Os beefs up Boks

Os beefs up Boks

Os du Randt has been declared fit to face Scotland in the first test in Durban.

Springbok coach Jake White predictably made massive changes to the pack that struggled against the World XV and the unit named on Wednesday shows five changes. Du Randt and John Smit return, lock Victor Matfield is back and Schalk Burger and Juan Smith are the flankers.

Joe van Niekerk wins the No 8 jersey ahead of Pedrie Wannenburg and Jacques Cronje, with the latter not in the match 22.

Fourie du Preez returns at scrumhalf and Breyton Paulse is drafted in at the expense of Gaffie du Toit.

The team shows six changes to the side that lost to France in Paris.

Boks (to play Scotland): Montgomery, Snyman, Fourie, De Villiers, Paulse, Van der Westhuyzen, Du Preez, Van Niekerk, Smith, Burger, Matfield, Rossouw, Andrews, Smit and Du Randt. Subs: Shimange, Sephaka, Muller, Wannenburg, Januarie, Olivier and Du Toit.


425 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] Show All

  • 401.mikeybrass: Reply to this comment

    POST 400! First time;-)

  • 402.Hmmm: Reply to this comment

    Dawn starts something and disappears.

  • 403.Ou Grote: Reply to this comment

    400 hehe

  • 404.Skim: Reply to this comment

    Stupid Cowboy message.

  • 405.mikeybrass: Reply to this comment

    Bugger you Vinnie, prat;-)

  • 406.Vinnie: Reply to this comment

    hahahaha skimmel.

  • 407.Ou Grote: Reply to this comment

    vokkit

  • 408.Skim: Reply to this comment

    Wat de moer het Keo gedink?

  • 409.Vinnie: Reply to this comment

    :lol: mikeybrass.

  • 410.Hmmm: Reply to this comment

    First time what mikey

  • 411.Ou Grote: Reply to this comment

    ok 500

  • 412.wpw: Reply to this comment

    vinnie, dont you have work to do? :grin:

  • 413.Skim: Reply to this comment

    That’s all from me.
    Cheers guys, may you experience joy and happiness in excess.

  • 414.Hmmm: Reply to this comment

    Congrat’s once again Vinnie.

    Ai, but your frustrating.

    That is why I no longer try.

  • 415.Vinnie: Reply to this comment

    Suppose the highbury monarch are smiling down on me now…

  • 416.Deutsche_bok: Reply to this comment

    OH there you Grote Piel … Are you still talking ****

  • 417.Deutsche_bok: Reply to this comment

    The tackler was so right about you guys … boring and stupid….

  • 418.mikeybrass: Reply to this comment

    You don’t want to know Hhmmmm, it’d overload your brain;-)

  • 419.mikeybrass: Reply to this comment

    DB, excuse us for having some plaful fun in a short break from work. If you want to contribute something, reply to one of the substantive posts in the thread. See, simple really.

    Vinnie, you must have beaten me by literally a couple of seconds. Keo, get your site to refresh quicker man! Ordered us some pizza to compensate for the loss of 400;-))))

  • 420.ddrek: Reply to this comment

    Our subs looked better last week,but that makes sense.
    Smith,Burger,Big Joe…..oh YES !!!!!!!
    Usually i’d have Venter over Big Joe or even Wannenberg ,but Joe looked exciting and committed last week…certaibnl;y more exciting player. Hope the 3 fire….could be somewhat rusty.
    I just dig Juan’s handoffs…..brutal.
    Its apparent to me that Jake epected the World 15 to run a lot hence the squad he picked also hence trying to play the 10 man game ,with runners coming on as subs rather.
    I just think the game plan was reversed last week and the Worlds had our number. Hopefully we can mix it up better this w/e.
    Scots will be bloody difficult !!!

  • 421.Onlooker: Reply to this comment

    Come on mikeybrass(398),
    Those token front row ‘Boks’ wouldn’t make the Greenside’s Pirate bench 20 years ago, it’s pretty simple if you look at those who weren’t even considered: Vissagie, Rautenbach, Dan Human, Pat Barnard, Bands etc.
    And you are correct about Honeyball and Stransky, also note that both had played at centre and fullback positions at the CC level, I remember Stransky in 1991 against Tvl at Ellis Park: from Fullback position scoring 2 tries running slaloms half the field and cutting Small and Hendriks with some telling side tackles

  • 422.Delek: Reply to this comment

    Stransky really was class. Could kick WELL with both feet, had tremendous speed, eye for the gap and periphial vision not to mention distribution skills. And could tackle well for a smallish guy.

    Just a bit erratic at times but apart from that top class.

    Honiball was a very different player but equally effective. Two true Natal legends. Those were the days!

  • 423.mikeybrass: Reply to this comment

    The point, Onlooker, which you have missed completely is that both Honiball and Stransky were given game time in their respectively positions. Stransky virtually never played anywhere but flyhaf…only a couple of occassions early on in his provincial career. Honiball played the *vast* majority of his matches at flyhalf.

    398 was Skim’s post. 399 was mine and said nothing about quotas. My quota post was 389 which you have been utterly incapable of answering except to spew your usual racist bullshit.

  • 424.mikeybrass: Reply to this comment

    Delek, personally I think Stransky is more of a legend than Honiball. Honiball was great but my preference is Stransky – when he was on song, I could watch his side-step and ability to send his centre into a gap for ages…

  • 425.Delek: Reply to this comment

    Mikeybrass we are on the same page. Watched Stransky play from his first season with Natal in ’88 I think it was. He just got better each year and was very exciting to watch.

    Then of course world cup ’95 and then three fantastic seasons with Leicester. He was the real deal.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] Show All

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.