Crusaders cleared of foul play

Crusaders cleared of foul play

Crusaders coach Todd Blackadder has demanded an apology from the Bulls after eye-gouging allegations against his team couldn’t be substantiated by the Super Rugby citing commissioner.

Bulls forwards Chiliboy Ralepelle and Flip van der Merwe complained to referee Jaco Peyper that they had been eye-gouged during their match in Pretoria, won 32-30 by the Bulls. Peyper used a white card to refer the incidents to the citing commissioner.

According to reports in New Zealand, the commissioner has reviewed the video footage of the incidents in question and found the Crusaders not guilty.

‘The citing commissioner has reviewed it and after that review there was nothing in the video footage that would point to the allegation being substantiated,’ Sanzar chief executive Greg Peters said.

‘The citing commissioner also found it interesting that the Bulls did not follow through with a complaint within the four-hour window after the game.’

After the game, Blackadder said he was ‘bemused’ at the allegations and demanded an apology if they were found to be incorrect. Following the citing commissioner’s ruling and after looking at the footage, the Crusaders coach wonders why the Bulls would have made such claims.

‘The first one with Chiliboy, you would expect that the player would come out of the breakdown holding his eye, but he certainly didn’t. I wonder whether it was a negative ploy.’

Captain Kieran Read also said that he was disappointed with the Bulls for accusing the Crusaders of such tactics.

‘Initially I was really surprised at the allegations,’ he said. ‘It has now come out that there’s no case to answer.

‘It’s a kick in the guts to us because we’re men of integrity and it’s no surprise that it’s turned out the way it has.’


692 Comments

Pages: « 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] Show All

  • 651.out wide: Reply to this comment

    @rossoneri(rossoneri)-650: Maybe the Bulls were fast on the draw and reviewed the same footage shown tonight in NZ on the rugby show Reunion. Flippie minus blood enters the fray, contact occurs during which any eye gouging would have been clear to see and wasn’t, he then emerges with blood around the eye. I think you used to get something in SA called “wrap from downunder”, a combination of the Oz Rugby Club and NZ Reunion. Have a look and make up your own mind. You seem more logical than some of the emotional posters here and are obviously capable of drawing an unbiased decision for yourself.

  • 652.mad eye: Reply to this comment

    Look as dirty and guilty as these Crusaders are,they are not dumb.
    As usual with New Zealanders they do their dirty work and skullduggery in the dark where no one can ping them.
    Unlike our boneheads, like Schalk Burger who gouges out in the open in front of the ref then rolls over and does it again for the other camera.
    The rules of the game unfortunately are that if there is no evidence you are not guilty.

  • 653.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @mad eye(mad eye)-652: hehehe

  • 654.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @whatever(whatever)-615:
    I really cant understand why this thread is still going.
    Blackadder has asked for an apology,silly i think. He should have said that in that same ruck one of his players were eye gouged as well. Then you guys will have something else to bleat about.
    No fukn proof means not fukn guilty, it is in NZ anyway, you should know, you arrived on one of the packed flights from South Africa.
    Give it a rest everyone, and Whatever, only time you rear ya ugly mug in here is when there could be a Kiwi in trouble.

  • 655.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @mad eye(mad eye)-652:
    First sentence you said the Crusaders are guilty and dirty.
    The the last sentence you said they are innocent,which one is it?

  • 656.out wide: Reply to this comment

    @mad eye(mad eye)-652: Lol, even Schalk would have a laugh at that one but maybe you should also try to see the tv footage mentioned above. The point is that it happens in the open, no dark ruck and anything like what you allude to.

    Your stereotyping of the Crusaders as guilty and dirty is the very reason Todd wanted an apology if the Bulls accusations were unfounded. Accusations even when there is no evidence have a nasty habit of sticking when it suits some detractors, unless they are challenged.

  • 657.mad eye: Reply to this comment

    Dirty and guilty as all shite,but innocent through lack of evidence.
    Thats the law innocent unless proven.
    As innocent as Richard Loe who actually invented eye gouging and perfected it on his own countrymen,then appears on Reunion as a morals commentator.

  • 658.cane: Reply to this comment

    Chili and Flipper………………………………………The despicaBULLS.

