Barrett breaks Blues’ hearts

Barrett breaks Blues’ hearts

RYAN VREDE watched Hurricanes flyhalf Beauden Barrett produce a sensational run to set up a last-gasp try then kick the conversion for a 26-25 victory over the Blues.

The Canes looked dead and buried, with the Blues pinning them deep in their territory through tactical punts and composed phase play. But Barrett, impressive all evening, sliced through the defensive line expertly in the dying minutes to craft a try for Conrad Smith. The youngster then held his nerve to kick the extras for a massive victory in the context of the Hurricanes’ season.

But while these sides were never going to produce a dour contest, it was an error-ridden affair. Neither side could control the ball through enough phases consistently to build any telling pressure, their poor ball protection on the ground undermining this cause. Furthermore their tactical kicking was woeful and often offered their opponents broken field opportunities.

The Blues would have wondered just how they trailed at the break (19-16) after dominating possession and territory. They need look no further than lethargic defence and a lineout that steadily capitulated.

They opened a 10-point lead through a Ma’a Nonu converted try and Lachie Munro penalty but would only add six points before the turnaround. The Hurricanes, however, absorbed considerable pressure but still managed three first half tries, Andre Taylor’s 40m effort the pick of the lot. Munro erred in the Canes’ second five pointer when he tried to run himself out of trouble, only to be isolated in a move that culminated in Cory Jane scoring. The Canes grabbed the lead for the first time soon thereafter, Smith benefiting from a favourable bounce after a scrappy hack ahead.

Munro booted the Blues back ahead with three penalties after the restart to give his side a six point lead going into the final quarter. The Blues had played more intelligently than they had at any stage in the first half and the Canes were showing signs of feeling the pressure, manifested through the infringements that allowed Munro to establish the lead.

When Barrett hooked a 64th minute penalty attempt that pressure mounted. The Blues went into containment mode and did so effectively. It was always going to take a moment of brilliance to unlock them. Barrett delivered.


189 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] Show All

  • 151.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @THE MAULER(THE MAULER)-148:

    say sorry to rehaan.

  • 152.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-147: answer the question dammit!

  • 153.pat1: Reply to this comment

    What was it that Keohane said about the Canes at the beginning of the season, think it was “plodding” and something along the lines of “weakest Kiwi side in the comp”. Hmmmm….

  • 154.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    Besides, the Stormers beat both these teams, and they’re only our third best franchise.

  • 155.gonzo: Reply to this comment

    I would rather have seen Tony Woodcock at 10 than Weepu – faster, scores more tries, and he wouldn’t kick in the last 90 seconds and lose the game. Is Weepu still on the payroll at the Canes?!

  • 156.welcome to my life, hugh...: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-147:
    he’s a drama king, tac… just another drama king…

  • 157.Sasuke: Reply to this comment

    @Papoose(papaown)-132: I also play Fox fantasy. Are you in the Keo pool started by Hendrik P?

  • 158.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    In terms of comparative strength I would rank the Bulls, Sharks and Stormers on the same level as the Crusaders.

    The problem with the Kiwi conference is that all their teams are **** this year.

    Except the Chiefs and Highlanders, but you can’t count them because its only a matter of time before the implode, as usual.

    So at this stage it seems as if it’s all a bit of lottery over in NZ. The Crusaders will probably rectify that as the season progresses.

  • 159.Sasuke: Reply to this comment

    @stormersboy(stormersboy)-135: What was your margin?

  • 160.John Galt: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-152:
    Not as simple as that Trannie.

    Bulls were at home. Blues have just travelled all the way back from SA, with a lot of injuries and suspensions as well. Alot of mitigating factors.

    I suspect you knew that though. I suspect Tacitus has hit the nail on the head hence your response here.

  • 161.scrumfan: Reply to this comment

    YEEEEEEESSSSSSS!!!!

  • 162.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    Saw the Reds captains run this morning. Will Genia practised at 10. Looked pretty good.

  • 163.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Horings(Horings)-146: i’m just saying, if you look at the fact that the bulls can give a 50pts pasting to the cheetahs who along with the lions are our kakkest teams, and the same bulls lose to the blues who in turn can’t beat the canes…there’s a 2 conferences with teams that hand out gimmes and it doesn’t look like the kiwi one is part of that stat.

  • 164.welcome to my life, hugh...: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-158:
    agreed on everything except the crusaders.
    i’ve got a feeling they’re gonna have a run similar to the bulls 2011 season, expect a midtable finish.

  • 165.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @John Galt(John Galt)-160: nail on the head? far from it…just throwing thoughts out there for bloggers to debate :D

  • 166.charo: Reply to this comment

    when plum said the sa conference is the hardest, he was talking about the attrition.

    why can’t you guys understand this?

