Stormers must handle first-half heat

Stormers must handle first-half heat

Allister Coetzee believes the Stormers will need to dominate the forward exchanges and bank early points if they’re going to stall the rampant Sharks.

The Stormers have produced some commanding first-half performances over the course of the 2012 season. If there has been one period of the game where they have consistently flagged, it’s been in the third quarter, and it is that lack of concentration that has often allowed the opposition back into the contest.

That being said, it’s interesting to note that the Stormers are not a team that excels at chasing the game. Indeed, in their two losses to the Crusaders and Sharks this season, they have trailed at half-time.

The Sharks won that derby in Durban 25-20 after leading 20-6 at the break. They also made a massive statement when they went to Brisbane last Saturday and scored 17 unanswered points in the first half hour.

No doubt they will be looking for another strong start in this weekend’s semi-final, as it will put the Stormers into a position where the Cape side will need to chase the game.

The Stormers coach believes there are lessons to be taken from the Stormers’ earlier defeat to the Sharks, and that the first-half showing will be important to the outcome.

‘It’s always a tight affair when these two teams play,’ he said. ‘There was three points in it in the first match, five points in the second and I’m sure it will be similarly close this Saturday.

‘[In the Durban fixture] they did well in the first half, they really looked to attack our set piece. When you can’t get lineout or scrum ball on your own terms, it can make life very difficult.

‘We were really unhappy with our first-half performance in that game. We lost a lot of ball in contact and made errors which they duly punished. It’s something the Crusaders did to us in last year’s semi-final, where they really pressured us at the set pieces.

‘We are looking for a good start but we are also looking to sustain that for 80 minutes.’

The Sharks boast an all-Springbok front row and have been one of the leading scrummaging teams in 2012. Their lineout is competitive, which as Coetzee suggests makes it very difficult for opponents to secure good set-piece possession.

They have some powerful ball carriers capable of dominating the collisions, as well as several players who are exceptionally good when it comes to turning the ball over at the breakdown.

Coetzee again highlighted the need for a top set-piece effort this Saturday, as well as an accurate breakdown performance that will limit the Sharks’ turnover opportunities. The Stormers boast the best defence in the competition, but that defence is more susceptible on turnover ball.

‘You can’t give them turnover ball, they use it very well,’ said Coetzee in reference to the Sharks’ performance against the Reds. ‘That’s what happens when you lose the collisions and you don’t look after your possession. And by looking after your possession, I mean winning clean ball at the set pieces too.’

The Sharks won’t be as fresh as their Cape counterparts, having had to fly to Australia and back within the space of a week. Coetzee, however, insists that the Stormers wouldn’t be taking anything for granted this Saturday.

The Stormers coach said the prospect of hosting a final at Newlands would serve as extra motivation to beat the Sharks.

‘This is what we’ve worked for all season, and knowing that we could have a home final is also a massive incentive. We are really close to achieving that. That’s why we view this weekend’s game as a big opportunity.

‘There’s going to be pressure, but we’re going to embrace it. We’re not just going to absorb it, but handle it.’

By Jon Cardinelli


428 Comments

  • 1.RAbies: Reply to this comment

    Stormers will definitely have their work cut out for them, but they’ll pull through. After the victory in Pretoria me thinks they have new mettle.

  • 2.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    forget about turnovers, you bloody box-kicking scrum half will hand the sharks ALL the possession they need to rip your D apart…fix that s.hit & you’re half way there.

  • 3.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    and with jpp @ his devastating best you’ll be up the creek without a paddle AC if duvenhage does his useless boxkicks to nowhere.

  • 4.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-2: @Transformation-3:
    Very poor quality imitations

  • 5.viewer: Reply to this comment

    Good point Trans. DuvetHanger (& grant) must control the game on their terms & be stingy with possession

  • 6.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    I think the Stormers need to make sure they score more points than the Sharks and they will win…

  • 7.BrumbiesBoy: Reply to this comment

    Well said, Einstein!!!

    :-)

  • 8.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @Slartibartfast-6:
    Good afternoon Slarti…..I was impressed by the Sharks, they played very well on the weekend, if they can put in another big effort could cause an upset you think?

  • 9.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @viewer-5:
    Do you think that was Transformation,or rather the real one?

  • 10.BrumbiesBoy: Reply to this comment

    #7 Sorry, forgot to start the sentence with “Duh,!”

    :-)

  • 11.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @Slartibartfast-6:
    ” I think the Stormers need to make sure they score more points than the Sharks and they will win…”
    I’m beginning to think you maybe an impostor too. The Slartibarfast I know is a very astute rugby man. Don’t know about this site.

  • 12.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @BrumbiesBoy-10:

    Well that is why my nickname is Einstein and yours not…!

    @Te Rangatira-8:

    Bridge to far I think T-Ranga, the Stormers defense is just to good and a tired Sharks team will struggle.

    But having said that, the Sharks team who beat the Bulls and Reds looked like a champion side and if they were at home would be clear favorites. Which ever way it won’t be by much.

  • 13.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @Te Rangatira-11:

    Hehehe no TRanga, no imposter but was just trying to keep up with the very lofty journalistic abilities of the keo scribes. They do come up with some real beauties sometimes.

  • 14.RL: Reply to this comment

    @Te Rangatira-4: indeed

  • 15.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @Te Rangatira-8:
    One big unknown in this game is also that we have the perennial ‘chokers’ in this game, both have been here plenty of times and without fail used the opportunity to fail miserably. You would think with a defensive record like they have, and a low error type game plan, that the Stormers should do fine but it has failed them in the past.

    On paper I think the Sharks have a better tight 5 but as soon as you move away from that the Stormers forwards are capable to stand their man. Back, zero flair in the Stormers but they did not end #1 because of flair…the froggie at #10 for the Sharks may have a blinder…or not!

  • 16.Jinx2: Reply to this comment

    I would play Fourie at 2. Liebenberg is off his game. Stormers will need the PitBull in the first 30, just to counter possession. I think the Stormers will be conservative, if not boring, for the first 30, relying on a kicking game and lineout superiority. But banking on tired legs is a very negative approach. If they lose the crowd, they will lose.

  • 17.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @Slartibartfast-12:
    You are probably right…. Stormers have impressed me with their consistency to churn out a win, even when mediocre….a very good team.
    @Slartibartfast-13:
    Oh sorry…….. there have been some episodes of nick misappropriation, thought you may have been a victim…..might just be me seeing things…..to be honest haven’t read this bit of Keo scribes journalistic brilliance…. not up to reading that stuff.

  • 18.RL: Reply to this comment

    @Te Rangatira-8: I’m sure that every kiwi will be supporting the guppies, for the final in NZ of course.

  • 19.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @Slartibartfast-15:
    I really can’t pick a winner, both teams are high quality and it will come down to who wants it the most.

  • 20.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @Te Rangatira-17:

    Every so often I forget and then I read it!

    Sign of a good team, winning even when looking poor. The problem with the game plan, and where they came unstuck before, is that in finals rugby the opposition suddenly plays a similar game i.e. winning at all cost if only by 1 point.

    So the harder pick for me is the other semi, would say Chiefs but only because they at home?

  • 21.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @Te Rangatira-19:

    So it comes down to home ground and travel fatigue…

  • 22.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @RL-18:
    Yeah I was thinking that way, hoping Sharks will come back these ways, but am beginning to get weird thoughts about going to Newlands and winning a final there as being more satisfying.

  • 23.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @Slartibartfast-20:
    Im going for the Chiefs because on my slide rule of likeability they are ahead of the Crusaders
    @Slartibartfast-21:
    Home Ground is a real advantage…..travel fatigue only comes into it when you lose….if you get my drift.

  • 24.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @Te Rangatira-23:

    Hehehe on your slide scale! Can I assume the Saders are a fair way down on the NZ scale?

    I do but no matter wht they say the sharks must suffer.

  • 25.Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19: Reply to this comment

    last time i checked rugby is a 80min game.
    this game is going to be tighter than a nun,so one lapse of concentration for a small period of time could sway the result of this game.
    will the stormers lack of try scoring ability come back and haunt them?
    let us see.

  • 26.Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19: Reply to this comment

    te ranged have you ever been really overseas?
    oz and the islands dont count

  • 27.Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19: Reply to this comment

    Linkin Park is coming to Mzansi in November!

  • 28.Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19: Reply to this comment

    http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wJ-l1LIdWOU
    When china comes along please point him to this post.
    china I would love your opinion on this as you stay there.
    Is Mc Williams being accurate,or is he wong?

  • 29.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19-26:
    Kia ora Fernly, yeah been to a few places outside Oz and Fiji, was alot fitter back in those days. I will retract my “travel excuse” Fernly, because if Sharks make the final and win it here, it will be the Greatest Feat in the History of the competition based on the distance traveled and the opposition faced. All good now?

  • 30.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Fern is not a stud,he is merely no19-27: And if you are a member of the underground you can get your tickets today already, like I will be doing. Chester and the crew in CT, Xmas in November. On a side note, I imagined Barry Manilow was your thing, not the incredible Linkin Park.

  • 31.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @Te Rangatira-29:

    You safe, won’t happen!

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-30:

    :lol:

  • 32.Puma: Reply to this comment

    See Paul Jordaan is still struggling with that hammie injury and is 50/50 for this game. Do hope though that Jordaan comes through this injury this week, as he was outstanding on Saturday. Lambie still out injured too.

    So do we have a case to apply again to get Frans Steyn? I know we were denied the first time round but think we have a better case this time. Worth a try I think. Bosman is actually registered as a fh. So worth a try I think to apply again.

  • 33.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-30:

    And here I thought it was Barry White?

  • 34.Blokkies: Reply to this comment

    @ Puma

    Are you one of those okes that thinks NO actually means YES? :-)

  • 35.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @Puma-32:

    It’s not going to happen…

  • 36.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @Blokkies-34:

    :lol:

  • 37.Puma: Reply to this comment

    @Blokkies-34: Yip… :razz:

    Worth a try though. They can only say bugger off…. or yes :)

  • 38.Puma: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die-35: hahaha. You never know pal.

  • 39.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    In other news, the Stormers still can’t score tries.

  • 40.Puma: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-39: :)

  • 41.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die-33: :) Quite possibly. Barry is the perfect ‘fit’ for all of Fern’s ‘alleged’ encounters with the ladies. Candles, Barry White, cheap wine, faulty condoms….(I actually imagine him being one of those twats who dances for his ladies – Magic Mike he ain’t, of that I am 100% certain.)

  • 42.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @Jinx2-16: “I think the Stormers will be conservative, if not boring, for the first 30 …” What will they do for the other 50 minutes – sit on the sidelines? :lol:

  • 43.HHS: Reply to this comment

    I want to see Tiaan cry again.
    Bissy make it happen…

  • 44.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    “No doubt they will be looking for another strong start in this weekend’s semi-final, as it will put the Stormers into a position where the Cape side will need to chase the game.”
    Yes, they would have to go on an all out place-kicking rampage. Hide your women and children.

  • 45.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    Sharky fanboys (and hangers on from other unions) in PR overdrive…. Boom, Bang, Boom, Bang. This is something to behold.

  • 46.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-41:
    is jy rerig n vroumens? :lol:

    “one of those twats who dances for his ladies”
    :lol:

  • 47.Blokkies: Reply to this comment

    The Stormers have been hiding their playoff game planning brilliantly the whole year.

    The subtle signs have been there, but most armchair supporters are too faak to have noticed.

    We will abandon the conservative approach and run the ball from all quarters.

