Gunning for greatness

Gunning for greatness

Pierre Spies has become one of the world’s elite No 8s. And he will get even better.

Here’s a thought to consider: Pierre Spies is into his fifth year as a professional at No 8. When you trace his progress since he reluctantly relinquished his ambition of becoming a Springbok wing in 2005, you begin to understand the magnitude of what he has achieved.

If he were to garner a passing mention in comparison to the world’s elite No 8s – France’s superlative Imanol Harinordoquy, the Italian colossus Sergio Parisse and Ireland’s gifted Jamie Heaslip (Harinordoquy at 30, and Parisse and Heaslip at 26, are six and two years his seniors respectively) – he would have achieved much. Likewise, if he were to be spoken of as having similar promise to some emerging eights like Springbok team-mate Ryan Kankowski, the robust Duane Vermeulen from the Stormers or the Brumbies’ excellent Stephen Hoiles.

However, Spies doesn’t simply stack up well. The fact that he’s widely regarded to be better than Kankowski, Vermeulen and Hoiles, and that a similarly strong argument can be made in the debate of whether he trumps Harinordoquy, Parisse and Heaslip – all of whom have spent the majority of their amateur and professional career in the position – bears testament to the phenomenon that Spies is. That he isn’t an imposter in their company speaks of his adaptability, unrelenting work ethic, mental strength and ability to learn. That he could be the finest of the lot, although such assertions are rarely absolute, is a salute to him and his coaches.

According to those who have worked closely with him, he will get better. A lot better.

‘The new breakdown law interpretations have allowed the attacking side to carry the ball through a lot more phases than they were able to previously, and this has amplified Pierre’s strengths because there’s often space and time for him to work with in the wider channels after five or six phases,’ Spies’s mentor and Bulls director of rugby, Heyneke Meyer, explains. ‘He’s a threat with ball in hand normally, but when he’s running at a depleted defensive line, he’s formidable. The less numbers you are able to post on him the greater the chance he’s going to hurt you. If he’s utilised intelligently by the Springboks, and there’s no reason to believe he won’t be, he could be the difference between winning and losing a Test.’

Eddie Jones, former consultant to the 2007 Springbok World Cup-winning team and successful Wallabies coach, offers his insight.

‘The breakdown law interpretations will see him become the pre-eminent No 8 in world rugby, simply because he’s light years ahead of any of the competition in terms of sheer athleticism and physicality. Who matches his pace? Nobody, not even Kankowski, who has some appreciable toe. Who matches his upper-body strength and leg drive? Same answer. He doesn’t have an equal as an eight in terms of the sustainability of his contribution at the highest level because none are as fit.

‘He needs to make minor technical improvements and he could be making better decisions. I’d also like to see him develop a short pass before contact because that would give him an unpredictable edge – will he pass, will he run? – but he’s a relative kid who’ll develop those skills in time.’

Bulls technical analyst and forwards coach Johann van Graan has worked with Spies since he was a Standard 9 (Grade 11) pupil at Affies and knows his game intimately. He points out areas Meyer and Jones have omitted.

‘Certainly the fact that there are now longer phases allows running No 8s like Pierre to get multiple carries in one possession, but his potency is amplified by the fact that players are now commanded to freeze their kick-chase if they are in front of the kicker, whereas before that area wasn’t policed as strictly,’ he explains. ‘Now Pierre has more space and time to assess his options, and when he runs he’s always a line-breaking threat, or at the very least commits two defenders which then creates gaps in the defensive line.

‘His high-ball catching has also developed immensely in the past year or so and his work from the base of the scrum now rivals that of Hoiles and Harinordoquy, who are two of the best in that department. He won’t stand still or regress because his work ethic is unrelenting and he can’t stand mediocrity. He’ll be one of the greats of the game.’

Spies has learnt to treat the dual imposters – adulation and criticism – with equal contempt. He knows the truth lies somewhere in between. That said, his self-belief is unwavering. ‘I believe that when I play to my potential I’m the best in the world,’ he says.

I prompted the response by revisiting the very same assertion he made prior to the British & Irish Lions tour in 2009. The British media fed on the quote like a pack of famished hyenas, their appraisal of the assertion ranging from ‘arrogant’ (The Times of London) to ‘downright deluded’ (The Independent).

