Super Rugby preview – Round 18

Super Rugby preview – Round 18

JON CARDINELLI and RYAN VREDE analyse the key match-ups and pick the winners at the weekend.

JC and Vrede called all of last week’s results correctly, and there’s a strong feeling at keo.co.za HQ that another full house is on the cards.

Both writers are expecting the Bulls, Sharks and Stormers to pick up wins and qualify for the play-offs. JC reckons the Chiefs should win the league by hammering the Hurricanes on Friday, a result that won’t please the Stormers, but won’t stop the Cape side from advancing. Vrede thinks the Chiefs will win in Wellington, but without a bonus point, and that will allow the Stormers to seize an opportunity against the Rebels and top the league.

The Sharks and Bulls will be under pressure to bank bonus-point wins in their respective matches after the Reds whip the Waratahs in Brisbane. The play-offs will only start next week, but this round could almost be likened to the Fifa World Cup’s Round of 16. It’s do or die, and we’re expecting the Bulls and Sharks to do the necessary and join the Stormers in the play-offs.

KEO.CO.ZA SUCCESS RATE
VREDE: 80/112 (71%)
JC: 82/112 (73%)

HURRICANES vs CHIEFS, WELLINGTON, FRIDAY 09:35

VREDE’S CALL: The Hurricanes need to win to keep hope of participation in the play-offs alive. The Chiefs need to hold the Stormers at bay and book an easier route to a final. The match clearly doesn’t lack for incentive for either side, but the Chiefs’ all-round superiority will reflect in the result. Their success has been built on their pack’s potency. The heavies were outplayed against the Crusaders again last week, but the Canes don’t have the calibre of forwards to test the Chiefs (in general play or at scrum time) in the manner they were tested in Hamilton. This will lend the Chiefs attacking impetus, with their back division allowed space and time to plot the Canes’ demise. Defensively I suspect the Chiefs’ dominance of the gainline will ultimately force the Canes into expansive, cavalier attacks that will be terminal to their cause and season. Chiefs by 10
JC’S CALL: The Hurricanes are a competitive side, but for every steal and game breaking play there is an instance of indiscipline or sloppy defence. The Hurricanes’ desperation to score a bonus-point win should play into the Chiefs’ hands. The Chiefs boast the second-best defensive record in the competition and are especially dangerous from turnover ball. Expect them to play a more structured, territorial game and feed off the Hurricanes’ mistakes. Unfortunately for the Stormers, I feel the Chiefs will secure the five points from this fixture and win the league. The Hurricanes may score some tries, but they won’t do enough to win or get a consolation bonus point. Chiefs by 9

Hurricanes – 15 Andre Taylor, 15 Cory Jane/Alapati Leiua, 13 Conrad Smith (c), 12 Tim Bateman, 11 Julian Savea, 10 Beauden Barrett, 9 Chris Eaton/Frae Wilson, 8 Victor Vito, 7 Jack Lam, 6 Faifili Levave, 5 Jason Eaton, 4 Jeremy Thrush, 3 Ben May, 2 Dane Coles, 1 Reggie Goodes.
Subs: 16 Motu Matu’u, 17 Jeffery Toomaga-Allen, 18 James Broadhurst, 19 Brad Shields, 20 Wilson/Jamie Nutbrown, 21 Tusi Pisi, 22 Jayden Hayward

Chiefs – 15 Andrew Horrel, 14 Lelia Masaga, 13 Jackson Willison, 12 Sonny Bill Williams, 11 Robbie Robinson, 10 Aaron Cruden, 9 Tawera Kerr-Barlow, 8 Kane Thompson, 7 Tanerau Latimer, 6 Liam Messam, 5 Brodie Retallick, 4 Craig Clarke (c), 3 Ben Tameifuna, 2 Hika Elliot, 1 Toby Smith.
Subs: 16 Mahonri Schwalger, 17 Sona Taumalolo, 18 Michael Fitzgerald, 19 Sam Cane, 20 Brendon Leonard, 21 Asaeli Tikoirotuma, 22 Tim Nanai-Williams.

BRUMBIES vs BLUES, CANBERRA, SATURDAY 07:35

VREDE’S CALL: The Brumbies only need a point to capture the Australian conference but will be eyeing the bonus point and the Stormers in second, hoping the Cape franchise somehow blow it against the Rebels. Their structured, accurate and powerful forward play will be the root of their success against a Blues side that’s already mentally on holiday. Their multi-phase approach has depleted much better defensive units than the Blues, and they will again lay the platform for their talented backs to exploit the Blues’ numerous defensive vulnerabilities. Brumbies by 10
JC’S CALL: There isn’t much incentive for the Brumbies to alter their approach and push for a four-try bonus point. The Stormers are likely to beat a weakened and rudderless Rebels side in Cape Town, and so what the Brumbies rather need to focus on is a win that will keep the Reds at arm’s length. They have the forwards and the general at No 9 to ensure their game plan is successfully implemented, and will want to keep the game tight to prevent some of the dangerous Blues individuals from getting into the contest. Expect another ugly but effective performance by Jake White’s men. Brumbies by 11

Brumbies – 15 Jesse Mogg, 14 Henry Speight, 13 Andrew Smith, 12 Pat McCabe, 11 Joe Tomane, 10 Zack Holmes, 9 Nic White, 8 Ben Mowen (c), 7 Michael Hooper, 6 Peter Kimlin, 5 Sam Carter, 4 Scott Fardy, 3 Dan Palmer, 2 Stephen Moore, 1 Ben Alexander.
Subs: 16 Anthony Hegarty, 17 Ruaidhri Murphy, 18 Leon Power, 19 Fotu Auelua, 20 Ian Prior, 21 Tevita Kuridrani, 22 Robbie Coleman.

Blues – 15 Charles Piutau, 14 Lachie Munro, 13 Francis Saili, 12 Ma’a Nonu, 11 Hadleigh Parkes, 10 Michael Hobbs, 9 Piri Weepu, 8 Luke Braid, 7 Daniel Braid, 6 Chris Lowrey, 5 Steven Luatua, 4 Liaki Moli, 3 Charlie Faumuina, 2 Keven Mealamu (c), 1 Tony Woodcock.
Subs: 16 Tom McCartney, 17 Tevita Mailau, 18 Andrew Van der Heijden, 19 Peter Saili, 20 Alby Mathewson, 21 Orene Ai’i, 22 Sherwin Stowers.

CRUSADERS vs WESTERN FORCE, CHRISTCHURCH, SATURDAY 09:35

VREDE’S CALL: The Crusaders showed their class in defeating the Chiefs last week in a match they had to win to control their own play-off destiny. They cannot win the New Zealand conference but can still finish fourth, which would secure them a home tie, probably against the Bulls – a match they would be favourites to win. They are one of the few teams in the tournament you would back to win a semi-final on the road. In light of this, the benefits of finishing fourth are self-evident. They’ll beat the Force comfortably, building that result on an intelligent kicking game in their half and a blend of grunt and industry through their forwards and panache in the backline. Crusaders by 15
JC’S CALL: The Force are without David Pocock and this will limit their success at the breakdown. An injury to Kieran Read has forced the Crusaders to pick Richie McCaw and Matt Todd in the back row, and while this could impact on their gainline ambitions it will ensure that they are well equipped to win the game on the ground. It isn’t the most intimidating starting pack, with the unimpressive Tom Donnelly named in the second row, but the Crusaders do have some class on the bench to ensure they finish strongly. The performances of their halfbacks as well as that of Israel Dagg will be important as far as their kicking game is concerned, and in this regard the Force will struggle to compete. Crusaders by 10

Crusaders – 15 Israel Dagg, 14 Sean Maitland, 13 Adam Whitelock, 12 Ryan Crotty, 11 Zac Guildford, 10 Dan Carter, 9 Andy Ellis, 8 Richie McCaw (c), 7 Matt Todd, 6 George Whitelock, 5 Tom Donnelly, 4 Luke Romano, 3 Owen Franks, 2 Corey Flynn, 1 Ben Franks.
Subs: 16 Quentin MacDonald, 17 Wyatt Crockett, 18 Samuel Whitelock, 19 Luke Whitelock, 20 Willi Heinz, 21 Tom Taylor, 22 Robbie Fruean.

Force – 15 Alfie Mafi, 14 Nick Cummins, 13 Patrick Dellit, 12 Rory Sidey, 11 Napolioni Nalaga, 10 Ben Seymour, 9 Brett Sheehan, 8 Lachlan McCaffrey, 7 Angus Cottrell, 6 Richard Brown, 5 Nathan Sharpe (c), 4 Toby Lynn, 3 Salesi Manu, 2 Nathan Charles, 1 Tetera Faulkner.
Subs: 16 Ben Whittaker, 17 Ruan Smith, 18 Pek Cowan, 19 Ollie Atkins, 20 Josh Holmes, 21 Kyle Godwin, 22 Will Tupou.

REDS vs WARATAHS, BRISBANE, SATURDAY 11:40

VREDE’S CALL: The defending champions have no alternative but to bank a bonus point win and hope that one of the minnows does them a favour at some stage in the day. They should achieve the former, with Will Genia and Quade Cooper controlling territory with their boots, and forcing the Tahs into risky 22m exits. From there they’ll back their defence to pressure the Tahs into errors and launch strikes from broken field or keep the board ticking over via Mike Harris’ boot. The Tahs have gifted backs, but their forwards’ inability to impose themselves will mean they won’t have the platform to exhibit their skills fully. Reds by 10
JC’S CALL: Not that Wycliff Palu has been particularly good this season, but his injury has forced a few telling changes to the Waratahs pack. There’s not much balance or continuity in that side, not much confidence and quite frankly not enough of a reason to win. The Reds have hit form late in the season and will have Digby Ioane and Liam Gill available for this match. Traditionally, this is tight fixture but I expect the Reds forwards will be too powerful and clinical at the tackle point and the backs will use that platform to win territory and score tries. This result will certainly spice up the later fixtures as the Sharks and perhaps the Bulls will need a bonus-point win to deny the Reds a play-off place. Reds by 13

Reds – 15 Luke Morahan, 14 Dom Shipperley, 13 Anthony Faingaa, 12 Mike Harris, 11 Digby Ioane, 10 Quade Cooper, 9 Will Genia (c), 8 Scott Higginbotham, 7 Liam Gill, 6 Jake Schatz, 5 Adam Wallace-Harrison, 4 Rob Simmons, 3 James Slipper, 2 Saia Faingaa, 1 Greg Holmes.
Subs: 16 James Hanson, 17 Ben Daley, 18 Radike Samo, 19 Beau Robinson, 20 Jarrad Butler, 21 Ben Lucas, 22 Ben Tapuai.

Waratahs – 15 Adam Ashley-Cooper, 14 Lachie Turner, 13 Rob Horne, 12 Berrick Barnes, 11 Drew Mitchell, 10 Bernard Foley, 9 Grayson Hart, 8 Dave Dennis, 7 Chris Alcock, 6 Dean Mumm, 5 Kane Douglas, 4 Sitaleki Timani, 3 Paddy Ryan, 2 Tatafu Polota-Nau, 1 Benn Robinson (c).
Subs: 16 John Ulugia, 17 Jeremy Tilse, 18 Lopeti Timani, 19 Jono Jenkins, 20 Brendan McKibbin, 21 Tom Carter, 22 Tom Kingston.

STORMERS vs REBELS, CAPE TOWN, SATURDAY 15:00

VREDE’S CALL: By kick-off the Stormers will know exactly what they require to top the log. They will be cheering for the Canes earlier in the day, hoping they beat the Chiefs or restrict them to four points in defeat. The latter scenario is more likely and if ever the Stormers had a better motivator to escape their attacking mediocrity this will be it. The Rebels don’t have the game breakers of tactical intelligence to trouble them on attack. They’ll be blunted at the gainline and systematically forced deeper and deeper into their territory. The Stormers have built their victories on penalty-inducing pressure and Peter Grant’s goal kicking but they will have to find an attacking dimension that has been sorely lacking if they hope to take the full haul of points they so desperately need. The players are certainly there, but they have to deliver in this the most crucial of matches. It is the responsibility of the forwards to give them the best possible launchpad, and you have to think that against the powder-puff Rebels pack they will do so. Stormers by 15
JC’S CALL: The Rebels are not to be underestimated. Ask the Crusaders, who suffered an embarrassing defeat to the Melbourne franchise earlier in the season. I don’t think there’s any point talking about a bonus point, as the Chiefs should secure top spot following their match against the Hurricanes. The Stormers will stick to script, building the pressure and taking any points on offer in the first half. There is a chance that it will rain on Saturday, so it is probably not the best time to play expansively when the game is still in the balance. Once they have built a decent lead, they may cut loose in the second half when that notorious Rebels defence begins to tire. Stormers by 12

Stormers – 15 Joe Pietersen, 14 Gio Aplon, 13 Juan de Jongh, 12 Jean de Villiers (c), 11 Bryan Habana, 10 Peter Grant, 9 Dewaldt Duvenage, 8 Deon Fourie, 7 Rynhardt Elstadt, 6 Siya Kolisi, 5 Andries Bekker, 4 De Kock Steenkamp, 3 Frans Malherbe, 2 Tiaan Liebenberg, 1 Steven Kitshoff.
Subs: 16 Deon Carstens, 17 Brok Harris, 18 Quinn Roux, 19 Jebb Sinclair, 20 Louis Schrueder, 21 Burton Francis, 22 Gerhard van den Heever.

Rebels – 15 Julian Huxley, 14 Mark Gerrard, 13 Mitch Inman, 12 Stirling Mortlock (c), 11 Cooper Vuna/Lachlan Mitchell, 10 James Hilgendorf, 9 Nick Phipps, 8 Gareth Delve, 7 Hugh Perret, 6 Tim Davidson, 5 Hugh Pyle, 4 Cadeyrn Neville, 3 Jono Owen, 2 Ged Robinson, 1 Rodney Blake.
Subs: 16 Luke Holmes, 17 Paul Alo-Emile, 18 Al Campbell, 19 Ryan Hodson, 20 Nic Stirzaker, 21 Cooper Vuna/Lachlan Mitchell, 22 Richard Kingi.