    Brock has peaked at the perfect time to take his true position of flyhalf. He is going to run over the Frenchman every chance he gets, and offload to a flying Bekker who will make a speedbump out of Bosman before skip passing to Tiaan on the wing who is a demon at scoring in the corner with 4 defenders hanging on him….

    Oh and I almost forgot, Gio is gonna secure all our lineout ball when Andries lifts him 4 meters in the air.

    You Guppies aint gonna know whats hit ya :-)

  • 48.Sasuke: Reply to this comment

    Sadie to Cheetahs on a two year deal just read it now on the SA rugby mag page on Facebook (via EWN sport)

  • 49.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @blokkies

    very snaaks this morning

  • 50.Blokkies: Reply to this comment

    @ kaksioek

    LOL @ “an all out place-kicking rampage” hehehe

  • 51.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-44:
    :lol:

    @Sasuke-48:
    he will dissapear into mediocrity
    another meyer bosman in the making

  • 52.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-44: funniest post of the week.

    Look, all the Sharks need to do is score 4 tries and they should win. The Stormers haven’t scored more than 3 tries in a game all season.

  • 53.Papoose: Reply to this comment

    Hmmm

  • 54.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-46: As a woman, I am more than qualified to guess that Fern is the type to do just that :)
    We women have all had to deal with a ‘no-hoper’ or two in our lives at some stage.

  • 55.Puma: Reply to this comment

    @Blokkies-47: Good one…………….. :lol:

  • 56.Sasuke: Reply to this comment

    @wooden spoon-52: Stormers havent conceded four tries in a match this season so Sharks should be worried. They will get two at most.

  • 57.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    @Sasuke-56: Look, if the Rebels can outscore your team 3 tries to 2 I’m sure the Sharks can do better.

  • 58.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Te Rangatira-4: imitation: the highest form of flattert mate…

  • 59.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-54:
    So what you saying is that my friend Fernly reminds you of Jim from American Pie………..” She’s gone! Oh my God, she used me. I was used. I was used! Cool! “

  • 60.Staal: Reply to this comment

    Sorry Sharkies… imo Stormers will walk this one…

  • 61.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-58:
    Whats wrong with these people, that guy was useless.

  • 62.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Te Rangatira-61: :lol:

  • 63.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Te Rangatira-59: :) Bloody right my friend.
    He also happens to remind me (and I’m sure any other woman who blogs here) of that ONE mistake you make in your dating life, when you are young and innocent…….the one that haunts you for years afterwards. The one that makes you thank all the gods for your husband.

    @Transformation-62: They will only imitate those they find threatening :)

  • 64.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-46: hi gallileo :D

    eish those canterbury “cheats” made mince meat of your bulle!

    didn’t I TELL YOU, your team will lose if you have to go to christchurch for a playoff game? hehehehe

    you suck in christchurch! :mrgreen:

    when the score was 16 – 0, justin marshall or nisbo reminded us that the last time the bulls were around those parts the game ended 27 – 0 nc nc nc

    “The Stormers and the Sharks are the African title contenders I had expected the Bulls to be. Instead, this year’s Bulls proved to be cumbersome plodders obsessed with kicking the ball to the opposition.

    The street savvy Crusaders lapped it up, setting their line, running good blocking lines and punishing a Bulls outfit for their tactical naivety. The Bulls didn’t offer a shot all night. “ – justin marshall

  • 65.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    Barry “the Shark” Manilow is a ******* genius.

  • 66.stormerforlife1: Reply to this comment

    Only a seriously deluded fool can see a sharks win on Saturday.

  • 67.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-63:

    :)

    Excessive self-promotion is such a dead giveaway for a deep rooted feeling of insecurity or self doubt.

  • 68.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-63:

    Fernley said he is just like Ernie Els.

    Humble and down to earth.

    He is a national treasure.

    (Fernley not Ernie).

  • 69.XhosaKid: Reply to this comment

    Well I guess its tickets for Stormers, they will be beaten to a pulp, the all conquering Sharks have already booked their flight to NZ, the availability of Etzebeth, Bekker and Vermeulen won’t add zilch to that side that got a whoopass at Kings Park.

  • 70.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-65:

    Barry Manilow?
    The other day you called Jim Reeves a genius too.
    Who is next? Charles Jacobie?

    :)

  • 71.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim-67: Or a dead giveaway for a deep rooted, small and totally ineffective ‘joystick’…. When I read Fern’s words on here, I see Michael de Pinna in the earliest Vodacom ads for some reason. Oiled up torso, combed and plaited chest hairs, medallion dangling, leopard print g string manties…..
    Back in a bit – have to go and puke (repeatedly)

  • 72.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim-70:

    Hank Williams.

    legend.

  • 73.stormerforlife1: Reply to this comment

    Checked the Sharks game last night for the first time and Turnstile Bosman tackling himself definitely the highlight.The Sharks probably going to play an injured Jordaan after that histrionics .

  • 74.Papoose: Reply to this comment

    Sharks won’t win on Saturday, purely because they’re performance has mentally shifted the Stormers, if they weren’t already there, to be ably prepared for this semi.
    The Stormers, though they haven’t scored 4 tries, have consistently shown how prepared they are mentally for play off games especially in winning games they shouldn’t have.
    I said last week its all about the mental aspect at this stage and that the Sharks would win and Bulls lose.
    The Sharks will lose as well as the Saders

  • 75.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-63:
    HMMM, you know what Pedigree, I enjoy your posts and I remember your first post under your infamous nick, when I think about it , you did have something different, perhaps your women’s intuition,rather refreshing if I must say.
    Fernly is a mate to me and I know he has said some unkind things to women on this blog but he has toned it down somewhat and is on the road to recovery, but I know you will keep him on his toes.

  • 76.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    Jim Reeves recorded an album of Afrikaans songs while here in SA shooting a movie about a washed up country singer. That moves him up several notches on the coolness scale.

  • 77.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman-76:

    The original… Kalahari Kid

  • 78.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @XhosaKid-69:

    haven’t you got some textbooks to deliver?

    :lol:

  • 79.ufo: Reply to this comment

    Think the movie was called Kimberly Jim..

    of iets

  • 80.XhosaKid: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-78: No, I didn’t my greedy paws on this particular tender.

  • 81.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-72:

    Bruce Springsteen once introduced John Fogerty as the Hank Willams of our generation so I guess old Hank must have been ok.

  • 82.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim-81:

    all three are… OK…

  • 83.NZINCHINA: Reply to this comment

    Just tried to google Freedom Furniture in NZ and google China threw me out, gotta love this country.

  • 84.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @stormerforlife1-73: It was the best tackle he has made all season. A try saving tackle on himself.
    Blades would have been ecstatic in commentary: “a telling tackle by Bosman on ummmmmmmmmmmm himself, Joel, this can’t be right?”

  • 85.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman-76:

    Did Ivan Redbroff not also once recorded an Afrikaans song?
    The first Afrikaans “rock song” I ever heard was “Vat hom Dawie” by the Bats (Rock with a concertina).

  • 86.Brigadier Van Zyl: Reply to this comment

    the only thing that could save the stormers in my opinion is sharks jetlag.

    if the stormers can somehow blunt the sharks 1-4 they are in with a shot.

    the sharks backrow is very light and rely more than any other side on the frontfoot provided by the heavies.

  • 87.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-78: He’s already delivered them to the corner of Stormwater Drain and Bridge Underpass.

  • 88.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Te Rangatira-75: Fern is an irritant, not a danger (except to himself..) Harmless :)

  • 89.Heavens Game Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-68: i am tired of fernly’s pathetic attempt to reach my levels of arrogance! i really hope it’s case of a multinic nonsensical nob gobbler trying his luck!
    and anyone hoping for a French style explosion from Freddy this sat, dream on, that cute little frenchie will be kissing my asss post match and i really hope his tongue is of KISS proportions, you get my drift!

  • 90.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @XhosaKid-80:

    Are you saving yourself for the interior decorating tender for Inkwazi II?

    @Brigadier Van Zyl-86:

    the sharks are going to neutralise the stormers front row by putting a Bar One Cheesecake in their dressing room before the game.

  • 91.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim-85:

    didn’t the Bats also do a New Zealand rock song too…???

    Shabby Lower Hut or something…?

  • 92.ufo: Reply to this comment

    just teasing, kiwi posters… :wink:

    was a song called Shabby LIttle Hut…

    nothing to do with NZ…

  • 93.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @ufo-82:

    For about 2 years John Fogerty was nearly untouchable- then he just seemed to lose that creative spark or inspiration to turn out a hit song nearly every month.

  • 94.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-64:
    ag its all dust in the wind to me, transie… dust in the wind…

    i’m moving on from super rugby, will only follow cc and internationals not involving new zealand (spit).

    until the irb/sanzar sort this shitt out and rid rugby of this blight, its just not worth losing sleep over.

    bulls played badly and the crusaders played well enough to win.
    they are still dirty though and there was enough of their play on show in the game.

    i wish the chiefs best of luck.

  • 95.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim-85: Indeed, he did. Two full albums. Here’s a little RuskieDutchie gem: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiAyFStYa8c

  • 96.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @ufo-79: Yes, that rings a bell.

  • 97.NZINCHINA: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-94:

    the Bulls infringed (cheated) all night and Steyn provided the comedy act

  • 98.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-88:
    “We’ll just tell your mother that… we ate it all”

  • 99.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim-93:

    yeah i know bud… one of the greats… rocked to car in my youth…

    used to have a record for most number ones in two years or something… which is just about as long as their recording career lasted…

    john did an excellent song a few years back about the iraq war called ‘deja vu all over again’… excellent song could’ve been one from the early 70s like who’ll stop the rain…

  • 100.ufo: Reply to this comment

    rocked to CCR….

    %^&*$%^& autocorrect….

  • 101.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    And now we’re going to take it down a notch. Kick back and relax with this little number by the evergreen Jim Reeves. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOZjIMJS_jc

  • 102.William Webb Ellis is now at home: Reply to this comment

    @NZINCHINA-97: and now hes not going to follow super rugby anymore..

    the toy has officially been cast from the cot..

    hilarious stuff, now if we talked of players like he talked of them on here (e.g calling reid a filthy cheat scum) hooboy, we’d have tough guys telling us to fck off from the blog..

    got to love the beaten Saffa, they are priceless…

  • 103.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    johnny cash

    nuff said….

  • 104.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @ufo-91:

    don’t be like that.

    Caner has just put a new astroturf carpet on his Airstream’s patio.

  • 105.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @NZINCHINA-97:
    you keep believing that…

  • 106.NZINCHINA: Reply to this comment

    @William Webb Ellis is now at home-102:

    i’m presuming thats Houston we have a problem? yip he’s been made to look very foolish the Bulls were slowing the ball down ,late/high tackles and entering the ruck from behind Ellis, isn’t that what he calls cheating?

  • 107.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-104:

    hehehe

  • 108.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-94: hahahaha :lol: ja, let’s isolate ourselves AGAIN :roll:

  • 109.ufo: Reply to this comment

    cane, poppa, NZiC, hurricane all got good sense of humor…

  • 110.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-103: Nasir Jones….enough said

  • 111.Atreides: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-94: Bud, seriously. The bulls were dire. The only reason they lost is because they sucked. I was hoping they would pitch up, but they didn’t. And they were the ones playing spoiling negative rugby, not the saders.

  • 112.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-103:

    Pooper was named after one of his songs.