  • 659.out wide: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane(Hurricane)-654: Yep, you are probably right about the need to move on. A professional outfit like the Crusaders would have moved on the minute they took off from Mr Tambo’s airport and they need to given what awaits them in CHC this weekend. Reunion gave big coverage of the Stormers performance in Dunners and not for nothing, voted Joe Peterson’s try as the try of the week. When the Stormers re-discover how to score tries like that on top of their rocksolid defence they become a formidable side. Going to be a cracker of a game on Saturday.

  • 660.mad eye: Reply to this comment

    Come to think of it old Richard was a Crusader too.
    Master of the dark arts.

  • 661.cane: Reply to this comment

    Well it’s Official,
    No evidence of a Crusader Gouging,

    That exonerates the 15 Kiwi’s.

    Still 15 on the field though, 15 Boneheads that is.
    Which among them Gouged his own teammates?

  • 662.cane: Reply to this comment

    @mad eye(mad eye)-660:

    A North Cantabrian, born and bred.

    However,
    he did his Gouging for Waikato.

    8)

  • 663.out wide: Reply to this comment

    @cane(cane)-662: Just goes to show Cantabrians should not leave the Mainland, they can be lead astray.

  • 664.viewer: Reply to this comment

    Sitting in the stands (with no commentary or the ref’s mic), both times it was hard for me to figure out why there was a stoppage in play as spies was addressing the ref. Flip & chilli’s body language tells a tale. Compare their reaction to that of adam byrnes’ accuser. That back was furious & gesticulating all over the place. My verdict – they were both gouged by a team mate.

  • 665.rossoneri: Reply to this comment

    @out wide(out wide)-651: Thank you for letting me know. We in SA will get to watch Reunion tomorrow evening. I said to Transformation that knowing TJ he would have examined the incident properly for the viewers and more often than not one gets a better analysis than you would from Supersport. I’m keen to see the footage you mention.

  • 666.Special Agent Raj Manipedi: Reply to this comment

    These Blue Bulls seem like good Christian gentllemen, they must be playing with a straight bat.

    My cousin once accused his wife of sleeping with a Punjabi of very bad character and definitely not playing the straight bat.

    They demmanded satisfaction at this slight and eventually was being settled in duel of a very gentlmanly fashion.

  • 667.rossoneri: Reply to this comment

    The 2012 season has highlighted a lot of incidents at Loftus this year. First Keven is hit with a bottle by a fan, then accusations of eye gouging on two players in one match. :lol:

  • 668.JEZ: Reply to this comment

    I would like to see this settled the old way. Play another fixture this season.
    Wont happen though because the men of integrity from christchurch wont make the playoffs.
    Probably because they are scared of the retribution that will come their way, within the rules of course. Kiwi softies dont like retribution.
    Imagine supporting a team that wont make the playoffs because they are scared!!!! Of course the NZ of SANZAR might recall Bryce for that match its their only chance

  • 669.JohnPaul: Reply to this comment

    Hey all you whinging, moaning lilly white, can do no wrong Jappies….what a sour faced lot you are, can’t even front up with hard evidence on the supposed ‘eye gouge’….I think it was a Bulls player that eye-gouged one of his own….that figures…so keep on moaning, just love that sound coming out of Jappie-land…oh and by the way we dont F*%K sheep, we do that to Jappies…haha

  • 670.charo: Reply to this comment

    @JohnPaul(JohnPaul)-669:

    high school next year hey……

    you must be so excited…………….

  • 671.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    Don’t lie John Paul.

    You **** your sister.

  • 672.peachy: Reply to this comment

    He did lie john paul.
    he wants to”"”" your mother

  • 673.man1a: Reply to this comment

    classic. SA accuses NZ of eye gouging? so flip gouges chilliboy and they cry foul?

  • 674.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    haha, so the kiwi responses are:

    1. it was a ploy to put the losers off their game (i use losers as a term because thats what the crusaders are at loftus, losers).
    2. the bulls players were gouged by their own teammates(surely one of the most brilliant pieces of kiwi supersleuthing in the history of the little island dwellers)
    3. we want an apology! (because we NEVER cheat! seriously? the biggest cheats in the world are raised in nz to play rugby)

    :lol:

    ah well, enjoy the flights back to sa for playoffs for the umpteenth year in a row kiwis.

    and todd, have a teaspoon of cement with your coffee and harden the *** up ok? loser.

  • 675.man1a: Reply to this comment

    todd handled this wrong asking for an apology
    rangerman “the biggest cheats in the world are raised in nz to play rugby” really? when u watch the AB’s or NZ teams play is that all u see? shame

  • 676.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane(Hurricane)-654:

    hahaha, does not take much to get your goat up………….or should I say sheep?

