101 Comments

• 1.PissAnt:
  5 Apr 2012, 10:14 am

  I got the Sharks and Bulls to stumble.

  Hope I am wrong.

• 2.the artist formerly known as gunther:
  5 Apr 2012, 10:18 am

  Reehaan is getting a lot of face time.

  Keo needs to sort him out with a clothing allowance.

  Maybe some Access Park vouchers.

  We can’t have a repeat of the towelling V-Neck incident.

• 3.wpstormerbok:
  5 Apr 2012, 10:32 am

  Don’t see the Sharks coming away with a victory.

  Bulls lost last weekend so I’m going with their inconsistency which means they’ll beat Saders by 50 this weekend.

  If Stormers can win Saturdays game then I’ll start taking this year’s class as serious title contenders. Like the Reds did last year beating us in Cape Town or the Bulls champion teams beating SA sides away from home on a consistent basis.

  Stormers need to show we’ve got that ”hard-edge win against all odds” away from home attitude otherwise the drought will continue for us.

• 4.Bradenel:
  5 Apr 2012, 10:35 am

  I love percy, such a funny fella! Gonna be an interesting weekend… Go Sharks!

• 5.seabiscuit:
  5 Apr 2012, 10:36 am

  Vrede : “you’re pussys are gonna get pumped”……. Now ive heard it all from this 12 yr old

  Keo wants the stormers to win but keeps saying how Kak they are???

  Anyways do agree that all SA teams will win this weekend

• 6.PapSak:
  5 Apr 2012, 10:40 am

  Nee donner Keo, staan stil as jy praat, jy werk op my nerves!!
  Don’t think the Sharks are gonna win this weekend. Not without Bissie and Lambie…

• 7.the artist formerly known as gunther:
  5 Apr 2012, 10:42 am

  Indeed.

  Pussypumps are no laughing matter.

  I’m going for a Saffa clean sweep this weekend.

  Stormers
  Sharks
  Bulls
  Cheaters.

  Lions to get cornholed.
  

• 8.pokkel:
  5 Apr 2012, 10:44 am

  I don’t think the Stormers will win this weekend. After the tough game against the Bulls and the long travel I think the Stormers might give up their unbeaten record this weekend.

  Sharks/Canes very tough to call especially without Lambie and Bismarck.

  Cheetah’s have travelled but I think they’re to strong for the Lions.

  Crusaders/Bulls. It should be Bulls but I went Saders on Superbru as my upset of the weekend. If the Crusaders ‘click’ their back 3 could cause havoc if Morne’s kicks aren’t spot on.

• 9.houston, we have a problem...:
  5 Apr 2012, 10:45 am

  @wpstormerbok(wpstormerbok)-3:
  no, to take the stormers seriously they first have to beat their bogey team away from home..the crusaders… if they can do this then i will take them seriously.

• 10.KWAGGA ROBERTSE:
  5 Apr 2012, 10:47 am

  Stormers scoring off the field?………aahhh yes, in die parkie op n bankie so ons weet Parkiepeester score.

• 11.wpstormerbok:
  5 Apr 2012, 10:48 am

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-9:

  When did the Bulls beat the Saders away from home?

  When was the last time ANY SA side did it?

  But to be honest this is the year I feel we have the best chance to do it given their form and the fact that they’ll have to fly home after clashing with the Bullies this weekend.

• 12.KWAGGA ROBERTSE:
  5 Apr 2012, 10:51 am

  @wpstormerbok(wpstormerbok)-11: They’ve been looking the part the couple of seasons. Said it yesterday as well. They have a leadership issue starting right at the top of the pile through to the captaincy.

• 13.wpstormerbok:
  5 Apr 2012, 10:53 am

  @pokkel(pokkel)-8:

  Stormers will be up against it but champion teams have come away with victory in tricky situations like these.

  3/4 tour will be a big statement, 2/4 okay will still leave some doubt about our credentials, unless one of those 2 scalps is a Crusaders one…

• 14.KWAGGA ROBERTSE:
  5 Apr 2012, 10:53 am

  I reckon Percy might’ve been dead serious…….Many a true word…….