  • 113.NZINCHINA: Reply to this comment

    @Atreides-111:

    he bit the head of his Ritchie voodoo doll half way through the 2nd half

  • 114.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-112: A boy named Sue?

  • 115.William Webb Ellis is now at home: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-112: big john? awww shucks Gunther, you do look at other blokes when in the conveniences huh? I thought it was only a rumour… :mrgreen:

    @NZINCHINA-106: Im waiting for the ref cheating post from our man with the love for bakkies… that ne should be highly entertaining

  • 116.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman-114:

    :lol:

  • 117.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-110:
    i googled him.
    he cannot possibly be as famous or musically good as johnny cash?

    @Atreides-111:
    agreed, it was a woeful, inept performance by the bulls and they deservedly lost. crusaders were at their usual though, watch the game again.

    and watch the game against the chiefs, see how that goes.

    and if they win then watch the game against their finals opponent, see how that goes.

    i wont watch the nz game but will enjoy the stormers – sharks clash.

  • 118.William Webb Ellis is now at home: Reply to this comment

    Gunther, i think this new found revelation has actually led me to understand your fixation with the “canon on my canoe”…

    e noho ra gentleman, and goodbye for now to you Saffas too..

  • 119.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @William Webb Ellis is now at home-118:

    Bye Sue.

  • 120.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-112:
    sue..?.

    that explains a lot

  • 121.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @NZINCHINA-106:
    Houston has gone into hibernation for a one week sabbatical, he will return with more allegations of onfield injustices perpetrated by us conniving kiwi………I’m beginning to love that shitt and I think Houston is the shizz.

  • 122.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @William Webb Ellis is now at home-118: Don’t forget your hairnet.

  • 123.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman-114:
    snap

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-119:
    :grin:
    i think it’ll stick

  • 124.Atreides: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-119: f uck, finally. Whatawanker

  • 125.NZINCHINA: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-117:

    The Bulls cheated all night very cynical, they made your prop an honourary Crusader after the match.

  • 126.NZINCHINA: Reply to this comment

    @Te Rangatira-121:

    he must have rented a cave in Pretoria

  • 127.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @Te Rangatira-121:
    no, its really just the crusaders and anyone who supports that sort of thing in rugby. even the chiefs are nowhere near as bad and the other nz unions are still within reason.

    crusaders rugby is filthy, dishonest, cheap shot, cheating rugby…

    and then there’s the refs amd TMO’s, i wont even go there…

  • 128.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @NZINCHINA-125:
    cynical..?
    ha

    haha

    hahahahaha

  • 129.NZINCHINA: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-127:

    you’ve been there a thousad times before one more time won’t hurt

  • 130.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-127:
    Houston you are here, HG is right need to have the former nic posted, well my friend you are obviously not going for the Crusaders…….join me in supporting the Chiefs……they will take down those “Cheats” for us, whattayousay.

  • 131.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @NZINCHINA-129:
    cant you get no satisfaction…

    @Te Rangatira-130:
    i mean no offense but i dont think i can stomach to watch the chiefs – crusaders game, rangy. i do support you along with the chiefs though.
    anyone to keep those people out, is a good thing.

  • 132.Te Rangatira: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-131:
    Yeah I understand……oh well Houston all the best and I will look out for your new nic. Peace out

  • 133.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-117: different strokes for different folks.

  • 134.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-133:

    ‘n Voël in die hand is beter as twee voëls in die bos.

  • 135.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die-134: is that jackparow?

  • 136.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    I see Sportingbet has the Stormers as favourites at 3/5. Sharks are still at 6/4.

  • 137.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-135:

    No, Fern.

  • 138.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die-136:

    the stormers have always been the saffa favourites.

    nothing new there.

  • 139.BuckT: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-138: maybe deep down in your subconscious mind, but weren’t the sharks and stormers both initially listed as initial favourites…? bookies place a huge emphasis on home ground advantage, but one can’t deny the sharks ‘momentum’. who are you supporting this Sat? be honest

  • 140.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    i am loving all the “oh the sharks are the greatest and the stormers mustnt even bother” posts from stormers fans.

    so sarky, so tender, such sensitivity.

    you must wake up.

  • 141.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @BuckT-139:

    Gunther will be washing his Kia Picanto on Saturday…

  • 142.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @BuckT-139: howdy buckt, long time mate.

    we are in for a ripper this weekend.

    i am very keen to see how the sides match up and i am already proud of both teams players (saffas one and all now that jeb is gone).

    a true saffa derby.

  • 143.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die-141: :lol:

    with the bass turned up.

  • 144.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    This site is going to the dogs…what’s up with the “posting too fast” comments?

  • 145.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-143:

    He might even turn convention on its head entirely and accompany Mrs Gunther to Canal Walk…

  • 146.BuckT: Reply to this comment

    Katman – Caddies fees are tax deductable, so unless he received a special ‘bonus’ from Ernie, I think his credit this month is still good! :)
    in ’97 when Ernie won the US Open, there was a Major bonus clause from Taylor Made that paid out $2Million so he gave the first prize of $500K to Ricky

  • 147.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-142:

    Ahem.

    I know Tendai Mtawarira got his SA citizenship.

    But I’m pretty sure Freddie Michalak is here on a work permit…

  • 148.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die-144: Ryan V and John C have to re-type all the comments from the little text box to the space under our names. Sometimes they struggle to keep up. Luckily Fuckadilly has taken a minor sabbatical. His posts are a fcken nightmare.

  • 149.BuckT: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die-141: you think the ‘wash cloth’ might be of a pink variety? :)

  • 150.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die-145: haha, kanalia walk?

    @WP Till I Die-147: haha, true that. forgot about the frog.

    typical sharks breaking the mold again.

    we are like that here in durbs.

  • 151.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @BuckT-146: No wonder Ricky’s gold chain just gets phatter and phatter.

  • 152.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-143: @WP Till I Die-141: Mrs G will be soooo happy :D

    a pair of hands to shift furniture.

  • 153.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-152: Shift furniture? That’s a euphemism for something, right?

  • 154.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-152:

    Maevis is overjoyed.

    No more heavy lifting for her.

  • 155.Brigadier Van Zyl: Reply to this comment

    chiefs have as good a chance of beating the crusaders.

    but for me…it’s going to be the crusaders against the stormers in cape town.

    the travel will hurt the sharks in the last few minutes.

    traditionally the crusaders have taken a spanking against the bulls in playoffs in SA. The Stormers are different, they poep their pants.

  • 156.BuckT: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-142: yes, without sounding to sarky, the sharks are impressing at the moment and even though i still don’t think we are going to see ‘that game’ from the Stormers we have been waiting for the whole season, if they can keep possession and play with confidence, it could go either way. how big was the snoek you shot anyway and did you just aim at a school and let fly or what??

  • 157.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman-153:

    Some (door)***** need polishing.

  • 158.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die-157:

    Doorknobs.

  • 159.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @BuckT-146: You still playing, or has daddyhood finally sunk your hopes of an Open qualifier wildcard?

    I’ll be playing my first game in months next weekend at Devonvale. Even hit the range a few times recently to make sure I can still advance the ball forward more often than not.

  • 160.NZINCHINA: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-150:

    it was nice to see your Sharks offloading in the tackle, its not really that difficult so im not sure what all the fuss is about but they looked very good

  • 161.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @BuckT-139:

    there is no room for debate here.

    finish and klaar.

    @rangerman-143:

    after market sound system from my friends at rad temple of sound in athlone.

    piccanto’s have very good accoustics.

    pump up the jam.

    @WP Till I Die-145:

    Mrs Gunther does her shopping in New York not Canal Walk.

    She does have her car serviced there though.

  • 162.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @BuckT-149:

    yeah… lot’s of pink loslappies in pretoria now… :wink:

  • 163.BuckT: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman-153: i think it will be automatic from the hand brake

  • 164.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @BuckT-156:

    No man.

    You don’t shoot snoek.

    The only time this has happened was when Snoek Dog was gunned down in Lavender Hill in 1997.

    (But he was very big.)

  • 165.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die-154:

    heavy lifting?

    please man.

    Maevis has had a doctors note for that since 2001.

    The only lifting she does is coffee and sugar from my pantry and the remote control to change from Oprah to the Wrestling.

  • 166.BuckT: Reply to this comment

    @Brigadier Van Zyl-155: it’s defintely going to be close and going on the results this season, Chiefs have out played the saders, could have so easily been 2-0 in their favour, plus the home ground advantage….it’s almost as if the Saders reputation precedes them these days, even with a few strange results this season….plus I think Reid is a massive loss, so going to back the Chiefs.

  • 167.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-165:

    Was it not a sangoma note?

  • 168.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-165: Why those are still two separate channels is beyond me. It’s the same market, so why not combine them? TV Show Wrestling could see Oprah take on Noleen and Jerry Springer up against Debora Patta.

    Of course, I’d only tune in to watch Jeanne D take on anyone.

  • 169.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @NZINCHINA-160: in SA one has to fuss as the coaches kill that kind of game at U20 level!

  • 170.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die-167:

    I don’t know.

    His name is Dr Moosha MD (University of Lagos)

    His business card says he specialises in spells, manhood problems and “things that are bad in your head”.

    I think I should pass his details on to Poep.

  • 171.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman-168:

    Just add Juju to the mix – his signature move can be the Moët & Chandon Smackdown – and we have some real potential here.

  • 172.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-170:

    Ah, he’s the one who keeps making criminal cases disappear from the Cape Town Magistrates Court’s roll.

  • 173.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman-168:

    it would certainly save Maevis some much deserved aggravation.

    I want to see Noleen sit on Jeannie D’s face.

    That’s payperview s.hit right there.

  • 174.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die-171:

    Deborah Patta’s signature move – the Tongue Lash.

  • 175.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    Did I say that out loud?

  • 176.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die-174: Or old Riaan C’s signature move, where he lifts the opponent’s feet off the ground, leaving them helplessly propped up on their hands, and then runs around the ring with them.

    It’s called the Kruiwagen.

  • 177.BuckT: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman-159: i manage a couple of rounds a month, keeps the rust off, but been a very fair weather golfer of note lately! we must organise a game at the Jewel of the north (aka durbanville) best greens in the Cape at the moment. lets wait until the fairways dry out first though!

  • 178.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-175: Yep. And I now need a brainscrub.

  • 179.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die-164: You are posting comments too quickly. Please slow down.
    @>^..^< katman-178: You are posting comments too quickly. Please slow down.
    @the artist formerly known as gunther-175: You are posting comments far too f u ck ing quickly. Log the f kc u off.

  • 180.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @BuckT-177:

    the jewel of the north.

    :lol:

    a rof diamond.

  • 181.BuckT: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-170: does he also guarantee no cheaty cheaty from wife with other manhood?

  • 182.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @BuckT-177: Funny that. D’urbanville always has the “best something” in Cape Town. You guys are truly privileged.

    But yes, we must arrange something. Maybe drag Bod back onto the tee box.

  • 183.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman-182:

    if only to mow it.

  • 184.BuckT: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-180: there are definitely a few cubics in the rough!

  • 185.BuckT: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman-182: yes, apparently best heroin dealers as well, if some stats are to be believed.
    what has happened to bod these days, made a short return then dropped off the radar…
    @the artist formerly known as gunther-183: hehe i thought you were still talking about Noleen sitting on Jeannie D’s face

  • 186.cane: Reply to this comment

    @BuckT-177:

    “lets wait until the fairways dry out”.

    Do you need that extra bit of rolly polly Buck.

