Comments on: Franks bros switch for Kiwi semi

By: Slartibartfast

Slartibartfast — Wed, 25 Jul 2012 03:57:07 +0000

@Hurricane-22: Is that a step up or a step down from glue sniffing?!

By: viewer

viewer — Wed, 25 Jul 2012 03:53:27 +0000

Puke

By: Hurricane

Hurricane — Wed, 25 Jul 2012 01:20:53 +0000

@Te Rangatira-21: hahaha We have a resident undie sniffer.

By: Te Rangatira

Te Rangatira — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:24:55 +0000

@Te Rangatira-20:
Oh… and his sniff test sealed it…….definitely ****.

By: Te Rangatira

Te Rangatira — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:18:08 +0000

@Hurricane-19:
RWC’11 does the Bok laundry…he noticed many a ****** bloomers before that game….put one and one together…..voila’ food poisoning…..simple

By: Hurricane

Hurricane — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:18:43 +0000

@RWC’11 was fixed-15:
The Boks had food poisoning before the Ozzie game??
lol first i have heard of that.
Seen as you noted that the Boks didnt go to the press with it……how the *** do you know about it then?

By: viewer

viewer — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:18:20 +0000

Owen’s the premier tight-head in SR. Would have thought he’s a better bet against Taumalolo in a pkay-off as opposed to Ben, who’s essentially a loose-head. Time will tell.
The Crusaders are a very well coached team & Todd has introduced a very practical & hard edge to their game. As a result, they’ve lost the languid continuity with ball in hand that was a hallmark of the Deans era

By: RWC'11 was fixed

RWC'11 was fixed — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:47:24 +0000

@TooMuchRugby-16: Like turning your pants brown!

By: TooMuchRugby

TooMuchRugby — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:36:48 +0000

@RWC’11 was fixed-15: Hahaha. "..bare the consequences.." like exposing your b.utt or what

By: RWC'11 was fixed

RWC'11 was fixed — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:35:01 +0000

@cane-9: The Boks also had 'food poisoning' before the Aussie game, but did not run to the press. I don't believe there was any direct poisoning as Laurie Mains fabricated. But if you eat a kebab from a shabeen on a night out and get the runs and you can't keep your underpants from turning a pale shade of brown, you bare the consequesces. Now Bryces actions were clear for the whole world to see.

By: Skeppie

Skeppie — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:31:52 +0000

@cane-13: Fair point! Regarding 1) though, haven't the sharks always been your No2 team?

By: cane

cane — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:21:34 +0000

@Skeppie-12:

1) Chiefs have been my number Two Team for many a year.
2) If Chiefs win …………………….we are guaranteed a fresh and New Champion.
3) They have failed in the past, only because of injuries and a lack of depth.
4) They are battlers, always have been. I like battlers.

By: Skeppie

Skeppie — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:10:16 +0000

@cane-11: Cane, why the cheifs over the saders?

By: cane

cane — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:01:16 +0000

@willievz-6:

I’m hoping the Chiefs can win too Willy.

Also would like the Sharkies to win…………………………………….but that will be very difficult, given the opposition and the travel.

By: >^..^< katman

>^..^< katman — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:00:18 +0000

@cane-8: The Mothereater can't touch Fuckadilly Skoppenshyte.

By: cane

cane — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:58:48 +0000

@RWC’11 was fixed-5: Rules are guidelines really RWC. Like.......... "don't poison your opposition when they are guests in your Country".

By: cane

cane — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:56:08 +0000

@BuckT-4: Is Skoppie still posting ? I thought he might have been given a little rest by The Moderator.

By: >^..^< katman

>^..^< katman — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:55:19 +0000

Between the Franks brothers and the Whitelock brothers, the Kiwi sides are more incestuous than the Welsh.

By: willievz

willievz — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:53:52 +0000

@cane-1: I do. I want the Crusaders to lose.

By: RWC'11 was fixed

RWC'11 was fixed — Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:52:42 +0000

@cane-2: I think there should be a poll for who bends the rules the most on the field. Crusaders will win this hands down. 1. Richie 2. Franks Bros 3. Whitelock