‘I don’t think the media and public know what they want you to be sometimes – humble [read: self-effacing] or supremely confident,’ he counters. ‘I don’t think I lack humility and neither am I apologetic about my own estimation of my standing in the game. I believe I have something special because I’m unlike most No 8s in terms of my pace, and my experience as a backline player gives me a more holistic understanding of how best to link with them and about attacking lines in the backline.

‘I don’t tell everyone who will listen how good I am, and I know there are areas of my game that need to improve.’

‘Like what?’ I interject, before offering a personally held belief that with his immense upper-body strength he should be more dominant at the tackle point on defence.

‘I agree with that and it’s something that I’ve been working on,’ he says. ‘I’m not a player who smashes okes 5m backwards in the tackle, but I realise I should be harnessing my strength better in contact. That’s just one example of many, like getting a lower body position in some contact situations in attack or working more effectively with Fourie [du Preez, the Bulls and Springbok scrumhalf].

‘But there are no No 8s with a complete game. If you analyse them closely they all have shortcomings. The best ones make those shortcomings less apparent by maximising their strengths.’

The one enduring criticism of Spies is that his threat is significantly diminished when required to mix it in the tight loose.

‘Rubbish,’ says Van Graan. ‘That argument was valid early in his career but people who still peddle that argument don’t know the facts.

‘Statistically he compares favourably with Hoiles, who’s one of the best at controlling the ball and playing from the base of the scrum, or with Vermeulen, who’s defensively superb in the tight loose and a powerful counter-rucker. His work rate and effectiveness in the tight loose can no longer be questioned. He carries the ball 10-13 times per match, many of those close to the ruck, and gets over the advantage line 80% of the time; he’s consistently among the best at the Bulls in terms of tackle count and the accuracy of those tackles, as he is in the rucking stats. He has also become a banker at the lineout, which is invaluable if your primary jumpers are under pressure. Maybe we should bury that argument.’

However, while he may have made strides in dispelling long-held perceptions about his aptitude for close combat, his primary value to the Springboks will be when tactical engineering creates opportunities for him to be pitted against the backs he dwarfs.

Doing so with the consistency that separates good Test players from the great ones will be his challenge.

‘In 2009 it felt like my game kicked up a gear to the point where I was a lot more influential than I had been previously,’ Spies explains. ‘The very best players are able to replicate those types of performances regularly.

‘Consistency is crucial because I realise now that if I fire, the Boks do well. As a rookie I was pretty carefree and just had a jol, but now I have a greater appreciation of my role and what my contribution should be.’

Meyer adds: ‘He’s more tactically astute now and is also able to rebound from bad starts in a way he wasn’t able to in the past. That comes with maturity and improved emotional intelligence in the sense that he realises that one mistake doesn’t make him a bad player and that it shouldn’t dictate his mood and, as a result, his performance.

‘That all bodes well for the Springboks because he’s making massive steps year-on-year. If he continues to progress like he has, questions about who the best in the world is will be futile.’

By Ryan Vrede

– This article first appeared in the June issue of SA Rugby magazine


87 Comments

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

  • 1.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    Jones summed it up.

    He needs a greater appreciation for the role of an 8 and with that better decision making will come.

    He is a brilliant athlete, but he now needs to become a brilliant 8.

  • 2.Jinx: Reply to this comment

    Pierre make crib notes from old Zinzan tapes.

  • 3.Black Panther: Reply to this comment

    Good player. Very good player.

    But every time he streaks thru in the clear with his admittedly great pace, he somehow becomes “a great player”.

    Still havent seen him bully a game like a Zinzan, a Teich, a Dallaglio, a Kefu.

    Wheres the bump’n'grind ? Where’s the soft hands releasing his flankers ? Wheres the 3 consecutive spot tackles on the line to save match-turning tries ?

    Far too early to judge Spies as a no8. He remains a highly-promising athlete playing damn good rugby; no more than that.

  • 4.Staal: Reply to this comment

    Ouboet – bly nederig!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • 5.gecko: Reply to this comment

    He is still a bit shaky at the back of the scrum, especially when the scrum is going backwards. And with our props he will need to work on this skill.