    :)

  • 187.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @cane-186: He doesn’t like mud splatter on his cream slacks.

  • 188.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @cane-186: And the short answer is no. Buck gets more carry with his 8-iron than I get with my best topped driver – roll included.

  • 189.BuckT: Reply to this comment

    @cane-186: Pinnacles these days bounce through the mud…plus the greatest big bertha can still do the biznis!

  • 190.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    baie baie snaaks vandag

    :lol:

  • 191.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    @BuckT-189:

    The greatest big Bertha?

    Don’t tell me yours has a Doctors note as well ?

  • 192.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-191: you were speaking on itenders earlier :D nom nom nom

    R8bn ‘green building’ for Pretoria

    | 20 July 2012

    Construction began on the Environmental Affairs Department’s new R8-billion “green building” in Pretoria on Thursday, illustrating South Africa’s determination to move towards a low-carbon economy.

    It serves as a “green and bold step” which signals a new era in South Africa’s response to climate change, Environmental Affairs Minister Edna Molewa said at the sod-turning ceremony.

    Molewa predicted it would change the face of the construction industry.

    “Through this green building we will propel the department above the construction industry players, setting a good example for other organisations and of course for the benefit of the environment and future generations,” she said.

    http://www.southafrica.info/about/sustainable/green-200712.htm

  • 193.WP Till I Die: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-192:

    R8 BILLION!!!!!!

  • 194.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-192: @WP Till I Die-193: A healthy lifestyle is expensive.

  • 195.ryecatcher: Reply to this comment

    Gunther @ 72.Hank senior

  • 196.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @WP Till I Die-193: I think that amount includes the building of a life size replica Chapman’s Peak mountain – all these new buildings must be on one.

  • 197.ryecatcher: Reply to this comment

    Gunther @ 72.Country music that made sense.Not this “Baby make my blue jeans talk walk”****.
    Johny cash @ Patsy Kline also great.

  • 198.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    I may have missed it but I don’t see too much of Tac around here…

    I told him before the time that the Bulls 10-12 axis = their Achilles; unfortunately I did not see that game but was not surprised when I saw the final score; ironically Wynand Olivier’s try in that match will secure him his place in the Bok side

    The bad news is that when Dan Kara departs then Tom Taylor will take over; now he comes from stock that offloaded in the tackle in the early 80s so it will be more of the same…

    Meanwhile I’m afraid the Stormers will not triumph but the Sharks will then end up runners-up; you have to admire how the plan their season

  • 199.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    Admire how the Crusaders plan their season…

  • 200.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    Admire how you arrange your easy listening jazz collection.

  • 201.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    R8 billion?

    What he means I’d that his mates and family will feel the lasting effects for generations to come.

  • 202.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    Sharks training sessions apparently going very well. Guys are in a good mental place too.

    Is tjulle reg Stormas ?

  • 203.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    Al Jarreau!

    And a bit of Salt n Pepa for when the joint is really moving.

  • 204.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    Anyone who thinks green comes cheap cannot be a true environmentalist. You can’t put a price tag on the earth. To make an omelette you must break some free range eggs. When it comes to saving the planet through your new offices, you get what you pay for. And anyway, haters gonna hate.

  • 205.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-203: Stick on Al Jarreau and you make da lady’s day. Stick on George Benson and you make her whole week.

  • 206.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman-205: Al Jarreau “the man with an orchestra in his mouth” :D

    i “missed” his performance in ’09 @ CTIJF and went to the famed Mavericks instead.

  • 207.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    Hahahana

    Sies.

  • 208.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-206: As opposed to Kenny G, the man with the organ in his mouth.

  • 209.Atreides: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-206: is it any good?

  • 210.Atreides: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman-205: lol siff

  • 211.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    I guess the key word in sport is ‘composure’ ; Amla scoring 300, the Proteas making sure that they get there and Sharks executing their game plan and surprising the Reds

    Federer winning a 7th and so on…

    So there is another opportunity for the Stormers… but will they keep their composure or will the moment be too big yet again?

    You have to have the ability to shut out the broader implications ie don’ worry about winning the entire tournament, just win the game and then enjoy the fruits of your labour

  • 212.ryecatcher: Reply to this comment

    Katman 208
    Very Good.Lol.

    All of my immortals are dead.Ray Charles
    Elvis Hank Patsy Kline,Johnny Cash.The list
    goes on.(An oxymoron in there)

  • 213.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    Geez you guys over-complicate things on these blogs, and I must tell you it amuses the players greatly. I would love to hear Percy comment on whether all this kak really affects the players.

    On Saturday, Sharks will play the Stormers at Newlands. The team that runs faster, finds gaps to run into, tackles more accurately and perhaps gets a little ‘rub of the green’ will win. Simple as that. Yes, the Sharks will be negatively influenced by their travel – that is a physiological fact that cannot be avoided.

    But all this mental stuff is a crock of bull.

    It is two rugby teams going up against each other….that’s how the players see it. Some might have some mental demons that come back to haunt them in pressure situations like this, but in general these boys are just going to do what they have done since school.

    Go out onto a rugby field on Saturday and play rugby to try and win.

    Just chill guys. Whoever is going to win….is going to win….

  • 214.>^..^< katman: Reply to this comment

    @Sheriff-211: Not just sport. We’ve got a great composure in the corner of the garden. All our veggie offcuts, eggshells, garden clippings go in there. It really is super.

  • 215.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @Sheriff-211: Another Federer supporter ? Are you also one of those that believes Federer gives a flying f$%k about his South African heritage ?

    Personally, I support Rafael Nadal. At least he doesn’t look like a ballerina when he plays tennis.

  • 216.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Atreides-209: it’s aaaaight

  • 217.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-215: he might not give a “flying f$%k” but he puts his money in south african charities, which is more than a weasel like you has ever done…

    :lol:

  • 218.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-217: Heita….fokkoff….

  • 219.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-217: In other words, he pours money into some corrupt ‘big chiefs’ pocket ?

  • 220.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-213:

    No doubt if they play the way you write then there can only be one outcome: defeat

    I was amazed just recently when I stumbled on a documentary where they interviewed the AB u20 side; they focused specifically the captain I forget his name

    I was amazed at the technical detail they discussed, the individual support and know-how; you may argue but they lost the game – let me tell you those players will re-appear in Crusaders, Chiefs jumpers in years to come and play with maturity beyond their year

    This becomes the basis for refined thinking later on in their careers, no wonder they are able to manipulate defences because its in their culture of thinking about the game

  • 221.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-215: He is a huge Springbok supporter.

    Does that answer your question?

  • 222.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    you know it really would not surprise me in the least if those new zealanders had put something into the bulls team’s food at the hotel they were staying in.

    nothing, nothing is impossible with these people.

    something sedatative perhaps, just enough to leave the team slightly lethargic on the pitch.

    anyway

    bygones

  • 223.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @willievz-221: Where do you see that ? I have never heard Federer say or allude to anything that has to do with his South African heritage.

    Vamos Rafa ! Give the ballerina a hiding !

  • 224.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @>^..^< katman-214:

    Well done, do you throw it in there yourself or does Ben-Lucius?

  • 225.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @Sheriff-220: Believe what you like. I have have been fortunate enough to chat to a few guys in my time, and its much simpler than this.

    They definitely dont complicate matters in their minds as much as we do on this blog. Thats for sure.

  • 226.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    very snaaks comments today

    :lol:

    rwl

  • 227.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-215:

    Yeah. And Djokovic.

    I thought Federer is Maori.

  • 228.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    haha, 8 billion for a green building is such utter bs.

    green doesnt have to be ultra expensive.

    unless you are an anc tunc lead by that fuckinglyingpig of a president rapist arseholethieffraudcorruptuncaringfuck.

    its like a bunch of pigs just stealing every penny they can lay their hands on before the public really sees what is going on behind the scenes and votes them out.

    by that time we will have the currency of zambia.

    zuma (that smilingfuckinglyingthievingrapist) was quizzed in a radio interview this morning by listeners and claimed that “many of the people found guilty of corruption had already paid the money back” but then couldnt name a single example of this happening?

    ffs, he is a liar. our president is a liar.

    thankfully the sharks are going to win on saturday so i will have something to be happy about.

  • 229.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-225: @Dusky-225:

    You talked to the 3 wrong guys; surely you see your mistake now?

  • 230.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-228:
    did a zulu tell you that?

  • 231.TooMuchRugby: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-215: At least Federer doesn’t scratch his a.ss and b.alls on court all the time, or suffers from OCD

  • 232.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-219: south africa, contrary to your strongly-held delusions, does not have monopoly on corruption. :D

    watch your money up there in Norway, a plaas japie like you might get swindled

  • 233.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-223: I am sure you know how to use Google?

    Federer’s mom is a Saffa. That alone makes him more Saffa than Andy Murray is English.

    Yet all the English support Murray during Wimbledon?

  • 234.TooMuchRugby: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-225: Well, they were not chosen for their mental abilities…….

  • 235.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    wow, that was extreme.

    apologies peeps, i was just getting my anger out in advance for when my kids have to share a textbook with 12 other kids at school one day.

  • 236.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-222: Sorry my friend, but that doesn’t explain how Pierre Spies and Morne Steyn have been playing with veins full of Ketamine all season. Unless someone has been doping them in Tswane….(Oom Wynie was confused by the candy labels?)

  • 237.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-230: tell me what?

  • 238.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-228: Ranger, are you Wayne Holroyd?

  • 239.David: Reply to this comment

    @willievz-221: You mean as opposed to the Swiss rugby side? :lol:

  • 240.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @willievz-233: hi willie.

    is federer seriously even aware of rugby?

    thats pretty cool.

    then again, the boks dominated world rugby for close to 100 years and have also had a hollywood movie made about them.

    unlike teams from small backwaters floating on the edge of the arseend of antarctica.

  • 241.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @willievz-233: Federer is Swiss. The Swiss look at us ‘Africans’ with great disdain. I know people in Switzerland that wouldn’t admit that their mothers had Italian heritage. I dont find anything on google, which is what I expected.

    Federer has never mentioned anything about his South African heritage, nor could he or his mom care less about South Africa. Which is exactly how my kids would be too. I can hardly blame them.

    I know South Africans will support anyone, even if they just had a groen onderbroek on – which is kind of sad.

  • 242.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Skeppie-238: haha, howdy skeppie.

    no bud, i see wayne at umhlanga from time to time.

    do you have a french surname?

  • 243.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-242: Nope…..dude there were not that many rugby nuts in 2E1…I would ask if you are Brett Harris but I know you aren’t…..hhmmmm?

  • 244.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-237:
    the sharks will win..

  • 245.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    Jeez Ranger.

    Tell us how you really feel about the guy.

  • 246.David: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-241:
    From Federers book:

    South Africa was always a special place for Roger Federer. He held a South African passport since birth and became endeared to his mother’s native country. He routinely traveled there with his family when he was little. “South Africa is a haven for him away from the world of tennis to find fresh inspiration,” his mother explained once. “It has a certain openness to it. You grow up with a lot of space in South Africa, which is something different compared to the narrowness of a mountain landscape. South Africans are more open, less complicated. Roger had taken on these characteristics.”

    Roger Federer
    Meanwhile, Federer acquired a valuable piece of property along the picturesque Garden Route on the western coast of South Africa at the luxurious Pezula Resort. After the exhausting 2000 season, Federer vacationed in South Africa, where he went on safari with his godfather, Arthur Dubach, a work colleague of Federer’s father during his work days in South Africa. They even experienced a rare site for tourists—a group of leopards killing and eating a gazelle.