SHARKS vs CHEETAHS, DURBAN, SATURDAY 17:05

VREDE’S CALL: The Sharks’ victory over the Bulls last weekend was their best performance of the season, but the Sharks’ campaign has been marred by inconsistency. However, you sense they are peaking at the right time and they should be too strong for the Cheetahs. Expect Bismarck du Plessis, Ryan Kankowski, Beast Mtawarira, Keegan Daniel and later Willem Alberts, to be prominent with ball-in-hand, gradually wearing down the Cheetahs’ resistance. The backline, bolstered by Pat Lambie’s return and displaying an added dimension with Frans Steyn at inside centre, will be too good for one of the weakest defences in the tournament. Provided they don’t get too loose in their approach (thereby granting Heinrich Brussow and co chances at stealing or stifling the ball) the Sharks will get the bonus-point that will probably see them through to the play-offs. Sharks by 12
JC’S CALL: The Sharks need to replicate their performance of last week, simple as that. They will, in all likelihood, go into this match needing five log points, but they mustn’t let this lead to a more frantic approach. The back row was outstanding last week, and will need to win the battle at the gainline once again. It will be a big game for Craig Burden as he fills in for the irrepressible Bismarck du Plessis, but he also has the potential to be dominant in contact and boasts a unique turn of speed. The Sharks need a strong first half, and they need to be clinical in taking points on offer and building a big lead. In the second stanza when the Cheetahs are less direct and more expansive, there will be more opportunities to score from turnover ball. Sharks by 14

Sharks - 15. Patrick Lambie, 14. JP Pietersen, 13. Tim Whitehead, 12. Francois Steyn, 11. Lwazi Mvovo, 10. Frederic Michalak, 9. Charl McLeod, 8. Ryan Kankowski, 7. Marcell Coetzee, 6. Keegan Daniel (c), 5. Anton Bresler, 4. Jandre Marais, 3. Jannie du Plessis, 2. Craig Burden, 1. Tendai Mtawarira.
Subs: 16. Bismarck du Plessis, 17. Wiehahn Herbst, 18. Pieter-Steph du Toit / Jean Deysel, 19. Willem Alberts, 20. Jacques Botes, 21. Meyer Bosman / Paul Jordaan, 22. Louis Ludik

Cheetahs - 15 Willie le Roux, 14 Nico Scheepers, 13 Robert Ebersohn, 12 Barry Geel, 11 Philip Snyman, 10 Riaan Smit, 9 Piet van Zyl, 8 Boom Prinsloo, 7 Lappies Labuschagne, 6 Heinrich Brussow, 5 Izak van der Westhuizen, 4 Andries Ferreira, 3 WP Nel, 2 Adriaan Strauss (c), 1 Trevor Nyakane.
Subs: 16 Hercu Liebenberg, 17 Marcel van der Merwe, 18 Waltie Vermeulen, 19 Ashley Johnson, 20 Jacques Coetzee, 21 Sias Ebersohn, 22 Andries Strauss.

BULLS vs LIONS, PRETORIA, SATURDAY 19:10

VREDE’S CALL: There has been so much talk of this Gauteng derby being close. On what basis? The Lions are by some distance the weakest team in the South African conference and one of the weakest in the tournament. If the Bulls lose this one it must be considered their worst result in recent years. They won’t. The Lions don’t have the personnel or appetite for a forward brawl and will look to attack in the wide channels at most opportunities. This will play into the Bulls’ hands. The Pretoria franchise have been as adept at crafting their own scoring chances as they have been at capitalising on their opponents’ errors and their victory in this fixture will hopefully see the third South African franchise enter the top six. Bulls by 15
JC’S CALL: Like the Sharks, the Bulls will need to produce a special performance to advance to the play-offs. And like the Sharks, they will be fortunate enough to play at home against one of the weaker defensive sides in the competition. The Lions so nearly blew it last week, and their inability to play for 80 minutes will cost them in this their final game (of the season? for the next couple of years?). The Bulls will need to lift their efforts at the breakdowns and collisions, as these were areas where they were clearly outplayed in last week’s battle with the Sharks. The Lions aren’t a good side, but the Bulls would be foolish to expect an easy ride. The Lions will try to spoil and force the Bulls to play as loose as possible. The Bulls must ensure they stick to their game plan and execute efficiently. It’s time for the forwards and the halfbacks to step up in this regard. Bulls by 12

Bulls - 15 Zane Kirchner, 14 Akona Ndungane, 13 JJ Engelbrecht, 12 Wynand Olivier, 11 Bjorn Basson, 10 Morné Steyn, 9 Francois Hougaard, 8 Pierre Spies (c), 7 Jacques Potgieter, 6 Dewald Potgieter, 5 Juandre Kruger, 4 Wilhelm Steenkamp, 3 Werner Kruger, 2 Chiliboy Ralepelle, 12 Dean Greyling.
Subs: 16 Willie Wepener, 17 Frik Kirsten, 18 Deon Stegmann, 19 CJ Stander, 20 Jano Vermaak, 21 Louis Fouché, 22 Francois Venter.

Lions – 15 James Kamana, 14 Lionel Mapoe, 13 Waylon Murray, 12 Butch James, 11 Anthonie Volminck, 10 Elton Jantjies, 9 Michael Bondesio, 8 Joshua Strauss (c), 7 Grant Hattingh, 6 Derick Minnie, 5 Ruan Botha, 4 Hendrik Roodt, 3 Jacobie Adriaanse, 2 Callie Visagie, 1 JC Janse van Rensburg.
Subs: 16 Martin Bezuidenhout, 17 Ruan Dreyer, 18 Etienne Oosthuizen, 19 Jaco Kriel, 20 Ross Cronje, 21 JR Esterhuizen, 22 Ruan Combrinck.


471 Comments

  • 1.shooter: Reply to this comment

    Al wat jy sien is die Blou Masjien

  • 2.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    If the Bulls win and somehow manage to beat the Crusaders in the quarterfinal, and if the Sharks continue their upward curve and beat the Brumbies in Canberra as expected, then the Bulls could end up facing the Stormers in the semis at Newlands, and the Sharks in the final at Loftus.

    That is my preferred outcome. I think a full Sharks team can most certainly knock over the Chiefs in Hamilton.

    Under the above scenario the Bulls would only have to play 1 game overseas, before coming back to SA for the semi and final.

  • 3.shooter: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-2: Ja, we wouldn’t want to go Crusaders in NZ, Stormers (away and flying back) and then Chiefs flying there again. But if we have to…

  • 4.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    @shooter(shooter)-3:

    Our big game will be the Crusaders. If we manage to pull that one through by some miracle, the Stormers at Newlands really don’t bother me. They were lucky to beat us both times, and this time we won’t be at the end of a 4 week overseas tour. And we’ll be motivated like hell.

    However, I don’t believe we can then fly back and stand a chance against the Chiefs in NZ. We must hope that the Sharks beat them and give us a final at Loftus. That will be an epic clash.

    Honestly, of the 5 other teams in the play offs I would rather face the Stormers than any of the others barring the Brumbies perhaps. The Chiefs, Crusaders and Sharks are all playing much better rugby than the men from Cape Town.

    And that would be the opinion of most neutral scribes without a doubt.

  • 5.NicG: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-2: That is very rose-tinted, but I certainly hope it works out that way… For the Sharks to then beat the Bulls at Loftus would certainly go some way to healing the wound inflicted at Kings Park in ’07. Anyway – your prediction is very hopeful and mine even more so!

    Go the Sharks (and the other SA teams if/until we face them).

  • 6.pokkel: Reply to this comment

    The ideal for the Sharks would be to end 5th, beat Brumbies, then Chiefs and stay in NZ for a Crusaders final.

    This would mean the least amount of travelling and the easiest game first up.

    But hey they first have to beat the Cheetah’s

  • 7.pokkel: Reply to this comment

    @pokkel(pokkel)-6:

    I meant to say Sharks to end 6th not 5th.

  • 8.pokkel: Reply to this comment

    @pokkel(pokkel)-6:

    That would mean that the Crusaders would have to go to Cape Town and fly back for the final.

  • 9.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    @NicG(NicG)-5:

    The Sharks are currently the team with the best players in SA. Hence their dominance of the Bok run on team.

    With the current players available to the Bulls, any game against the Sharks will be extremely tough. That was clearly demonstrated last week.

    The Bulls beating the Crusaders in Christchurch though – that is an extremely tall order.

  • 10.shooter: Reply to this comment

    The Cheetahs Bulls game first 40 minutes – that is what the Bulls are capable of.
    the next 120 minutes after was just an aberration.

    Stormer’s defensive gameplan could help them in tight games though.
    ..IF.. the Deon Fourie thing works out.

  • 11.stew: Reply to this comment

    Revenge will be sweet coming to the quarters , it is about time the Bulls get some of their own medicine in Christchurch – we will be lookin for total domination and a smooth game into the semis against the Cheifs

  • 12.sharks_lover: Reply to this comment

    the team i am hoping due to injuries the Sharks play against the Cheetahs

    15 Ludik
    14 JpP
    13 Whitehead (Jordaan still injured)
    12 Steyn
    11 Mvovo
    10 Lambie
    09 Mcleod
    08 Kanko
    07 Alberts
    06 Coetzee
    05
    04 Sykes
    03 Jannie
    02 Burden
    01 Beast

    16 Cooper
    17 Herbst
    18 Jandre (PSDT injured)
    19 Deysel
    20 Daniel
    21 Freddy (cover 10 and 09)
    22 Odwa/Viljoen

  • 13.stew: Reply to this comment

    @pokkel(pokkel)-8: Flying back for the final in Christchurch … what a pleasure , much easier than last season anyhow

  • 14.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    @shooter(shooter)-10:

    I don’t rate the Bulls first 40 against the Cheetahs, just like I don’t rate the Bulls performance against the Reds.

    Against weak teams the Bulls get their front foot ball going, and then they run riot. But against strong teams with organised defense, this doesn’t work.

    They need to rediscover their tight game dominance, like in the semis and finals of 2009 and 2010.

    Games where you only get 2 or 3 chances, and use them all. Not games where there are 20 chances, and you use 10 of them, like against the Cheetahs and Reds.

    The current Bulls aren’t there yet.

  • 15.sharks_lover: Reply to this comment

    @pokkel(pokkel)-7: i was about to correct you on that :lol:

  • 16.stew: Reply to this comment

    @stew(stew)-13: Also the revenue will be welcomed after last years disaster put the union in deep financial crisis.

  • 17.shooter: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-4: Yes. The Sharks played as well as the Bulls played badly in the last game.
    I can see that working out that way.

    Now let’s just beat the Lions first. 8)

  • 18.stew: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-14: Has to come down to the quality of players as well …. you have lost plenty world superstars this season … i wouldnt be too dispondent with your teams performance this year

  • 19.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    @shooter(shooter)-17:

    Lions aren’t my concern. The Crusaders are.

    I suspect our season is going to end next weekend in Christchurch. But while we’re still in the running, there’s always hope.

  • 20.pokkel: Reply to this comment

    @stew(stew)-16:

    Well we’re hoping for the same outcome then!

  • 21.stew: Reply to this comment

    Still think that this Hurricanes team should not be underestimated

  • 22.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-19: Let’s wait for the results on the weekend, first.

    You might even play the Brumbies in Canberra, which I think could be a likely outcome.

    Or miss out on a playoff spot altogether.

  • 23.stew: Reply to this comment

    @pokkel(pokkel)-20: definately

  • 24.shooter: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-14: i understand your point. Especially looking good against weaker teams. But we have to mix it up at least this year – given our vaste 6 is not what they were in the past couple of years.

  • 25.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    The ideal for Nz is Chiefs to finish second overall on the log, Crusaders to take out Bulls then play Stormers and beat them at Newlands . Then a Super Final in Hamilton.

  • 26.shooter: Reply to this comment

    @willievz(willievz)-22: 100%

  • 27.stew: Reply to this comment

    The playoffs seem very unfair – as with last seasons final you cannot expect a team , even though they may be the best , to travel across the world for away games and still expect them to win the final …. travel and fatigue eventually show and it seems inevitable ……… Still think the final should be played in a neutral venue , this would show which team is the best in the S15

  • 28.Slappes: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus – ever the optimist I see. Lol! The Stormers would prefer the bools as well but you cant beat the saders without a no 8.

  • 29.goody: Reply to this comment

    Good news for the Bulls, they won’t be playing against the Blues in the quarters…

  • 30.stew: Reply to this comment

    @Te Rangatira(Te Rangatira)-25: We have all completely forgotten about the Brumbies ….. Dont forget Jake White is good at playing playoff rugby as was shown in 2007

  • 31.shooter: Reply to this comment

    @pokkel(pokkel)-6: is that scenario possible for the Bulls too?

  • 32.stew: Reply to this comment

    @Slappes(Slappes)-28: You cant beat us with 16 men so dont stress yourself out !

  • 33.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @stew(stew)-21:

    They are playing at home.

    I reckon they could beat the Chiefs, if they minimise the amount of set pieces and spread the ball to wider channels more often.

    They have a weaker pack, but arguably a more mobile one.

  • 34.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @stew(stew)-30:
    Probably Brumbies at Waikato….have to go Chiefs

  • 35.stew: Reply to this comment

    @willievz(willievz)-33: Going to be a high scoring game what ever happens – will check on the weather cond

  • 36.heboric: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-4:
    “Our big game will be the Crusaders. If we manage to pull that one through by some miracle, the Stormers at Newlands really don’t bother me. They were lucky to beat us both times, and this time we won’t be at the end of a 4 week overseas tour. And we’ll be motivated like hell.”

    Wow, but I suppose Stormers will say the Bulls wont bother them if they play them at Newlands

  • 37.stew: Reply to this comment

    @willievz(willievz)-33: Going to be wet on the weekend – not good for the canes me thinks

  • 38.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-4:

    How about the circa 40 hour return flight + other forms of travel?

    Are you worried about that?

  • 39.Beertjie: Reply to this comment

    A win for the Hurricanes over the Chiefs will really add a bit of spice to a number of other games and will put huge pressure on the Sharks …

  • 40.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    For you Tacitus.

    We promise according to our hopes and perform according to our fears.

