KeoTV: Boks must win big

KeoTV: Boks must win big

MARK KEOHANE argues that Victor Matfield and his mighty men can’t be excused defeat to the the Back-up Blacks.


257 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 » Show All

  • 101.ashampoopaloo: Reply to this comment

    @Sheriff(Sheriff)-98:

    Are you all of a sardine the voice of moral interjection here… and wtf is a jihad… don’t bother I weren’t born yesterday I know quite clearly what it is … and my blasphemy against Saint John ain’t a Jihad by any standards…. your Brother John better shape up or ship out… because he ain’t been shaping up the past two years and COUNTING… so rather you worry about your own moral standards of humane association… and I’ll worry about mine.

  • 102.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Sheriff(Sheriff)-100: interesting, go on.

  • 103.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @ashampoopaloo(joel1yahoo)-101:

    I just felt it is important to call you to order.

    You have raised your concerns. They have been noted and you must now move on.

    Aim for balance. Less is more.

    John is fighting his own battles but there is no need to single him out. Many players find themselves in that space. Habs, JdV, Morne, Spies, Brussow and the list goes on.

    What we need is a team effort where someone can be the catalyst to spark the entire unit to all perform at their best at the business end of the tournament.

  • 104.Dawn: Reply to this comment

    Helen Zille

  • 105.RugbyGuru_0_: Reply to this comment

    @ Sheriff(Sheriff) I want to shoot the sherrif but I didn’t shoot the deputy! Haha taking the morale high ground captain oh captain?

  • 106.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-102:

    Funny that you ask.

    Let me explain. I’ll use Dawn to illustrate my point.

    You see Dawn has what I call ‘bloggermylitis’ that is, she has to blog every day.
    Nothing wrong with it, but she may have reached a point that she feels that she is not in equilibrium when she did not read the threads or blogged herself.

    Also, because she has been blogging here for so long, before 2006 if memory serves me right, she feels – quite unintentionally – that this is her domain.

    Here she can take a leave from say ‘katman’ and take a bit of a break to come back with fresh perspective.

    The problem is that the longer we blog the more intolerant we become and feel it is quite OK to lash out at newcomers. I speak from experience, it nearly happened to me a few years ago.

  • 107.Dawn: Reply to this comment

    Excuse me?

    Who’s lashing out? Me?

    Who is reffing this game

  • 108.ashampoopaloo: Reply to this comment

    @Sheriff(Sheriff)-103: you sound like a preacher man where you come from, Xmas Past?

    You sound like Saul of Tarsus or somebody with some great savior you trying to protect and enshrine for dear life.

    Call me to order who the fck you piddly dweeb actually think you are?

  • 109.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    Simultaneously several question arise: what is Helen’s agenda?

    Why did she have to make an entrance here with such an emphatic way?
    Why not slip in and make friends?

  • 110.RugbyGuru_0_: Reply to this comment

    @ Sheriff(Sheriff), Dr. Phil is that you?

  • 111.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @ashampoopaloo(joel1yahoo)-108:

    Sham-poepol- loo ; you know me well

    You know well I stand for justice

  • 112.mpundulu: Reply to this comment

    S

  • 113.RugbyGuru_0_: Reply to this comment

    @ mpundulu(mpundulu), one word at a time, you can do it! Hehe

  • 114.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @Dawn(Dawn)-107:

    You said nothing because Rossoneri said what you wanted to.

    You knew well that it would have been duplication if you also said the same thing.

    One thing I can say for you is this: you’re not into duplication

    You did not call Rossoneri to order hence you agreed in your heart with her. Your only concern was and is the true identity of ‘Helen’

    Bloggermylitis tells you its ‘Helen Zille’

    My bet is that it is just another ‘Helen’ ; say ‘Helen Parker’ or Groenewald

  • 115.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @RugbyGuru_0_(RugbyGuru_0_)-110:

    It’s not psychology; it’s logic… read it again…

  • 116.RugbyGuru_0_: Reply to this comment

    @ Sheriff(Sheriff), Helen the Genherist?

  • 117.mpundulu: Reply to this comment

    Helen arrived with immense gusto and crimson but just lacked in knowledge. She merely had an inability to accept that the one point she got from someone else is actually rather short on idea and does not need exception. She pressed on that particular avenue until many got quite annoyed. She needs a broader rugby intellectual base, and save on the insult first strategy.