  • 247.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    The Fed actually holds South African citizenship.

    We’re claiming him.

    Fuc.k what a quisling like dusky says.

  • 248.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-241: from da intranets bud:

    Personal Began playing tennis at age eight… Mother, Lynette, is South African and father, Robert, is Swiss and they met on a business trip… In 2003, initiated Roger Federer Foundation which supports disadvantaged children in South Africa and promotes sport for young people… Named ATP Player of Year, Stefan Edberg Sportsmanship award and ATPtennis.com fans’ favorite in 2004…. Federer spends his off-court time playing cards, cricket, ping pong, other sports and sitting on the beach… Speaks English, German, Swiss German, French and some Swedish and Italian… In 2005, worked part-time with Aussie coach Tony Roch

  • 249.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @David-246: LOL…ok David. A group of Leopards ? eating a Gazelle ?

    What a load of kak. GO RAFA !

  • 250.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-248: I think he’s a gwat.

  • 251.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Skeppie-243: haha, i wasnt a great rugby player bud.

    in fact i was terrible.

    but i did play with a few lads from the old boys 1st div reserves and then 4ths over the last few years.

    i left it all behind for spearfishing and beer :lol:

    brett is a magic guy.

    but i digress, i dont really want to have my name on this site, too many wackos like me around lol.

  • 252.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-250: a little more for you:

    Federer backs Boks at RWC
    2011-01-26 13:11
    Email | Print
    Roger Federer (File)
    Related Links

    French back All Blacks at RWC
    Money rolls in for All Blacks
    Latest Australian Open news

    Melbourne – Roger Federer will be closely following this year’s Rugby World Cup – just don’t ask him to support the All Blacks.

    The Swiss tennis great, now at the Australian Open halfway towards his 17th Grand Slam, On Tuesday revealed he is a keen rugby fan – but backs the Springboks.

    He was aware of the tournament set to kick off in October, but told the NZ Herald website he would not be backing the men in black.

    “(I’ll support) the Swiss,” he joked. “I think they are starting to get into it a bit.”

    Indeed Switzerland, who have about 2 000 registered players, have made progress in recent years but are still ranked 63rd in the world.

    “(No) I’ll probably support the South Africans,” admitted Federer, “because my mum is from South Africa. So I always support them.”

    Though rugby is irrelevant to most Swiss, the 29-year-old immediately recalled the 2007 World Cup and how he had enjoyed watching the Springboks triumph in France.

  • 253.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-248: A ‘p’ word that is the same as;

    A ‘quim’, a ‘gwar’, a ‘steak wat grond toe kyk’, a ‘wolbeursie’, a ‘guava’……get the picture ?

  • 254.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-251: Fair enough…..I know Angus Powers is quite the sports writer these days……

  • 255.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    shame that poor chick in the back of the keotv pic with the keo crowd looks like an anorexic alien with that hairstyle.

    or is it the chubbiness of ryan and keo that cause this effect.

    she has a nice smile though.

  • 256.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-252: Aaahhhh man – isn’t that sweet. Have you ever been to Switzerland ? Worked with the Swiss in any business capacity ? Or had any Swiss friends ?

    I want to see Federer stand up at a formal cocktail party, at one of his mansions – perhaps in Genevre and preach out about his African heritage….LOL….

    But – if you like Federer – good for you. Great tennis player, I just think (much like the Stormers) he plays effective yet extremely boring tennis.

  • 257.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-253: :lol: no worries bud, i am ambivalent towards tennis players.

    @Skeppie-254: haha, angus is a cracker, he was here the other day.

    ba s t a rd gets to go on blerrie sports illustrated shoots with the swimwear models.

    he always was a cleva that angus lol.

    who were you mates with at school?

  • 258.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-256: ze swiss and ze ranger have not really crossed paths besides for the swiss chap i had to advise to lance a weeping sore on his leg in mexico and then squeeze (i was sure he had a passenger onboard after dealing with putsi fly).

    he popped out a wem.

    he was an unhappy switzi :lol:

  • 259.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Skeppie-254: then again, angus came from that beachlands (or something?) school with their torn clothes and their scruffy demeanour.

    he turned out ok though :lol:

  • 260.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-257: Garth Parsons who was with you in 2E1…Bretty….Martin Connor……Grant Swan, Brad Hancock etc.

  • 261.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    Gunther

    if i really told you what i thought of zooma and his bunch of pirates i would probably have to go underground :lol:

  • 262.NZINCHINA: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-240:

  • 263.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Skeppie-260: @Skeppie-260: dont talk k uuuuuuuuuuu k!

    :lol:

    what position you play at school and for what team :lol:

  • 264.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @NZINCHINA-262:

  • 265.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-258: hawu….a wem ? From her leg ? From the fly ? eish !! aikona wena…..I kant belief….

  • 266.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    dusky:

    He’s Swiss, plays tennis and backs the ‘Boks

    25 January, 2011
    Roger Federer will be closely
    following this year’s Rugby World
    Cup – just don’t ask him to support
    the All Blacks.
    The Swiss tennis great, now at the
    Australian Open halfway towards
    his 17th Grand Slam, yesterday
    revealed he is a keen rugby fan -
    but backs the Springboks.
    He was aware of the tournament
    set to kick off in October, but told
    the Herald he would not be
    backing the men in black.
    “[I'll support] the Swiss,” he
    joked. “I think they are starting to
    get into it a bit.”
    Indeed Switzerland, who have
    about 2000 registered players,
    have made progress in recent
    years but are still ranked 63rd in
    the world.
    “[No] I’ll probably support the
    South Africans,” admitted
    Federer, “because my mum is
    from South Africa. So I always
    support them.”
    Though rugby is irrelevant to
    most Swiss, the 29-year-old
    immediately recalled the 2007
    World Cup and how he had
    enjoyed watching the Springboks
    triumph in France.
    “It’s a great sport. I just like good
    matches. So especially World Cups
    and stuff, I try to follow those.”
    Earlier some British journalists,
    still smug from the recent Ashes
    triumph, had asked the world No 2
    if he had “noticed” cricket during
    his frequent visits to Australia
    over the years.
    “I do follow cricket. I did see a bit
    of the Ashes at the very beginning
    and I always like to watch cricket
    when I’m down here.”
    The Fleet St smiles dipped slightly
    with his next comment.
    “Yeah, I know it’s big news [but]
    you should be happy that you
    have it,” he said. “It’s not always
    going to be like that, you know.”
    As the sporting vein continued, he
    said he would have opted for
    soccer, basketball or skiing if he
    hadn’t chosen tennis. “Just not
    swimming for sure. I can swim
    well, but I wouldn’t want to – too
    hard.”
    Federer switches seamlessly from
    English to French, then Swiss-
    German and Italian. He always
    finishes with a couple of German
    answers and can also handle
    Spanish if necessary.
    For this reason the French and
    Germans have adopted Federer as
    one of their own, and it is not
    uncommon for his post-match
    media commitments to take
    longer than his games.
    Federer’s recall is impressive. He
    is able to precisely remember
    details from any of the more than
    900 career matches he has played
    - as well as the best moments
    from the 2007 Rugby World Cup.
    Rugby

  • 267.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-266: Yes, I got that one already. Ranger found it quicker than you. See my response at 256.

  • 268.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-265: :lol:

    he was paler than your average swiss gent.

    and thats pale.

  • 269.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-263: Now that would be a bit too much detail…

  • 270.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-236:
    ag you know this is exactly the kind of opportune circumstances under which people blow up world trade centres and then allow ‘conspiracy theorists’ to fuel their own ‘cuckoo’ fires.

  • 271.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-268: ooooo….sorrie ne…..

    Seriaaas ? Jy’t home gevat darrie wem van die been ?

  • 272.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Skeppie-269: hahaha, ok man.

    but i was with Brad at cape Vidal this weekend spearfishing.

    he shot a snoek, i shot a snoek.

    we ate my snoek, we froze his snoek.

    :lol:

  • 273.NZINCHINA: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-264:

    Your Sharks could go all the way with their new off load game, JPP voted the best winger in the world on the KEO poll, the stars are aligning

  • 274.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-261: is insulting someone for something that hasn’t happened – your daughter sharing a book with 16 other kids – referred to as a pre-cursor?

    *you know mu command of the eeengggileeesh is not good so help…

  • 275.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @NZINCHINA-273:
    did you vote ‘no’ ?

  • 276.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @NZINCHINA-273: haha, dont bait me you cunning fellow.

    @Transformation-274: :lol:

    nah, it wasnt. he already presided over it happening now so nothing pre about it.

    gotta go. skeppie, chat laters bud stay well.

  • 277.NZINCHINA: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-275:

    didn’t vote but he looked good on the weekend

  • 278.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-272: Andrew Macdonald?

  • 279.NZINCHINA: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-276:

    I’m a Shark this weekend if thats ok.

  • 280.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-270: :) :) :)

  • 281.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-261: I could say what I think of Zooma. He can do fokkol to me here where I am.

    I think Zooma is a typical African chief. He got the position because the people liked him, but he has no flippin clue what he is doing. This oke wakes up every morning wondering how he ended up being president of a country but still has no idea what he is doing. Absolutely no clue, which makes him more dangerous than if he actually did because he can be easily manipulated into talking about things like the ‘second phase of the transition’ which international business sees as ‘seizure of land without compensation’ and ‘nationalisation of banks and mines’.

    Eish…I wonder how many international contracts were scrapped after the ANC’s clever ‘second transition’ idea ?

    The rest of the government. From the pressure to cut costs at local municipalities (how on earth with the minimal funding they already get), etc. etc. I think the amount of money available for embezzlement has dried up to some extent. I think even with Malema out the picture, the ANC are still over-spending on the lavish lifestyles of the guys that said they would bring ‘Ubuntu’ to our country.

    Also, there is complete ignorance of the issues, or development of scenarios that will cost South Africa’s economy heavily in the longer term. But that is a long conversation and I have no interest in entertaining a debate from our resident village idiot on that.

    Its a circus – or rather a zoo….

  • 282.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @NZINCHINA-277:
    yes, he did.

    its a clash of unstoppable forces and immovable objects in the saffa playoff on the weekend. wonder which will give.

    respectfully, i wont comment on the kiwi one.

  • 283.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-282: you’re going to give yourself ulcers hating keewees! :lol:

    relax and enjoy the game

    it’s only sport

  • 284.NZINCHINA: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-282:

    I’m hoping the Sharks win for obvious reasons, think the Crusaders might take the NZ game although Read is a huge loss. I doubt the Sharks could travel to CHCH and win. Will Steyn still play 10 for the Bokke later in the year?

  • 285.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @wait for it, wait for it…-282: imagine mandela felt about the springboks the same way you do about the crusaders when he was on robben island :mrgreen:

  • 286.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-285: Ahhhh…..imagine…..

  • 287.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    Daai Theuns Jordaan klong klink baie keer soos Petrus Padda van Wielie Walie faam in die 80s

    Maar hy’t nogal ‘n lekker song nou ‘appel en ‘n ui’

  • 288.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-285: I don’t think Mandela felt about the Nat government the way Galileo feels about the Crusaders.

  • 289.NZINCHINA: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-288:

    surely Mandela wasn’t that bitter even after decades of incarceration

  • 290.Sheriff: Reply to this comment

    katman

    Net vir jou

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_339699&feature=iv&src_vid=LTa16SFpfXM&v=O1dEX2HpuNo

  • 291.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @NZINCHINA-289: In other countries, the death penalty has been used for crimes involving the planning of terrorist acts which result in the death of 19 people. 27 years is a bargain.