• 15.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 10:54 am

  cheetahs, the toast of New Zealand

  Underrated Cheetahs Over-performing!

  Article By: Paul, Neazor

  Monday, 2 April 2012 4:06 p.m

  At halftime in Wellington any old score was possible, as the teams turned at 32-32 (it had been 32-11 to the Hurricanes at one stage), but the second spell was a much tighter affair that the Cheetahs dominated through plenty of aggressive running in the close channels.

  Although Coenie Oosthuizen’s second try would probably have been ruled out if the TMO had been asked to take a look at it – it was awarded on the assistant referee’s recommendation – the visitors were value for their win.

  The Cheetahs have become popular visitors to this country over a number of years and in 2012 they return home with a touring record that would be the envy of any South African side.

  They achieved that record by playing a lot of good rugby, getting stuck in and staying that way for the duration and also by taking a positive attitude into every game.

  But they also achieved those results in the face of pressure that few Super rugby teams have ever been subjected to, since it is by no means certain they’ll be included in the 2013 competition.

  That’s all tied up with the very messy rugby politics in South Africa and the Cheetahs franchise is an easy mark for those self-interested parties, but the players have attended to the only thing they can control – the way they perform during the 80 minutes of on-field action every week.

  I get regular texts (generally one a week) from a friend who thinks, as I do, that they’ve been under-rated at the betting agencies and in the media all season and it’s normally the same: “Gotta love those Cheetahs”, as he trousers another decent collect.

  It doesn’t seem to matter how high the odds may be stacked against them, the 2012 Cheetahs are not put off by anything much and good luck to them.

  I hope their performances over the last couple of seasons finally start earning the respect they deserve – in the boardrooms at least, but I wouldn’t cry if the Cheetahs were over-priced underdogs at the TAB for the rest of the season.

• 16.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 10:59 am

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-9: how are the crusaders the stormers bogey team when in 2010 the stormers walloped the saders by 40 points (42 – 14 i think), last year the bulls lost 27 – 0 to the crusaders, have they gotten over that?

• 17.seabiscuit:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:00 am

  sharks will be fine without bismaak at least we wont start knowing we are 9 points down with the rate he gives penalties away

• 18.wpstormerbok:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:06 am

  @seabiscuit(seabiscuit)-17:

  Yes but Bis saves you a lot of points and offers many counter attacking chances with those steals out of nowhere, you’re gonna miss him big time I think.

• 19.houston, we have a problem...:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:09 am

  @wpstormerbok(wpstormerbok)-11:
  my point was you’re using a possible away victory against the highlanders as your yardstick by which to call them ‘serious title contenders’… which is really a load of crock considering they’ve been beaten at home in the past by such lowly teams as the lions, force, blues, hurricanes and sharks….even the stormers have beaten them at home in 2009 (and no i dont care about their current run of form).

  i repeat a real sign will be if they beat a seemingly depleted and jetlagged crusaders team at home… which may be easier said than done… after all a seemingly depleted and jetlagged crusaders team scrumfucked them to a victory at nuweland…you may recall…

  to finish, the highlanders are having a temporary, short term run of good form but have historically been beaten at home by all and sundry… there’s nothing to prove here…
  the crusader however are having a short term run of poor form but have historically been beaten by very few teams at home… there’s something to prove there…

• 20.cane:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:17 am

  So then ………………………………..

  Larry, Curly and Moe have spoken.

• 21.weakoma:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:19 am

  Some exciting games this weekend, looking forward..Percy starting to look more comfortable on camera..

• 22.wpstormerbok:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:20 am

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-19:

  I’m talking about this year, which shows the Landers leading the NZ Conference, the same one which includes the high flying Chiefs and of course Crusaders, then you have the never to say you disregard their current form, on what basis is that?