    We’d never know how high we are till we are called to rise; and then, if we are true to plan, our statures touch the sky.

    Were it not for hope the heart would break

    We must accept finite disappointment, but we must never lose infinite hope.

    We must have hope or starve to death.

    When it is dark enough, you can see the stars

  • 41.charo: Reply to this comment

    @Beertjie(Beertjie)-39:

    it is quite conceivable that;

    stormers could top the overall log and be the only sa team in the play offs.

    we can expect the reds to beat the tahs and it is not a given that sharks and bulls will win their games.

  • 42.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    Bulls will trip up against the Lions, rendering this whole discussion pretty futile.

  • 43.Hondo: Reply to this comment

    Hurricanes vs Chiefs: too close, Kaplan in control, for the pundits, Canes by 3 to 5

    Brumbies-Blues: a Kiwi referee will shaft the Brumbies to help a respectable exit for Lam.
    Blues by 7

    Red Waratahs: insignificant, even less so with Steve Walsh, Reds by 12 plus

    Stormers Rebels: Don’t know the referee, regardless, will be no doubt successful to facilitate the Stormers’ home field aspirations
    Stormers by 10-13

    Crusaders-Force: call in the SPCA

    Sharks vs Cheetahs: Go figure whom SARU prefer for the Play offs, The Bulls or the Sharks?
    Sharks by a small margin of 7 -10

    Bulls vs Lions: Old firm of Joubert & Pro Legota @ Loftus, thought I’ve seen that movie once or twice before :(
    Bulls by as much as they need for the playoffs
    :D

  • 44.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    chiefs
    brumbies
    force
    reds
    stormers
    sharks
    bulls

  • 45.pokkel: Reply to this comment

    @Hondo(Hondo)-43: :lol:

  • 46.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @Hondo(Hondo)-43: The evolution of your prejudice here on keo has been most amusing to witness. I’m sure you used to mistrust referees in the past in addition to being a full-blown white supremacist. And I’m sure you still don’t like blacks much these days, in addition to being a world-renowned referee conspiracy theorist. But the switch in balance between the two objects of your hatred is most intriguing.

  • 47.TooMuchRugby: Reply to this comment

    I just found something that reminds me of the Heyneke’s appointment as Bok coach:

    There’s an old sea story about a ship’s Captain who inspected his sailors, and afterward told the first mate that his men smelled bad…

    The Captain suggested perhaps it would help if the sailors would change underwear occasionally.
    The first mate responded, “Aye, aye sir, I’ll see to it immediately!”
    The first mate went straight to the sailors berth deck and announced, “The Captain thinks you guys smell bad and wants you to change your underwear.”
    He continued, “Pittman, you change with Jones, McCarthy, you change with Witkowski, and Brown, you change with Smith.”

    THE MORAL OF THE STORY:
    Someone may come along and promise “Change”, but don’t count on things smelling any better.

  • 48.Beertjie: Reply to this comment

    @charo(charo)-41: If we had the old system of no conference and no wild cards (thus top 4 makes semis) SA would’ve had only one team in the semis.

  • 49.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @stew(stew)-37: Few things to consider:

    Right.

    The wet weather might benefit the stronger pack – maybe not at scrum time as rain is usually a leveller in this regard, but in terms of the pack hunting as a unit they will almost certainly boss the collisions in the closer channels.

    But Kiwis know how to play (read handle) in wet weather, and it will affect both teams.

  • 50.stew: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman(katman)-46: Who you you going to support next season ?

  • 51.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @stew(stew)-50: My wife and kids. Why don’t you try doing the same?

  • 52.THE MAULER: Reply to this comment

    Everyone seems confident about the Sharks beating the Cheetahs… I’m a little worried about that game…

  • 53.stew: Reply to this comment

    @willievz(willievz)-49: true true , starting to feel the Chiefs will have the edge in the battle upfront.

  • 54.stew: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman(katman)-51: LOL no seriously have you taken serious thought about this

  • 55.line break: Reply to this comment

    Semi finals Will be:

    Chiefs v Crusaders in Hamilton
    Stormers v Sharks in Cape Town

  • 56.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @line break(line break)-55: Could well be ;)

  • 57.RainbowBanana: Reply to this comment

    According to Keo Bismarck is out, so is Plum still worried about Patrick or Alberts fitness? Why no Sharks team yet?

  • 58.line break: Reply to this comment

    Think the Crusaders and Sharks are the best two sides in the tournament tho…

  • 59.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    The dynamics of this extended S15 season are quite interesting.

    No team can really maintain its form over the entire tournament. The team that came closest to this was the Chiefs, I guess.

    But in general what we see is a combination of teams that stacked up the points early on, and are now barely hanging in there (like the Stormers) and teams that were poor in the early season but are now hitting awesome form (the Crusaders and Sharks).

    On current form the Sharks and Crusaders are on a different planet compated to the Stormers, but the Stormers early wins have allowed them the advantage of an extra week off and a home play-off.

    The question is: Will this be enough to ward off the assaults of clearly superior teams in the form of the Sharks and Crusaders?

    Personally, I don’t think it will.

  • 60.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-59:

    compared to

  • 61.stew: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-59: It will come down to travel fatigue – unfortunately this will be a bridge to far for the Sharks

  • 62.pokkel: Reply to this comment

    @RainbowBanana(RainbowBanana)-57:

    Sharks team was just announced on sharksrugby.co.za

  • 63.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman(katman)-42:
    :lol:

  • 64.Sharks fans are genuine Bok supporters: Reply to this comment

    On present form I can see the Stormers being well beaten by any one of the Bulls, Sharks, Crusaders, Chiefs, Brumbies….and even Rebels.

    The Stormers are hanging on by a very thin rope that’s fast shredding.

  • 65.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-59:
    you rate the sharks too highly

  • 66.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    @stew(stew)-61:

    Well I tend to agree with you about the unairness of this system then. If it ultimately proves impossible for a 5th or 6th placed team to ever win the competition, due to having to travel backwards and forwards between continents in three consecutive weeks, then they should rather scrap the 6 team play-offs and limit it to 4 semifinalists only.

  • 67.RainbowBanana: Reply to this comment

    @pokkel(pokkel)-62: Thanks! The same Bulldozing teams as last week.

  • 68.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-66:

    unairness = unfairness.

  • 69.Charging Rhino: Reply to this comment

    As a Sharks supporter I’d far prefer to play the Brumbies than the Crusaders in a play-off match.
    First things first though… let’s qualify then start talking about play-offs. Anything can happen still with the Bulls and Sharks being replaced by the Hurricanes and Reds. Unlikely but nothing is certain yet. Except for Chiefs and Stormers.

    The Sharks or Bulls could still finish in 4th and host a play-off. If the Crusaders lose. There are so many different outcomes that could occur really.

  • 70.stormersboy: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-59: You think? I think that the Stormers have been more consistant than anyone.

    We’ve won more, and by a similar margin each time.

  • 71.sharks_lover: Reply to this comment

    12 July 2012 (14:16) – The Sharks team named to play the Cheetahs at Mr Price KINGS PARK on Saturday was delayed to allow for late fitness tests on Pat Lambie, Willem Alberts and Jacques Botes, with all selected in the Match 22.
    The team to take on the Cheetahs in this final pool match of the Vodacom Super Rugby tournament – before the Final Series – includes Lambie at fullback in place of Louis Ludik who plays off the bench, alongside the returning Alberts and Botes who have all been passed fit.

    Pieter-Steph du Toit who left the field in the first half of last week’s match with an ankle injury has been bracketed in with Jean Deysel amongst the reserves, as have the backline duo of Meyer Bosman and Paul Jordaan. Jandre Marais will start at lock with Steven Sykes not declared fit yet and du Toit still not cleared. There are no other changes to the team that beat the Bulls last week.

    The Cheetahs gave the South African Conference leading Stormers a proper run for their money last weekend and no doubt will prove competitive in this final match for them. With no way of finishing in the top six, this will be their last hurrah before the Absa Currie Cup and with a couple of players leaving for a taste of European rugby, they will want to finish on a high.

    For The Sharks, come kick-off time, they will have a good idea of what is needed to secure a place in the qualifiers with the Reds and Hurricanes both within touch and with a last gasp chance to secure a valuable top six finish.

    There is no doubt that this match will have an important bearing on the way the pool stages finish, with a nail-biting wait to see the outcome of the Bulls-Lions match in the final game of the weekend.

    The Sharks:

    1. Tendai Mtawarira
    2. Craig Burden
    3. Jannie du Plessis
    4. Jandre Marais
    5. Anton Bresler
    6. Keegan Daniel ( C )
    7. Marcell Coetzee
    8. Ryan Kankowski
    9. Charl McLeod
    10. Frederic Michalak
    11. Lwazi Mvovo
    12. Francois Steyn
    13. Tim Whitehead
    14. JP Pietersen
    15. Patrick Lambie

    Replacements:
    16. Bismarck du Plessis
    17. Wiehahn Herbst
    18. Pieter-Steph du Toit / Jean Deysel
    19. Willem Alberts
    20. Jacques Botes
    21. Meyer Bosman / Paul Jordaan
    22. Louis Ludik

  • 72.willievz: Reply to this comment

    I’ve tried to list the 6 teams who I think will end up in the knockouts, and their competitive advantages:

    Chiefs and Brumbies – best coaching staff
    Stormers – best defense
    Sharks – most depth
    Crusaders & Bulls – most experience of knockout games

    Gents, we are in for a treat of a finish

  • 73.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    @stormersboy(stormersboy)-70:

    Consistently unimpressive, yes. Scraping through each game, whether against strong teams or against the Lions or Cheetahs.

    At no stage have the Stormers looked as good as the Crusaders or Sharks look now. And they seem to be regressing each game, rather than improving.

  • 74.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-73:

    Scraping through each game led them to the Conference title…

  • 75.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    Bring vir die, Harlekuin nog wyn,
    Rooiwyn, vir sy lag en traan en puin,
    Hy wys ons, die nuwe wind wat waai,
    Van die Vaal tot, onder in Saldanhabaai.

    Bring vir die, Harlekuin nog wuin.
    Doe, doewha, doe, doewha.
    Rooiwyn, vir sy lag en traan en puinn.
    Doe, doewha, doe, doewha.
    Hy wys ons, die nuwe wind wat waai.
    Doe, doewha, doe, doewha.
    Van die Vaal tot, onder in Saldanhabaai.
    Doe, doewha, doe, doewha.

  • 76.Sharks fans are genuine Bok supporters: Reply to this comment

    Stormers will fall out. They look fragile and running out of players. No depth whatsoever.

    Prepare for Cape Town to go into mourning in a few weeks.

  • 77.John Galt: Reply to this comment

    @sharks_lover(sharks_lover)-71:
    Good looking side that. Very strong bench.
    Except for Botes.

    Would rather have PSDT and Deysel there and drop Botes entirely. His time has come to make way for the youngsters.

  • 78.stormersboy: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-73: Oh so when you said most consistent you actually meant to say most impressive then?

    Oh OK, sorry, my bad.

    My mind reading powers are waning.

    In spite of my wife’s high expectations of them….. ;)

  • 79.stormersboy: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-73: Ja that game 2 games ago when we beat the Bulls was a really kuk game by us. Things are just going from bad to worse…..

    We should have thumped such a loser team by much more…..

  • 80.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-73: It seems you are getting ready to climb on the Sharks mini-bus if the Bulls Quantum rolls off the road?

    I love the way you Bulls and Sharks astro-travel between Durban and Pta (depending on which team is winning)…..You’re the best, no you’re the best, no you’re the best.
    Get some of this rock hard generic Viagra kak being advertised on this website you limp willied prairie dogs.

  • 81.willievz: Reply to this comment

    And some people still wonder why the Bulls are such a hated team, in all corners of the world :roll:

  • 82.wpstormerbok: Reply to this comment

    LOL @ cry baby Tacitus

    I’d rather support the ‘lucky’ Stormers than a team who just got whipped 4 times in their last 5 games.

    Eina

  • 83.stew: Reply to this comment

    For the Stormers supporters

    In Wellington the Hurricanes have a much better record against the Chiefs as they have played them 9 times and won 6 – or 66 % of their matches against the men from Waikato.

    However all six of those matches have been won in the last six clashes and the Chiefs have not beaten the Hurricanes in Wellington in 11 years as their last positive result was a 27-51 victory in May 2001.

  • 84.Sharks fans are genuine Bok supporters: Reply to this comment

    The Sydney Morning Herald refers to the Stormers as ‘dour’.

  • 85.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.(The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food)-80:

    Tegnikus believes naively that if he talks up the Sharks on a blog then the attention/spotlight will move to the Sharks

    Im not sure what the rest of permutations are, but one thing is guaranteed: in that simulation the Bulls lift the trophy

    PS – why are you so harsh?

  • 86.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Sharks fans are genuine Bok supporters(Predawn)-84: And that chap on Re-union referred to the Sharks as ‘mentally weak’.

    Next….

  • 87.Sasuke: Reply to this comment

    @line break(line break)-58: chiefs? stormers? brumbies?

    if the sharks and the crusaders were the best sides in the tournament then they would have been no 1 and no 2.

  • 88.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.(The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food)-86:

    But who are the game breakers in that awesome Sharks team?

    Freddie Wie-se luck?

  • 89.Gumboots: Reply to this comment

    The Stormers getting all the attention again… Shame that is what happens when you are tops…

    :lol: Some supporters really…

  • 90.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Sheriff(Sheriff)-88: I think you should ask the Shark’s poster boy Pre-*** about that…

    If you really want my opinion on the Shark’s gamebreakers though, I would have to say: Craig Joubert and Jaco Peyper.

  • 91.wpjoulekkading: Reply to this comment

    Everyone can go on happily predicting the Stormers demise. Its been that case since the start of the season, if I had 10 bucks for everyone on here saying “Stormers will fall apart soon”, “wait until that game” etc etc I would be able to buy a losie at Newlands.

    Us true province fans will just keep watching and enjoying the games, knowing that we have a good chance to finally win a Super title. Indeed we would prefer it if you keep making us into the underdogs, every time in recent history the Stormers was touted as favorites they lost composure and blew it, so please, keep writing them off.