  • 118.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @RugbyGuru_0_(RugbyGuru_0_)-116:

    Helen the Generic

  • 119.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @mpundulu(mpundulu)-117:

    Who gives you the right to judge?

    How many kilograms rugby knowledge do you have?

  • 120.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    Meanwhile keo has not put an article here of Wayne Smith praising PdV

    There is a reason for this. He knows well that Wayne is not into conspiracy theories or mindgames like himself.

    Wayne simple stated that people underestimate this bloke. His saying that he thinks the guy deliberately portrays himself like that.

    Remember Wayne is smart, he knows what he’s talking about. I also remember old Ted walking over to PdV to shake his hand in 2009 which to me was a sign of great character

  • 121.Gunther: Reply to this comment

    Well Helen the Generous has certainly had a profound impact on keo.

    She called stormerboy sweetie and he hasn’t been seen since.

    Probably in the free weights section slinging tin

    :lol:

  • 122.Dawn: Reply to this comment

    What are you talking about

    I haven’t been on all day

  • 123.keo: Reply to this comment

    @Sheriff(Sheriff)-120: I haven’t put it there cos I know what they think of him privately and it certainly isn’t the patronizing nonsense spoken at a press conference about him being ‘shrewd’

  • 124.keo: Reply to this comment

    more importantly, it’s good to see my jawline starting to take shape. A big thank you to PT Bridgette (at Virgin Active, Wembley Square).

  • 125.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @Dawn(Dawn)-122:

    Why can you not make eye contact with me?

    You know well that you always read all the threads every day, especially the longer ones

  • 126.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    Everybody is taking the bait tonight

    I have not played in a long time, but clearly it’s like riding a bicycle

  • 127.I am a stormer: Reply to this comment

    @Sheriff(Sheriff)-120:

    Wayne Smith was actually mis-quoted.

    He said overestimated.

    People make mistakes.

  • 128.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    I tend to agree with the gist of what is said in the clip.

    NZ slaughtered our (true) B team in NZ.

    We really should be expected to convincingly beat an AB team at home without eight regular starters. A loss at HOME to a B team would be utterly devastating for our RWC hopes. This game is extremely important in the psychological stakes – if our full strength team can’t do it at home against a weakened team, what price of beating a full strength on their patch?

    Only thing I didn’t agree with in the clip was Keo’s popped collar.

  • 129.mpundulu: Reply to this comment

    If one follows helen’s positions, there are centrally two, Nienaber’s appointment means that the Boks in two months will do what the stormers have achieved in three years. That’s nonsense. Additionally, with the Boks having jdv and Jacque Fourie then that translates to the bok squad being able to translate the two stormers knowledge to accelerate their understanding of Nienaber’s defense strategy from systems to individual technique bearing in mind that the Boks have had one game with the Rustenburg 21 and a following game this weekend before the WC to pull together their defensive strategy. Now there are some pool games in the WC, however, two of those are critical to ensure the Boks don’t leave before they reach the qualifying stage. If you’ve followed her posts, the above is easy to accept unless she’s your significant other, relation, or friend if not than it’s trying to accept what precisely you are arguing about?

  • 130.ashampoopaloo: Reply to this comment

    @keo(keo)-123:

    so keo pray tell

    what do the inner circle of influential friends and uncles ACTUALLY think of PdV… Maybe Wayne Smith is shrewder than all you saffa high priests of springbok rugby combined?

  • 131.I am a stormer: Reply to this comment

    Pdiv should have:

    Started with Beast, Bissie, Jannie dup
    Started Butch at FH

    And let combinations develop. His A team.

    But didn’t.

    He missed a trick there.

  • 132.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    Ted and his mates know that PdV had the right idea when he joined the Bok setup.

    He wanted to play ‘total rugby’

    Of course the pressure of winning got to him and soon the Jake White voices went up that we ‘need to return to our traditional strengths’ Talking of Jake – I see he is ‘ talking a lot of rubbish, all the time’ ; I guess his fear is that PdV will lead the Boks to retaining the Cup – something no one has ever done!!!?

    Wouldn’t that be something!?

    I bet they will find a thrust of how John/Victor/FdP mapped it out and that after all, PdV was merely a spectator in it all

  • 133.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    Despite what Nienaber did with the Stormers’ defence the Crusaders were still able to unlock their defence sufficiently well enough at home to win, once with a B team.

    You can defend as well as want but you will still give away penalties in your half, you will still slip a few tackles and even Jake White’s team had a bit of attacking nous to score a try or two.