  Therefor I’m saying it will be a good measure of where we are since we’re playing a confident team in their own difficult conditions after a hard game vs Bulls and a long flight to NZ.

  Of course the Stormers got shown up by the Saders and Reds last year at Newlands which proved we still weren’t Champion material yet.

  But this is the 2012 season, Stormers have a chance to make a statement and if not then I’ll consider is still vulnerable and not ready to wear the crown. That was said all in my first post already.

• 23.NoRugbyGuru_0_:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:25 am

  These journo’s on this site have 60% win accuracy which is pathetic. No use following what they say.

• 24.houston, we have a problem...:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:26 am

  @Transformation(Transformation)-16:
  oh transie, please refer post #19

  firstly, this is about the stormers not the bulls. it is also about most stormers supporters thinking that the highlanders will be the acid test of their teams ‘title contesting’ credentials. i refute this as i believe the real test will be in taking the crusaders at home in the same way the crusaders took them at home (twice) last season. if they can beat the crusaders away then they will believe they can beat them at home in a semi…geddit…

• 25.Mr Black:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:28 am

  @wpstormerbok(wpstormerbok)-22:

  I agree, if the Stormers can win this weekend it will be a massive statement considering the travel / bulls game / Highlanders form.

  For your sake I hope they can do it, but it will be tough.

• 26.the artist formerly known as gunther:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:31 am

  Keo is Curly.

  Obviously.

• 27.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:31 am

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-24: what part of that tenous explanation makes the saders their “bogey” team.

  “bogey”?

• 28.Mr Black:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:32 am

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-24:

  Dont give Transie a hard time.

  He deserves to have a opinion on this forum due to promises made in 2005 allready.

  It’s his time now.

  

• 29.houston, we have a problem...:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:33 am

  @wpstormerbok(wpstormerbok)-22:

  oh i see, it seems i cannot communicate with you…. you are from the clouds… i am from the earth… or perhaps; bulls are from mars, stormers are from venus.

  two very different languages…

• 30.wpstormerbok:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:35 am

  @Mr Black(Mr Black)-25:

  Don’t know if I’m just imaging it but this current group (2010 to now) play with more freedom on our tours than we do at home so I’m slightly more confident of getting a pleasant surprise than a beautiful letdown this weekend.

  Don’t think the Highlanders have met a pack yet this season playing at our forwards’ intensity.

• 31.John Galt:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:36 am

  Kiss o’ Death for all Saffa sides.

• 32.wpstormerbok:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:38 am

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-29:

  So I see yes.

• 33.Mr Black:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:38 am

  @wpstormerbok(wpstormerbok)-30:

  True, less pressure away from home. Go for it I say, nothing to lose.

• 34.greentea:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:39 am

  Crusaders to spank the Bulls with DC back at the helm.

• 35.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:41 am

  i have a chihuahua after me now, NICEEEE

• 36.Vetkoek:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:43 am

  With Daniel Carter back, I have a feeling the Bulls are in for a bit of a snotting this weekend.

• 37.the artist formerly known as gunther:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:43 am

  Bulls are from Mars, Stormers from Venus.
  

• 38.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:44 am

  @Mr Black(Mr Black)-28: be warned blackie, little pooches like you are easy prey for Capo

• 39.houston, we have a problem...:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:46 am

  @Transformation(Transformation)-27:
  did you watch ‘that’ semi transie? i have never before or since seen a stadium of 50000+ go deathly silent in the middle of a rugby match…. it even made me feel uncomfortable…

  @Mr Black(Mr Black)-28:
  transie can be silly sometimes. he brings up two selective games as a comparison between the stormers and bulls yet he forgets the bulls have beaten the crusaders in three semis already.

• 40.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:46 am

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-19: just as a by:

  HEAD TO HEAD: Played 16; Highlanders 9, Stormers 6, drawn 1

• 41.MacToogie:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:47 am

  @NoRugbyGuru_0_(RugbyGuru_0_)-23: their picks have been bad this year but then again the results have been flipped on their head so it can be forgiven, i went the same on SB and hopefully this blind squirrel can find that frikken nut for once this season, im sitting pretty well placed in the Keo SB pool though so i cant complain but tis more down to MP’s than anything else

• 42.Mr Black:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:48 am

  @Transformation(Transformation)-35:

  You are the Chihuahua yapping all day on anyones comments.

