KeoTV: Boks in Blacks’ dust

KeoTV: Boks in Blacks’ dust

MARK KEOHANE says there has to be drastic changes to the Springboks’ game plan if they hope to compete with and beat the All Blacks consistently.

 


452 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 » Show All

  • 151.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @mikeybrass-137:
    nice

    @Transformation-139:
    booya!
    :grin:

  • 152.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    keo also told us that morne was THE guy and we must sommer wait.

    haha, then he told us morne was actually k a k.

    keo is showing signs of schitzophrenia.

  • 153.katman: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-152: Yes, and so is keo.

  • 154.TooMuchRugby: Reply to this comment

    @KWAGGA ROBERTSE-84:
    Geneig om saam te stem. Sal weer Maandag begin moan as hulle verloor het.

  • 155.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-141:
    bridges were alredy rebuilt by then with only a phone call away to meyer for all the players and coach.

  • 156.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @i_love_u_bakkiesbotha-148: Ek is nie Bronlo nie

  • 157.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @katman-153: :lol:

  • 158.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    @katman-153:

    :)

  • 159.gonzo: Reply to this comment

    @SAussie/QldRed-146: The Boks do beat NZ regularly. They need to stop losing to Australia, Scotland, Ireland, and drawing with England and Argentina to become number 1. Oh, and beating the ABs even more regularly :) I would expect them to be #2 by end of the year at least

  • 160.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @gonzo-159:
    looking at ozz’s form i’d say thats pretty much inevitible.
    bks being 2nd by year end.

  • 161.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @Skeppie-156:
    ek **** jou

  • 162.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    h o o r jou

  • 163.gonzo: Reply to this comment

    @i_love_u_bakkiesbotha-160: Let’s wait for those chickens to hatch before we count them

  • 164.TooMuchRugby: Reply to this comment

    @i_love_u_bakkiesbotha-161: Get a room!

  • 165.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    why is h o o r on the banned list?

    makes no sense

  • 166.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @TooMuchRugby-164:
    :lol:

  • 167.TooMuchRugby: Reply to this comment

    @i_love_u_bakkiesbotha-165:
    Funny thing is, if you look at the “recent comments” on the right hand side of the page, the swearing is not starred out. WTF?

  • 168.katman: Reply to this comment

    @i_love_u_bakkiesbotha-165: Because souties think it sounds like a prostitute.

  • 169.gonzo: Reply to this comment

    @TooMuchRugby-167: Really?

    ****, piss, ****, ****, **********, ************ and tits

    *sorry if i offend anyone, purely for research purposes*

  • 170.Gazelle: Reply to this comment

    They will be ranked 2 if they beat the wallabies, saturday.

  • 171.SAussie/QldRed: Reply to this comment

    With so many injuries I do expect the Bokks to be number 2, We,ve got problems we need to sort out, sometimes you have to go backwards to go forwards

  • 172.mikeybrass: Reply to this comment

    Transie, google is a friend.
    Meyer was first appointed as executive of coaching at the end of 2010.

    You have a point re the 2009 title. At the same time remember Meyer was back in the country in January that year and his advice was sort.

    Re-read what I said about Ludeke nit being as bad as people make out but neither is he of the same quality as Meyer.

    The attempted parallel with Deans is simply wrong.

  • 173.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @TooMuchRugby-167:
    its a circus :lol:

    @katman-168:
    :lol:
    that or the chops can’t spell
    guess who got an e for afrikaans :lol:

  • 174.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @gonzo-163:
    being a bok supporter
    i can only agree :lol:

  • 175.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @Gazelle-170:
    i’m betting we’ll be ranked 2nd by years end even if we dont beat the wallabies on saturday :lol:

  • 176.mikeybrass: Reply to this comment

    @i_love_u_bakkiesbotha-175: Telling the ref he has sexy eyes might do it in Hondo’s world :-)

  • 177.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @mikeybrass-172: “The attempted parallel with Deans is simply wrong.” on what basis?!!

    Deans used Smith’s “structures”, no? Ludeke used Meyer’s “structures”, yes?

    YOU SAY “Meyer was first appointed as executive of coaching at the end of 2010.”

    after the season and the bulls had beaten the stormers in orlando! meyer had fokkol to do with the 2009 & 2010 Bulls titles!

  • 178.Hondo: Reply to this comment

    @mikeybrass-176:
    Hondo is scooping in bales of greenbucks just looking up the match referees
    How much are you making dude?
    :-D
    Money talks

  • 179.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Hondo-178: talk is cheap hondo…we have no proof of all these winnings you brag about, it’s like rangerman bragging about fighting off great whites, we weren’t there…

    delusions of a bigot!

