KeoTV: Backing Bekker

KeoTV: Backing Bekker

MARK KEOHANE says there has to be a concerted investment in Andries Bekker.

 


469 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 » Show All

  • 151.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay-138: I am with you on this one.

    But our society will never accept those kind of out-of-the-box players.

    They simply do not fit the South African stereotipe of a conservative, well-mannered, Calvinistic “ja-oom-ja-meneer” upbringing.

  • 152.XhosaKid: Reply to this comment

    @katman-148: I’ll zip it then and be a good black.

  • 153.KWAGGA ROBERTSE: Reply to this comment

    @gunther-150: wont be able to make practise though. He is still trying to get his front bumper out of the chips frier.

  • 154.katman: Reply to this comment

    @XhosaKid-152: That’s racist, man.

  • 155.Tacitus: Reply to this comment

    @katman-146:

    Reminds me of that Hayibo article a few years ago, about Zimbabwean scientists building their own version, called the Six Million Zim-dollar Man.

    Turns out he was a Zimbabwe Air Force Pilot who tried to defect with their most advanced prototype aircraft, only to crash the one engine Cesna into the Limpopo River.

    They put him back together using cowdung, dried sticks and some woven grass rope.

    His superpowers include lying really, really still and making an eerie ”Aaaah” sound at the enemies of the state.

  • 156.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    @gunther-150:
    His playing for Sir Lowrians RFC.

    Sir Lowrians has Quinton Davids as their head coach and Wayne “Holle”Julies as their backline coach.

  • 157.TooMuchRugby: Reply to this comment

    @XhosaKid-145:
    Gunther a bigot? ……………………………………………..Never???

  • 158.KWAGGA ROBERTSE: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay-156: So it is safe to say Geo will not be involved there.

  • 159.nama1: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay-143:
    GOOD ANTICIPATION, steadying himself to REGATHER the ball and enough speed to OUT SPRINT the defenders in order to score the try.

    Somebody explained as something like that.

    Must say, it was funny reading it the 1st time…and the 2nd time …and the 3rd….

    :lol:

    @KWAGGA ROBERTSE-144:
    Throw in Sharp at 5 as well.

    So they have 5 quality forwards, most with reasonable experience.

    In our pack, the back five (locks plus loosies) played a combined what, 25 test matches?

    So my point is, if we cannot dominate them in the pack, all this talk about Morne, Hougie or the “midfield magic” means squad. At this moment however, I can’t see us dominating them up front.

  • 160.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    @willievz-151:
    Willie, what people don’t understand is that rugby and sport in general is a form of entertainment that has to compete with going to the movies or spending time at your favourite restuarant.

    We need to fill the stadiums and this can only be done by convincing the wives and girlfriends to spent a few hours at the rugby.
    The females will only come if there are glamour boys playing. Simple as that.

  • 161.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay-126: There will be jeanpants full of kak should that day ever dawn my friend.
    Hell, Percy Montgomery nearly tipped the nation over the edge, and all he did was wear silver boots.

    Fellows like Taccy are already wailing about tattoos as though the end is nigh.

    Ronaldo like flyhalf indeed.

  • 162.KWAGGA ROBERTSE: Reply to this comment

    @nama1-159: Sharp is past his prime. Kruger should have the better of them in the line outs. Experience is a problem but I reckon we have the goods to moer them.

  • 163.katman: Reply to this comment

    @nama1-159: Don’t be THAT guy again, Nama. You can’t have us believe on the one hand that Ricky scored his lucky bounce try against the Kiwis through sheer brilliance and skill, and on the other hand that Frans totally lucked into his charge down try. Werkie sonie, nê.

  • 164.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    @KWAGGA ROBERTSE-158:
    Apparently Keo resigned as communications manager of the Boks because of the Geo/Quinton incident.

  • 165.KWAGGA ROBERTSE: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay-164: Bliksem….talk about a show stopper….

  • 166.gunther: Reply to this comment

    @XhosaKid-145:

    I’m sure faf will get the chop.

    The fact is that going into the England series he was Swanns bunny.

    He’s worked hard to sort himself put in that department.

    The bigotry is in your head.

    It’s holding you back my friend.