  Just returning serve, quoting a famous blogger.

  Anyway, have a nice weekend bro, and regards to OP when you see her.

• 43.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:50 am

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-39: the point is : “bogey team”- over two defeats in one season, is that really the criteria?

• 44.Dawn:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:51 am

  @cane(cane)-20:

  

• 45.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:51 am

  @Mr Black(Mr Black)-42: it’s called a BLOG, poochie

• 46.Mr Black:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:52 am

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-39:

  Selective blogging……….

• 47.the artist formerly known as gunther:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:52 am

  Behave you two.

  Floyd is a senior blogger.

  Show some respect.

• 48.houston, we have a problem...:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:54 am

  @Transformation(Transformation)-40:
  thanks for that, transie.

  now do the crusaders/stormers for us, please

  PS: could you also do home and away loss/win data.

• 49.Dawn:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:54 am

  Reyhan is so fecking rude.

  His mother never raised him like that.

• 50.Mr Black:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:55 am

  @Transformation(Transformation)-45:

  Then why are you calling me a Chihuahua?

  It’s a BLOG!!

  Dumbasss!

• 51.Bagel:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:55 am

  Same as PA, got Sharks and Bulls to lose.

  Wouldn’t be surprised if the Bulls win although with Stegmann that pack doesn’t click like it should, but Sharks are gonna lose, they’ve been ridiculously lucky with such kak defense and the Canes know how to score tries.

• 52.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 11:57 am

  i thot i taw a puttytat

• 53.Vetkoek:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:00 pm

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-24:

  But the Bulls have a record of 6 from 18 against the crusaders and have NEVER beaten them in Christchurch.

  Yet they have won the Super 14 a few times. Should we not take those trophy wins seriously as they weren’t achieved with away wins over the crusaders?

  So how can it be that the Saders are the bogey team for the Stormers? Surely then they are the bogey team for all the SA sides?

  Unless you have a different interpretation of the word bogey?

• 54.houston, we have a problem...:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:01 pm

  @the artist formerly known as gunther(gunther)-47:
  hehehe
  cannot wait for the kings to start super rugby…cant ****** wait…

• 55.Vetkoek:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:04 pm

  bo·gey also bo·gy or bo·gie (bg)
  n. pl. bo·geys also bo·gies
  1. also (bg, bg) An evil or mischievous spirit; a hobgoblin.
  2. also (bg, bg) A cause of annoyance or harassment.

  I’m assuming we are referring to the second definition of bogey when stating the Crusaders are the Stormers bogey team?

  Apt that it can also be used in the sentence “Bulls supporters are a constant bogey when it comes to ill-thought out, infactual, random statements re the Stormers”???

• 56.the artist formerly known as gunther:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:07 pm

  Only Floyd is allowed sarky comments.

  Everone else who does so is unnecessary.

  He is has dictatorial tendencies and we shall remove him at Mangaung

• 57.stormersboy:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:08 pm

  @the artist formerly known as gunther(gunther)-2: I think Rehan needs some electrocution lessons.

  He can’t pull off “credible” sounding like that.

• 58.KWAGGA ROBERTSE:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:09 pm

  @the artist formerly known as gunther(gunther)-56: Bladdy agent….voetsak!!

• 59.the artist formerly known as gunther:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:10 pm

  Eloctrocution therapy?
  

  How was Hostel California?

• 60.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:13 pm

  @Mr Black(Mr Black)-50: you know why Poochie

• 61.Jeraldjay:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:13 pm

  @the artist formerly known as gunther(gunther)-59:
  Did you know Rehan is an aspiring keeper/batsmen. Plays for Avendale. They play in the minor leagues…..1D.

