Cooper: I won’t play for Wallabies

Cooper: I won’t play for Wallabies

Quade Cooper has unequivocally announced that he would not want to play for the Wallabies even if he was fit.

The injured flyhalf has been in the news following his scathing attack on the Wallabies coaching staff and a team environment he described as toxic. On Thursday night, he reiterated his stance when he spoke live on Australian television.

‘I’m just striving to be the best that I can be and that’s why I said I didn’t want to be involved in that kind of environment,’ Cooper said. ‘For me to continue to improve as a player and as a person you want to be in the best possible environment and I feel that that environment is destroying me as a person and as a player, so that I can’t do the best that I can do to represent my country and my family and my friends, to the best of my ability.’

Cooper is currently unavailable because of injury, and is unlikely to recover in time for the Wallabies’ end-of-year tour. But even if he was fit, he claims that he wouldn’t want to be involved.

‘No, like I said, the environment there at the moment is one that I don’t feel comfortable in and if I don’t feel comfortable and if I don’t feel that I can give 100% for my country and that yellow jersey, that’s a very big problem,’ he said.


52 Comments

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

  • 1.WP-Forever: Reply to this comment

    Rebellious dragon.

  • 2.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @WP-Forever-1: He is a toolbag of note! Definitely in my top 5 “rugby palooka’s”

  • 3.londonshark: Reply to this comment

    His 2011 Super Rugby form was insane. Put Spencer to shame to be honest.

    But like Spencer, he can’t seem to really step up when it comes to test rugby.

  • 4.Test: Reply to this comment

    Kevin Pieterson, Quade Cooper…too many of these prima donna’s in sports these days IMO.

  • 5.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    Oh well, i guess one has to respect him for taking a stand whether one agrees with him or not. At least he did it in the open unlike Pietersen who blackmouthed his captain behind his back in what was supposed to be ‘confidential” messages.

  • 6.BrumbiesBoy: Reply to this comment

    Each to their own, I suppose. No man (or woman) is bigger than any game.

  • 7.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    well then f uk off quade.

  • 8.rossoneri: Reply to this comment

    Quade really calling out his team. Wonder how the other players feel about his comments.

  • 9.greatest13gerber: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-7:

    agree. What a joke. this is agent driven.

    How can you not want represent your country because you dont like the facilitices??? etc?????

    cry baby

  • 10.JA-JA: Reply to this comment

    Well his test days are over.

    Nobody is bigger than the game, not even you Quade believe it or not.

  • 11.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @greatest13gerber-9: its not the facilities as much as deans i think.

    but he will learn the hard way that the game is bigger than any player.

  • 12.rossoneri: Reply to this comment

    Litigation: Landmark SCA ruling on dirty play in rugby

    The SCA has ruled that rugby players will be forced to pay up for serious injuries caused to opponents, says a report in The Mercury. This after schoolboy Ryand Hattingh’s neck was broken during a rugby match between the first teams of Laborie High School and Stellenbosch High School in 2005. The SCA found that a flagrant contravention of rugby rules that resulted in a serious injury could attract legal liability and dismissed an appeal by Alex Roux against an order of the Western Cape High Court that he was legally liable for the neck injury of an opponent. The report says evidence in the High Court found Hattingh had complained about Roux’s scrumming manner before the conduct that resulted in the injuries. As the forwards were forming a scrum, Roux had shouted the word ‘jack-knife’ and then blocked the channel into which Hattingh’s head was meant to go. Because of this, Hattingh’s head was forced downwards and his neck was broken. The High Court accepted the evidence of Hattingh and rejected that of Roux. The report says the unanimous judgment of five judges found the High Court’s findings could not be faulted and the conclusion that Roux had acted deliberately was faultless. Roux’s conduct was wrongful, and the SCA held it was so.
    Full report in The Mercury (subscription needed)
    Judgment
    See also a Beeld report

  • 13.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @rossoneri-8:

    They are understandably dead quiet for now although Drew Mitchell has tweeted that he is ‘finding it increasingly difficult to bite his tongue” without eloborating whether he was even discussing Cooper’s comments and whether he supported or disagreed with it.

  • 14.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-11:

    He does not agree with the defence orientated gameplan of deans and wants the players to have more say into team tactics etc.

  • 15.rossoneri: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim-13: But I am certain that it must be causing upset in the team.

  • 16.Nils: Reply to this comment

    Big deal. He was awesome in one Super rugby season and that’s pretty much it on positive note.

    His off-field record stinks and form loss surpass even Morne’s. So shame, Blacks and Boks have lost their prime weapon.

  • 17.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-11: He’s a prima donna. Deans’ gameplan has too much kikcing for Quades taste and he is being asked to do more than just play the way he wants to hence the tantrum. Cooper might be insanley talented but he cannot be good for team moral.

  • 18.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim-14: so he wants to be like john, fdp and matfield to pdv…ok i get it

  • 19.rossoneri: Reply to this comment

    @rossoneri-12: This was a good decision for rugby. Players, esspecially youngsters have to learn and know that as physical as the game can get, safety must be a priority, or there will be consequences.

