Comments on: Loffie’s new Lions http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/ An independent look at South African rugby Thu, 23 May 2013 05:56:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Mackie http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-87140 Mackie Wed, 24 May 2006 22:20:42 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-87140 Go Eloff!
Hope this boy sorts this business out!

]]> By: Hmmm http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-87092 Hmmm Wed, 24 May 2006 16:04:59 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-87092 Bluebarb,

I don’t think there are that many teams.

The 5 big guys qualified automatically with the Spears.

And the smaller union that scored the most points against the other smaller unions is the only other qualifier, that being the Falcons.

Well, that’s what Capistanio said on the telly at least.

]]> By: bluebarb http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-87085 bluebarb Wed, 24 May 2006 15:50:11 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-87085 alle kanniedoders is stormer fans.

]]> By: bluebarb http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-87083 bluebarb Wed, 24 May 2006 15:47:18 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-87083 Jorrie F@kken Muller.
mag die Liewe Heer julle arme Leeus fans bewaar, dit gaan nog n lang seisoen wees.
But seriously, apart from that,I hope they come right, and there are some exciting players in that bunch. the big difference will have to be mental though. they need the believe that they can win, and it wont hurt if they do ocassionally win a game too. I’ll be shouting for them, as long as they arent playing against the Bulls, Cheetahs, Stormers, Sharks, Falcons, Bulldogs or the Eagles. apart from those teams they have my full support.

]]> By: Hmmm http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-87072 Hmmm Wed, 24 May 2006 15:39:28 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-87072 Well,

Since the Lions with the same players reached the semi’s and one final under Ludeke, only a CC victory will be an improvement then.

Show us Loffie.

]]> By: suparugby http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86957 suparugby Wed, 24 May 2006 14:16:37 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86957 Its a secret of the pro’s…

]]> By: Dawn http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86953 Dawn Wed, 24 May 2006 14:12:30 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86953 What’s this. Some kind of Freemasons thing?

I worry about my bro’ Habana stuck in die Bastions Maskoshuis.

Fess up. I want to know what goes on.

]]> By: emiel http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86906 emiel Wed, 24 May 2006 13:30:56 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86906 Lions have had following problem the last couple of years
 Loose forwards – Since Joe van Niekerk left there were few intelligent and skillful loosies who could compliment the backs. Hope players like van der Merwe and Bernard make the grade.
 No quality players as back-up for January and Pretorius. Varmaak is a real find. Big problems at fly-half though. Fourie never was a long term solution. The Rose brothers have plenty of flair, but that’s not necessary what’s required to win close games (where tactical play is more important that flair). In any case, personally feel that Earl should concentrate on full-back and Jody is a more natural no 12.
 Few creative no 12’s., Molefe and Swarbooi are good physical crash ball inside centers, while le Grange is effective at poaching the ball on the ground, but with the exception of Earl Rose there are no 12’s with good acceleration, footwork and passing skills All the top teams have skillful no 12 that can back-up the no 10 ( Mmauger, Githau, De Villiers etc.)
ï‚· Since Habana left no real speed men coming through. Daniels the only one with real pace in this group

]]> By: suparugby http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86887 suparugby Wed, 24 May 2006 13:18:07 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86887 lol katman

Jy bly n *oos :roll:

]]> By: suparugby http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86877 suparugby Wed, 24 May 2006 13:13:42 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86877 Katman

Redcard was in die vyand daghuis! Drommies en Kanniedoders nie groot maats nie! Daar is darem n mate van mutual respect…jou afleiding van wat ek gese het klink soos iets uit Jerry Springer (of egoli)

]]> By: katman http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86867 katman Wed, 24 May 2006 13:10:18 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86867 Nee, Suparugby. Hoekom? Begin jy ‘n groepie?

]]> By: katman http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86862 katman Wed, 24 May 2006 13:08:31 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86862 RedCard, standing up for a koshuismaat is one thing. But incest? Walk away from this one.

Just kidding though :) I know what his sentence meant.

]]> By: suparugby http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86860 suparugby Wed, 24 May 2006 13:06:58 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86860 Katman

Is jy n ******?

]]> By: St.Petersburgbok http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86859 St.Petersburgbok Wed, 24 May 2006 13:06:37 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86859 becoming expensive…….
and the kid isn’t even born yet.

]]> By: katman http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86851 katman Wed, 24 May 2006 13:04:33 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86851 Well, Dawn, I think Suparugby might be in a better position to explain. He seems to have found some kind of blue-eyed, brotherly love. Although he also mentions the name Skoonveld, which sounds like a Dameskoshuis*. And this poses some tricky questions about the brother…

* if you want to know what a Dame is – it’s like a Vrou, but with one part manners, one part inhibition and one part guilt.

]]> By: Dawn http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86846 Dawn Wed, 24 May 2006 13:01:29 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86846 St Pete how’s the baby business!

]]> By: St.Petersburgbok http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86837 St.Petersburgbok Wed, 24 May 2006 12:57:42 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86837 These okes suck.

]]> By: RedCard http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86833 RedCard Wed, 24 May 2006 12:56:15 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86833 katman,

Jy het die kat aan die gat beet. “…my broer…” is the start of a new sentence.

]]> By: RedCard http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86826 RedCard Wed, 24 May 2006 12:54:35 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86826 Sarky so the only difference between Lions and WP is that the WP guys still have details (not credentials!!!) in the coaches column.

]]> By: sarky http://keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86823 sarky Wed, 24 May 2006 12:54:04 +0000 http://www.keo.co.za/2006/05/24/loffies-new-lions/#comment-86823 Bloem Leeu

You’re closer to the action than I, where (positions) are these Loffie boys going to play?

]]>