  Avendale is Bob Woolmer’s former club. Fark, he’ll turn in his grave if he sees the state of the club…… probably has already.

• 62.houston, we have a problem...:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:14 pm

  @Vetkoek(Vetkoek)-53:

  again, this isn’t about the bulls… its about the stormers…
  the stomers were scrumfucked and ruckraped by the crusaders in a home semi so my thinking is they need to prove a point by beating thecrusaders away if they are going to have any belief in being able to beat the crusaders at home.

  as you point out the bulls are not an easily affected team from a mental/psychological perspective. they can lose to teams but still have the mental hardness to bring it when it matters against those self same teams they lost to.
  can we say the same for the stormers based on past performance..?.. i think safely not….

• 63.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:15 pm

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-48: HEAD TO HEAD: Played 17; Crusaders 12, Stormers 4, drawn 1

  stormers seem to have never won in christchurch the best they’ve ever done was a 16-16 draw in ’97

• 64.stormersboy:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:16 pm

  @the artist formerly known as gunther(gunther)-59: Ja. Him and Ashwin. Although I like it when Ashwin says Saaaaks. Unlike when Rehan says, well, anything.

  The Eagles was grrrreeeeaaat!

  One of my favourite bands so it was a real treat.

• 65.KWAGGA ROBERTSE:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:17 pm

  @Jeraldjay(Jeraldjay)-61: Keeper/batsmen………………….Can we then say he should keep his opnion to himself and bat it out?

• 66.Vetkoek:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:19 pm

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-62:

  But they can beat the crusaders at home. AS they’ve shown in the past.

  Who says they will even get the saders in a home semi? Who says either of them will even get a semi?

  It is about the Bulls as well as the Stormers/Cheetahs/Sharks/Lions, as it is a completely unsubstantiated statement. To suggest the Stormers need to beat the Saders away to prove they can win the tournament is senseless as the Bulls have already proved it is unnecessary?

• 67.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:19 pm

  @Transformation(Transformation)-63: now you can say “BOGEY” team!

• 68.the artist formerly known as gunther:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:23 pm

  I didn’t know that Jerry.

  Let’s hope he doesn’t play in his towelling V-neck.

  Otherwise Bob will be turning like a subcontinent wicket on the final day of a test.

  I dig Ashwyn SB.

  He adds spice to a very bland product.

• 69.stormersboy:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:35 pm

  @the artist formerly known as gunther(gunther)-68: Exactly. Also he really does have something clever to say. I really enjoy his analysis.

• 70.wpstormerbok:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:41 pm

  @Transformation(Transformation)-67:

  Do you maybe have stats on many victories SA sides have at Christchurch?

  As I can’t even recall a single one now but surely there must be one, maybe Sharks during the 90′s?

• 71.houston, we have a problem...:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:50 pm

  @Transformation(Transformation)-63:
  thanks transie.

  ahhhhh 97..?… the stormers glory years….or was that 99..?…

• 72.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm

  @wpstormerbok(wpstormerbok)-70: Mar 2007 Sharks 27 – 26 Crusaders
  25 Feb 2006 Crusaders 22 – 20 Sharks
  29 Apr 2005 Crusaders 77 – 34 Sharks
  10 Apr 2004 Sharks 29 – 25 Crusaders
  18 Apr 2003 Crusaders 23 – 18 Sharks
  20 Apr 2002 Sharks 34 – 37 Crusaders
  28 Apr 2001 Crusaders 34 – 24 Sharks
  15 Apr 2000 Sharks 24 – 32 Crusaders
  08 May 1999 Crusaders 34 – 29 Sharks
  24 May 1998 Crusaders 38 – 32 Sharks
  16 May 1998 Sharks 20 – 32 Crusaders
  19 Apr 1997 Crusaders 26 – 26 Sharks
  27 Apr 1996 Sharks 58 – 26 Crusaders

• 73.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:56 pm

  Bet on Rugby at Unibet »
  Head
  to
  Head
  Super Rugby, Playoffs
  2011-06-25Crusaders Sharks 36-8

  2011-03-27Crusaders Sharks 44-282010-02-26Crusaders Sharks 35-6
  2009-04-18Sharks Crusaders 10-13
  2008-05-02Crusaders Sharks 18-10
  2007-03-03Sharks Crusaders 27 – 26

• 74.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:57 pm

  it doesn’t look like the sharks have done it either. yoh

• 75.wpstormerbok:
  5 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm

  @Transformation(Transformation)-72:

  Ah just like I thought, not so easy to go and win there is it.