    This Bok team predictably crashes it up route 1 (think JDV – ever seen him pass?) when they don’t kick it away.

  • 134.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    If a coach doesn’t have the guts to stick with his stated game plan choice – through either public dissent (pressure) or poor results – whose fault is that?

  • 135.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @keo(keo)-124: Bridgette does face lifts and tucks at Virgin Active? Doesn’t sound awfully sterile. You sure it’s cool?

  • 136.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @mpundulu(mpundulu)-129:

    Helen is a junior blogger so I did not read all her comments in detail, but I felt she had good logic there

    She is obvioudly at risk if she gets her facts mixed up, so that she needs to negotiate, but I felt comfortable that she has potential to be a regular here

    Time will tell. Not everyone can do it.

  • 137.JockBok: Reply to this comment

    Hey Keo, I know it maybe defeat the purpose, but any chance you can put up a transcript of these tv sections of yours? I can’t watch on my crappy connection in an even crappier country and i like the opinion pieces.

    Oh, and you can MP3 your Sat morning show or podcast it as well, can’t stream here either.

    You know you want to ;)

  • 138.BullDog15: Reply to this comment

    That other thread has way too much BS so I will comment over here on the team.

    I think this is our best backline. Now if only Jean would pass once in a while, things will be fine.

    In the forward pack I am unconvinced Gurthro is ready for test rugby. Possibly a case of too little too late. Great player, but no game time and probably should not go to the WC. Big pity. Also don’t think Juan will be fit and ready (once again, no decent game time, unless he has a few blinders in the CC). So realistically, we need to look at a starting replacement. Perhaps Burger? Albert works, but he lost a bit of form in the S15. Too many knock-ons to make me comfortable. If Burger is fit, then I’d play him on the bench to cover just about all 3 loose forward positions. But can you really afford a guy like Burger on th bench and not starting?

    So start with Beast, add Burger on the bench, and have only CJ as prop cover. Add another backline player…maybe Frans Steyn, provided he goes on a major diet.

  • 139.JockBok: Reply to this comment

    @Sheriff(Sheriff)-136:

    Lol. How far is your head up your arze?

  • 140.Guns: Reply to this comment

    @Helen(Helen)-46:

    “”keo, how come you are allowed to say bull ****, but our posts are censored?”"

    Classic!!!

  • 141.Dawn: Reply to this comment

    @Sheriff(Sheriff)-136:

    Go pick on someone else

    Am not in mood for your kuk tonight

    I will read the threads if I want it’s a free fecking country

  • 142.I am a stormer: Reply to this comment

    @wooden spoon(wooden spoon)-133:

    Must admit I’ve been disappointed in JDV this season. Although the hasn’t made the line breaks one expects him to, gone are the ability of creating a half-gap and the quick hands he used to have.
    Possibly needs to stand a metre or two deeper. Would have preferred him starting with Butch again who gets over the gain line himself, who does have quick hands would make a difference.
    It’s going to take time – but the clock is ticking.

  • 143.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    I have no idea why they are starting with M Steyn this weekend. Step backwards imo!

  • 144.RugbyGuru_0_: Reply to this comment

    @ Sheriff(Sheriff), how much have you been drinking tonight?

  • 145.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    Skoppie, I would love to have a good rugby conversation like in the old days, no offense mate, never intended it to come across as such but reading my post it sort of did.

  • 146.JockBok: Reply to this comment

    @I am a stormer(I am a stormer)-142:

    Problem is, the 12 jersey is a toss up between JdV and WO in Divvyland.

    But I agree with you on this season, he never did enough for me either (fark, i hope HG doesn’t read that) ;)

  • 147.charo: Reply to this comment

    @mpundulu(mpundulu)-129:

    actually you can add habanero as another stormer coached by nienaber.

    so, perhaps helen was not that far from the truth?

    she reminds me a lot of another blogger, big g from years back but i get the impression that helen is a lions supporter – big g was all sharks.

    nevertheless, she adds more value than 90% of the “ou manne” here.

  • 148.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @charo(charo)-147: Everyone is supporting the Lions these days.

  • 149.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    @charo(charo)-147:

    And she was/is kak hot

  • 150.charo: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman(katman)-148:

    lot of fickle people about these days?

    @PissAnt(PissAnt)-149:

    helen or big g….i suspect you are referring to the latter?

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 » Show All

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.