Crusaders cleared of foul play

Crusaders cleared of foul play

Crusaders coach Todd Blackadder has demanded an apology from the Bulls after eye-gouging allegations against his team couldn’t be substantiated by the Super Rugby citing commissioner.

Bulls forwards Chiliboy Ralepelle and Flip van der Merwe complained to referee Jaco Peyper that they had been eye-gouged during their match in Pretoria, won 32-30 by the Bulls. Peyper used a white card to refer the incidents to the citing commissioner.

According to reports in New Zealand, the commissioner has reviewed the video footage of the incidents in question and found the Crusaders not guilty.

‘The citing commissioner has reviewed it and after that review there was nothing in the video footage that would point to the allegation being substantiated,’ Sanzar chief executive Greg Peters said.

‘The citing commissioner also found it interesting that the Bulls did not follow through with a complaint within the four-hour window after the game.’

After the game, Blackadder said he was ‘bemused’ at the allegations and demanded an apology if they were found to be incorrect. Following the citing commissioner’s ruling and after looking at the footage, the Crusaders coach wonders why the Bulls would have made such claims.

‘The first one with Chiliboy, you would expect that the player would come out of the breakdown holding his eye, but he certainly didn’t. I wonder whether it was a negative ploy.’

Captain Kieran Read also said that he was disappointed with the Bulls for accusing the Crusaders of such tactics.

‘Initially I was really surprised at the allegations,’ he said. ‘It has now come out that there’s no case to answer.

‘It’s a kick in the guts to us because we’re men of integrity and it’s no surprise that it’s turned out the way it has.’


692 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 1114 » Show All

  • 151.Michael: Reply to this comment

    @Treehugger(Treehugger)-148: Thehehehe, say no more :-)

  • 152.Treehugger: Reply to this comment

    @JL1…lol..of course I am her !!!! How did you know ?

  • 153.JL1: Reply to this comment

    @Treehugger(Treehugger)-152: The modesty gave it away

  • 154.ufo: Reply to this comment

    mikey & huggy

    :wink:

  • 155.Treehugger: Reply to this comment

    151@Michael. ;-)

  • 156.CoachPete: Reply to this comment

    Hard to prove this one I dont believe Kiwis are dirty players

  • 157.Treehugger: Reply to this comment

    Well we have cheered up this thread a bit guys, that’s my good deed to humanity for the decade.

  • 158.Dawn: Reply to this comment

    Samantha Brick. Phooey.

  • 159.CoachPete: Reply to this comment

    hello Ladies happy easter to you both and ALL

  • 160.Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19: Reply to this comment

    just go and search for “expat exposed” on the interwebs…
    it’s all there

  • 161.Dawn: Reply to this comment

    I read the whole shebang and she is cuckoo!!!!!

  • 162.JL1: Reply to this comment

    @CoachPete(CoachPete)-156 :? ?????????

    Sarcastic

  • 163.cab: Reply to this comment

    Yep there some gdam dirty filthmongering crafty wangers around – time we setup an academy otherwise how we gonna compete?

  • 164.nama1: Reply to this comment

    @ufo(ufo)-139:
    LOL

    Funny, very funny. :lol:
    ====================================================

    Without video proof, there is not much the citing commisioner can do about the claims by Chilli and Flip. I’m sure that if there was any video evidence of the eye gouging, we would’ve seen it by now on DSTV. I can’t see anything coming of this.

    Just like nothing came of the claim of eye gouging by Heinrich Brussow a few years ago when we toured in Europe.

    best to just get on with it.

  • 165.JL1: Reply to this comment

    @cab(cab)-163: Yes we need an academy

  • 166.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @nama1(nama1)-164: and if they find video evidence?

    why would you be so blase about it nama?

  • 167.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    and blackadder DEMANDS an apology if no proof can be found?

    a lack of proof does not mean it did not happen so he can get *** k ed.

  • 168.cab: Reply to this comment

    Dam right JL1 – I’m convinced mexteds academy got a section fir gamesmanship and refmanship..brycie blew that vluitjie for 80mins straight with a straight face – disgraceful.

  • 169.JL1: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman(rangerman)-166: Ranger, I am with you

    May the find so much video evidence that it exposes the cheats for who they are

  • 170.Treehugger: Reply to this comment

    Have googled her and decided I am not her, I am far better looking and she looks dumpy ;-0. She now has competition.