  • 167.XhosaKid: Reply to this comment

    @Tacitus-155: Racist, but farken funny!!! lol!!!

  • 168.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay-160: Don’t generalise :) I rate my rugga boys a little differently. Tell me if any of my faves (past and present) have the glam guru factor?: Paul O Connell, Thierry Dusatoir, Pelous, Zinny Brooke, Neil Back, Josh Kronfeld, Flavell, Pichot, Danie R, Juan Smith, Duane Vermeulen etc…

    Ok, a few of my fave backs might have had a little glamglam – but they could still play :)

  • 169.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay-160: Absolutely.

  • 170.nama1: Reply to this comment

    @katman-148:

    @katman-163:
    The one was a sniping break around the fringes of a scrum/ruck, chip over the head of the last defender, regather and a swallow dive to score a try that will always be talked about. Bok legend stuff.

    The other was an opposition full back taking to long to clear, got charged down and conceded a try. Totally against the run of play.

    MOERSE difference between the two. I’m sure you can see it as well.

  • 171.XhosaKid: Reply to this comment

    @KWAGGA ROBERTSE-158: Sir Lowrians use a tractor to go to gym, I can’t see it happen taking into account Geo’s recently developed “Tractor-phobia”

  • 172.KWAGGA ROBERTSE: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-168: No glam there except for Zinzan maybe

  • 173.KWAGGA ROBERTSE: Reply to this comment

    @XhosaKid-171: Good thing Earl did’nt use the company car then otherwise that fish and chips shop woul’ve been levelled…..

  • 174.katman: Reply to this comment

    @XhosaKid-167: No, just funny.

    @nama1-170: Only difference is in the eyes of the beholder. Think about that. For about a month.

    Since the two of you cannot possibly cultivate bigger chips on your collectively burdened shoulders, here’s a little laugh for you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TG4f9zR5yzY

  • 175.XhosaKid: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay-164: Then her formed this website, I am proud to say, I’m one of the initial posters here back in 2003 or early 2004, that’s how far back.

    In fact those ” senior” posters who buggered-off were not “senior” than me here. I am the original “Muppet” . :-) !!!

  • 176.nama1: Reply to this comment

    @KWAGGA ROBERTSE-162:
    Let’s hope so.

    I’m not too confident we will.

  • 177.XhosaKid: Reply to this comment

    @katman-174: HOW MANY TIMES MUST I TELL YOU WHITEYS, THAT I DO NOT HAVE A CHIP ON MY SHOULDER, I HAVE THE ENTIRE AMAZON!!!!!!!!!, RESPECT!!!!!

  • 178.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-168:
    Josh Kronfeld?. As glamourous as the vagrant outside the local bottle store.

  • 179.KWAGGA ROBERTSE: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay-178: and ugly to match…

  • 180.KWAGGA ROBERTSE: Reply to this comment

    @XhosaKid-177: So you like a bit of wood then………

  • 181.nama1: Reply to this comment

    @katman-174:
    Hahaha… would’ve been funny if it was not so stale.

    This chip on the shoulder kak. I have no chip on my shoulder, boet.

    You guys were telling all and sundry that Ricky’s try was “pure luck of the bounce yet some raved about Fransies charge down last week as “pure brilliance.”

    Eye of the beholder indeed.

  • 182.katman: Reply to this comment

    @nama1-181: I did neither of those things. But I guess we all look the same to you.

  • 183.TooMuchRugby: Reply to this comment

    @XhosaKid-177:
    The river or the rainforest?

  • 184.John Galt: Reply to this comment

    Faf and Dean Elgar should both get the chop.
    Some of those shots that Faf played, particularly his played on 2 games ago…fk me. Exasparating.

    And Peterson as well as soon as Albie comes back.
    It physically hurts me to watch Peterson play for SA.

  • 185.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food: Reply to this comment

    @Jeraldjay-178: Indeed. :)
    But I get what you are saying. The more ‘James o Biebers’, ‘Quade Coopers’, ‘SBW’s and ‘Hougies’ there are – the better for the commercial side of the game…(on which the games future rests)

  • 186.gunther: Reply to this comment

    @TooMuchRugby-157:

    Go and find another leg to hump my little plank.