  • 6.sparticus: Reply to this comment

    Great athlete I agree , awesome going forward and would rather have him in my team than against me but he cannot defend so lekka , with so one with such strong upper body strength I am surprise how the Italians brushed his off. His only weakness and fortunately something that can be worked on. For me he is much like Bob Skinstad in his prime , awesome on attack , not that great on defense , Still I would put his name down first with Morne Steyn (and I am a die hard WP supporter)

  • 7.sparticus: Reply to this comment

    Oh and one more thing , can the magazine guys do a different cover for a change ? Someone other than Spies or Fourie ? How about a article on De Joung or evens Hurdles ? One of the up and coming stars ?

  • 8.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    Look I’m a big Spies fan and all, but how many of these rehashed articles are we going to see?

    Didn’t we see this exact article in the last SA rugby?

    My take on Spies:

    He is the greatest athlete the game has seen.

    He is the fastest no.8 the game has seen.

    He is one of the most powerful no.8′s the game has seen.

    He does NOT have the greatest hands.

    And in order to be such a great athlete, his build does not lend itself to him being the most effective tackler, as he struggles to get a low enough centre of gravity to take guys down effectively at the first go, especially if they wrongfoot him.

    He is not the ball player that the oh-so-revered Zinzan Brooke was.

    But as a whole, I would take him over any other no.8 anyday.

    His strong points make his weak points worthwhile in my view. And his weakpoints are slowly being addressed.

    He will never be a Quade Cooper with ball in hand, but I’m quite happy with that. Zinzan Brooke was never a Pierre Spies when running at the defensive line. There is no one that comes close in that respect.

  • 9.sparticus: Reply to this comment

    I did hear that he dropped a goal in practice the other day so maybe he will show us more in future , how cool would it be that he drops a goal against the abs ?

  • 10.Oubaas2009: Reply to this comment

    @Black Panther(Black Panther)-3: Kefu? Bwahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. You just showed your hand.

  • 11.RugbyRIP: Reply to this comment

    And every time he gets a suck like this article, it will take him longer to get to just-above-average in actual fact.

    Come on with the stats, let us see.

    And in which games did he dominate his opposite number to the effect that it made a difference?

    And as part of loosie combination – the crucial question actually?

    He can do things that look spectacular, but against whom and in which sort of situations, and to what actual value for his side in the match situation – he has a long way to go to deserve this sort of worshipping (Pun intended.

    I hope he does, but then he should not read these articles.

  • 12.Dawn: Reply to this comment

    @Black Panther(Black Panther)-3:

    Bump ‘n grind? From Pierre?

    Rude!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    (PS: O vok he got his foot on a soccer ball!)

  • 13.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    pierre spies is overrated imo.

  • 14.Sonito: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Tacitus)-8:

    Thats a excellent assesment on Spies.

  • 15.katman: Reply to this comment

    @Black Panther(Black Panther)-3: How the fck did Kefu sneak onto that list of great eights? Or are you just checking that we’re awake?

  • 16.boktoinfinityandbeyond: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman(rangerman)-13:
    THAT is an excellent assessment of Spies.

  • 17.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Tacitus)-8:

    Problem I have with that is that Pierre’s play will only suit a certain type of team or game plan which compliments his strengths as an athlete more than a number 8.

    For now it is working because we build around him and his ability.

    A more tactical and technical astute 8th man fits into any team.

    That is why I would like to see him work on his technical abilities for the position.

  • 18.Bod: Reply to this comment

    Being a Slummies man, I am surprised that ol Tac is chosing to blog and is not down at the Bok training ground in salivatating at the legendary Pierre live in action

  • 19.sharks_lover: Reply to this comment

    @PissAnt(PissAnt)-17: omg Morne how can you suggest Spies is not perfect and has short commings , sacralidge i tell ya :lol: :lol:

    Taccy will never forgive you now :roll:

  • 20.Taahirah: Reply to this comment

    @sharks_lover(sharks_lover)-19: See post 8. Tac admitted Spies has shortcomings.