  • 171.JL1: Reply to this comment

    @cab(cab)-168: Week 2 for 2 weeks

    Fall over the ball and show the ref that you cannot move
    Obstruct the kick and chase whilst holding your line
    Diving into a ruck without getting noticed
    Eye gouge away from cameras
    Illegal scrumming the way it was itended for by the Kiwis
    Winking at the ref when caught red handed
    Cross running to block defenders
    Diving in from the side
    Playing the ball from the off side position
    Facial expressions of innocence on day 14

  • 172.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Treehugger(Treehugger)-170: is that so?

    but i know you bunny hugger-ladies. are you well groomed? :lol:

    p.s. do you hate her cos she is fit?

    @JL1(JL1)-169: we must hope they caught it but by now it would have broken if it was available i think.

    i have very little doubt there is some basis for the complaints of chili and flip though.

  • 173.cab: Reply to this comment

    Oops seems the lassies are on here now, better clean it up a bit, terrible filth on tge field, mind u we do rule it with piet ‘The Boep’ van zyl and johan ‘The EarNibbler’ le roux, but those are blunt instruments of ignorance competed to the crafty guile of fingers mccaw.

  • 174.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @JL1(JL1)-171: :lol:

  • 175.JL1: Reply to this comment

    @Treehugger(Treehugger)-170: Check out the French husband with the hanging moustache

  • 176.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @JL1(JL1)-175: ag she is not very hot imo but its cool if she is confident i suppose, he looks like a serial killer though.

  • 177.Treehugger: Reply to this comment

    @Rangerman… No, am fat and lardy, don’t brush teeth or wash hair, only wear hemp clothing and what I don’t wear I smoke. Oh and if I want to try look a a bit pretty a bit of camo stuff (mud and charcol) will do in a pinch, oh and no waxing of body hairs, have a couple of chin hairs but they make me look earthy so I am divine to my creatures.

    @JL1….. I saw, they both actually ridiculous.

  • 178.nama1: Reply to this comment

    @Dawn(Dawn)-161:
    You’re just jealous. :wink: :wink:

    @rangerman(rangerman)-166:
    That’s what we should be waiting for. In fact, the Bulls management should themselves actively look for video evidence and present it to the commisioner. In the absence of any evidence for such serious allegations WE are looking like the fools here.

    There are minimum sanctions for eye gouging if a player is found guilty of that. In case of any evidence being found, the guilty party should be punished as such.

    What do you mean I’m blase about it? Don’t you think if there was any proof of the incidents that it would’ve been all over our TV screen by now?

  • 179.CoachPete: Reply to this comment

    @JL1(JL1)-171:
    You forgot to big ones
    Hands in the ruck
    Playing the ball on the ground (RM)

  • 180.CoachPete: Reply to this comment

    @nama1(nama1)-178:
    Sometimes the TV angles dont show some things and in this case may not
    It does not take away the fact 2 Bulls players said it happened
    So I guess its their word against the Bulls players
    No one was injured ( as I understand) so both teams need to move on

  • 181.Hondo: Reply to this comment

    @nama1(nama1)-178:
    I’ll be surprised if they find any such a video, it’s not the Saders’ style
    It’s more of Fitzpatrick-Ranger-Tipoki-Nonu style, or Bakkie of course
    I suspect some Pro Legota’s involvement in falsified the story to Peoper
    Same as last year

  • 182.Treehugger: Reply to this comment

    Rangerman, bunnyhuggers I know and associate with and well groomed ex kugel partygirls that are mostly married to professional men, they swill champagne at my place at least 3 X a week and we exchange notes. Some are rescuers and some have sancturies, my place is the meeting spot as I will have the largest and best sanctuary in Natal and I am central to every one. They all know me from other stuff before I decided to calm down and start this project which is almost complete. Actually it should be finished by now but builders do there own thing and don’t pitch all the time. Am not a fatty am a lean mean blond fighting machine lol, normally wear my hair in a plait or 2 plaits to keep it out the way when doing things outside or dealing with an animals. Looks wise, I am ok, did a bit of modeling when I was younger but am now a lot older, looks are in the eye of the beholder to some I may be fugly and to others not so fugly. Don’t know why people have this impression treehuggers are weirdos, oh and I am also a recent vegetarian, bout 6 months now.

  • 183.nama1: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman(rangerman)-167:
    The problem is that a lack of proof means that no action can be taken.