  • 92.stormersboy: Reply to this comment

    @Gumboots(Gumboots)-89: Jealousy makes you, well many things. None of them pleasant.

  • 93.Gumboots: Reply to this comment

    @stormersboy(stormersboy)-92:

    Psychology says you will always criticize a threat! I love it…

  • 94.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.(The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food)-90:

    Someone once said that the Sharks are chokers?

    And to be fair, I think we’ve seen it a few times at the business end of the competition

  • 95.Sasuke: Reply to this comment

    Bismarck on the bench. Risky

  • 96.Gumboots: Reply to this comment

    Don’t the prophets of doom ever feel embarassed to come online and then still try and predict. They are always proved wrong, yet come back to open another can of whoopass. They look really foolish and lose credibility too… No names mentioned…

  • 97.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @wpjoulekkading(wpjoulekkading)-91:
    And all you strompies told us game after game “wait till our brokebackline click, then you’ll see.” We’re still waiting.

  • 98.Sharks fans are genuine Bok supporters: Reply to this comment

    Na the premier chokers are the lads from Cape Town. Choked against The Sharks in the Currie Cup final, The Bulls in the Super 15 final….next.

  • 99.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    I guess the ‘chokers’ concept resonated with you

    You just had to come and defend yourself

  • 100.wpjoulekkading: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-97:

    Generalize all you want, I never said that. And think about what you people are saying? You seem to suggest the Stormers players should do much better than they are, that they have more quality than that. So just how good do you think the Stormers are then?

    And another thing, guess all you “brokeback” jokers must either be homophobic or *** yourselves.

  • 101.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    The problem with Sharks fans is this: they think they’re from England

  • 102.Sharksgirl: Reply to this comment

    @RainbowBanana(RainbowBanana)-57: Sharks team has been announce Bissie is on bench as well as Alberts. Lambie is at 15, but then there is a thread on this :)

  • 103.Gumboots: Reply to this comment

    @Sharksgirl(Sharksgirl)-102:

    Oh good news: Bissie not injured if on the bench…

  • 104.Biscuit: Reply to this comment

    A correction or 2 for the predicters above
    * 5 points for the Sharks and Bulls will guarantee the side getting 5 points a playoff place. So 5 points won”t probably see them through. It will definitely do so

    * The Sharks or Bulls can lose out even if they get 4 points IF
    - the Reds get 5 points (regardless of margin) (Reds will have more wins) and/or
    - the Canes get 5 points AND trump the PD of the Sharks or Bulls. The Canes are 12 PD behind the Sharks and 29 PD behind the Bulls

    The Sharks will know almost all the results but 1 when they play. The Bulls will know them all.

    I cant see the Sharks or Bulls trying to game the result by aiming for 6th.
    Get 5 points and get on the plane. (Unless the Saders lose)
    Neither game is a gimme. The SHarks and Bulls could lose.

    I am hoping that neiher the Reds nor the Canes get 5 points meaning that the Sharks and Bulls just need to focus on the win

  • 105.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    Here’s how I check if someone is a Sharks fan in SA:

    I say to them: say ‘piano’

    If they say ‘ pee-ha- no’ then its prolly a Bull or Lions fan

    If they pronounce the ‘a’ soft then I know its a Rhodesian Sharks fan

    ‘Police’ is another one, if they say ” Poo-lease ‘ then but if they say ‘Pleece’ then …

  • 106.Sharksgirl: Reply to this comment

    @Sheriff(Sheriff)-101: If we lived in Cape Town maybe, but living with our magnificent climate, especially in winter, I think that would be a little difficult. We are still tanning and we are in July :lol:

  • 107.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @wpjoulekkading(wpjoulekkading)-100:
    Geez, did I touch a nerve?

    Anyway, got my tickets for Saterday.
    Looking forward to see the Bulls making the playoffs (better than last year)
    And it will be the last time I’ll see the Lions in Super Rugby
    Rather them than the Kings (nê Transie)

  • 108.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Gumboots(Gumboots)-96: Retardation does have it’s benefits…the inability to feel any sort of shame or embarrassment being just one of them :)

    I wish there was some sort of EQ test people could be forced to complete and pass before blogging. Then again, who on earth would advertise on this site if “Rock Hard p e nile support” lost it’s core market…(Fern, Pre ***, Taccy , Hg and co)

  • 109.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @Sharksgirl(Sharksgirl)-106:

    There may be other reasons why there is that false belief; see post 105

  • 110.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    @Biscuit(Biscuit)-104:

    Seriously. The Cheetahs have a defense like Swiss Cheese. Unless it’s a torrential downpour the Sharks shouldn’t have too much trouble getting 4 tries. Even if the Cheetahs score 3 tries in return.

    It is only teams with zero attacking capability like the Stormers who struggle to score 4 tries against the Cheetahs.

    The Bulls put 60 past them in Bloem, and scored 4 tries by halftime at Loftus.

  • 111.wpjoulekkading: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-107:
    No nerves, I just say it like I see it. But you might have born the brunt of my response to the collective anti stormers sentiment from some of the other comments also, sorry of that :D

  • 112.THE MAULER: Reply to this comment

    @ Sherrif 105… And ask a Stormer supporter to say ” Jakkals” and it will be ” Jacques Kallas”…

  • 113.Gumboots: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.(The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food)-108:

    Absolutely! Don’t some people have any pride though! Thickness is not a sickness… or is it?

  • 114.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-110: And it’s only against the best defence in the competition that the Cheetahs fail to score even one try…..

  • 115.Gumboots: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.(The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food)-114:

    Sit back and enjoy! :lol:

  • 116.Sharksgirl: Reply to this comment

    @Gumboots(Gumboots)-103: yes I am extremely happy, but worried that they may be rushing him in so we can make play offs, and we all know Bissie he whants to play. We will need him if we make it so hope he is ready!

  • 117.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    *********SPESIAAL VIR TEGNIKUS ******************

    As jy bang is vir die donker, steek ek nog ‘n kers aan vir jou …

  • 118.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @THE MAULER(THE MAULER)-112:

    Want Jacques Kallis issie Kaap-se-allles ou pel

  • 119.Sharksgirl: Reply to this comment

    @Sheriff(Sheriff)-109: ahh!!!

  • 120.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.(The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food)-114:

    Yes, yes, well done on that.

    We all know how much pride you take in Dewaldt Duvenage hollering at his props to get up and “assume the position” non-stop for 80 minutes like Makyaha Ntini doing is cattle herder impression out from long-off.

    But you’re gonna need a tad more than Brok bouncing up like a rubber ball after a Duvenage ***-slap to charge off to the next tackle, if you wanna beat the Crusaders or Sharks in the play-offs.

    Like you found out against the Crusaders and Sharks the last time you played them.

  • 121.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Gumboots(Gumboots)-113: Pride you say? You realise what species of cretin you are talking about here don’t you?
    How much pride can one possibly have when your breakfast is still stuck on your chin at 13:00, and the sh y te stained toilet paper you used when trying to wipe your b u t t this morning, is trailing out of your jogger shorts at 15:00…..(a la Fern and Pre- ***)

    (And the dog poo you managed to stumble in at 11:00am has crusted on your toes as it seeped through the air holes on your crocs….)

    Pride? :)

  • 122.THE MAULER: Reply to this comment

    @ 118 Sherrif hehe touche

  • 123.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @wpjoulekkading(wpjoulekkading)-111:
    I won’t make the “brokeback” jokes again
    But you have to admit, the rest of the republic think it’s k@k funny

  • 124.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @THE MAULER(THE MAULER)-122:

    You must learn to click on the arrows on the right hand side…

    Do you really think people type out all of that every time and then underline it?

    Between you and me: I really dislike these long type of nicks, bad taste if you ask me

  • 125.heboric: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-120: Well least the Stormers B side didnt lose against the Blues – Whoopass

  • 126.Hoops: Reply to this comment

    TAc

    Ohhh gawd no no….we are hanging on only just…..while your Bulls are stampeding towards the play offs with an excellent 1/5 games win ratio that leaves the opposition shattered in fear…….

    What will the Stormers do??????? They have been playing play off rugby the whole season….nothing will change come match day!

    Fact is the press are keeping the bulls in the run……but truthfully the bulls should be written off as also ran……..if the stormers were 1/5 all would write them off……..but not this mighty favorite bulls side….it was over for the stormers when we lost to the sharks with a b team, but all we heard was our bubble burst………..

    The bulls bubble never materialized!!!!!

  • 127.THE MAULER: Reply to this comment

    Sherrif iPhone doesn’t have that option…

  • 128.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @THE MAULER(THE MAULER)-127:

    Neither does it have a spell check it seems – ‘ SHERIFF’

    One ‘r’ and 2 x ‘f”

  • 129.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    Take this nick for instance: ‘ The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions’

    Someone with a nick as long as that has something to hide

  • 130.Biscuit: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-110:

    Hope you are right Tac.

    If it works out in the Top 4 as it should then 6th place goes to Canberra and 5th place to Christchurch

    The Top 2 positions may flip as well.
    If the Chiefs get 4 then the Stormers need 5 to go top on No of Wins

  • 131.THE MAULER: Reply to this comment

    Oh it does… Took it off to type in Afrikaans and it always wants to correct you with an english word… Sheriff…

  • 132.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    @Biscuit(Biscuit)-130:

    Chiefs
    Stormers
    Brumbies
    Bulls
    Sharks

    That’s how I think it will end.

  • 133.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-132:

    With the Crusaders between the Brumbies and the Bulls, of course.

  • 134.William Webb Ellis is now at home: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-132: Reds will pip the Shorks Tac..

  • 135.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-120: I struggle to take your rugby comments seriously, because of the blind ‘Meyer is THE miracle we need’ hero worshiping you have exhibited.
    Benefit of the doubt was granted, until you explained the masterful coaching logic behind Pierre Spies’s ‘death rattle stop’ before taking contact followed by an essay on Spies’s Usain Bolt legs.
    After that, well anything you say, can and will be held against you going forward.

    PS: Do you read Tarot cards, tea leaves or cat sh y te in a litter to predict the future? If you are so sure of the way this tournament is going to end – put some serious money on it :)

  • 136.Sharksgirl: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.(The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food)-121: Okai now you have gone too far!!!! you have put some pictures in my head that are going to keep me awake tonight! What did I do to you :evil: :grin:

  • 137.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.(The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food)-135:

    Sweetie, if I took anything rugbyrelated you said seriously, then I would need to get my head read.

  • 138.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    History lesson Thursday 12 July 2012

    When Jan van Riebeeck arrived in //Hui! Gaeb in 1652 he bought the following from Harry the Beachcomber:

    10 kg biltong
    10 kg droë wors
    10 kg samoosas
    10 kg bokkoms

    Jan paid off his debt over 3 months

  • 139.Biscuit: Reply to this comment

    @William Webb Ellis is now at home(poppa69)-134:

    That can happen IF
    * The Reds get 5 points against the Waratahs AND
    * The Sharks only get 4 or less

    OR the
    * The Reds win AND
    * The Sharks lose

    Reds may struggle to get 5 against the Tahs but I am pretty sure they will win

  • 140.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Sharksgirl(Sharksgirl)-136: Well on the upside…at least you will know what to look out for at KP should you ever feel the need to ‘meet and greet’ Fern, HG and PreDawn on the B field after a Sharks game :)

  • 141.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-137: Whether you take anything I say seriously or not is of little importance to me – but I would STILL suggest you follow through with the “getting your head read’ thingy done.
    Do it.
    Soon you will be leaving your home without pepper gas. You will be smiling at people who don’t look like you. You will be buying Linkin Park’s latest album (brilliant).
    Just do it.

  • 142.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.(The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food)-108: i suspect Pissant is involved in these Maxidor and Rock hard adverts, he is always here telling us that in SA rugby’s biggest target market is the 50 + year old white male – the likely buyers of the stuff.

    talk about catering to the market on keo :roll:

  • 143.Pee Wee: Reply to this comment

    I love how Tacticus makes as if the Stormers – at Newlands – will be an easier prospect than any other in the playoffs. Its actually the reverse – we’d love the Pinksters at Newlands. Your hate for anything WP/Stormers is obvious. Your mighty Bulls couldn’t beat the WP Vodacom Cup team at fortress Loftus.

    Another interesting fact is the band of brothers eminating in the Bull Shark corner. These poor souls take turns complementing each other – while totally ridiculing the Stormers. The log indicates just how foolish they are. That they have to gang up shows how desperate they’ve become! :)

  • 144.shooter: Reply to this comment

    What is that disease/ syndrome/ habit/ condition or whatever that kids have when one kid is getting all the attention. when attention switches to the aggrieved party – he is still unhappy and gets more petulant? Because underlying all the geraas there is really a different problem altogether?

    The Stormers are acting up alot lately. Shame mamma se kindjie. The idignation they are suffering at wanting to be the centre of attention because they are no 1 for now…. Now it looks like they can’t handle any comments anymore – don’t! say anything (negative) about the Stormers, but! don’t! also say anything about the Bulls or the Sharks. it’s really a problem.

    plenty of examples right here in this thread.

    **along with the usual disclaimer required for all the innocent Stormpies out there. You know who you are.

  • 145.William Webb Ellis is now at home: Reply to this comment

    @Biscuit(Biscuit)-139: thought that was the permutations with regards the reds…

    think the Cheetahs will prove very tough for the Sharks, especially with Bissie on the bench.. they may just provide the upset..

    cant see the reds beating the tahs by 5 either, but with Cooper back if they score one early then I think they will play expansively and try to accomplish it..

  • 146.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    Later

  • 147.William Webb Ellis is now at home: Reply to this comment

    @William Webb Ellis is now at home(poppa69)-145: by bonus point win I meant..

  • 148.heboric: Reply to this comment

    @Pee Wee(Pee Wee)-143: Ha Ha, “Band of Brothers” classic

  • 149.shooter: Reply to this comment

    :D :D :) :) :mrgreen:

    Let’s hope any of the three teams win the Final.

    Maybe Ryan can write an article on this tomorrow >

    Was the entire S15 a waste of time already or not?