    Sorry – I said it….

  • 292.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-291: You are a right ray of conservative f u cking sunshine aren’t you?

  • 293.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-292: Am I wrong ? If this guy in Colorado gets 27 years for shooting 13 innocent people including a 6 year old, would you think that would be suitable justice ?

    I am just being real. Or has the braaivleis smoke and the tears during the anthems before a Springbok test blinded you as well ?

  • 294.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    Still giving this to the Stormers by a whisker.

    No doubt my Sharks friends will be happy given my record on jinxing teams but then again, I believe Keo with a worse record than mine is backing the Sharks?

  • 295.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @PissAnt-294: Actually it is a bit scary. In 2010 Ryan Vrede predicted exactly how the Bulls would beat the Sharks in the semi-final, and it was spot on except it was exactly the way the Sharks beat the Bulls.

    He then went on to describe to an absolute tee how WP would beat the Sharks in the final, and what was extremely uncanny is that for a second week in a row he described exactly how the Sharks in fact beat WP.

    So – this positive talk of how the Sharks will dismantle the Stormers is very disturbing. It could be the exact reverse.

  • 296.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-293: That “Joker” was strung out on fantasy and psychosis…Comparing his totally fe cked in the head inspired rampage to an armed struggle (which began only after repeated attempts at peaceful resolution) for the right to walk down a road, visit a bathroom of your choice and vote is like comparing Kurt Darren to Muse or Linkin Park – worlds and contexts apart.

    You do realise that if there was no armed struggle, the highlight of your sporting year would still be a Currie Cup final or the Comrades marathon, with permed haired meisies saaing uit van die SAUK kantoor in Auckland Park?

  • 297.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-296:

    Don’t forget the Lion Cup and the North South rugby game

  • 298.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-296: I can recognize the positives that Mandela brought to our country, but I am not going to worship him. I am afraid I am too much of a realist for that.

    Google ‘church street bombing’ and go and look at some of those images ? Have you read ‘Long walk to freedom’ ? He admits signing off on this. Regardless of what right you’re fighting for – You think 27 years is unjustified ? Just the right amount ?

  • 299.fantasticbarnsmell: Reply to this comment

    @Sheriff-290: nice one… speaking of old adverts, for years i’ve been looking for an old Simba peanuts advert with this song about this kid Bantula, who happens to be the coolest ever, but to no avail.

  • 300.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-298: What would you have done were you in his position all those years ago?

  • 301.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    Happily, people’s predictions have no bearing on what will happen on Saturday – for example, they can’t change the fact that the Stormers are extremely limited and attempt to win games by avoiding playing rugby wherever possible.

  • 302.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok-297: Yes! The Lion Cup and Benson and Hedges night cricket :)

    @Dusky-298: If you read what I wrote the other day, you would see that I don’t worship Mandela either. He is a mortal, not a God. His capacity for forgiveness and nation building however separates him from mortals like you and I.The only question you have to ask, when you look at those images you suggest I ‘google’ is the following: Would the SA government of the day have taken ANY notice, or even acknowledged just the MOST fundamental rights of the ANC if the ‘spear of the nation’ hadn’t taken up arms? Quiet diplomacy didn’t work with the Nats, they were far too arrogant for that. Google a few images of the Nats war crimes, and tell me if that alone was not reason for an armed struggle, once all else had failed?
    Tragic that there were casualties in the armed struggle of course (and I’m sure many of the comrades developed a taste for blood born not out of freedom fighting, but out of bloodlust – so I am NOT saying MK and APLA etc were all innocent)
    What I am saying is this: If someone denies you the right to move freely, or holds you hostage in your own home (never mind country) I guarantee you right now, that you Dusky, will take up arms if dialogue fails.

  • 303.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-301:

    That is exactly how Jake won the RWC in 2007.

  • 304.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-301: They don’t attempt to win games.
    More often than not (14/16) they DO win games :)

  • 305.Narutokun: Reply to this comment

    The sharks should just give it up already! Coz surely they not going to win the S15 in NZ. Which makes the stormers SA best chance of winning theS15.

  • 306.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-302: What you said

  • 307.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @Skeppie-300: Lets leave this discussion on a rugby forum.

    Who do you think will win on Saturday ? Both games ?

  • 308.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-302: I mostly agree. Actually, its in defense of South Africa that I usually raise this argument. When criticized for Madiba’s imprisonment the opposite question is also pertinent – ‘What would any other government have done under the circumstances ?’

    Anyway – enough of that. Moving right along. Shouldn’t have raised the topic in the first place.

  • 309.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-307: Fair enough. I reckon the saders will pump the chiefs who just don’t have the pack to win a play off game and as a sharks supporter I reckon the sharks will take the stormers…..only problem there is as a saffa if the sharks win, asking them to go back and play the saders in Christchurch in the final will be like rugbys everest.

  • 310.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @PissAnt-303: I think the Bok success in 2009 is a better example, but yes – I’m thinking along the same lines. Either way, it’s a regression.

  • 311.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @Skeppie-309: But can you imagine if they make it to the summit ? It would be the dream Super 15 season. The absolute cherry ! They would have done it from 6th position, something that might not be repeated for some time to come – perhaps never.

    I have to admit that from a SA rugby perspective the Stormers have a better chance of taking the trophy right now.

  • 312.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @Skeppie-309: Much like the world cup in New Zealand, winning a Super 15 trophy in the Crusaders back yard would be something very special. I can’t help but dream a bit….:-)

  • 313.willievz: Reply to this comment

    I see no one here is giving the Chiefs any chance of lifting the trophy.

    Interesting.

  • 314.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @willievz-313: I have no idea who will win the semi between the Chiefs and Crusaders – it could go either way. I think the Sharks will beat the Stormers though. In the final, who knows?

  • 315.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-314: That’s the beauty of knock-out rugby. You never know.

    I don’t think the Sharks will make it on Saturday, but if they do manage to go all the way I will ask Transie to archive all the posts at the beginning of the season when I was punting the Sharks as a dark horse this tournament.

    Needless to say, I got a lot of stick for my prediction.

    :lol:

  • 316.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @willievz-315: I’ve put my money where my mouth (and heart) is, so I’m hoping your early prediction was right :lol:

  • 317.Andile: Reply to this comment

    Does this site have a BlackBerry app???

  • 318.IAAS: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-316:

    Rather bet with your head.

    Support with your heart and your big mouth. :D

    It’s called an emotional hedge.

    That way you won’t be disappointed.

  • 319.Dawn: Reply to this comment

    Watsup with Dusky talking up the Stormers

  • 320.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @willievz-313: I reckon the Chiefs will beat the Crusaders. SBW will want to make up for that glory boy moment that cost them a draw in the last meeting. I think he will look to his outside this time round if the opportunity presents itself :) Nothing the Crusaders did (apart from DC’s distribution) against the Bulls points to them being this ‘unbeatable’ team some hype them up to be. The Chiefs backline is superior to the Saders IMHO, and their forwards as a unit have been rough,tough and potent against ‘better rated’ packs. They have no need to take one step back for the Saders. Chiefs coaches are also more astute than their Cantabrian counterparts :) They will be ready, and up for it, and will win it….

  • 321.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @IAAS-318: I took the bet because the odds were against the Sharks winning – that made the bet attractive, because if the Sharks somehow pull it off the reward is great. Last weekend’s performance has convinced me that the Sharks can do it.

  • 322.IAAS: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-321:

    Obviously I’m going the other way. But there will only be a handful of points in it. There’s a lot going for both sides. This weekend and next couldn’t have been scripted better.

  • 323.David: Reply to this comment

    @willievz-315:
    C’mon Willie, at the start of the season the Sharks were the favourites to head the SA Conference. :lol:

  • 324.We are called the Springboks: Reply to this comment

    If the Sharks win this weekend then they will win the comp. They would have beaten both attacking and defensive minded teams to get to the final and away from home, this would put them in a good position and mindset for the final. Its not impossible

  • 325.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-310:

    Don’t underestimate how desperate the Stormers are…

    I do think the Sharks have the momentum but I reckon the Stormers are just that much more desperate. The team that keeps calm upstairs (psychologically) will take this. Stormers will not change their way of playing one bit and they have been doing it for 15 games in a row now so they are very well versed in their roles and responsibilities. That’s why I give it to them.

  • 326.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    @David-323:

    Yup, they were my personal pick

  • 327.We are called the Springboks: Reply to this comment

    On the other hand the Stormers have been playing knock out style rugby the entire season and wont deviate from this. They could end up capatilising on errors from the Sharks

  • 328.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @PissAnt-325: Why are they more “desperate”? They are at home having rested while the Sharks flew to Australia and back and if they win they play the final at home. If the Sharks win they have to fly to New Zealand. If they lose then the trip to Australia and back was for nothing. If either team deserves to be desperate, it is the Sharks.

  • 329.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    Coetsee is going to make a mistake playing Fourie at 8.. this is not the Cheetahs or Rebels this weekend its the Sharks

    Fourie should start at 2 and we should flood the 2nd row and back row with enforcers

    Roux, Elstadt, Kolisi Bekker, Etsebeth, Harris, Fourie, Kitshoff .. That should be our starting 8

    with

    Carstens, Liebenberg, Malherbe, Steenkamp, Armand or Vermeulen on bench..

    we only need Schreuder and Vd Heever as reserve backs, Grant will see out the 80 .. and if he don’t then Duvenhage or Pietersen can go to 10.. we don’t need Francis on the bench but we do need a full army of front row, 2nd row and back row back ups..

  • 330.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-328:

    I think we are on different frequencies wrt to desperate.

    Stormers have not won a trophy of any significance in over a decade. Every year the Cape press reminds them of this. They cannot be in a better position to do it than right now (home semi and final if they win). Failure now will end some careers.

  • 331.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-320: There are not many teams out there that can match the Crusaders’ effectiveness at counterrucking.

    But then again, the Bulls were their own worst enemies on the weekend.

    The Bulls did not protect their ruck ball sufficiently on the offense. This was partly due to the fact that they did not know what to do with ball in hand – carriers and support runners alike. The strike runners attacked from too deep and with too little support going into collisions.

    The Sharks are far better in this regard. They trust their offensive game a lot more and their supporting lines are well defined.

    The Stormers are also protecting their offensive ball a lot better this season by staying upright in the collisions a little more. Their defense is at a different level though – I cannot believe that Nienaber is not involved with the Boks.

  • 332.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @PissAnt-330: Fair enough, but I don’t think that sort of desperation helps – it hinders.

  • 333.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    Stormers are way more desperate .. Sharks got far less to lose because Sharks are playing catch up rugby coming from the pack while Stormers got to defend their higher log position as well as their home town status.. but that kind of desperation can backfire like it did when Schalk took the team to Durban and Soweto and got done in on the premise of far too much expectation.. the expectation is what is the biggest burden to carry.. it weighs heavier than a ton of bricks on a team and coaching staff and captains minds…

    This time they got to shake all that burden of expectation off before they run on the field else it going to play straight into Sharks hands who have relatively zero expectancy bearing down on them in comparison…

    Sharks got everything to play for.. Stormers got everything to prove to their supporters and to themselves and to defend their so called home town advantage….. Its far easier to come in as underdogs on a momentum high than as home town favorites carrying the burden of a sound defensive system and huge expectation from your home fans every and anytime..