  Wonder what the Bulls’ record is like over there

• 76.Jeraldjay:
  5 Apr 2012, 13:06 pm

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-71:
  It was 99′. Won six in a row. Skinstadt got injured night after beating Crusaders.
  Players (lead by Andy Marinos) wanted incentive bonuses before the home semi-final against the Highlanders and threatened to strike.

  They eventually agreed to play on the 11th hour and got moered stukkend by the Highlanders in that game.

• 77.wpstormerbok:
  5 Apr 2012, 13:17 pm

  @Jeraldjay(Jeraldjay)-76:

  The Men in Black year, was like a cool movie with a very k@k ending.

• 78.houston, we have a problem...:
  5 Apr 2012, 13:23 pm

  @Vetkoek(Vetkoek)-66:
  ja, but you forget the bulls do not suffer from mental weakness.
  they do not need any sort of confidence building excercises to convince themselves they can do things… they just do it…

  @Jeraldjay(Jeraldjay)-76:
  thanks jerry,
  was that his motor vehicle inury? and, how’s that for irony… its the highlanders who beat them… maybe there is value in beating the highlander team after all.

• 79.>^..^< katman:
  5 Apr 2012, 13:31 pm

  Lions to not only beat the Cheetahs, but score a bonus point in the process.

  Thus spoke the katman and so it was.

  There will be no discussion on this.

• 80.stormersboy:
  5 Apr 2012, 13:36 pm

  @>^..^< katman(katman)-79: You should have told me this before I made my ‘bru picks.

• 81.Jeraldjay:
  5 Apr 2012, 13:39 pm

  @wpstormerbok(wpstormerbok)-77: @<a
  Very kak ending indeed. But if the Stormers won that game they would've played the final in Christchurch against the Saders….No chance.

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-78:
  Skinstad couldn’t handle his Ford Falcon V8. Crashed into a bridge.

• 82.Nils:
  5 Apr 2012, 13:41 pm

  Hehehe, I thoroughly enjoyed this clip, victory drums beating, tram-tararam-tararam.

  Would not be surprised by 3-0 to the “wrong teams”.

• 83.>^..^< katman:
  5 Apr 2012, 13:42 pm

  @stormersboy(stormersboy)-80: Let that be a lesson to you then.

• 84.greentea:
  5 Apr 2012, 13:50 pm

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-62:

  Bulls were good for 3 seasons and shite for 13

• 85.houston, we have a problem...:
  5 Apr 2012, 13:58 pm

  @greentea(greentea)-84:

  would you trade three seasons of heaven and 13 of hell for a lifetime of mediocrity..?..hmm..?…

  anyway, its not true to say 13 as they were only really bad for about 5 or so of those 13, for the rest they made decent placings on the comp log.

• 86.Kietzphat:
  5 Apr 2012, 14:11 pm

  Percy’s best Keo TV yet.

  Soooorriiee Bulls.

• 87.greentea:
  5 Apr 2012, 14:17 pm

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-85:

  Bulls = Bokke 3 from `16

• 88.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 14:30 pm

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-85: have the bulls won in christchurch before?

• 89.houston, we have a problem...:
  5 Apr 2012, 14:38 pm

  @greentea(greentea)-87:
  ja, the bulls and bokke must improve… i agree…

  @Transformation(Transformation)-88:
  you know the point is that the bulls have beaten the crusaders in three semis, transie. and no, i’m not j(ch)oking. they took their losses away on the chin and went back home and demolished all before them in semi and finals.
  can we say the same about any other saffa team..?..