  • 187.John Galt: Reply to this comment

    @XhosaKid-145:
    So what if they got the chop after their first series.
    So did jacques kallis and Shane Warne. Whats your point.

    And Amla was ka k in his first series. He had that funny Jim Furyk type backswing.
    He was also found out by the quicks with the short ball.

    If you had watched any of the cricket, the comentators actually did a full review on how much he had worked on his game since then and how much it had improved.

    So by dropping him and forcing him to go and work on his technique, you think the selectors did him a disservice? Moron.

    As Gunther said, let it go man. It really is holding you back.

  • 188.XhosaKid: Reply to this comment

    @John Galt-184: You have very very very limited knowledge of cricket.., fark!!!, now that I think about it, your rugby knowledge is even worse, must be farked up being you, boet.

    Whilst you are pondering how kuk knowledge is, try and remember the CWC game against England and check out who destroyed the English Top order, then fast forward to last night, Bingo!!!, that’s why Peterson opened tired England to a kuk start. Consider it a free gift of sporting knowledge, now go and redeem yourself and tell them why Peterson opened the bowling last night and got Bell out, it was a planned move no luck.

  • 189.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @keo-50:
    thank keo, but you could just make ryan or john do it :lol:

    @mikeybrass-52:
    i know :lol:

  • 190.XhosaKid: Reply to this comment

    @John Galt-187: You just proved it, i.e. your k@k knowledge of cricket, When was Jacques Kallis dropped, when was he dropped. Just answer the question and prove me right or wrong.

  • 191.John Galt: Reply to this comment

    @XhosaKid-188:
    Not sure what I like more about good ol Robin.

    The fact that he averages 19 with the bat or 34 with the ball in ODIs. He screams average.

    He’s a nothing cricketer.

  • 192.TooMuchRugby: Reply to this comment

    @gunther-186:
    Gunther, “die gemaskerde sopdrol” strikes again, ridiculing all in his way.

  • 193.XhosaKid: Reply to this comment

    @John Galt-191: No shyyt Sherlock, and you want him replaced by Albie Morkel who averages a whooping 38 with the ball and a modest 23 with the bat????, as I said, shut the fark up!!!, all you are doing is spew forth your abundant ignorance and proving me correct.

    If Peterson is screaming average, what the hell do Albie’s stats scream??, you are up against a wrong Nyygga, my pedigree chump, I’ll own your arss in sport knowledge

  • 194.John Galt: Reply to this comment

    @XhosaKid-193:
    You’re a very angry elf arent you?

    Hehe. Economics expert indeed. My Nyga!

  • 195.katman: Reply to this comment

    @XhosaKid-193: Do you have any idea how stupid that arse-owning sht sounds, Xhosanostra?

    Also, it’s pedigree chum, without the p. For someone who seems to google for a living, you let a lot of rubbish creep in.

  • 196.XhosaKid: Reply to this comment

    @katman-195: Stupid if you don’t know the context, in short, black guys get what I mean, guess you not.

  • 197.John Galt: Reply to this comment

    @XhosaKid-196:
    No no. Katman is right.

    Just stupid.

    ‘Ill own your arss in sport knowledge’ Pfft who says that.
    Google is an amazing thing lighty.

  • 198.XhosaKid: Reply to this comment

    @John Galt-194: Lets stick to sport, now inform us all genius,

    1 When the fark was Jacques Kallis dropped?
    2. Why you call a Peterson average and be replaced by worse player, besides race, what gave you the misguided idea that Albie Morkel was/is a better ODI player than “average” Peterson.

    Don’t start with my education, in high school I used to sell my homework to white kids, I still do to an extent, its just stakes is different now, but I digress, lets stick to your sporting humiliation.

  • 199.Jeraldjay: Reply to this comment

    @John Galt-191:
    Calling Robbie a nothing cricketer is a bit heavy.

    His recent form suggests his become a vital member of the ODI setup.

    Because of his influence yesterday with the ball we managed to draw the series.

  • 200.XhosaKid: Reply to this comment

    @John Galt-197: looking around for the white sympathy vote??, what?, cat got your tongue?. Be a man stand up for your own shhyyt, its you who knows shhyyt about sport.

    Humbly waiting…..

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 » Show All

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.