  • 334.We are called the Springboks: Reply to this comment

    With Bekker back the Stormers backline has an extra dimension;)

  • 335.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    Stormers do NOT want to run on the field having to prove to themselves they belong at the back end of the competition.. they do NO want to run on under a huge cloud of desperation and over arching expectancy.. if that is how they going to run on then their own psychological expectation is going to be a bigger threat to their own game than Sharks physicality or Sharks potential power and offload game.

  • 336.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella-335: The Stormers aren’t going to win because the Sharks are the better team – simple, really. Just sit back and dream of Africa and it will soon all be over :wink:

  • 337.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-332:

    It has been hindering them for 10 years now. The difference this year in the Stormers team is they overcame adversity through sheer balls and mental toughness to end where they did given all the injuries. If they can apply that in a play off situation then they will win – but that remains to be seen and I am not overly convinced.

    But they have the advantage going into this semi.

  • 338.ufo: Reply to this comment

    I said on keo after the world cup that the senior wp players had got together and decided to all come back and give it their all to win the super15 trophy… was told by someone involved and that they had all committed to it and worked right throughout the off season to ensure they were ready and the evidence has been the turn around by bryan… and in their attitude and determination to play for each other and win… no matter what… and the reason for the huge spirit in the team… this came from the players… i’m sure they were all as shocked by jaque’s departure as we were but don’t think anyone holds it against him due to the huge money they dangled…

    but yeah pissant… you’re right… people are underestimating the sheer will of these guys to finally do it and win the comp…

    but as i said the other day… one of the things that has assisted the stormers is the fact that fans (in particular) and other teams keep looking at their lack of tries and bonus points and underestimate them and say ‘we will show these stormers’… but there is huge gees and determination to win… which everybody bar them is not taking seriously enough…

    make this underestimation continue for another two weeks…!! :wink:

  • 339.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @PissAnt-337: Watch the game between the Sharks and the Reds again – I am. The Sharks can play like that and the Stormers can’t, therefore the Sharks will win. In the end, rugby will be the real winner :lol:

  • 340.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    Coetsee going to play straight into Plumtree’s hands if he plays Fourie at 8 again.. which is what I think he’s going to do… He should play Fourie right up there at the cutting edge and challenge Bismark right from word go with Fourie’s tenacity and low center of gravity pit bull strength.. he should not put Liebenberg up against Bismark.. he should play Fourie as his pity bull in the trenches to counter Bismark..

    then he should flood his 2nd row and back row with big enforcers to negate all that flowy pacy Sharkshit attack around the fringes… Power the Sharks 2nd row and back row out the game

    Play Roux at 8, Vermeulen off bench only if fit enough.. and if not then save him for a possible final.. don’t risk Vermeulen if he’s not ready for it…

    And then with Elstadt, Kolsisi, Bekker, Etsebeth, Steenkamp and Armand we go for broke to take out the lighter Sharks 2nd row and back row out the game… Stifle and power them out the game … negate Daniel, Coetsee and Kankowski by sheer power and shut down the offensive at inception… don’t give them the latitude that Reds did with their wide open game which is why they found themselves 17-0 down after 15 minutes.

  • 341.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    Watched Bosman tackle himself again – priceless! Man, I hope Jordaan is fit to play on Saturday.

  • 342.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-339: Surely the Stormers’ defense is a superior unit than the one of the hapless Reds?

    The Sharks will need to find a way to establish an attacking platform of note.

  • 343.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    In th?s week a lot depends on the sen?or players l?ke De V?ll?ers, Bekker and Habana vs B?smark, JPP and Alberts and whether can have a calm?ng effect on the youngsters.

  • 344.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay-343: Why your i can like to be a ?

  • 345.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-339: You will not get a Reds team this Saturday.. you are meeting the Stormers.. Reds played straight into Sharks hands from opening kick off.. and second half reds were ALL over Sharks like a rash dominating entire territory and momentum until Genia made the poor decision to go for 3 points instead of keeping the pressure on.. which had he done so I doubt you would have gotten the intercept try and Reds could easily have won….

    Stormers are not the Reds.. you won’t get the open sesame opportunities like you did last weekend.. and in Durban earlier in the season you got some lucky bounces going your way…. which resulted in early tries… but like Reds came at you so did Stormers second half and almost took the game back again…

    This time if you don’t get a flying start.. we take the game.. your best hope is you come flying out the blocks again like you did at Loftus and Durban and Brisbane….. when you got caught behind in Ellis Park all your 2nd half efforts couldn’t win you the game…

  • 346.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @willievz-342: Conversely, the Reds pose a greater attacking threat than the Stormers – so the Sharks don’t need to score as many tries against them. Pop Gun Pete needs to be in spitting distance of the poles for the Stormers to get on the board.

  • 347.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella-340:

    > He should play Fourie right up there at the cutting edge and challenge Bismark right from word go with Fourie’s tenacity and low center of gravity pit bull strength

    Last time Bismarck gave him a little b-itch slap and he ran to the ref, imagine if Bismarck gives him a real PK this time?

  • 348.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella-345: Ja, ja, if Bosman didn’t tackle himself it would have been 34-10 (or even 37-10 after Michalak’s later penalty) instead of 27-10 going into the final 10 minutes and perhaps the Reds would have given up and never scored their consolation try after the Sharks had a man sent off. If the Stormers weren’t so boring perhaps everyone wouldn’t be betting against them. If your uncle didn’t have balls he could be your aunt. You get the picture.

  • 349.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-346:

    i’ve never been a fan of peter grant… can’t wait for our youngsters like tim swiel to come through…

    but…

    credit where it is due…

    grant was only a pop gun kicking out of hand… he’s long been able to convert from the halfway line… hence his ability to pop them from the sidelines too…

    this year however he is much improved with his kicking out of hand and on many occasions is getting superb distances…

    the only spitting distance will be in your eye when the ’95 percenter’ keeps ‘popping’ them over the posts…

    as i said people keep underestimating them…

  • 350.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @ufo-349: Well, we don’t have long to wait to find out :wink:

  • 351.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-350:

    hehehe

    you think..?

    it’s waaaay too long for me…!! :lol:

  • 352.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    A colleague of mine ask me today whether the Sharkies will target Vermeulen injured knee if he starts on Saturday.
    I told him not at that level and especially not the Sharks. :lol:

  • 353.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay-352:

  • 354.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay-352:

    blank was not a mistake…

    lost for words….

    at the thought even…

  • 355.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @ufo-351: More time for banter …

  • 356.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @ufo-354: It’s a professional sport with a lot of money on the line and careers in the balance, not a game of touch rugby.

  • 357.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-356:

    this we know…

    so what are you saying/suggesting…?

  • 358.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    @ufo-354:
    Ja ufo, looking forward to Saturday.

    Folks at WP Rugby want a home final so that they can get some extra cash and the player receive incentive bonuses for reaching the final.

    But the fans want the title………..

  • 359.TooMuchRugby: Reply to this comment

    Yawn

  • 360.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @ufo-357: If you can gain an advantage by doing something within the rules, you probably will.

  • 361.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay-358:

    bud… the players want the title more than the fans…!!!!

    this is fact

  • 362.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @TooMuchRugby-359:

    off to bed then… :wink:

  • 363.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    If Duane Vermeulen isn’t 100%, he shouldn’t play – or he might not be 100% for quite a while.

  • 364.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-360:

    don’t speak for me…

    what are YOU saying…?

  • 365.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-363: Was exactly what I was going to say. Not a good idea to go into this game if you aren’t 100%. Going to be outright, high paced warfare for 80 minutes.

  • 366.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @ufo-364: Jissus, I am going to try and make this simple: If Duane has a booboo on his knee and he gets on the field, the Sharks will give his knee a fitness test. Because this isn’t tiddly winks.

  • 367.TooMuchRugby: Reply to this comment

    @ufo-362: Nag ou grote

  • 368.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    @ufo-361:
    Jean, Andries and Gio haven’t won anything for their province yet, so I’m sure they would want to give something back.

    But I’ll call it even.

  • 369.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-366: :-) Indeed, but I get a feeling the Sharks will be giving the Stormers a fitness test anyway. I think the Sharks should be tested, because its like they took some crazy pills or something. They really are rampant. If they played like that since the beginning, they would have ended top of the log and they would be playing a home semi-final and they would be clear favourites for the trophy. The only thing thats a problem for them is the travelling and winning 3 tough away games in a row.

  • 370.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-366:

    yes… i know it’s simple…

    just wanted YOU to say it…

    @Jeraldjay-368:

    i don’t think any of them have won anything for their province… hence the desire to do so…

    but sure… let’s just say players and fans… we all want this BADLY…!! :wink:

    @TooMuchRugby-367:

    cheers bud…

    i’m out too…

    JeraldJay and kaksieok… good chat… next time…

  • 371.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay-368: I would love to see Jean De Villiers afforded the opportunity of lifting a trophy in his provincial colours. He deserves it, a loyal servant to both WP/Stormers and the Bokke. I would have liked to see Schalk stand next to him though.

    Unfortunately, though the Stormers wont make it through the semi-final :-)

    So they will have to weer probeer next season.

  • 372.wait for it, wait for it...: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-283:
    true, true
    i shouldnt let things work me up as much. my blood pressure has been off the charts lately and its affecting my health, i think.

    @NZINCHINA-284:
    yes, for the same reasons i’d prefer the stormers to win. read is a significant loss for the crusaders, he was busy in the chiefs game. i cant remember if he played the whole game or was injured during?

    as a betting man i would say yes, morne will play flyhalf for the boks in the 4 nations.

    @Transformation-285:
    madiba’s a great man.
    amazed he’s still kicking it.

  • 373.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-369: Yes, it took them a long time to gel. I’m not sure what did it, but whatever it is they need to keep it up. Doing it the hard way will make it that much more memorable.

  • 374.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-366: Nej….tdjy moet die rigte taal praat mej bra…..anderste kan hulle tjou nie verstaanie….

  • 375.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @ufo-370: Cheers, go well.

  • 376.David: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-371:
    The Stormers are not a provincial side.

  • 377.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    I’m also out.

    Kaksioek. You right, rugby is not tiddly winks but there are to many camera’s at this level and I doubt whether any player will risk his career and reputation by deliberately injuring an opponent.

  • 378.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay-377: There’s nothing in the laws of rugby against tackling a player’s knee – nothing at all.

  • 379.cab: Reply to this comment

    Stormers just hotta keep it tight and get ready to take on the 3 monster gamebreakers beasty, bismark and alberts at own game – keep it tight and mow their backrow right down – don’t look left nor right just keep mowing – but they must also attack grant must hit tge adv line with de jong on his shoulder and go for it for 80 mins – no defense kak, take it to to them, if u let that backrow play they will outrun you – instead play it like a test

  • 380.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-378:

    In Spike Erasmus, the Stormers have one of the best knee surgeons in the country- he will for sure not allow vermeulen on the field if his knee is not 100% and even stronger than before – the problems with Vermeulen (if he takes to the field) could be a lack of fitness or match sharpness and not a weak knee so to target his knee will be plain stupid. You should give your team and their leadership more credit than what you just did.