• 90.Transformation:
  5 Apr 2012, 15:04 pm

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-89: how many of those semis were at the AMI stadium in Christchurch?

• 91.houston, we have a problem...:
  5 Apr 2012, 15:53 pm

  @Transformation(Transformation)-90:
  ag transie, you are such an agent.
  this is a revolutionary rugby house…

• 92.houston, we have a problem...:
  5 Apr 2012, 16:05 pm

  happy easter drinking everybody…

• 93.wpjoulekkading:
  5 Apr 2012, 17:13 pm

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-78:
  Oh please, the Bulls are not immune to mental weaknesses. In fact their forwards are probably busy developing one right now after having their asses handed to them by the young Stormers pack.

• 94.grunk:
  5 Apr 2012, 18:31 pm

  The betting yesterday was Evens on the Hurricanes and 23/20 on the Crusaders (both non-favourites).

  With the results we’ve had so far and bearing in mind the quality of the two sides involved, one of them surely will win so there has to be a very easy bet somewhere along the line.

• 95.THE MAULER:
  5 Apr 2012, 18:57 pm

  The only SA team to win a playoff on overseas were the Shartks…

• 96.THE MAULER:
  5 Apr 2012, 18:57 pm

  On overseas soil!!

• 97.carol:
  5 Apr 2012, 21:10 pm

  Firstly with my Keo TV critic hat on…

  Percy, that was far better, however firstly as a Percy Montogomery fan and secondly as a Bulls fan you were a bit ‘flippant’ about the Bulls and you even sniggered!! However I forgive you

  Ryan, I still need a translator when you get excited and talk quickly!! (I am a Pommie)

  Keo, heavens man, whats with the flapping arms? However you do talk some sense this week!!

  Secondly…There is no secondly!!

• 98.carol:
  5 Apr 2012, 21:17 pm

  Actually Ryan and Keo do drop a comment from time to time…..Now I am waiting for a Percy comment!!

  Cummon Monty, I dare you!!

• 99.Nils:
  6 Apr 2012, 02:02 am

  @wpstormerbok(wpstormerbok)-70: Crusaders have lost at home, as far as I know, only to 2 South African teams – in Christchurch to Northern Transvaal in 1996 (18-34) and in Nelson to Cats in 2001 (31-32).

• 100.nama1:
  6 Apr 2012, 02:36 am

  @THE MAULER(THE MAULER)-95:
  Did they win the Super rugby trophy that year?

  Can’t remember!

• 101.KeurboomPark:
  6 Apr 2012, 05:01 am

  @houston, we have a problem…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-62:

  Don’t talk puss to a priest, moegoe.

Latest Rugby News by Category

• Super Rugby

  26

  Sharks 0 Bulls 0 (K/O 19.10 SA time)

  Keo.co.za brings you live Super Rugby score updates from South Africa. Read More

• Springboks

  312

  Le Roux, Lappies finally rewarded

  Willie le Roux and Lappies Labuschagne have finally been rewarded with spots in the Springbok training group. They are two of eight that are first timers in Springbok training groups this year. Read More

• World Cup

  13

  RFU rejects cheeky Welsh request

  The Rugby Football Union has turned down a proposal from their Welsh counterparts to stage the 2015 World Cup pool match between England and Wales in Cardiff. Read More

• Sevens

  14

  England bury Boks

  Marcus Watson scored in extra time to beat the Blitzbokke in the London World Series Sevens Cup quarter-finals. Read More

• Six Nations

  290

  SA French connection trebles

  French coach Philipe Saint-Andre has included three South African-born players for the three-Test series against the All Blacks in New Zealand. Read More

• The Rugby Championship

  34

  Hansen rewards Blues

  All Blacks coach Steve Hansen has selected several uncapped Blues players in his training group. Read More

Find us on Facebook

Follow Keo on Twitter

twitter.com/keocoza