  • 167.Horings: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-163: True, although the Cheetahs Bulls game stands out if you look at the results over the past two years. Does this statistically mean it is an outlier or should it be part of your argument. I think the Cheetahs Crusaders and Cheetahs Hurricanes game will give us a better picture.

  • 168.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @John Galt(John Galt)-160: see, he finally answered at 158 :D

    ocassionally tac tends to be too clever for his own good and needs to be taken down a peg ;)

  • 169.welcome to my life, hugh...: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-163:
    ok fine… so, using this logic where would that put the kings, transie? :grin:
    does that put them in a special category where they get 50 points here and 50 points there and maybe 30 or 40 ponits in oz..?..hmmm?…

    please dont answer it…its rhetorical….

  • 170.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    @charo(charo)-166:

    I understand it. And I agree with him.

    The Cheetahs could lose to the Bulls by 30 points one weekend, and beat the Sharks in Bloem the next weekend. But inbetween Coenie moered his opponents stukkend, whether the Cheetahs won or lost.

  • 171.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @welcome to my life, hugh…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-169: the kings haven’t played a stitch of super rugby so i don’t get why you’re getting huffy :roll:

    the bulls lost to a blues team sans kaino, hobbs, toeava, wulf plus a rookie flyhalf. surely one of the top teams (if tac is to be believed) slipped up, no?

  • 172.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @charo(charo)-166: that is a totally different debate and not what i’m talking about. i’m referring to results which in turn affect log standings and thus playoff spots/home & away semis.

    by the way, the chiefs played the highlanders in their 1st game this season, they lost lelia masaga, ben afieaki, toby smith and another 4th player i can’t recall, so they can surely claim “attrition” to be affecting them too, no?

  • 173.welcome to my life, hugh...: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-171:
    the blues (to the credit of all the weak teams in super rugby) will on occasion lift themselves for one or two big games against the ‘top’ teams. :roll: right back at you hehe

  • 174.Michael: Reply to this comment

    Poor Tac cannot bring himself to acknowledge that the Hurricanes are better than people thoughts (us Stormers have been telling you all along) and that so far the Stormers are the leading SA team (ala last year).

  • 175.THE MAULER: Reply to this comment

    So sorry Rehaan… Lmfao!

  • 176.Papoose: Reply to this comment

    @Horings(Horings)-142: same here..cant believe you sold the goose!
    he currently has the most points for an inside back
    which fantasy rugga you playing?

  • 177.Papoose: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-154: lol, good 1

  • 178.Papoose: Reply to this comment

    @Sasuke(Sasuke)-157: no! whats the name of the group, how do i join?

  • 179.John Galt: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-172:
    Serious question.

    Why are the Kings playing some of their VC games at Paul Roos school in Stellies when they have a big stadium to play at at home?

  • 180.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @welcome to my life, hugh…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-173: so the blues are a weak team? hehehe

  • 181.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @John Galt(John Galt)-179: i certainly have no idea…they are playing province this week, isn’t province’s home game? their first game was against the Pampas who to my knowledge are based in Stellenbosch…last week they played Border here @ home…

    so is it not a case of away game for the Kings?

  • 182.Nils: Reply to this comment

    Well well, absolutely happy for the Hurricanes and an absolute screw-up for my Superbru again. 9th loss in a row in Super/6N. And Force can make it TENTH. Sheesh. 8)

    Can’t believe I finished 9th from 130 695 players once.

  • 183.welcome to my life, hugh...: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-180:
    come on transie, the blues are second last on the log as we speak…

  • 184.cane: Reply to this comment

    “The Canes looked dead and buried,…………………………………………”
    Ryan Vrede.

    You can never bury a Cane Ryan.
    We sprout at the vaguest suggestion of a Bud.

  • 185.cane: Reply to this comment

    Blues started with an All Canes 9, 10, 12, Combo.

    Alby,Peri and Maá.

    And they almost nailed us.

    Until the last 5 seconds of the game that is!

    :)

  • 186.Horings: Reply to this comment

    @Papoose(papaown)-176: I am playing testrugby’s fantasy league, but their standard has dropped over the last 2 years.

    I just think it is a good time to sell Goosen as the Crusaders will overpower the Cheetahs (As the Bulls did) and then the Cheetahs will not get any ball. I also have a feeling Drotske will give him a rest either this game or the next.

  • 187.John Galt: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-181:
    Ah yes, it was against Pampas now that I think about it.
    Obviously a ‘home’ game for the Argies.

  • 188.Papoose: Reply to this comment

    @Horings(Horings)-186: actually that makes sense, also figured Naka surrendered this game with the changes made…just that i didnt have enough sups. in fact O’Connor was my captain…BUT He didnt play today .DAMMIT

  • 189.Nils: Reply to this comment

    @cane(cane)-184: Congrats, Cane. Despite my superbru, very glad your team won, their results show middle finger to those who after all off-season turmoil confidently said they are no hopers and worst team in Kiwiland (or maybe even the comp).

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] Show All

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.