indeed.

and after millions of hours spent reading and admiring my posts you thought your moment had arrived?

so that’s a no on the holiday front then?

priceless!

now that

is priceless

@NZINCHINA-244:

Fuckinhell but you are a sad sack.

Priceless indeed. Are you taking the missus with you on holiday?

lol that’s priceless

I’m not too sure what to make of the Bok squad. I suppose it’s part for the course. My interest mainly lies in the match 22. I doubt we’ll see an deviation from what we’ve seen in the Eng series. I do wish we develop our style of play, but I don’t envisage Heyneke being so bold.

How do you feel about the Bok squad?

I don’t recall giving you stick, but if i did, it was only because i didn’t think the sharks could win the whole thing.

I didn’t think any sa team would win it.

I had to look up dismay in the dictionary it’s true.

But do you at least understand the difference between cut me some slack and give me some flack now?

Because then we are making real progress.

You can then explain to me the nuances of de facto and de jure favourites.

Ladbrookes laughed at me when I asked on the phone.

Don’t try and pronounce words which you don’t understand the meaning of.

Typical Bulls fan, you

But you said they would definitely win?

De facto?

I think you were talking about you bum.

Just a little bit.

And it’s give me flack.

And cut me some slack.

But you’re right, my bulls were pants this year but they will be back.

Much to your dismay.

The Stormers choked. And they have themselves to blame for it.

Unlike your Bulls/Boks, who were completely hammered and got shown up yet again.

I thought you said the stormers were definitely going to beat the sharks?

Something about de facto and de jure underdogs?

how did that work out at the bookies?