Comments on: ‘Four Nations’ venues confirmed

By: slavedriver(slavedriver)

slavedriver(slavedriver) — Fri, 01 Jun 2012 05:17:47 +0000

@NZINCHINA(NZINCHINA)-81: Your coaches been trolling the islands again

By: Hurricane(Hurricane)

Hurricane(Hurricane) — Thu, 31 May 2012 20:44:05 +0000

@Oranjebliksemblou(Oranjebliksemblou)-125:
lol, as if the Boks are saints and dont cheat
All Blacks are called the world champs.
As people on here told us in 2007, we beat whoever was put in front of us….others did not. You can cry all you want about refs but 2007 RWC win was due to a ref failing to ref a game correctly in the quarters.
NZ would have taken 2007 as well, we all know this.
But unlike your sad and negative life i can man up and say the Boks won 2007 and deserved it.

By: Greenies(Greenies)

Greenies(Greenies) — Thu, 31 May 2012 19:30:17 +0000

Actually in China The minority people of which there are over 50 cultures are allowed more (2) where the main “han” chinese people were “only ” allowed one. What really happened was if they had more they simply paid a fine. The poorer who needed hard working men for their farms one way they got rid of new born girls was drowning them in a bucket. Also what most of the world dont get whats going on right now is there are infesting every country on the planet(now africa) and breeding like flies. So although the population in China is “increasing” slower than India, count in all their emigrants and their kids and it is scary. Africa must look at this as a concern(chinese are flooding in) because neither do they respect wild-life hence the latest depleations( and poaching increases) throughout africa in the last few years.

A sick race if you ask me..

By: CenturionShark (aka LondonShark)(londonshark)

CenturionShark (aka LondonShark)(londonshark) — Thu, 31 May 2012 18:53:17 +0000

@Golden Boy(Golden Boy)-145: All valid points.

By: carol(carol)

carol(carol) — Thu, 31 May 2012 16:42:02 +0000

@sparticus(sparticus)-62:

The Boks get their own Zulu Warrior!!

Perhaps we can send out a member of the Household Cavalry complete with horse!!

By: Great White Shark(Predawn)

Great White Shark(Predawn) — Thu, 31 May 2012 15:22:58 +0000

@NZINCHINA(NZINCHINA)-107: I'd have to be tortured and brainwashed first. It won't happen naturally unfortunately.

By: Golden Boy(Golden Boy)

Golden Boy(Golden Boy) — Thu, 31 May 2012 15:09:59 +0000

@nama1(nama1)-143: India to surpass the USA by 2025...China and the USA are currently level-pegging...but yeah..the USA are grinding to a halt, Europe has slowed down to on average 2.5 percent growth and if you remove the Germans, French and the UK its actually >1%. @CenturionShark (aka LondonShark)(londonshark)-129: Thanks for some clarity..although it is rather simplistic and considering that certain African cultures equate having large families with wealth, I doubt it will ever be successful there. Personally I think all children should be subsidized but that smaller families should have more tax breaks. Rather reward smaller family units instead of punishing larger ones.

By: bryce_in_oz(bryce_in_oz)

bryce_in_oz(bryce_in_oz) — Thu, 31 May 2012 15:06:15 +0000

@sparticus(sparticus)-62: Sounds awesome... pity it's only one guy though... far more nerving like they were the last time (if more organised)...

By: nama1(nama1)

nama1(nama1) — Thu, 31 May 2012 14:59:49 +0000

@CenturionShark (aka LondonShark)(londonshark)-141: Well, I remember watching the news earlier this year or late last year in which the World Bank announced that China had officially surpassed the USA as the biggest economy in the world. India on her way to pass the USA in the near future.

By: nama1(nama1)

nama1(nama1) — Thu, 31 May 2012 14:47:38 +0000

@rangerman(rangerman)-140:
Don’t we all?

By: CenturionShark (aka LondonShark)(londonshark)

CenturionShark (aka LondonShark)(londonshark) — Thu, 31 May 2012 14:46:28 +0000

@nama1(nama1)-139:

Lol, fair enough. I still like the idea of the gov helping out more with your first kid though But obviously not taxing your balls off if you have more (like China). That seems kinda counter productive.

PS I think the yanks are still top though.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)

By: rangerman(rangerman)

rangerman(rangerman) — Thu, 31 May 2012 14:20:56 +0000

@nama1(nama1)-124: you probably also think you sound cleva when you are sitting dronk with your friends nama.

because you understand the dynamic lmao!

By: nama1(nama1)

nama1(nama1) — Thu, 31 May 2012 14:20:24 +0000

@greentea(greentea)-135:
Thanks for some clarity.

There we go, Centurion Shark. Did you read.

So it was not the one-child-per-household policy that helped China to become the leading economy (passed USA some time ago) in the world.

By: CenturionShark (aka LondonShark)(londonshark)

CenturionShark (aka LondonShark)(londonshark) — Thu, 31 May 2012 14:16:36 +0000

@CenturionShark (aka LondonShark)(londonshark)-134:

Ironically, I made a ton of spelling and grammatical errors in that post. But I am working and blogging at the same time

By: greentea(greentea)

greentea(greentea) — Thu, 31 May 2012 14:14:00 +0000

“single child families”

By: CenturionShark (aka LondonShark)(londonshark)

CenturionShark (aka LondonShark)(londonshark) — Thu, 31 May 2012 14:13:31 +0000

@nama1(nama1)-133:

Back to rugby

By: greentea(greentea)

greentea(greentea) — Thu, 31 May 2012 14:12:20 +0000

@nama1(nama1)-132: Not for the vast majority, farmers are allowed two, if both parents are from single families you can have two, ethnic minorities are allowed two, you can pay the tax and have 20 if you want , if you have guan xi you can have two, many many loop holes to get around this law

By: CenturionShark (aka LondonShark)(londonshark)

CenturionShark (aka LondonShark)(londonshark) — Thu, 31 May 2012 14:11:51 +0000

@greentea(greentea)-130:

Anything but OBE

I’m in education, and I can safely say that OBE was ruined the minds of millions of students. It’s scary when a 18 year can’t work with fractions.

But seriously, the answer to your question is pretty objective.

By: nama1(nama1)

nama1(nama1) — Thu, 31 May 2012 14:10:11 +0000

@CenturionShark (aka LondonShark)(londonshark)-129: OK, I see you realised why I may have come to that conclusion. All's fine then.

By: nama1(nama1)

nama1(nama1) — Thu, 31 May 2012 14:08:42 +0000

@CenturionShark (aka LondonShark)(londonshark)-127:
You did bring in China…where it is law.

Can’t blame me for thinking you also want the one-child-per-household idea, legislated.