Super Rugby preview – Final

Super Rugby preview – Final

JON CARDINELLI and RYAN VREDE analyse the key match-ups and pick the winner of the title.

So the boys got a zero from two return last week, backing the Crusaders’ pedigree in the first semi and the Stormers’ defensive excellence in the second.

This week someone’s going to be right, with Vrede giving it to the hosts comfortably and JC, for the third successive year, backing the underdog. Vrede hopes that it’s third time lucky for Cardinelli. A Sharks win would be glorious, wouldn’t it?

CHIEFS vs SHARKS, HAMILTON, SATURDAY 09:35

KEO.CO.ZA SUCCESS RATE
VREDE: 88/124 (71%)
JC: 91/124 (73%)

WHY THE CHIEFS ARE FAVOURITES:
JC: The Chiefs must be feeling the pressure. They will enjoy home advantage this Saturday while the Sharks will be at a significant disadvantage given their taxing travel schedule. The expectation to win will be enormous. If Dave Rennie’s side were to lose this match, it would go down as one of the biggest chokes in sporting history. Even if the Sharks had come into this match well-rested, the Chiefs would hold the edge given the balance between their attack and defence. They may not boast many All Blacks in their pack, but the forwards have been excellent in terms of laying the platform and exhibiting the handling skills needed to play a high-tempo game. And in the halfbacks, they have the decision-making nous to hurt the best defences. The Sharks haven’t been consistent in this regard, and it won’t help that they will be forced to make further changes to their midfield now that Tim Whitehead is unavailable. Sonny Bill Williams will benefit from a strong forward platform, and take his side beyond the gainline to set up further attacking chances. On defence, the Chiefs boast a great record and watch for their terrific line speed, it should cut down the Sharks’ momentum. All in all, they’re an 80-minute side, and even if the game is in the balance in the final quarter you’d back the Chiefs to win it, as this is when the Sharks will tire.
VREDE: I had reservations about their ability to match the Crusaders’ outstanding forwards in set and general play last week, but their heavies were outstanding, sustaining their effort through 80 minutes. Their victory will be built on a performance that calls on that strength once more, with Kane Thompson, Tanerau Latimer, Craig Clarke, Ben Tameifuna, and Sona Taumalolo particularly prominent in the tight exchanges, establishing the platform that has been at the heart of their attacking potency. The Sharks’ heavies reached down to somewhere special to produce the defensive performance they did against the Stormers, but 35 000km worth of travel in the last three weeks will reflect in their capacity to resist the Chiefs, particularly in the last quarter. From there the Chiefs’ 9-10-12 combination have offered them every attacking dimension possible. Fatigue will have a telling effect on the Sharks’ attacking play as well, with their key strike runners to be blunted by the abrasive, organised and accurate Chiefs.

WHY THE SHARKS ARE CAPABLE OF DEFYING EXPECTATIONS:
JC: I called the Stormers to win in the 2010 final and the Crusaders to win in the 2011 decider (two away wins in Super Rugby finals) – so to say I’m a dreamer who believes that the fairytale ending is possible is an understatement. The Sharks have certainly given me good cause to believe a win in Hamilton is well within their power. Their victory in Cape Town last week highlighted the belief within the side, and while belief alone won’t be enough to win a Super Rugby final, it will certainly give the men from Durban a fighting chance. They are going to fade in the latter stages, so they will need to catch the Chiefs early on and build a substantial lead in the first half. What’s in their favour is their superior scrum, lineout and breakdown exponents, and so it would be wiser to force the Chiefs to play a tighter game. They also have a master tactician in flyhalf Freddie Michalak, who will play them into the right areas of the field, and take kickable opportunities be they penalties or drop goals. Finals are typically tighter than league matches, and in this environment the Sharks should prosper. But they have to take their early chances if they are going to end on the right side of the final scoreline.
VREDE’S CALL: I live in hope that the words I’m about to type next reflect how the match will unfold. If, man it’s a big if, but if the Sharks’ forwards somehow summon the energy, strength, clarity of thought and raw desperation to boss the gainline, they will force the Chiefs to revert to a cavalier approach. Then it’s game on. The Chiefs’ vulnerabilities have been exposed a couple of times when pinned in their half, and a platform that would allow Frederic Michalak, Charl McLeod and Pat Lambie to drive their side into Chiefs territory, then force infringements through pressure defence, is essential. Michalak has kicked superbly and can steadily grow a lead through his boot if given opportunities. The Sharks have also consistently shown their ability to convert scoring opportunities into tries. Their aim should be a 12-point lead going into the last 20 minutes. Then it’s down to their desire and resolve.

JC’S CALL: Sharks by 3
VREDE’S CALL: Chiefs by 12

Chiefs – 15 Robbie Robinson, 14 Tim Nanai-Williams, 13 Andrew Horrell, 12 Sonny Bill Williams, 11 Asaeli Tikoirotuma, 10 Aaron Cruden, 9 Tawera Kerr-Barlow, 8 Kane Thompson, 7 Tanerau Latimer, 6 Liam Messam, 5 Brodie Retallick, 4 Craig Clarke (c), 3 Ben Tameifuna, 2 Mahonri Schwalger, 1 Sona Taumalolo.
Subs: 16 Hika Elliot, 17 Ben Afeaki, 18 Michael Fitzgerald, 19 Sam Cane, 20 Brendon Leonard, 21 Jackson Willison, 22 Lelia Masaga

Sharks – 15 Pat Lambie, 14 Louis Ludik, 13 JP Pietersen, 12 Paul Jordaan, 11 Lwazi Mvovo, 10 Frederic Michalak, 9 Charl McLeod, 8 Ryan Kankowski, 7 Marcell Coetzee, 6 Keegan Daniel (c), 5 Anton Bresler, 4 Willem Alberts, 3 Jannie du Plessis, 2 Bismarck du Plessis, 1 Tendai Mtawarira.
Subs: 16 Craig Burden, 17 Wiehahn Herbst, 18 Steven Sykes, 19 Jean Deysel, 20 Jacques Botes, 21 Meyer Bosman, 22 Riaan Viljoen.