    Relax dude, you’ll pull a foufy valve

  • 677.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @cane(cane)-661:

    Is bonehead like sheepshagger? Meant to rile? Funny, bonehead is generally an English Saffa term for and Afriks Saffas, where did you pick it up? On Keo?

    How often in law has a guilty person gotten off scott free due to lack of hard evidence? Plenty

    Dirty filthy sader cheats eye gouged, it’s as clear as er…… mud :)

    Something happenned, can’t be proven so we move on…………

  • 678.stormer in a teacup: Reply to this comment

    Bulls players gouging their own teammates? I remember Sean Fitzpatrick biting his own ear, so I guess anything can happen.

  • 679.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @stormer in a teacup(stormer in a teacup)-678:

    :lol:

  • 680.JEZ: Reply to this comment

    John Paul’s theory that the bulls gouged themselves is right up there with his namesakes theory that using condoms is a sin.
    It would appear from the comments that his sheep, mother and sister finished a packet last night but for the life of me I cannot understand why he wants *** with a japanese person.

  • 681.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @JEZ(DEE DAH)-680:

    Same people who made up Suzie, what did you expect?

  • 682.JEZ: Reply to this comment

    Yip we are a bad bunch after all we invented gouging, biting, stamping and cancer. In fact Dan Brown failed to mention that under his garments at the last supper Judas had a springbok jersey on.

  • 683.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @JEZ(DEE DAH)-682:

    Aids? Oh no that was the Americans…phew! But I assume we helped…

  • 684.ufo: Reply to this comment

    what is really interesting is that while the guilty crusader player has escaped exposure and punishment (and shame) due to a lack of evidence… SOME kiwi posters are suggesting no evidence proves no crusader did anything wrong…

    … and… still with no evidence…

    in the same breath… suggest that it must have been a bulls teammate…!!

    it would be laughable if it wasn’t so cringingly disturbing…t

  • 685.j59: Reply to this comment

    @cane(cane)-32:

    Its not often you’re right but your wrong again….you’d imagine Carter was guilty of 10.1.c? No?

    10.1 OBSTRUCTION
    (a) Charging or pushing. When a player and an opponent are running for the ball, either player must not charge or push the other except shoulder-to-shoulder.
    Sanction: Penalty kick
    (b) Running in front of a ball carrier. A player must not intentionally move or stand in front of a team-mate carrying the ball thereby preventing opponents from tackling the current ball carrier or the opportunity to tackle potential ball carriers when they gain possession.
    Sanction: Penalty kick
    (c) Blocking the tackler. A player must not intentionally move or stand in a position that prevents an opponent from tackling a ball carrier.
    Sanction: Penalty kick
    (d) Blocking the ball. A player must not intentionally move or stand in a position that prevents an opponent from playing the ball.
    Sanction: Penalty kick
    (e) Ball carrier running into team-mate. A player carrying the ball must not intentionally run into team-mates in front of that player.
    Sanction: Penalty kick

  • 686.JEZ: Reply to this comment

    I forgot about aids, global warming and the global financial meltdown it would appear that we are also quite humble too.

  • 687.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @whatever(whatever)-676:
    :-)
    You know me mate, i just cant help myself.

  • 688.PrickBoks going South: Reply to this comment

    dirty

    lying

    cheating

    GOUGING

    Yappies !

  • 689.trupisero: Reply to this comment

    @ufo(ufo)-684: if Corne Krige was playing it wouldn’t be a surprise…remember how how broke Andre Pretorius’ jaw?

    @PrickBoks going South(PrickBoks going South)-688: voetsek jou nare nat naai

  • 690.PrickBoks going South: Reply to this comment

    Bulls players have been trained to gouge for generations, filthy Bikkies Bumfcuk had crowbars for fingernails.

    Now they’ve been caught LYING.

    No one trusts these dirty

    cheating

    lying

    G O U G I N G

    Yappies

  • 691.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @PrickBoks going South(PrickBoks going South)-690: On the contrary, no one trusts the sheepshaggers. Especially after the debacle of the farcical so called World Cup last year…. A farken disaster and the first time match fixing in rugby was plain to see…

    Ridiculous little islanders…

  • 692.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-691: Actually the Sheepshaggers should make good on their promise to boycott the next RWC… They won’t be missed at all.. Integrity in Test matches will rise exponentially as a result.

Pages: « 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] Show All

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.