  • 381.fitz1ella: Reply to this comment

    Bismark never gave Fourie a b1tch slap.. if Bismark reckons he gonna try a bitchslap on Fourie he gonna come off second best.. Fourie should play hooker this weekend .. not 8th man….

    and like cab says Stormers must just grind these okes out.. smack them sideways from first whistle till last.. not let up one second just keep smacking that advantage line with gusto.. Play Fourie right up in Bismark’s face and take on Beast and Alberts at their own game

    With Etsebeth, Elstadt, Kolisi and even Roux and Armand we can take these okies out.. with Grant hammering away at first center all game long and De Jongh right there with him.. JdV should play further out at 13 and De Jongh right up close with Grant hammering away at that advantage line all game long and we’ll crack these sardines wide apart…

    Don’t make the mistake that Reds did of playing open sesame rugby.. keep it tighter than a nuns whatsit and Sharkieshits won’t have anywhere to run to..nowhere to duck and hide.

  • 382.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim-380: Happy to hear it bud. The Stormers have got far bigger problems to worry about than Vermeulen’s knee – I’m just pointing out that if he gets on the field, he will be tested. Ever had a knee injury? It isn’t much fun. And your knee often isn’t the same afterwards.

  • 383.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @fitz1ella-381:

    > Bismark never gave Fourie a b1tch slap

    The game at Kingspark

  • 384.cab: Reply to this comment

    Yep stormers gotta be on their game for 80 not the **** they dished up v rebels – plumtree has been psyching beast up the whole week – kolisi elstadt and all need to play hard frenetic rugby like they capable of – kitshoff also needs to reproduce early season form – bekker better not get lost at centre again – fkme I never seen a lock make so many linebreaks.

  • 385.cab: Reply to this comment

    Gdam that boy rivals sbw with the offload – pity he’s a gdam lock gdam

  • 386.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @cab-385: Pity he has a back that makes Skop look sprightly :lol:

  • 387.cab: Reply to this comment

    Gdam what a beauty – time out

  • 388.cab: Reply to this comment

    386 kaksoeker – apparently ou doosie fancies himself as a sprinter – all I know is must’ve been a long fkn time ago

  • 389.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-386:

    Humping energetic young student girls in the park does that to your back

    Bekker’s that is not Skops

  • 390.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @cab-388:

    Maybe he fancies himself a Mercedes Sprinter?

    You can pick up and load a s-hitload of discarded half bricks from building sites around the Cape with one

  • 391.cab: Reply to this comment

    VB is that from Ozzie or Canada victoria?

    yep dunn much about cars but that mercedes t wing or whatever from the 60s is a thing of beauty.

  • 392.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok-390: :lol:

  • 393.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @victoriabok-389: at least he is not humping old hags like your bulletjies hougaard & helberg :lol:

    dries had a fresh varsity chikita on that park bench.

  • 394.cab: Reply to this comment

    Nothing wrong with hougaard they’ve ruined him with that up&under **** – let him run ffs – fdp was fdp – hougaard completely different fish

  • 395.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    Now now.

    There is something to be said for experience.

    An old head on young shoulders.

  • 396.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @cab-391:

    Canuckistan

    Mercedes Sprinter panel van

  • 397.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-393:

    Maybe, 20 goes into 40 something a lot more than thirty goes into 20 :-)

    That’s why he and his back is f-ucked

  • 398.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @cab-394: Church.

  • 399.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @cab-394:

    Hougie should concentrate on rugby, not fashion, flogging hair products and fast cars

    And old ladies like Jacquie Fish, a name (or smell?) that suits het to a “t”

  • 400.victoriabok: Reply to this comment

    @the artist formerly known as gunther-395:

    Or old legs wrapped around young shoulders?

  • 401.the artist formerly known as gunther: Reply to this comment

    Tomorrow is national tequila day.

    #letsripit

  • 402.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    Yep I reckon the Stormers have this game wrapped.

    - home ground advantage
    - fully rested
    - motivation of knowing a home final will follow
    - best defence in the tournament
    - 14 wins from 16

    I would say the Stormers are 70% likely to win.

    There is always the prospect of an upset but I reckon this game will be one hurdle too far for the Sharks.

  • 403.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    Yep, just as I was saying… the odds are very firmly stacked in the Stormers favour.

    Even the experts agree (from Sport 24):

    Well renowned South African sport scientist, Ross Tucker, believes the Stormers will have an 8-10 point head start over the Sharks in their Super Rugby semi-final at Newlands on Saturday.

    Tucker, who works at the Sports Science Institute in Cape Town, predicts the Sharks will be exhausted after travelling to Australia to beat the Reds last Saturday and then back to South Africa for their semi-final.

    “The competition’s history shows that home ground advantage is already worth five points,” he told Die Burger.

    “With the physical toll of the overseas flight, combined with the bumps and bruises they have to recover from, I’ll speculate that the Stormers will start with an 8-10 point advantage.

    “Some guys don’t get affected by jet lag, but it’s very tough if most of your players’ sleep patterns are disturbed for four nights over a two-week period,” said Tucker.

    However, Sharks coach John Plumtree is adamant that the travel factor can’t be used as an excuse.

    “We’ll be up for it alright, but we’ve got to be smart about our preparation this week,” he told the Sharks website.

    “Everyone will be talking about the travel factor, but we knew we’d have to travel again if we got through our playoff. We’ve had to come back to South Africa and the players are positive, at least they can sleep in their own beds and spend time with family. It’s always nice coming home.”

    Should the Sharks prove Tucker wrong they’ll nevertheless remain heavy underdogs to lift the trophy as they’ll then have to travel back to Australasia to tackle either the Chiefs or the Crusaders – who clash in the other semi-final on Friday.

  • 404.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    “Well renowned South African sport scientist Ross Tucker,” hey? Tickles will be delighted to have someone new to add to his Christmas card list. Noakes hasn’t been returning his calls recently.

  • 405.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    The Sharks are going to rewrite the record books.
    Nighty night.

  • 406.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    Lol. Do you remember that “Prof Noakes takes on The Tackler” thread?

  • 407.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-405: dude, no need to preach to me. I am a believer.

    Unfortunately I am also a realist. If my life depended on it my money would be on the Stormers.

    I hope for a very pleasant surprise though.

  • 408.cab: Reply to this comment

    Sharks r riding high – I still reckon stormers will stop them at source even with vermeulen and schalk injured it’s still a better pack

  • 409.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    Jirre you can’t argue with Beast, The Bis-ness, J-Doop, Alberts, Coetzee, Deysel these guys don’t stand back to anyone.

    I highly doubt the packs are going to be outmatched.

  • 410.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    In fact it was men vs boys at the Kiings Park fixture a few rounds ago. Sharks raced into a 20-6 lead remember?

    Nah, it’s not the packs.

    It’s the weary legs. I don’t expect the Sharks to keep the intensity up for the full 80.

    The Stormers, on the other hand, are fully rested and will be champing at the bit to go.

    I will say it’s likely to be close for 60 minutes.

  • 411.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @wooden spoon-410:

    It is of course possible that the Stormers might be rusty.It often happens that a team is a bit “off the boil” after a 2 week break.I hope Ross has taken this into consederation when he worked out that the Stormers have a 8-10 points advantage.

  • 412.wooden spoon: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim-411: the Stormers won both games immediately after their two byes this year.

    Being “rusty” after a week off hasn’t been a problem for them before.

  • 413.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @wooden spoon-412:

    The fact that they won both games does not mean they were at their best or played well– anyway, I am not saying they will be rusty, just pointing out that it often happens to teams and could be a factor.

    Re the game in Durban, the Stormers were shocking that day- it was their worst game of the season – i am not taking anything away from the Shartks as they did play well and placed the Stormesr under pressure but it was one of those days that everything went wrong for the stormers- – i remember the Canadian dropped a sitter with no pressure on him from a kickoff, someone lost the ball when diving over the line to score , passes went astray, Kolisi withdrew just before the game……..

    It is very unlikely that the Stormers will be as bad as that day again.

    My prediction taking everything into consideration is Stormers by 7.

  • 414.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    Anyway, let’s just hope there are no ref controversies– i am out.

  • 415.Johannes Expatinus: Reply to this comment

    As long as the Stormers score more points than the Sharks we should be able to pull the win off.

  • 416.Sasuke: Reply to this comment

    Sports Scientist Ross Tucker says the Stormers have a head start of 8-10 points because of home advantage and Sharks’ travel (Die Burger)

  • 417.Sasuke: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim-413: We missed Kolisi big time in that game!

  • 418.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @Sasuke-417: And Bekker was playing with an obvious back injury at the time, he called the line outs but took 2 balls at most. He was on the field, but absent in body.
    That schooling the Sharks forwards gave our lads, might have been a blessing in disguise, as it truly was the ONLY game of the year in which we were utterly and totally bossed in all facets for 40 minutes.
    I’m not buying the travel fatigue kak but what I am buying, is the 122 tackles the Sharks made in the 2nd half in Brissie last week. They were outstanding on D, but it is NOT something they have focused on and ‘played’ week in and out.
    I don’t think that sort of D is something mere mortals can handle, week in and out, unless you are the Stormers and your body is used to the recovery in the way the Stormers bods are.

    Travel fatigue is a factor, but those 122 tackles in the 2nd half might contribute more to the ‘exhaustion’ theory than what Singapore airlines does.

  • 419.shooter: Reply to this comment

    @Sasuke-416: so the prediction is Sharks by 30 minus 8-10 = 22 to Stormers 20?

  • 420.shooter: Reply to this comment

    @shooter-419: sorry. maths.
    Sharks 30 minus 10-8 = 21 vs 20 Stormers.

  • 421.SuperStirrer: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-404: That was damn funny how a few cyber snipes by a blogger got Tim Noakes to come out snorting and get his own article to rubbish Tickle balls.

  • 422.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @SuperStirrer-421: Yes, old Noakes is clearly rather insecure. Tickles won that one in straight sets if you ask me.

  • 423.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @SuperStirrer-421: @kaksioek-422: “I read with great interest the claims by The Tackler that I am the “pseud and mouthy charlatan” who is responsible for this burnout issue. These are certainly complex words for a blog on rugby matters. Although the word mouthy does not appear in my Illustrated Oxford Dictionary, pseud as an adjective refers to someone who is intellectually or socially pretentious and not genuine; the noun defines a poseur. Similarly a charlatan is someone who falsely claims a special knowledge or skill. The word apparently originates from the Italian meaning a ‘babbler’.”

  • 424.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-423: :lol:

  • 425.kaksioek: Reply to this comment

    Come back Tickles, we have another sports scientist for you to tackle!

  • 426.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-424: @kaksioek-424: can you say “precious” hehehehe :lol:

  • 427.nama1: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-298:
    ‘church street bombing’

    The fact that the PAC accepted resonsibility for that, does not bother you at all.

    They are ALL black and therefor they are the same.

    I get you. They ALL look alike.

    For some, all whiteys look alike also, you know. So, when the Supreme Court find a whitie guilty of high treason, don’t be surprised when some sommer start moering any “whitey” who they see on the street.

    You guys should think before you talk any kak that runs through you’re head.

    It goes both ways!!!

    Just saying.

    Lekker om in ‘n ander land te bly en kak te praat, ne!!!

  • 428.nama1: Reply to this comment

    @kaksioek-405:
    “The Sharks are going to rewrite the record books.”

    Rewriting the record books?

    What do you mean? By beating the Stormers at Newlands?

    How the **** is that “rewriting” the record books?

    You do that ALL the time, don’t you? Beating the Stormers at Newlands.

    Hahahaha……

    How delusional can one fucked up Shark supporter be?

    A 3kg snoek will devour a 5kg “sandhaai” tomorrow, boet.

    Deal with it. You will be in the same state of snot en trane like the Saders supporters.

    Thanks for coming.

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.