  • 21.David: Reply to this comment

    Spies reminds me a bit of the Welsh 12, Roberts. Both of them are big and fast yet Roberts needed BOD to bring the best out of him with his running lines both on and off the ball. Roberts hasn’t had the same impact for Wales since the B&IL tour, injuries apart. Both Spies and Roberts are devastating in space but both need someone to create that space for them. Spies is a taker of chances not a maker, which is why I feel that at 8 he’s not the best choice. Pottie creates space and knows when to release the ball, which is why I’d go for him, with Spies at 7 or off the bench as an impact player.

  • 22.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    @David(David)-21:

    I have long stopped saying Spies and Kanko will be more effective 7′s.

  • 23.Bok fan: Reply to this comment

    My comments after the Italy game:

    Spies must be the most overrated player in sa. If he’s such an “athlete” then he must go to the olympics. I pray we have a combo of brussouw, burger and smith at the world cup

  • 24.brains_trust: Reply to this comment

    Spies is a poor mans Vermeulen.

  • 25.David: Reply to this comment

    @PissAnt(PissAnt)-22:
    Yes, I know. For me, the vital point strangely enough, is that they both score a lot of tries. Which tells me that they’re not doing the primary work of an eigth man.

  • 26.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    as far as tac saying spies is “the greatest athlete the game has ever seen” i find this hard to agree with.

    he has brute power and speed in spades but his ball skills (surely a vital part of his “athletic” prowess?) are very poor and i just dont think he is an effective link man who can put others into space.

    his work at ruck time is not poor, it is dismal.

    kanko is far more athletic if all-round rugby skills are taken into account and his lack of physicality is a large part myth as evidenced by his bulked up frame this season.

    as PA says, our game has been built around using spies as a strike runner/ball carrier where he takes impact sucking in defenders and then we go through phases trying to utilise the gap he has created.

    smart teams defend against this quite well.

    he has a long way to go before he justifies the hype imo.

  • 27.WO_owned_De_jongh_in_super14_final: Reply to this comment

    its simple really … if your a Sharks fan. then you support Kanko … Province = vermeulen … bulls = spies. All i know is that spies had a great super 14 … he gave the Bulls the “go forward” in the semi’s vs Crusaders …strong runner of the ball at pace … best nr 8 in world rugby, by a mile!

  • 28.Ig: Reply to this comment

    Spies whikle a large chunk of ******** hasn’t even began to reach his potential, we see very little of a classic eight, he runs into people seeking contact, very rarely links with anyone and just holds the oppostion up. Far better eights in the world.

    If he started working on becoming a better player – he might actually go onto be a legend, not another hulking South African who didn’t reach his potential and relied on his size.

  • 29.wpw: Reply to this comment

    with the help of performance adhancing drugs yes!!

  • 30.GI POT: Reply to this comment

    Spies has great potential, but a great no 8 has a presence on the field. Morne Du Plessis, Gary Teichmann and even Jannie Breedt. The flyhalf kicks a ball and the 8 is there to collect it – the flyhalf passes the ball and the 8 is there to take the wing out on the corner flag – the flyhalf runs and the 8 is there to tackle the living daylights out of him.

    Anton Leonard was the last such no 8 that I had the privilege to see. Spies has to work on his positional play. The progress he has made over the last five years in the position is remarkable, though. I am sure he will get there within the next season or two. Rassie better get his cheque book out

  • 31.John Galt: Reply to this comment

    @wpw(wpw)-29:

    I think you need the help of spelling enhancing drugs.

  • 32.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Black Panther(Black Panther)-3: yes, spies is still an apprentice, he got outclassed by parisse just last weekend…

  • 33.GI POT: Reply to this comment

    @PissAnt(PissAnt)-22: I have also stopped saying it, but I am thinking it a lot. Spies will be far better in a role of blindside flank where he can play with less structure and much more towards the ball.

    Kanko, on the other hand, has all the skills needed to be a classic no 8. I think his rugby is suffering because of his presence in the Bok touring squad without being given opportunities to play. He must play a full season for him to hone his skills.

    I must say, in conclusion, that we are truly blessed in SA with the stacks of world class loose forwards at our disposal.