  • 150.wpjoulekkading: Reply to this comment

    @shooter(shooter)-144:
    Shame all you want, you have the whole thing so backwards it’s actually funny.
    The Stormers fans are perfectly fine discussing anything else, but it’s you Sharky and Bully fans who can’t bear the thought of the Stormers doing well who try to consistently break down their achievements this season. Acting up a lot? The only ones acting up are bitter Bullys who miss Bakkies and Sharkies who thinks they are now the best because the crushed the Bulls.
    And i don’t even care, go ahead. But then YOU get to wear the whiny mamma se kindjie flag, cmon, you are earning it.

  • 151.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-142: Bad news for SARU and the ‘Rock Hard’ ***** company…the times they are a changing :)

  • 152.Pee Wee: Reply to this comment

    Shooter jy k@k die pot mis bru! :)

    The Bulls supporters can’t handle being average. It happens bru so they have to live with it. The Bulls have been up for a couple of years and are experiencing mid table mediocrity for now. The Sharks on the other hand………………….. have always been average. :)

  • 153.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    crusaders will lose to the force

    you heard it here

  • 154.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Pee Wee(Pee Wee)-152: peewee, did you already finish your glass of stfu?

    :lol:

    stop being a stroker and just enjoy your teams success lol.

    fark some of you stormers fans are being so precious today!

    why do you care if the sharks and bulls respect each other?

  • 155.shooter: Reply to this comment

    @Pee Wee(Pee Wee)-152: scoring two (or was it three) tries in the whole season. is just about average :)

    the Sharks and Bulls are in process of building a new invincible team – can you excuse us for awhile – Springbok team…that is.

    Thanks

  • 156.NoRugbyGuru_0_: Reply to this comment

    Tacticus is such ai ignorat f00l. The Bulls lost 4 of their last 5 games and still he believes Bulls have better chance than Stormers.

    Captain farking can of whoopass himself said Piere Spies should play Fullback when his not playing well at 8th man.

    Plonker of note.

  • 157.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @NoRugbyGuru_0_(RugbyGuru_0_)-156: easy with the namecalling NRG :D

  • 158.NoRugbyGuru_0_: Reply to this comment

    I reckon Tac should skip rugby for a while and rather watch DSTV box office.

    I pray to the rugby Gods that Lions beat the Bulls this weekend.

    I will cut of my left testicle and dance in the rain.

  • 159.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    Maevis just called, she hasn’t seen Gunther for 3 days
    I told her to look under the bed, she did, he’s not there
    I said “Look again, he’s a tricky b@sterd”. He is still not there
    His Picanto is parked in the driveway

    Where in the world is Gunther?

  • 160.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @NoRugbyGuru_0_(RugbyGuru_0_)-158:
    seriously..your left testicle..seriously..?
    :lol:

  • 161.NoRugbyGuru_0_: Reply to this comment

    I will cut it off with a butter knife while reading Tac’s biased Bulls comments :-)

  • 162.NoRugbyGuru_0_: Reply to this comment

    I will call my left testicle the “lucky stormer” and give it to Tacticus to eat ;-

    And no, I won’t do any manscaping.

  • 163.Atreides: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus(Deucalion)-59: What you meant to say is “Please please please dear god don’t let it”

    I do hope for you, as a Bulls fan and a saffer that the Bulls can pull it off and make the final. But I shudder to imagine the depths of despair & anguish you will suffer if we beat you for a 3rd time….

    ;)

  • 164.Atreides: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.(The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food)-80: I don’t think it;s a viagra replacement…I believe it’s meant to reduce the recovery time between, um, rounds….a good mate of mine tried it and said it worked like a charm, but gave him a severe headache lol

  • 165.AssassinWP: Reply to this comment

    No NZ referees selected for the Rugby Championship,strange

  • 166.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @NoRugbyGuru_0_(RugbyGuru_0_)-162:
    tac would never eat a stormer’s testicle…never…

  • 167.Pypkan: Reply to this comment

    Tacticus

    Gun die Stormers ‘n plekkie in die son man. Die Stormers het seker meer guts as enige ander span in die reeks gewys hierdie jaar. Die jong, uitgedunde span wat die Bulle op Loftus geklop het het baie karakter gewys.

    Die Stormers het 87% van hulle wedstryde gewen teenoor die Bulls en die Sharks se 60% elk, so ek dink dit is uiters oneerlik en arrogant om dit aan geluk toe te skryf. Dis eerder die Bulls en die Sharks wat hulleself gelukkig kan ag om met hulle bonuspunte(4 driee en verloor bonuspunte) nog in die prentjie te wees.

    Die Bulls sal weer opstaan, hulle is ‘n goeie span met ‘n fantastiese kultuur, en is nog nie uit die reeks nie, al dink baie dit is te laat vir hulle. Hulle is goeie spelers en goeie mense en ek wens hulle alles van die beste toe.

    Maar met elke kommentaar wat jy hier lewer probeer jy ‘n goedkoop houtje inkry om vir almal te vertel hoe sleg en gelukkig die Stormers was.
    Dit raak nou vervelig ou Tacticus.

  • 168.William Webb Ellis is now at home: Reply to this comment

    @AssassinWP(Ashraf Ismail)-165: what will Saffa crybabies blame then when NZ win it?

  • 169.Atreides: Reply to this comment

    @NoRugbyGuru_0_(RugbyGuru_0_)-156: Well look, I don’t agree that Spies has no vision or can’t read a game…..he can spot the slightest hint of a physical threat from 20 meters away and make sure he either gives it a wide berth, or just collapse like a head-shot gazelle

  • 170.Atreides: Reply to this comment

    @Pypkan(Pypkan)-167: Dis al van februarie-af vervelig

  • 171.Kea-Cat: Reply to this comment

    The big question is, can the Bulls beat the Lions, the team that beat the mighty Sharks who thumped the kak Bulls who lost to the super kak Stormers C team.
    What are the chances, who’s the ref?

  • 172.Atreides: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-159: He’s been in Mavericks since Friday night. Handcuffed himself to stripper pole and told them to keep the pink drinks coming

  • 173.NoRugbyGuru_0_: Reply to this comment

    @ bakkies,

    Well then I will tie him down, and all of us can play beer pong with my left testicle :-)

    Aim of the game, bounch my ball in Tac’s mouth.

    Teabag point.

    The rest down their beer.
    :-)

  • 174.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-166:

    It would be so small, he’d need a tweezer to pick it up

  • 175.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @NoRugbyGuru_0_(RugbyGuru_0_)-173:

    No Rock Hard for you eh?

    You’re more the target market for Cinnamon Ring flavored KY?

  • 176.William Webb Ellis is now at home: Reply to this comment

    @NoRugbyGuru_0_(RugbyGuru_0_)-173: you want to teabag tac? how ummm unusual

    I think youre on the wrong site, you should try

    realmendrinktea.co.za

  • 177.NoRugbyGuru_0_: Reply to this comment

    @ victoriabok,

    Tac is that you?

  • 178.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Atreides(Atreides)-163:

    Die Bulle suig donkie hierdie jaar, ons kan net swak spanne wen

    FL is besig om ons span op te foeter sonder HM wat oor sy skouer kyk, en hom elke Maandag ‘n PK te gee sodat hy kan fokus

  • 179.Kea-Cat: Reply to this comment

    The Stormers have lost two games in 15 with a C team and they haven’t got depth, sometimes I wonder……………

  • 180.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @NoRugbyGuru_0_(RugbyGuru_0_)-177:

    No mate, he lives in the EC, I live out on the far, far West Coast

  • 181.NoRugbyGuru_0_: Reply to this comment

    @ poopsicle,

    With my amputated testicle.

    Shurrup or you’re next.
    :-)

  • 182.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @NoRugbyGuru_0_(RugbyGuru_0_)-181:

    We could always hold down ET and take his extra ball, Tac won’t know the difference?

  • 183.NoRugbyGuru_0_: Reply to this comment

    @ victoriabok,

    One ball in each hand.

    Double teabag points.

    You win the game.
    :-)

  • 184.William Webb Ellis is now at home: Reply to this comment

    @NoRugbyGuru_0_(RugbyGuru_0_)-181:

    reminds me of the woman at the Elmo factory, on her first day of a new job… production line was held up at her station.. here she was using marbles and sewing little bags between each Elmo dolls legs..

    her manager soon realised the confusion, and had to explain it was her job to give each new Elmo doll two “test tickles” :D

  • 185.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @Atreides(Atreides)-172:

    ;)

  • 186.Kea-Cat: Reply to this comment

    The Bulls will win on Saturday only because it’s at Loftus, then it’s off to play the Crusaders, shame, I suppose it has to happen when you are in 6th place and you are still in the play offs.

  • 187.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-185:
    Damn, I meant :)
    No more brokeback stuff

  • 188.wpjoulekkading: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-187: I’m watching you.. :D

  • 189.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @NoRugbyGuru_0_(RugbyGuru_0_)-173:
    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-174:

    there’s a lota balls being bandied about :lol:

  • 190.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-187:

    Why not, are you not in touch with you effeminate side?

  • 191.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-190
    Let’s leave my sides alone
    Dawn will be here soon telling us we are *** addicts
    HG and Hondo will be talking about butt f@cking

    We live in interesting times

  • 192.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    UFO, you will be happy to see Tim Swiel’s name on the bench for the U/21′s 1st game of the season :)

    DHL WP u21 Coach, John Dobson, announced his team to take on the MTN Golden Lions as follows:

    15. Craig Barry
    14. Damian de Allende
    13. JP du Plessis
    12. Michael van der Spuy
    11. Devon Williams
    10. Dillion Leyds
    9. Rick Schroeder
    8. Rayn Smid
    7. Jacques-Pier Swanepoel
    6. Beyers de Villiers
    5. Wilhelm van der Sluys
    4. Gerbrandt Grobler
    3. Francois van Wyk
    2. Skarra Ntubeni
    1. Ollie Kebble

    RESERVES:
    16. Stephan Coetzee
    17. Jacques Kotze
    18. James Kilroe
    19. Jody Reyneke
    20. Andries Truter
    21. Tim Swiel
    22. Clearance Khumalo

    Referee: Ben Crouse

  • 193.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    I just looked, I don’t have a effeminate side .

    Now I can use the

    ;)

  • 194.Hondo: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-191:
    I beg your pardon?
    I strictly discuss here rugby proper, selection, racial quota and refereeing

  • 195.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-193:

    You do, just bend over

  • 196.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.(The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food)-192:

    Gerbrandt Grobler?

    Any relation to his namesake?

  • 197.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @Hondo(Hondo)-194:

    I’m sorry. Humble apologies.
    Forgot you are the one with the refs

    No offence ment

  • 198.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-195:
    And kiss my watsisname goodbey

    Cheers and good riddince

  • 199.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-198:

    I meant “Cheers and. Goodbey”

  • 200.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-199:

    Goodbey?

    But don’t worry Boet, I’m not that way inclined either, it’s more a Brokeback thing

  • 201.Dawn: Reply to this comment

    Kukpraat!

  • 202.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-200:
    Funny
    Goodbey as in Sound of Music (I have no idea what. That meens)

    (I’m trying the Queen’s taal, give me some slack

    I told WPlekkerding no more brokeback jokes

    Geez. My phone internet is slow

  • 203.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-202:

    Why do the guys here always implying the Stormers and their fans are pansies and Brokebacks?

  • 204.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-203:

    sorry imply

  • 205.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-202:

    > I’m trying the Queen’s taal, give me some slack

    Ek hoop jy praat van Liesbet en nie die ander soort queen nie?

    Werk jy nog in die losie op Loftus?

  • 206.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-196:

    It appears as if he is not related to Gerbrandt. He does however look a bit like him and is also originally from Pretoria- check the link:

    http://www.beeld.com…brandt-20120119

  • 207.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Dawn(Dawn)-201:

    Hello Dawn, have you tried to make poutine yet?

  • 208.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim(Robzim)-206:

    Thanks, the original was ahead of his time, we weren’t used to attacking fullbacks back then

    The Loftus faithful used to call him “Sooibrand” (heartburn)

  • 209.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    Marriage councillor says to a couple,
    “Tell me something both of you
    have in common.”  

    Husband, after a long awkward silence pipes up sourly, “Well, neither of us sucks c.ock.”

  • 210.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-208:

    I remember him well- great player, also a good left hand fast bowler . If my memory serves me right he was in a car with Braam van Staden when they made an accident and he got killed.

  • 211.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther(gunther)-209:

    That could be a problem if the couple is from //Hui!Gaeb

  • 212.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim(Robzim)-210:

    With a couple of girls as well, he was a bit of a hound dog, but I guess that’s par for the course for cricket players

    Just ask Gibbs?

  • 213.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim(Robzim)-210:

    > also a good left hand fast bowler

    Yes, in today’s professional sports it would be rare to find a sportsman excelling in both rugby and cricket again

    Jeff Wilson was the last one I think?

  • 214.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-212:

    I think Herchelle might have raised the standard in that regard :)

  • 215.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim(Robzim)-210:
    Was he with Braam Van Straaten that played for the Stormers.

  • 216.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim(Robzim)-214:

    It’s not the only thing he raised…

  • 217.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-213: Rudie van Vuuren.

    Represented Namibia at the 2003 Cricket and Rugby World Cups.

  • 218.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay(Jeraldjay)-215:

    Braam played for the Bulls as well, he grew up in Pretoria

  • 219.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay(Jeraldjay)-215:

    Yes, the same guy.I think he lives in George now.

  • 220.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    @willievz(willievz)-217:
    Peter Kirsten was a good flyhalf.

  • 221.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-205:
    Haha
    Dis my losie
    Ek se wie kom of nie

  • 222.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay(Jeraldjay)-220:

    Brian McMillan would have made a good flanker ;-)

  • 223.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-221:

    Bulls Babes ja of nee?

  • 224.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-213:

    Herchelle was also an absolute brilliant flyhalf while at school- made the SA schools team.

    He attended the same famous school in Cape Town as Robbie Fleck, Tim Noakes …and the Keo blogger called Coach Pete :)

  • 225.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim(Robzim)-219:
    That his hectic because Braam was the first person to find Ge Korsten dead in his holiday house in the Wilderness.

  • 226.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim(Robzim)-224:

    Wasn’t Vlok Celliers a good cricketer as well?

  • 227.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay(Jeraldjay)-225:

    Stay far away from Braam then? :-?

