Best Bok lives as quota dies

Best Bok lives as quota dies

Keo, in his Business Day column, writes that green should be the only colour that matters in Springbok test selection.

Black and white representation in SA’s rugby teams should be a matter of course and not a national event each time a team is made official.

When black players can be dropped and white players can replace them, without fuss or accusations of racism, our rugby will have moved beyond the farce that paraded as a unification process in 1991.

South African Rugby Union (Saru) president Oregan Hoskins’s public confirmation that coach Jake White would be free to select his best team every weekend was the most significant endorsement any Bok coach has received in the last decade.

Too much emphasis has been placed on how many black players make the Test team. There has never been enough emphasis on increasing playing opportunities for black players in club, Currie Cup and Super 14 rugby.

The logic should always have been that the bigger the black playing pool, the greater the number that progress to the national team. But when you had a system in 2001 that demanded four black players be in every Springbok match 22, but only six were starting regularly out of 60 in the then Super 12, there was always going to be an issue with black representation at the top.

Perhaps, just perhaps, Springbok rugby is moving towards normalisation where the best can play, regardless of colour. And perhaps the message has finally sunk in that if 50 black players are getting regular Currie Cup and Super 14 exposure, no selector has to play the political numbers in determining the make-up of the national squad.

The quota system, post unity, was always necessary in South African rugby, but the application of the system never complemented the intention. The quota system failed because it was measured at a national level, when the national structure should have been the beneficiary of an effective quota system at other levels.

Hoskins’s acknowledgement that White would not have a gun held to his head every time he picked a test squad was overdue and good news. Where I disagree with him is in his qualifying statement that the Bok team should never again be an all-white team.

If the Bok coach has carte blanche to select the best, then there should not even be an afterthought of a colour count.

If opportunities are present at all levels I doubt a Bok XV would be all white too often.

However if, because of lack of form and injury, there is no black player good enough to make the starting XV then so be it. If in 20 years’ there is no white player good enough to make the first XV then so be it too.

The merit of national selection should be that the best man plays. In SA’s rugby for the past decade this was not always possible because of racist mindsets that could not acknowledge that white may not always be best.

For every black player accused of being a quota Test selection, there were plenty of white players who wouldn’t have been picked had it not been for a misguided belief in SA this past century that white was superior.

White, the coach, has changed that, with his belief in black players at under 21 level, and in the past two years at Test level. But rugby politicians bullied him initially for his belief, and his credibility was questioned because of a black numbers game.

White players were being prejudiced as White sought alternatives to injured black stars Gurthro Steenkamp and Ashwin Willemse. White needed clarity that black does not have to replace black, just as he broke down the bias that black cannot replace white. He now has freedom of choice. He no longer has to pick a black wing and a black manager, the ugly stereotype so synonymous with Springbok rugby’s transformation in recent times. He can now pick the best team. Some may call that normal, but in the context of SA rugby’s last decade it’s an abnormality.


266 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] Show All

  • 251.Amerifikaner: Reply to this comment

    ON news24.com JW admitted, by mouth of Hoskins, that not inviting one of the Ndungame twins was a slip up???? How do you slip that up? Anyone of the two is better than Gaffie. And didn’t he always said it was not too late to invited other players than the current training group. What’s with holding him?

  • 252.YoMama: Reply to this comment

    Could this be the end of Julies and Eddie?

  • 253.capeflatsboy: Reply to this comment

    So YoMama you believe they are “quota” players?

  • 254.jonny: Reply to this comment

    jb I think StM is saying that by this time Paulse should have been overtaken by other POC’s, but what he fails to mention is that Willemse, Chavhanga et al are injured and Paulse is purely a backup. Also think the Ndungane’s should be given a chance to prove their worth in the Bok squad instead of reverting to the likes of Andre Snyman! Jeez!

  • 255.jonny: Reply to this comment

    YoMama I’m afraid you are wrong. Eddie and Julies are there for the long-haul. JW has stuck by them and it’s clear to me anyway that Julies has the class to be in the squad if not a regular starter at 12.

  • 256.StMichel: Reply to this comment

    My point is that the selection of Paulse cannot in anyway be based on talent and form.

    The majority of SA provinces have chosen the wing position to bring through POC. And we still cannot find anyone better than this chap. For 8 years he has evidently not been good enough yet we still to have select him. Because he is the best out there. It is a disgrace.

  • 257.capeflatsboy: Reply to this comment

    StMichel, I agree with you. It is a disgrace that South African wingers rank amongst the worst in the world. Why? Because coaches put their token black players in those positions. The guys have not been schooled in the through art of wing play. They are told we will pass you the ball and you run as fast as you can with it.

  • 258.jonny: Reply to this comment

    StMichel, can England not find anyone better than Mike Catt to play centre? Argument over.

  • 259.Rudebud: Reply to this comment

    Still would have loved to see both the Ndungane brothers in the squad. Good players with natural ability. Good finishers as well.

  • 260.k1w1in0z: Reply to this comment

    It would appear that RACE (read colour) will be an issue in RSA for some time to come.
    Please don`t forget that it is NOT SOLELY a white issue.
    As some posts have aluded to, race issues obviously affect all people and hate is a very powerfull destructive force being the basis of much of humanities problems and anything which goes toward healing, is worthwhile.
    A tuely reflective BOK team, will not be present for some 20 years as players need to be brought to Rugby, young and progressively, the word QUOTA ought to be as demeaning to the (RSA)nation as it is to the players.

  • 261.ClothesLineWhenNotLooking: Reply to this comment

    Yes, Ndungane brothers did catch my eye this year.Would love to see them play

  • 262.ClothesLineWhenNoOneIsLooking: Reply to this comment

    9. Pienaar
    10. Butch
    11. Habana
    12. Jean
    13. Fourie
    14. Ndungane or Ndungane
    15. Russell

  • 263.ClothesLineWhenNoOneIsLooking: Reply to this comment

    1. Os
    2. Smit
    3. BJ
    4.Bakkies
    5.Matfield
    6.Burger
    7.Van Niekerk
    8.Aj

  • 264.ClothesLineWhenNoOneIsLooking: Reply to this comment

    16.Gary
    17.Sepaka/CJ vd linde
    18.Rossouw
    19.Wikus
    20.Ricky
    21.Julies
    22.Jaco

  • 265.twojays: Reply to this comment

    Too good to be true. Anyone who thinks that the ANC has no position in naming a Springbok squad is living in cloud cuckoo land. Hamba Kahle

  • 266.jonny: Reply to this comment

    Helluva side CLWNOIL!

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] Show All

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.