    If there was indeed some eye gouging that took place, and I have no reason to believe that Chilliboy and Flip would make it up, the citing commisioner will need proof to charge the guilty player. The fact that they alerted Spies about it during the match suggests to me that something untoward did take place. However I would like you to think back bout the HB incident a couple of years ago. Although there was proof that somebody scratched him around his eye, (photo) the citing commisioner could not act against a player because there was no video evidence on the culprit hence nobody could be charged.

  • 184.optiplay: Reply to this comment

    @Hondo(Hondo)-181: Was it ever proven on video that Bakkies eye gouged Cannon? I am asking this because as far as I can remember it was not. Yet his track record started there.(honest question)

  • 185.Hondo: Reply to this comment

    @CoachPete(CoachPete)-180:
    Flip has some reputation preceding him, like Dad Flippie or Bro the ‘Dentist’
    Could be some retaliation involved which I doubt, but Chiliboi’s case sound a fabrication to me, he is not a dirty player and his involvements in rucks is minimal, there is nothing to instigate such a despicable act from a clean team like the Crusaders against him?

  • 186.nama1: Reply to this comment

    @CoachPete(CoachPete)-180:
    Most unions have their own camera teams to record their matches for analysis purposes and such. So there would be plent film material available to look for proof, from their own sources and that of the broadcaster.

    All I’m saying that bleating about this without proper proof, will not bring us anywhere except making us look like a bunch of whinging fools.

  • 187.Hondo: Reply to this comment

    @optiplay(optiplay)-184:
    No it wasn’t, his fingers never shown in full contact with the eye as far as I can recall
    But he did bitten away a chunk of Brendon Cannon’s shoulder flush, that one was shown in full ;)

  • 188.JL1: Reply to this comment

    @CoachPete(CoachPete)-179: That is after course work, only once you completed the modules on cheating the Kiwi way can you venture down the post graduate qualification

  • 189.CoachPete: Reply to this comment

    @Hondo(Hondo)-185:
    As i said if no proof of Video or even physical evidence then its he said said she said.
    I dont think the crusaders are a dirty team either.
    So what i am saying is Give me proof or move on

  • 190.Hondo: Reply to this comment

    @nama1(nama1)-186:
    The procedure is that the Captain has to tell the referee straight away and makes the referee inspecting the injured eye/eye socket
    I cannot recall that happened yesterday, have you seen Spie talks to the referee in real time?

  • 191.CoachPete: Reply to this comment

    @JL1(JL1)-188:
    let me clarify my position
    The crusaders IMO are not a dirty team but they sometimes cheat :)

  • 192.JL1: Reply to this comment

    @CoachPete(CoachPete)-191: Yep, they have been known not to be dirty, but cheating is they fortè

  • 193.Hondo: Reply to this comment

    @CoachPete(CoachPete)-189:
    When Leicester scrumhalf Du Pui did his act, the whole stadium saw it on the big screen time and again and instantly, not yesterday though

  • 194.nama1: Reply to this comment

    @CoachPete(CoachPete)-189:
    “So what i am saying is Give me proof or move on”

    What I’ve said in the beginning. (p164)

    @Hondo(Hondo)-190:
    “Chiliboy Ralepelle and Flip van der Merwe reported incidents to referee Jaco Peyper, who issued white cards and a citing commissioner will now investigate the allegations.”

    I’ve seen Spies talk to the ref a few times. Obviously I couldn’t hear what they were talking about on every occasion. I can’t recall seeing Peyper inspecting the eye sockets of the two players but the fact that he issued a white card suggests that he must have been concerned about the allegations.

  • 195.CoachPete: Reply to this comment

    @Hondo(Hondo)-193:
    And he is a frenchman? :)

  • 196.CoachPete: Reply to this comment

    @nama1(nama1)-194:
    I saw that and basically agreeing with you :)

  • 197.CoachPete: Reply to this comment

    @nama1(nama1)-194:
    See usually there is eye damage so if no eye injuries or damage
    and no video proof then its History

  • 198.CoachPete: Reply to this comment

    Samantha Brick the most attractive Brick in the world :)

  • 199.nama1: Reply to this comment

    @CoachPete(CoachPete)-197:
    Yip.

  • 200.JL1: Reply to this comment

    @CoachPete(CoachPete)-198: Aha, so you googled the pretty face, caught out, now you need to clear your search history before the missus checks her out

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 1114 » Show All

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.