  • 228.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    “Kom of nie” is seker nie die regte woorde vir die site nie

    Welcome Gunther
    Hiding in tje spare room I see

  • 229.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay(Jeraldjay)-225:

    Hectic indeed, I think Braam runs a guess house together with his wife in George. She is from the Southern Cape, a very beautiful woman I have to add.

  • 230.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-226:

    Not sure about Vlok but I won’t be surprised.

  • 231.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim(Robzim)-229:
    Braam is a top guy. Very religious. Was kicking consultant for the Wallabies last year.

  • 232.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay(Jeraldjay)-231:

    Indeed that’s why he was an ace kicker.

    The big guy parted the Red Sea.

    Compared to that a little pesky crosswind is nothing.

  • 233.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther(gunther)-209:
    snaaks

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-211:
    baie snaaks

    :lol:

  • 234.Dawn: Reply to this comment

    Poutine not on my bucket list

  • 235.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-221:
    en wat van jou oom?

  • 236.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther(gunther)-232:
    I’ll turn to religion if I went through the tough times he had to get through. Hectic.

  • 237.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-233:

    Bly jy ook in Kaapstad?

    Ken jy dalk die vrou?

    Sy’s fugly maar sy’s definitief nie lui nie

    http://www.rapport.co.za/Suid-Afrika/Nuus/600-keer-seks-Jou-siek-liegbek-20120630

  • 238.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay(Jeraldjay)-225:
    are you joking..? :lol:

    because he emptied his bucket more than 20 years ago. what was braam doing out in the wilderness 20 more years ago?

  • 239.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim(Robzim)-224:

    Eton lite?

  • 240.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther(gunther)-239:

    :-)

  • 241.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-238:

    Die emmer geskop?

  • 242.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-238:
    No joke Bakkies. It happened in 1999.

  • 243.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-237:
    :lol:
    ja ek bly in die kaap maar nee ek ken haar nie, maar ken van haar. sy’s blykbaar n skatryke weduwee.
    ek sal geris n smile op haar dial sit

  • 244.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-207:

    She is struggling to find fresh curds.

    I suggest she milks Nikita .

  • 245.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-241:
    ja, self gedoen.

    @Jeraldjay(Jeraldjay)-242:
    ok, my mistake.
    i thought it was twenty years ago

  • 246.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-243:

    600 keer? ;-)

  • 247.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther(gunther)-244:

    Those little B-cups won’t produce much, it would have to be poutine on a Provita then

  • 248.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay(Jeraldjay)-242:
    can life sound any stranger than that?
    braam van straaten finds ge korsten dead…wow..?

  • 249.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    Well it wouldn’t be news if he found him alive now Bakkies would it?

    Head in the game.

  • 250.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-248:
    The reason why I brought it up was because in an earlier post Robzim said Braam was the passenger in the car when Gerbrand Grobler died.

  • 251.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-248:

    Strange yes, suspicious would be if Grant or Skoppie found Barney with a hotdog stuck in his throat

  • 252.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-223:

    Nee

  • 253.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-246:
    vir R400 per uur per sessie..?..
    terapie is terapie… :lol:

  • 254.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-252:

    Die vorige Babes was beter, die huidige klomp in nie so s-exy nie

  • 255.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-253:

    Betaal sy per duim?

    Of vir dienste gelewer?

  • 256.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther(gunther)-249:
    ag ja i know gunner,
    it’s just one of those moments where you get that ‘hair on the back, strange alien music, 6 degrees of reality’ feelings isn’t it.

    how the univers brought braam to ge’s doorstep, the day he died…

  • 257.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    Chiefs
    Brumbies
    Crusaders
    Reds
    Rebels
    Sharks
    Bulls

  • 258.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay(Jeraldjay)-250:
    yip
    i’m with you

  • 259.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-235:
    He joined the Somalies
    More profet than a losie

  • 260.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-256:
    If it wasn’t for Ge there’s no Liefling.

    And without Liefling the Bulls is just another rugby team.

  • 261.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-256:

    fark!

    there’s a farking movie script for clint eastwood right there

    seriously

  • 262.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay(Jeraldjay)-260:

    You’re right, we could do with Derrick right now

  • 263.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-255:
    :lol:

  • 264.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-261:

    Who would you cast as Gé and Braam?

  • 265.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-259:
    ok, he’s investing in the shipping industry?
    maybe its for the best

    @Jeraldjay(Jeraldjay)-260:
    :lol:

    fark, i’m telling you

    six degrees of reality right there

    the universe is a strange place

  • 266.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-264:
    fark, no idea but a part of me would love to steve hofmeyer in an emotional tear jerking drama of this sort

  • 267.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-262:
    derrick’s been trying to make the team since march

  • 268.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-266:

    Or Kurt Darren?

  • 269.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-267:

    We could do with his place kicking, Morne was too busy thinking about becoming a daddy

  • 270.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-261:

    > there’s a farking movie script for clint eastwood

    Go ahead Gé, make my day?

  • 271.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-268:
    :lol:

    its funny but i actually think he’d pull off a role in a clint eastwood tearjerker

    patricia lewis will sell her somoosa to get a part

  • 272.Airwell: Reply to this comment

    Bulls must learn to become physical again
    Bring back Danie and Bakkies please

  • 273.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-271:

    > patricia lewis will sell her somoosa to get a part

    Again?

    By now it’s probably so worn out it looks more like a taco

    Remember the Hoff also had an innings there?

  • 274.Airwell: Reply to this comment

    Bulls must learn to become physical again
    Bring back Danie and Bakkies please

  • 275.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Airwell(Airwell)-272:

    Yes, we need harde manne, these guys are good players without any malice or intention to do grievous bodily harm

    With the no-contact-I’m-a-virgin example Captain Spiere is giving them it’s no wonder

  • 276.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-273:
    :lol:

    wow! i feel like having a batch of t-shirts made with patricia’s face and the words ‘i hit the hoff’ printed on :lol:

    @Airwell(Airwell)-274:
    and gurthro,
    to deel with that naughty bismarck

  • 277.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-254:

    A girl like you would know
    What I meant was I don’t LIKE them
    The previos ones were provesional
    These are a bunch of students

  • 278.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-276:

    > of t-shirts made with patricia’s face and the words ‘i hit the hoff’

    Or shorts with “the hoff tapped this” across the a-ss

  • 279.Airwell: Reply to this comment

    Yes we miss Guthro too

  • 280.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-275:
    thats why they cancelled training sessions, for one-on-one’s with the head dokters.

    even mvovo and kankowski were throwing their weight around
    iets is nie reg nie

  • 281.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    Girl must be kid
    Sorry
    Haha

  • 282.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-277:

    Nee, Boet jy misgis jou, ek’s ‘n Blou Bul met die standaard issue drie horings

    Pro’s is altyd beter, as selfs die mees gemotiveerde, gewillige amateurs ;-)

  • 283.Airwell: Reply to this comment

    But to be fair to the Sharks they moered us fair and square and of all the SA teams IMO they have the best chance of winning The brokebacks have little chance

  • 284.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-278:
    :lol:

    winner, winner chicken dinner…

  • 285.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @Airwell(Airwell)-283:
    agreed.
    although the bulls lost i liked that game, because it was hard and fair.

    the kiwi game was hard and at pace but with the usual high degree of cheating just ruined it for me.

  • 286.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-280:

    We were like that long ago, between Burger, Adri and Pote’s retirement and before the Cronje’s, Bakkies and Danie

    Flip is the only so called “hard man” we have and he would pee his pants if Bakkies or Geo gave him a PK

  • 287.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-284:

    Thanks, it tastes more like fish though :-?

  • 288.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-282:
    Kanada?

  • 289.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Airwell(Airwell)-283:

    The way they played they would have beaten anyone on the day, but we didn’t turn up for the game anyway

    Too busy thinking about their outfits and hairdo’s for the July

  • 290.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-288:

    Ja

  • 291.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-288:
    Ek vra net
    Het so paar ekstra losie kaartjies

    My foon is moer stadig. Sug

  • 292.Nils: Reply to this comment

    Stormers will top the table but final will be in Hamilton thanks to Crusaders.

  • 293.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-286:
    hehe
    flip would have to write a 500 word essay on the effects of a pk from geo…after getting a pk from geo… if bakkies tolf him to… because if you dont do what bakkies tells you to…well…

  • 294.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-290:
    Dit moet seker suig in die winter
    On the other hand Darren I’ve never seen snow

  • 295.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @Nils(Nils)-292:
    i got a feeling the force will ruin a party

  • 296.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-291:

    Hulle behoort darem die Lions te wen en dan is alles weer hunkie dorie

    Dan speel hulle teen die Crusaders in Kiwiland, en hulle gaan aan ons doen wat die Sharks aan ons gedoen het, die enigste verskil is dit sal al klaar gedaan wees in die eerste helfte

    En die Crusaders gaan na rustyd hul beurt gesluit verklaar en hulle reserwes instuur om verder te kolf…

    Die ouens het maar kort geheues, ons het met ‘n baie beter span, met Heyneke as afrigter, (ek gaan nie eers probeer om hom met Ludeke te vergelyk nie), twee keer weg semi’s gespeel, een keer in Nz en die ander in Aus en altwee verloor

  • 297.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    Let em keep thinking they got all the aces stacked up under their pienk or black and white lace petticoats .. or the other bunch of premonitory predators with their fangs all bared for a dynamic killing

    they are simply jealous as hell thinking where their beloved brekers are sitting in comparison to where the quiet and resilient bunch in Stormy Valley are preparing for the last series of showdowns.

  • 298.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-291:

    > My foon is moer stadig. Sug

    Wat se foon is dit, is dit ‘n smartphone

    Of ‘n dom foon?

  • 299.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-293:

    He won’t survive a PK from Bakkies

  • 300.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-294:

    Nee dit sneeu nie veel hier nie, reën net moer baie die hele winter lank

  • 301.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-294:

    > On the other hand Darren I’ve never seen snow

    Jy mis nie veel nie, dis wit en koud soos ‘n Skandinawiese koekie ;-)

  • 302.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-294:
    hoekom nie?
    daars baie plekke in sa om dit te doen
    klein winterberge in winter
    jy kan vir jou sneeumannetjie’s laat maak en sneeubal vegte met jou kinders het.

  • 303.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-301:
    :lol:

    ek hou van koekies, in die winter

    kan dit heel dag eet

    true story

    :lol:

  • 304.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    ek het al Skandinawie se koekie geproe en ek vertel jou ietsie.. dis glad nie yslik en koud soos witse sneeu nie… al lyk dit miskien so.

  • 305.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-303:

    Soos ‘n mango?

    Of hou jy van die bald eagle?

  • 306.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    ok i’m out,
    cheers to the beers
    :grin:

  • 307.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-300:
    Die nuwe Blackberry, maar dit suig
    Stem. Half saam. Ek dink ons gaan teen die Crucheete wen nie

    Ek dink. Nie ons sal dit. Maak. Nie in die uitspeel games. Nie

    Maar dit beter as verlede jaar

  • 308.Nils: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-295: Nope, Crusaders smell blood, they will not let that one slip. I’d be tempted to say politcorrectly it will be hard fought win but no, it won’t.

    I’d rather guess Chiefs, Brumbies and Sharks to stumble.

  • 309.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella(fitz1ella)-304:

    Ha ha, mooi so Oom Skop!

    There’s still some life in the old dog eh? ;-)

  • 310.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella(fitz1ella)-304:
    hehe
    hoe lekker proe koekies wat jy self versier het, fitz?

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-305:
    :lol:

    vaarvan praat jy, vic?

    ek gesels oor koeksisters en ouma’s beskuit..?… :lol:

  • 311.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-301:

    Koekie?
    Jy het nie my aandag nie

    Ek is seker hier is n paar ouens wat hulle lippe aflek

  • 312.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    Cheers Roundnes

  • 313.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @Nils(Nils)-308:
    probably true,
    looks like read’s iffy though.
    this could sink them later on.

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-309:
    hehehe
    die milljoen dollar vraag is: ‘watse soorte skandinawiese meisie sou vir skop haar lekker goie koekies gee..?..’ :lol:

    i’m just flushing your chain, skop
    i would bet you have nailed a lot of goddesses in your time
    nice

  • 314.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-313:

    but of course, i’m only talking about cookies
    :lol:

  • 315.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-312:
    ja, this time i mean it
    cheers

  • 316.galileo, roundness, union, coach...: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-311:
    vir n vars gebakte koekie… in winter..?..
    seriously?

    :lol:

    ok
    cheers for real

  • 317.Dawn: Reply to this comment

    Craptalk

  • 318.Nils: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-313: True, but Force don’t have Pocock. Much bigger loss. IMHO, he wouldn’t save them anyway.

  • 319.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-309:
    amper net.. dit was al n rukkie verlede maar ek onthou dit nog as n mooi prestasie van volle vrouelike liefde

  • 320.Nils: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-313: Yes, after Force every game is tricky, even at home. Can’t be sure about a thing anymore.

  • 321.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @galileo, roundness, union, coach…(i_love_u_bakkiesbotha)-316:
    Goeie nag. Net betuids. Hier is my Dawn

  • 322.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    Seriously? Are we being treated to tales of yet ANOTHER Skoppie conquest? You know what they say about guys who talk about it the most, nê?

    Skoppie, my bullshit detector is in very good working order,

  • 323.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    “Betuids” ?

  • 324.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-311:

    Wie se lippe word gelek?

  • 325.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman(katman)-322:
    No bumber fender in Benoni then I guess.

  • 326.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella(fitz1ella)-319:

    > dit was al n rukkie verlede maar ek onthou dit

    Mooi so!

  • 327.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Dawn(Dawn)-317:

    No, a couple of inches to the other side

  • 328.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    believe whatever you like there’s no brag here.. just some simple unenviable facts from some little while ago

  • 329.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella(fitz1ella)-328: And another great thing about senile dementia and altzheimers is that you get to hide your own easter eggs. Lucky you.