  • 180.outrightrugby: Reply to this comment

    @ Dawn, Transformation and Gumboots

    Please take this in context:
    If the Boks lose tomorrow it does not mean Aussie are a better team than them. Laugh at how contradictory that sounds but in truth what it means is that our coach has been worse over the past months than Deans and as such, our team are underprepared. The boks have better depth than the Aussies and this will show once the team is given a fair chance, ie next year.

    Should we be happy with Heyneke thus far – No.
    But does it change the fact that we have more rugby talent than Aussie – No.
    Come the end of year tour – Boks and NZ will be unbeaten and from there we can build toward becoming all that we can be.

    Gumboots, if NZ fielded a lot of rookies they would beat Arg, yes, but they’ve had a smoother year than the boks. Our game was at altitude in freezing conditions with a poorly sellected team on the pitch – the boks had no chance.

    If Heyneke’s carreer is 110m hurdles: he’s fallen flat on the first, about to fall flat on the second (over the next two weeks) but there-after he’ll only have one or two wobbly strides in an overall successful run-in to the RWC. Yes he’s been poor so far but he’s damn lucky that we and NZ are the two strongest squads in international rugby (if coached correctly)

  • 181.Sharksgirl: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-177: and quite honestly neither with the 2007 one, that should be credited to Steve Walsh! :(

  • 182.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @outrightrugby-180: what are you saying?

    “Our game was at altitude in freezing conditions with a poorly sellected team on the pitch – the boks had no chance.”

    who selected the team “poorly”, the easter bunny?

  • 183.TooMuchRugby: Reply to this comment

    I must admit that, being one of the biggest HM critics on here, I feel a little better after some of the personnel change for this test. I wonder if the 7 hour selectors meeting had anything to do with it. Would have liked to be a fly on the wall there.
    Unfortunately, no matter of personnel change will be able to rectify the antiquated game plan.
    If Meyer proves me wrong at the end of this year it will only be because the Boks might actually win some tests this way. But to me winning is not the only thing. I need to enjoy what’s on offer also, and i doubt if HM has the ability to bring that to the park.

    Amen

  • 184.TooMuchRugby: Reply to this comment

    @Sharksgirl-181:
    Hie Hie Hie…..hoe lekker kry ek nou

  • 185.mikeybrass: Reply to this comment

    Transie, I enjoy your posts. However you aren’t reading the posts of mine properly this occasion, today.

  • 186.gunther: Reply to this comment

    @mikeybrass-185:

    Transie is a proffessional rugby blogger.

    I think you are out of your depth here.

    :lol:

  • 187.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @mikeybrass-185: what am i missing? was meyer back at the Loftus at the beginning of 2010 and thus had a hand is what you described earlier as brilliant attack or something like that?

    if so, where is the proof?

  • 188.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @gunther-186: :mrgreen:

    is that a new profession?

  • 189.cane: Reply to this comment

    Keo is starting to make sense.

  • 190.cane: Reply to this comment

    but wait……………………………………………………….”NZ were not magnificent against OZ, only good.
    NZ left 7 tries out on the field”

    Markie.

    So with a bit of luck, NZ could have won by 60.
    Only good. Come on Keo.

    They were friggen fantastic.

  • 191.gunther: Reply to this comment

    Some ****** put too many Fs in my profession.

    Sticky Fingers.

  • 192.gunther: Reply to this comment

    @cane-190:

    Indeed Caner.

    You sound tumescent with pride.

    If you could I bet you would be bent double right now giving little Cane a right seeing to.

  • 193.cane: Reply to this comment

    @cunther-192:

    tumescent …………………………………………did you get a Thesaurus for your birthday gunna?.

  • 194.gunther: Reply to this comment

    @cane-193:

    Indeed Caner.

    For my tenth birthday.

    I’m surprised you now what a thesaurus is.

    My money would have had you googling dinosaurs.

  • 195.katman: Reply to this comment

    Don’t pick at it. Thesaurus bleeding again.

  • 196.cane: Reply to this comment

    @gunther-194:

    close.

  • 197.viewer: Reply to this comment

    @57 :D

  • 198.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @gunther-194: you already hitting the sauce! :mrgreen:

  • 199.TooMuchRugby: Reply to this comment

    @gunther-192:
    tumescent = abnormally distended especially by fluids or gas
    Are you picking on Thelo again?

  • 200.cane: Reply to this comment

    Good Luck tomorrow Oke Dokies.

    I think you may need it.

    Oz by 4.

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 » Show All

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.