  • 34.wpw: Reply to this comment

    @John Galt(John Galt)-31:

    hehehe

    ‘enhancing’

  • 35.WO_owned_De_jongh_in_super14_final: Reply to this comment

    LOL @ 31. JOHN

  • 36.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @wpw(wpw)-29: ridiculous :mrgreen:

  • 37.GI POT: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-32: Parisse was nowhere in that game, as was Spies. We can be glad Imanol did not play because he is a different kettle of fish.

  • 38.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @GI POT(GI POT)-33: kanko is being done a dirty imo.

    he had a great start to the s14 until he got injured.

    he came back even better.

    but he has had how much gametime since then?

  • 39.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @GI POT(GI POT)-37: Huh?

    parisse was AWESOME.

    for the italians.

    imanol plays for the frogs (aka cheese eating surrender munkeys aka bafanas b i t ch es).

  • 40.John Galt: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman(rangerman)-38:

    Was the same last year as well.

    Warmed the bench for so long that when he did eventually get some game time, he was undercooked and played behind a sub par pack. Then everyone comes out and says he is average.

    Had a great S14, has packed on bulk and is a great athlete.

    Geev heem anuda shance!!

    How you Ranger, get any bugs recently?

  • 41.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    Well, the Bulls seem to do remarkably well for a team with:

    A useless fullback,
    A wing that is actually a scrumhalf,
    Another wing that is still a “manchild”, can’t tackle and whose pace is overrated,
    An inside centre who is the most overrated player in SA,
    A kicking flyhalf who cannot get his backline away and has little creativity,

    A no.8 who has almost no skill and shouldn’t even be playing eigthman,

    A flank who is too small and another flank who is too ill disciplined,

    Props who can’t scrum and a hooker who apparently couldn’t cut it in the northern hemisphere and who isn’t one of the top 4 hookers in the country, according to the national selectors.

    Given all of the above, it seems Fourie du Preez, Victor and Bakkies won the S14 all on their own. 3 times.

    And to think Bakkies was injured for 90% of the 2010 campaign.

    Victor and du Preez must be damn good players.

  • 42.GI POT: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman(rangerman)-39: Ah damn, wrong team, my bad. I did not see the Italy game because I refused to watch if Butch played. I won some money because I predicted a yellow card for him.

    Sorry Transie – Parisse was awesome. Thanks for the correction Ranger

  • 43.GI POT: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Tacitus)-41: Just shows you how kuk the rest of the teams were:lol:

  • 44.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    And as for how other countries rate our players?

    It is worth noting that the only three SA players the new French flank had even heard of before the Cape Town game, was Habana, Pierre Spies and Ronald Red Card Mcdonald on the flank.

  • 45.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    In contrast, the Stormers have:

    The most deserved Bok fullback in Joe Pietersen,

    The two incumbant Bok wings,

    The most recommended Bok centre pairing,

    A flyhalf that was done an injustice for not being in the Bok squad,

    The incumbant Bok no.9,

    An eigthman who was done an injustice for not being in the Bok squad,

    The two incumbant Bok flanks,

    The apparent best no.5 lock in South Africa,

    A front row that should all be playing for the Boks in a few years time.

    And yet they have zero S14 titles to their name.

    How DOES this game of rugby work?

  • 46.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @John Galt(John Galt)-40: howdy man!

    no bugs in a while.

    but this weekend i hope to do some diving.

    ja, kanko needs a bit more gametime foreshore.

    @GI POT(GI POT)-42: no worries.

    @Tacitus(Tacitus)-41: tac, cmon now.

    spies is a very good player. he is not however the greatest anything yet.

    @Tacitus(Tacitus)-45: :lol:

    uh oh. its on like donkey kong.

  • 47.katman: Reply to this comment

    If Spies has iffy hands, Kanko must have two bags of runny **** at the ends of his arms. He spills more than BP.

  • 48.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @GI POT(GI POT)-42: hehehehe noted, you didn’t see the italy game but are quick to refute :D

  • 49.MELSTER: Reply to this comment

    Pierre Spies is over rated as an eighth man. He is a great athlete but that’s that. When last have anyone actually seen him cover half the ground that he is suppose to. He is spoiled at the bulls and boks to have FDP because he covers ground and kicks so well.

  • 50.GI POT: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-48: Only because I trust your judgment and I saw Parisse score a great try on the highlights :-)

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.