  • 20.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim-14: he is a player, not the coach. so he can f uk off imo.

    @Skeppie-17: i dont buy the player power bs.

    because the coach ultimately takes the fall.

  • 21.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @rossoneri-15:

    I have no doubt of that- i guess we will hear some stories quite soon especially if they lose against the boks and even argies over the next 2 weeks.

  • 22.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-18: Any bitterness there Transie?

  • 23.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-18:

    Yip, seems like it

    @rangerman-20:

    See #18 above.

  • 24.rossoneri: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-18: :lol:

  • 25.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-18: @Robzim-23: so you are saying 2009 was due to the players and not pdv?

    or did he cave after his great results?

    what a flawed line of reasoning guys.

  • 26.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @rossoneri-24: It was the ANC’s fault.

  • 27.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Skeppie-22: hi skeppie, how are you?

  • 28.Robzim: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-25:

    I believe that the players had a huge input on the gameplan (s) of Peter de Villiers right through his tenure as coach.

  • 29.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @Transformation-27: Too good Transie too good and you?

  • 30.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-25:
    Why?
    What happened in 2009?

  • 31.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-30: we won the 3n and beat the BIL.

    where were you?

  • 32.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-25: hey! we never came up with the theory that the players were coaching the team, gavin rich was the main man behind the rumours in ’09.

    it also didn’t help that matfield said “when peter first came in, he really wanted to coach and he had lots of ideasbut i think he quickly realised that we has set out minds on how we actually wanted to play.

    he didn’t step back, but he sat down and said ‘ok let’s do this together’. every week on a monday morning we would sit with all the assistant coaches, peter and about three or four senior players, later on it was a bit more, during the world cup”

  • 33.greatest13gerber: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-11:

    yes.

    I agre he is prima donna. Does he want to caoch the side????

    this is not Quade job. He is a disgrace and no way other players will back him over the coach. No respect.

  • 34.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @rangerman-31:
    I know. I thought you like saying it so i gave you a window of opportuinity :-)
    My Ranger took it.

  • 35.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-34: Hurricane you are too kind…can we move onto 1995 and 2007 next? At this point we need some pampering!

  • 36.Transformation: Reply to this comment

    @Skeppie-29: am great too…

  • 37.greatest13gerber: Reply to this comment

    @Robzim-28:

    That is True. Peter was political pawn. Smit, Du Preez and Matfield were real coaches behind the scenes

  • 38.rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-34: hehehe, thought maybe you had emerged from a cave.

    @Transformation-32: fair enough bud.

    gotta go guys, cheers.

  • 39.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @Skeppie-35:
    haha, dont get too carried away………..ohhh ok, what happened in 2007? :-)

  • 40.aliboy: Reply to this comment

    Love to see Cooper off to league. Those guys are much better at the kisses and cuddles his ego needs than those rough old union players ;-)

  • 41.Delki: Reply to this comment

    Coooper is a complete boofhead.

  • 42.gunther: Reply to this comment

    no truth to the rumour that quade the fade simply wants to get out of his contract so he can follow sunni bin dollar to japan?

  • 43.greatest13gerber: Reply to this comment

    @gunther-42:

    very true. This whole thing was agent driven as both SBW and Quade have same agent.

    This is what Aussie ad kiwi media are saying

  • 44.boktillzero: Reply to this comment

    I guess this means will be seeing Quade playing for the roosters along side SBW next year…funny enough thats not a bad idea they have the right skill set for the game

  • 45.The Donkeys Egg: Reply to this comment

    @londonshark-3:

    are you referring to Carlos “can’t seem to really step up when it comes to test rugby” Spencer ?

    Spencer vs Springboks

    Played 7

    Won 6

    84pts

  • 46.aliboy: Reply to this comment

    @boktillzero-44: Not really in Coopers case. He can’t hide from tackling in League, and he will also have to take some big hits once the opposition work him out as a *****.

  • 47.Black Power: Reply to this comment

    What a prized wanker this guy is. Thank goodness he moved to Aussie. I hope he stays there as we have no room for him back in New Zealand.

  • 48.Greenies: Reply to this comment

    Rugby League is like Soccer

    The players and supporters are Knackers.

    So there is no surprise with a former rugby league player either looking for attention in the media and having a fanny wobble.
    Bunch of skirts
    neither am i a fan of SBW, another rugby league poof

  • 49.aliboy: Reply to this comment

    @Greenies-48: Not sure that I agree with the ‘poof’ comment. Some pretty hard boys playing league. I suspect that some of them look at union as a ‘soft option’.
    Seem to have more of a ‘prima donna’ culture in league though and doesn’t do them any favours. Cooper would fit right in apart from when he has to make or take a real tackle. Not a huge fan of the SBW circus either, but the man can surely play. If he stuck in one place/code for a while his true value would probably live up to the hype.

  • 50.cane: Reply to this comment

    Quade, Quade, Quade.

    If you had half a brain …………………………………………..well you haven’t,
    so WTF.

Pages: [1] 2 » Show All

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.