  • 330.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman(katman)-322:

    Gun die man sy stukkie

    Onthou hy was jonk in die Swinging Sixties toe die girls kort mini’s gedra het en lus was vir spyker

    In sy jongdae was Brigitte Bardot nog jonk en mooi genoeg om ‘n Bond meisie te wees

  • 331.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-330: Hy was nog steeds hy. En dis die beste vorm van voorbehoedmiddel ooit.

  • 332.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    I got a better memory than you and all your hopeful dreams all put together.. whats in the past remains right there .. in the past

  • 333.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella(fitz1ella)-328:

    Have you ever been to the Scandinavian countries?

  • 334.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    and it weren’t in the swinging sixties either.. quite sometime after that.

    .. klaar, subject closed .. this little Katmankant is simply jealous.. there ain’t nothing here to brag about even if others wanna latch onto their own incapacitated expectancy of fantasia.

  • 335.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella(fitz1ella)-332: fairly obvious statement.

    is that supposed to be profound?

    because its actually incorrect.

    you brought the “encounter” into the present by virtue of its mention.

    i wont thank you for that.

  • 336.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella(fitz1ella)-334: Never happened, you phony. If it weren’t for your dreamt up accomplishments here on keo, what would be left?

  • 337.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella(fitz1ella)-334: ok, ok settle old man settle.

    no need to explain yourself to anyone.

  • 338.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-333: met the woman in Frankfurt Germany.. haven’t been to any Scandinavian country less you refer to North Holland as close enough…. furthest north I’ve ventured is Orkney Isles off North coast of Scotland.

    enough about me and my wayward ventures… back to the debate about Stormers gonna moer either guppies of bulletjies whoever comes first.

  • 339.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    The Joelinator strikes again.

  • 340.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    skopshyte is a twat.

  • 341.KeurboomPark: Reply to this comment

    One month and no Klippies. Waht’s the use in getting sober if your bokkie breaks up with you. Skeen I’ll just celebrat ein style this Saturday when Stormers score 4 tries.

  • 342.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    i for one have never been with a scandinavian girl.

    polish yes but i dont think that counts.

  • 343.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella(fitz1ella)-338: Come on, tell us about all the Orkney poppies you pomped. Regale us with your lustful exploits, Cassanob.

  • 344.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @KeurboomPark(KeurboomPark)-341: :lol:

    you mean she only loved you for your klippies?

  • 345.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman(rangerman)-342:

    It counts if it was in a sauna.

    Double points if she beat you with a birch twig.

  • 346.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-324:
    Myne?
    Nice

    Gaan Saterdag die laaste Lions game in Super Rugby kyk
    Poor sods

    Watching Lettermen, he is a prick

  • 347.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    somebody mentioned Skandinawiese koekies which jolted my memory from around 1996.. so what’s so unsolicited and deplorable about that?

    How old were you in 1996 Katmankannadu and little Lord Fauntleroy Rangerpifflyprude?

  • 348.KeurboomPark: Reply to this comment

    en my titties :)

  • 349.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    @KeurboomPark(KeurboomPark)-341: the Stormers score 4 tries?

    :lol:

  • 350.KeurboomPark: Reply to this comment

    @wooden spoon(wooden spoon)-349:

    sorry 5

  • 351.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther(gunther)-345:
    Welcome back

  • 352.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    @KeurboomPark(KeurboomPark)-350: you have me rolling in tears now.

    Belly wobble guffaws all round.

  • 353.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther(gunther)-345: sadly no birch or saunas.

    it was an african encounter :lol:

  • 354.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    the third little prudent prick comes sauntering in all seething with envy and pernicious idiocy

    whats with all these little ponsefied prats brought up on daddies sugar cane farms?

  • 355.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    seriously, I wouldn’t mind the Brumbies getting 5, the Stormers getting zero and the Sharks getting 5.

    Stormers would probably be the easiest quarterfinal for the Sharks, by some way.

  • 356.KeurboomPark: Reply to this comment

    You can check me out when i strip kaal and jorl acrss Newlands on Saturdqy. Have your signs ready!

  • 357.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella(fitz1ella)-338:

    They say the Dutch and German girls are just as busy as the Scandinavians…

    > back to the debate about Stormers gonna moer either guppies of bulletjies whoever comes first.

    The Bulls started well this year with their inexperienced team all things considered, WHEN Heyneke was still with them and in charge and it looked if we might just have enough firepower to go all the way

    However with Frans in charge it took a turn for the worst and we won’t win a semi

    The Sharks had lots of injuries and started badly, they will be strong contenders, you better hope you don’t need to face them

  • 358.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @Atlas(Atlas)-351:

    Nkosi

    :lol:

  • 359.KeurboomPark: Reply to this comment

    Lighten up, Ouens, jissis, man. You sound like Connie Mulder with a carrot up his @rse.

  • 360.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella(fitz1ella)-354: what the hell are you on about?

    :lol:

  • 361.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @KeurboomPark(KeurboomPark)-359: Weet Connie jy praat so uit die slaapkamer uit?

  • 362.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman(rangerman)-342:

    Did she polish your Polish?

  • 363.KeurboomPark: Reply to this comment

    lolol. you just klapped me binne in my sterre, Katvis.

  • 364.KeurboomPark: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-362:

    Nuggeting your nougat?

  • 365.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @KeurboomPark(KeurboomPark)-363: :)

  • 366.KeurboomPark: Reply to this comment

    Where’s the party tomorrow? Friday 13th. Stormers only please. *** friendly.

  • 367.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @KeurboomPark(KeurboomPark)-359: dont be so bossy.

    you sound like patricia de lille before she left the pac.

  • 368.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther(gunther)-358:
    In the maids toilet then

    Nobody looked there for you
    Least offall Maevis

  • 369.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    i got to see behind the iron curtain.

  • 370.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    Stormers klapped Sharks thrice in the last 2 seasons.. Sharks got one lucky home town decision when Stormers were without their front line armor and even then guppies got out of jail at the end when they were scrambling to prevent another breakaway Stormers try…and these piffle arsed guppies reckon they so full of dynamite … let em think their bullshit bravado stories.. if it comes down to a sharkshit shootout.. guppies gonna be the ones busting their balls backwards just like they did 3 times from the last 4 meetings they encountered against the men from the south west.

  • 371.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella(fitz1ella)-370: ja, lucky home town decision that forward pass was :lol:

    sorry old timer, the sharks will have you dribbling in fear if we are to meet.

    :lol:

  • 372.Atlas: Reply to this comment

    Waiting…………..waiting………

  • 373.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella(fitz1ella)-370: Who cares? Tell us more about the scores of exotic, long legged, full breasted maidens who succumbed to the famous Skoppie pick-up line, “Does this rag smell funny to you?”

  • 374.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @KeurboomPark(KeurboomPark)-364:

    My gat work nie ge-nougat of ge-enigiets nie

    Behalwe as jy die pinkie trick ken?

  • 375.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman(katman)-373: :lol:

  • 376.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @KeurboomPark(KeurboomPark)-348:

    Hmmm, nou praat jy

    Is hulle B’s?

    of C’s? ;-)

    of D’s? :-)

  • 377.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    anyways, out.

    tjorts people.

  • 378.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman(rangerman)-369:

    They say those ex-commies like to pomp kwaai?

    It’s the only thing they didn’t need to stand in queue for :-)

  • 379.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman(katman)-373: you must have a huge problem with your unfulfilled lust or ego.. or both.. what you so anxious about my escapades with exotic long legged maidens for.. or you just envious about something that in your case is quite outa bounds?

  • 380.KeurboomPark: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman(rangerman)-367:

    Patricia het lucky lips. Sy prat sy bek verby. She knows that if all the cops were G A Y in the Flats, then it would turn into Disneyland. But Zille had a silly: Send in all the HIV army boys, and infect all the mobsters! Finish en Klaar.

  • 381.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella(fitz1ella)-379: Think of me as the Thuli Madonsela of this site. Nothing gives me greater pleasure than to expose the morally corrupt fakes and phonies that stink this place up with their self-inflated ego-stories.

  • 382.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    Anyway, that’s me for the night. Keep it real (that means you, Skop).

  • 383.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @KeurboomPark(KeurboomPark)-380:
    > Send in all the HIV army boys, and infect all the mobsters! Finish en Klaar.

    They’re all infected already, the gangsters pomp each other in prison

    Nie veel anders om te doen nie

  • 384.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman(katman)-381: you’re a nothing of the sort.. you think you such a wise little fucknut .. the fact of the matter is you a fake of the utmost kind… somebody who thinks he’s wide awake yet is fast asleep.. that’s the little fucknut fake you actually are..

    you wanna come after me like you the bloodhound for morality and truth .. keep coming fucknut.. you don’t know morality nor truth till it smacks you sideways right off your fake fucknut stool of self serenading enlightenment..

    The moral objectivity of this here fake arse society.. that who you reckon you are little fuckface.. well let me tell you straight to your fake fucknut face.. you ain’t who or what you think you are… pissarse piece of fake self righteous garbage that’s who you exactly are..

  • 385.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella(fitz1ella)-379:

    > or you just envious about something that in your case is quite outa bounds?

    Why?

  • 386.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    Thuli Madonsela of Keo.. that what this little Katmankunt think he is…

    somebody give this fuckface a medal .. he actually thinks he’s doing society a huge favor for exposing all the debauched frauds on the socially corrupt interweb…

  • 387.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-385: ask the little prick why he got envy or morality ******** up his zealously guarded self righteous ultra moralizing brain… maybe in his case his wife don’t fulfill all his self serenading high society desires.

    It happens in life sometimes.

  • 388.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman(katman)-381:

    If you’re Thuli, who is going to be the Debra Patta of keo?

  • 389.KeurboomPark: Reply to this comment

    I’ts Friday 13th. Be very afraid. Heaven’s *** is in the Bar.

  • 390.shooter: Reply to this comment

    i think alot of people on here are fatter and shorter.
    >>> bye

  • 391.shooter: Reply to this comment

    but not shorter than keo :)

  • 392.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @shooter(shooter)-391:

    Have you seen the Keo tv ad with Percy and Ryan with Keo in the middle on the left bottom of the
    keo homepage?

    Why is Percy and Ryan grinning while Keo’s not very happy?

    Maybe he’s drawn the short straw again and they’re going to give him some?

    No wonder they’re cuddling up to him

  • 393.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @KeurboomPark(KeurboomPark)-389:

    Hey Boom, hoe gan dit?

    Sorry om te **** van jou breakup

  • 394.KeurboomPark: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok(victoriabok)-393:

    Kwaailappies, Boet. Ag, she was a bit of a *****, anyway. Nagskof raak koud hierso. Lekker slaap.

  • 395.Pee Wee: Reply to this comment

    Stormers……………fear the Sharks………….bwahahahahahahahahahaha…………..the same Shark team who played an injury ravaged Stormers team and beat them so convincingly that they were holding on for dear life at the end? I wonder what would have happened had Deon Forurie not knocked on over the line! :) Didn’t the so called “feared” team lose to the bottom feeders the very next week? So feared that their fate is not known till the last round of the comp. Jokers of note! LOFL!

  • 396.Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19: Reply to this comment

    So I see my title has been taken by Snoekskiet who is on here bragging how he bent his pipe inside some Scandinavian squirrel in 96.She prop was built like a shotput and javelin athlete.feckin bent backspitting vegetarian f anny duckin stormers supporter.

  • 397.KeurboomPark: Reply to this comment

    @Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19(Fern)-396:
    Gaan naai jou hand, fernie. Again. Stoooooooooooormers!

  • 398.Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19: Reply to this comment

    keurboom
    jy is n goeie voorbeeld van alles wat verkeerd is met julle gatgabba stormer ondersteuners.

  • 399.Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19: Reply to this comment

    keurboom
    jou cherry het jou onder jou gat geskop so jy is die een wat hand naai.
    kan haar nie blameer dat sy n straight ou soek nie.

  • 400.Kea-Cat: Reply to this comment

    Listen Sharks and Bulls, you are the bottom dwellers, the Super 15 is the only comp. in the world where they accomodate bottom dwellers, where in the world have yo heard the 5th and 6th place team are in a playoff. The only reason you are still in it is to help the other bottom of the earth dwellers get a bit of money in their pockets.;

  • 401.PrickBoks GoingSouth: Reply to this comment

    @KeurboomPark(KeurboomPark)-397:

    Slim change of that happening, rumour has it his hand took out a restraining order against him…

  • 402.Kea-Cat: Reply to this comment

    Listen Sharks and Bulls, you are the bottom dwellers, the Super 15 is the only comp. in the world where they accomodate bottom dwellers, where in the world have you heard the 5th and 6th place team are in a playoff. The only reason you are still in it is to help the other bottom of the earth dwellers get a bit of money in their pockets.

  • 403.Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19: Reply to this comment

    @kea
    You stormers supporters are “bottom dwellers” in every sense of the word.
    Now go and do some work,that is if you have a job.
    Feckin bent little butterfly.

  • 404.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @Kea-Cat(KEA)-402:

    Gridiron, basketball, NRL, AFL and probably a few I don’t know about. Just because you have never seen it does not mean it never happens.

  • 405.Kea-Cat: Reply to this comment

    @Slartibartfast(Slartibartfast)-404: once again digging at the bottom, fecking bottom dwelleres the bunch of you.

  • 406.Kea-Cat: Reply to this comment

    What’s the bet if one of the undeserved bottom dwellers win the comp., the rules will be changed next year. Money money money, thats all what it is, suck it out of the bottom dwellers while you have the chance.

  • 407.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    dwelleres – what that?

    Knowing your team’s success in play-off games I would pull my neck in for the time being. But arrogant will be arrogant I suppose.

  • 408.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    I know it is hard to understand so I will type slowly just for you. The conference and extended play-off systems have been around for a very long time and is widely used around the world. Time for you to broaden your horizon a little, big wide world out there…

    For what it is worth, if #5 or #6 team manage to win it actually support the fact that the system works, again I know you will struggle to understand that.

  • 409.Sasuke: Reply to this comment

    @Slartibartfast(Slartibartfast)-408: And if 5 and 6 do win it they really deserve it becomes they have it tough and need to beat three teams placed higher than them.

  • 410.Guns: Reply to this comment

    TFIF!!

