all those sheep ******* with your head, or is that all you’ve got?