324 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] Show All

  • 301.IAAS: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-297:

    Tell you what.

    Why don’t you go and sleep the sleep of the unemployed?

    Till Monday morning.

    I’m sure your life will improve.

  • 302.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @carol-299: Sorry about that. Gaylord is struggling to understand what I am trying to say. He keeps on diverting to the Chiefs/Sharks game this weekend whereas my comments are purely aimed at the past weekend when the choking Stormers were hawked up and spat out of the Super 15 like a loogy by the Sharks.

  • 303.mako: Reply to this comment

    Phelps did it again! The guy is phenomenal! His parents must be from KZN.

  • 304.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.: Reply to this comment

    @mako-291: A graduate of the Tiny Tots centre for toddlers with special needs I see?
    I would like to explain this to you in a manner you would understand, but the site doesn’t take crayon.

    Cast iron excuse if you lose you say? Nope. If you lose, travel can’t be blamed – the games you lost because you weren’t quite good enough to win them earlier in the season is the reason you had to travel. So travel can’t be used as the excuse as it’s the direct result of kak rugby earlier in the season.
    You lose, it’s because you weren’t good enough throughout the season to AVOID the travel.
    Which will mean, overall, just not good enough. Simple as that.

    Now I am off. Steal my nic as much as you want…….if it makes you feel better.

  • 305.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @IAAS-301: You know what – I think I will take your advice. Adios amigos….nice chatting to you.

    And dont forget that the Stormers were removed from the Super 15 like a piece of dog kak is scraped from the underneath of a shoe by the Sharks. Don’t forget it. Sleep tight.

    See you Sharks obsessed people here again tomorrow.

  • 306.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-304: Scraped like toe jam from underneath the toenail and discarded by the Sharks. Goodnight choker.

  • 307.mako: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-304: Nighty night. When all is said and done, our kak rugby was enough to get us to the final, so must be less kak that the other 13 teams in the tournament that didn’t make it.
    Take your Crayons to bed with you, you may wake up in a better mood in the morning…

  • 308.mako: Reply to this comment

    Well done Chad Le Clos, winning his semi final. That will give him a good lane tomorrow! Another good KZN boykie!

  • 309.IAAS: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-305:

    And don’t slam the door on the way out!

  • 310.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @IAAS-309: Stormers – Flicked off like a snollie picked from the nose of the Super 15 by the Sharks – thrown away like a used dome.

  • 311.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky@The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions.-249:

    Sorry.I have regained my composure. This multiple personality disorder is doing me in since the Stormers lost Saturday. I do not know at most times whether I am a) Dogfood b) Mad Eye c)A N Other.

    I have no proof that you stole my nic at 223 or any other. So those egging me on are out of order too.

    Sorry for my diatribe that followed. You too must be just as confused.

  • 312.mako: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged by Mad Eye Productions-311: That was quick. Must be those fat crayons. They definitely did the trick though, well done!

  • 313.IAAS: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-310:

    Pure class!

    Don’t ever change.

  • 314.mako: Reply to this comment

    Right, bedtime. I am going to dream about SBW gifting us an intercept try. Cheers all, thanks for the entertainment!

  • 315.Antiviral: Reply to this comment

    Tomorrow is total showdown in the London Olympic pool in the Men’s 100m Butterfly.
    Phelps will be baas and everyone else klaas. :roll: :smile:

    ‘n Nuwe vergelyking: so dom soos die boere van die Boeremag :smile:

  • 316.Antiviral: Reply to this comment

    @IAAS-313:

    Is jy dan Klaas , Iaas? :roll:

  • 317.IAAS: Reply to this comment

    @Antiviral-316:

    You can run but you can’t hide.

    And your language will never let you down.

    How’s it tjommie? How’s it hanging?

    Proteas got to kick on.

    And you’re right. Phelps is a legend in the doggy paddle. Just like you. :D

  • 318.IAAS: Reply to this comment

    @Antiviral-316:

    While you’re still thinking of what to say next.

    Here’s a joke for you.

    See if you can catch it.

    As a present, what do you give the guy that has everything?

  • 319.IAAS: Reply to this comment

    @Antiviral-316:

    And the answer is ” antivetrovirals”.

    Didn’t expect you to get it.

    You have to be “compos mentis” you understand.

    Nice chatting.

    Welcome back.

    Out.

  • 320.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    EXTRABALLAS in the hizzy baby! doggy paddle olympian extraordinaire

  • 321.Stoffel: Reply to this comment

    Straeuli and some of the support crew were on my Qantas flight from Sydney to Auckland yesterday. Does anyone know what flight the boys are arriving on into Auckland? I’d like to go welcome them.

  • 322.sharks_lover: Reply to this comment

    @Stoffel-321: Stoffel, tghe Sharks arrived in NZ yesterday ealy your time there

  • 323.oogle: Reply to this comment

    GB in 6th position with 6 by 6 by 6 = 18 medals.

    RSA somewhere in the 20s.

  • 324.Greenies: Reply to this comment

    Phelps is a saw looser, doesnt seem to have sportmanship when he looses, just look when Le Clos took his dream gold( which i love dearly for) away from him. Didnt even congratulate him….umlovos mtonda!

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] Show All

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.