  • 411.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    Oh yes…

    Let us humble supporters of “bottom dwellers”, Sharks and Bulls, not to mention Lions and Cheetahs never forget who is at the “Top”, sitting at no 2 on the log…

    “Top”, not for winning the S15 comp of course… But “Top” for being Conference “Title” holders… while the actual Trophy still has to actually be won… Of course :lol:

    Fark me… Triple K… Keo Kape Kunties

    A Gift that Keeps on Giving….

  • 412.Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19: Reply to this comment

    Keo’s Cape Captains of Industry
    Bwhaha

  • 413.heboric: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-411: Oh boo hoo little inbred man is cross

  • 414.Sasuke: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-411: Good that you havent forgotten ya bottom feeder.

  • 415.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @Kea-Cat(KEA)-406:
    Whats this bottom dweller stuff…..you learned in the charms of proctology?

  • 416.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @heboric(heboric)-413: Inbred… You mean like one with a Passion gap who tends to support the Saders on their famous homeground, Newlands…

    You mean like one who spits on the Blitzbokke at George…

    You mean one who is a “solid” supporter of the team who occupies the “Top”, other than when they face the Saders or Canes… of course…

    Naah, sorry for you…

    I support a “bottom dweller” team with Pride…

    The Dynamite…

    Black and White…

    SHARKS FOREVER…

    BOOM!!!

  • 417.Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19: Reply to this comment

    Kea and heboric has both given more b j’s than they have received.

  • 418.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Sasuke(Sasuke)-414: On Keo, its hard to forget who is “Top”…

    Who are conference “title” holders…

    While the trophy still actually has to be won yet….

    Woe is everyone here if any “bottom dweller” such as Sharks, Bulls or Saders have to win the damn thing over such luminaries sitting right at the “Top” such as the Chiefs, Cunties or Brumbies…

    Sackclothes on…

  • 419.Sasuke: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-418: No the Stormers have already won the conference title last week buddy. Now just to capture the S15 Champion Trophy.

    Dont you follow the news?

  • 420.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-418:

    On paper the Sharks are a great team with the lock combo your only real weakness.
    But the big difference between the Stormers and Sharks teams 2012 is mental toughness and the ability to grind it out week in week out. On your day you can beat the Crusaders in Christchurch but you can also lose to the Lions at Coca Cola Park.

  • 421.Pee Wee: Reply to this comment

    Fern is like HG’s little helper – always feeding off his comments – kinda like Grootbek en Katvis.

  • 422.Gumboots: Reply to this comment

    @Pee Wee(Pee Wee)-421:

    Mini-Me with a many flaws… :lol:

  • 423.Gumboots: Reply to this comment

    forget the ‘a’

  • 424.Sasuke: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-416: Is that BOOM the Sharks blowing themselves up?

  • 425.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-411: nothing “humble” about this:

    214.Heavens Game:
    2 Jun 2012, 14:59 pm

    So here we are last game before Internationals.

    If Sharks beat Lions with a 5 pointer that effectively gives the Sharks 54 points on the log including a bye.
    Should the Stormers draw with the Bulls, this gives the Stormers 52 pts and Bulls 50 pts
    Should the Stormers beat the Bulls, which will never be a 5 pointer, the Stormers will have 54 and the Bulls 49 (with bonus point)

    The most likely scenario is that the Bulls beat the Stormers with a 5pointer which leaves the Stormers on 50 and the Bulls on 53…

    So, at 9 o clock tonight we shall see the SA conference looking like this:
    Sharks 54
    Bulls 53
    Stormers 50

    Bulls and Stormers likely to win their first games after the Intl break with likely 4 point victories leaving the log at
    Bulls 57
    Sharks 54
    Stormers 54

    The championship game will then be played by the Sharks and Bulls with the Sharks likely to get a 4 pointer and Bulls a possible 1 point BP loss. Stormers could come short against the Cheetahs with a losing Bonus point.

    The standings will be
    Sharks 58
    Bulls 58
    Stormers 55

    The last game of the season will play out as such

    Sharks 63
    Bulls 63
    Stormers 60

    Leaving the dynamite with a home semi…

    You read it here first.

    no humility whatsoever.

  • 426.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    oh and i forgot

    BOOM

    :D

  • 427.Sasuke: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-426: Yes i picked up that the BOOM is very important!

  • 428.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-425: “Leaving the dynamite with a home semi…”

    The only semi doing the rounds is HG’s ‘Rock Hard’ induced little ‘heads up’……

  • 429.Sasuke: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.(The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food)-428: lol

  • 430.Gumboots: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-425:

    Do people really spew such rubbish!!! :lol:

  • 431.heboric: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-416: Nah, there is more to Cape Town than those people you mention you inbred pr!ck. All i see you do is insult people. I dont know whats worse Cape Crusader supporters or those Sharks/Bulls Supporters who are so arrogant. Grudgingly at least the Bulls supporters have something to shout about because of there record – but good grief the Sharks. Its like me going to a blog dealing with the Spanish football team and logging on there saying they cant play football

  • 432.Stawm: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-411:

    Hey D U M B A S S

    How many super rugby titles have the sharks won?

    Take your time.

    Maybe end with a HOOHA or something, to make you think you are making an impression.

    Dont forget to say thanks to your b u m chum fern, for his continual support and manly admiration of you.

  • 433.Stawm: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-425:

    Give the poor lil guy a break, hes been right once this year, thats got to count for something.

  • 434.Sharks fans are genuine Bok supporters: Reply to this comment

    The Sharks are on the up and most importantly, scoring tries like other quality teams in this competition. I expect The Sharks to win at a canter and not to ‘grind out a win’ like the Stormsaders. The game against the Cheetahs was as boring as one would expect from the most overrated team in the competition. True championship material is not a tag the Stormsaders wear comfortably chaps.

  • 435.Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19: Reply to this comment

    @421
    Hehehe,daai was n kwaai show.
    Gaan was nou die kom uit jou bek,maak vir jou gatgabba koffie sodat jou dag kan begin en jy salon toe kan gaan.

  • 436.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    Such anger from supporters of the “Top” side…

    Why?

    You ladies should be happy…

    Your team has achieved its goals… Conference “Title” holders… consistency in hardly any team crossing the tryline in all games, including the “Title” holders themselves…3 Boks.

    The lowly Sharks and Bulls just might make the playoffs in comparison… Nothing like the “Top” team… I mean the “Great” Deon Fourie, once proclaimed as definitely the “2nd best Hooker in SA” now playing at 8…

    Phooaawr… Killer Side :lol:

    Killer Supporters too…. BWAAAAAAAAAHAAAAHAAAA

  • 437.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation(Transformation)-425: So the resident Keo Kape Kuntie Sharksworld rugby expert following humble HGs posts with a fine toothed comb…

    Eat it up, umfana…

    Look and learn from the Bwana,,, Ne? :lol:

  • 438.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Stawm(Stawm)-432: “Dumbass”…? Are you been a hiddenhomo again Stawmynawmy… hehehe

  • 439.Stawm: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-436:

    Try understand d u m b a s s , stormers have achieved what they have so far, inspite of their huge injury toll. Therefore your pitiful example of Deon Fourie, with “great” in quotation marks, is juvanlile at best.

    Also, what does BWAAAAAAAAAHAAAAHAAAA mean. Is it a MXIT term?

    Please dont forget your customary, very manly HOOHA and BOOM at the end of your posts.

  • 440.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @heboric(heboric)-431: Naaah, come now my “wellbred” blueblood… I like to think I just insult the Triple K on here… well, not really insult… just tell the unadulterated truth….

    You poor souls… so much anger… is it because I is just a refugee… We all know how much refugees are welcome in Zille’s Republic of Cape Frottage?

  • 441.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Stawm(Stawm)-439: “juvanlile”… :lol: Is that a play on words, Stawmy…

    Your obviously astounding, enlightened Cape education astounds me….

    BWAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAHAAAA

    :wink:

  • 442.Stawm: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-438:

    I’m still waiting for you pumkin.

    Tell us again, please, how you prefer to be pleasured by women etc. Its very apt to a rugby forum.

  • 443.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    eish stormers fans looking a little frazzled?

    :lol:

  • 444.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    Here it comes….
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    BOOM!

  • 445.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Stawm(Stawm)-442: Oh darling… do my stories excite you…

    Don’t hide…

    There’s nothing wrong, its your choice…

    Just know, I never shove it up the poopshoot, no matter how much crocodile death rolling (Fern TM) you may do in protest…. :lol:

  • 446.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Stawm(Stawm)-442: why are you getting so upset?

    chillax buddy, its the weekend.

    surely the cape weather making you stormers fans so grumpy?

  • 447.Stawm: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-441:
    Your stupidity astound me. Why do you assume I’m from the Cape, just because I support the Stormers?

    Please dont forget to end your posts with a Pacinoism. Its very manly.

  • 448.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Stawm(Stawm)-447: Because you a “hiddenhomo”… (Your words Stawming Nawmy)

    Just an assumption… I may be wrong…

    You might just be one of Newlands famed AB supporters instead…

    Now please don’t spit on me… I aint a Blitzbok, okay?

  • 449.Stawm: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-445:
    You need to read up a bit about latent h o m o s e x uality. You display all the classic symptoms.
    Seriously.

  • 450.Stawm: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman(rangerman)-446:
    Sometimes I just feel like feeding the *******. Why else go to the zoo?

  • 451.Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19: Reply to this comment

    Feck me,their side is gonna top the log and they are very jittery.

  • 452.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Stawm(Stawm)-449: Oh do I? And so, what are the “classic symptoms” of “latent” ho.mosexuality, daaahling?

    Is there such a thing?

    And if there is, why should there be a problem… I mean I dont judge you for being hidden… or for the passion gap… It is your choice after all, and as long as you don’t force your choice onto others then its okay… Really :lol:

  • 453.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19(Fern)-451: Yeah their side may top the log… they should be happy as a piginshit… Truly logging the top stukkend in happiness

  • 454.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    Nearly forgot my “manly” HOOHA…

    Can’t not be “latent” and all… :lol:

  • 455.Stawm: Reply to this comment

    @Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19(Fern)-451:

    Topping the log with a B team. We’ve every right to be jittery. If the full team was back, I’d be as arrogant as a Sharks/Bulls supporter.

  • 456.Stawm: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-452:

    The important fact here, and one you are obviously forgetting, is that you are calling all WP supporters h o m o s e xual.
    You are the one constantly with the g a y undertones (along with fern – what a coincidence).

    You obviously cant criticize the actual rugby, because , well, look at the log.

  • 457.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Stawm(Stawm)-456: Thought maybe your mouth was previously occupied with something suitably large and therefore gone suitably silent… save for the odd “educated” squeal of “juvenlile” of course. :wink:

    I have only ever called WePee and Stormersader “supporters” Brokebacks or Breezers… Now if that appeals to your self described “hiddenhomo” or latent “tendencies” then obviously no apologies necessary… Because nothing wrong, yeah?

    And look at the log… for all the talk of the Brokebacks being a “top” team, the lowly Sharks and Bulls may also be in the playoffs after tomorrow… Nearly as “good” as your “Top” team….

    Hooha :lol:

  • 458.Stawm: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-457:

    Suddenly changing your tune now doesnt change the facts.
    Everyone else on this blog sees you for what you are. A biggot. Addinf a few smileys to your post doesnt change the message.

    Sharks and Bulls rely on luck from hereon.
    Stormers?
    No.

  • 459.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Stawm(Stawm)-458: Am I supposed to care how “everyone else on this blog sees me”? :lol:

    Btw, what’s a “biggot”….? Chuckling

  • 460.Stawm: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-459:
    I’m sure you think continually baiting everyone at the level you do is fun, but your need to do it constantly shows how immature you are, no substance of note. Obviously you wont see this from your side.

    Chuckling?
    Serious question, how old are you?

  • 461.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Stawm(Stawm)-460: Old enough to ask what a “biggot” is, umfana…

    Now, lets be serious… Who engaged who initially here?

    Why?

    Do you have a ha.rdon for yours truly?

    Not that you will answer any questions… Your mouth may be otherwise engaged… :lol:

  • 462.Stawm: Reply to this comment

    I’m glad you keep coming back.
    I’m sure you can see past the spelling mistake?
    Think a bit again about your s.e.xual reference in your post. You cant resist it can you? Or perhaps you just simply dont have the intellect to come up with good arguments to support your bigoted viewpoints, and have to resort to gutter talk. In that case you cant really be held accountable.

  • 463.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @Stawm(Stawm)-462: You haven’t considered that intellect is wasted on some fools… Casting pearls to swine and all that… Like a pearl necklace in a Bay of Pigs, no?

    Not that you will have any idea what I am talking about, hey Stawmy…

    My supremely intellectual No 1 fan :wink:

  • 464.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @Stawm(Stawm)-455: Hmmm just a wee bit of generalising there? What makes Sharks and Bulls supporters so arrogant?

  • 465.Stawm: Reply to this comment

    @Skeppie(Skeppie)-464:
    Yup I was generalizing there, sorry.

  • 466.Stawm: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game(Heavens Game)-463:
    I dont think you have any idea what you are talking about. The number of assumptions you make says it all.
    Do you feel very brave behind your keyboard?

  • 467.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @Stawm(Stawm)-465: Erm, ok forgiven…..even if you are a stormers supporter

  • 468.Treehugger: Reply to this comment

    You shouldn’t say say such nasty things about Paticia Lewis, you don’t know her, have never even met her socially. She is actually a sweetie, and married with little kids.

  • 469.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Treehugger(Treehugger)-468:

    She used date the Hoff a long time ago (ie he did hit that)

    Before or after, I’m not sure, she made the soft core porn movie

    Long before she married this guy with the crappy hairstyle, it looks like he scaled the haircut from one of the 1970′s “fotoverhaal boekies” like Saal 10 or Tanya die Vegter

    A long time ago we used to call them P…boekies

  • 470.brains_trust: Reply to this comment

    I am so glad the S15 is drawing to a close !!! Zzzzzz

  • 471.Treehugger: Reply to this comment

    @Victoriabok……….met her a few times at Zimbali and she is very unassuming, hub is nice as well, agree about his hair though, as for soft porn, don’t care, her choice. I don’t judge people on that kind of stuff, am very judgmental in other ways unfortunately.

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.