<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;We have a long way to go&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/</link>
	<description>An independent look at South African rugby</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:17:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SjamBok</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2245251</link>
		<dc:creator>SjamBok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 04:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2245251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There was panic in the ranks when we went down by a score.  This ewas inexperience. We should just have maintained the pressure of the first half and kept sinking the penalties.  The AB&#039;s dont let in tries- they will give a penalty before a try every time. Eventually enough penalties result in a yellow card, and then keep the pressure on anyway.  Keep it tight ALL the time. Until they have no more players left on the field due to yellow cards.

Thats the only way that you beat the AB&#039;s.  It is all a pressure game. Huge tightness in defence, massive pressure on attack, keeping it tight. Any looseness is punished. 

Their set piece running even from broken play was impressive. Our team needs a month or two together for intensive practice NOW to try and play catch up a bit. 
We will not cacth up their 9 years of consistent selections and coaching and systems and their familioarity with their systems ina  few weeks before the RC. We need to put in extra effort at this time.

Otherwise, when will they ever gel as a TEAM? In 6 years? Perhaps SARU should set aside a long period every year for Bok team practice and conditioning exclusively. Twice the amount that the AB&#039;s set aside.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was panic in the ranks when we went down by a score.  This ewas inexperience. We should just have maintained the pressure of the first half and kept sinking the penalties.  The AB&#8217;s dont let in tries- they will give a penalty before a try every time. Eventually enough penalties result in a yellow card, and then keep the pressure on anyway.  Keep it tight ALL the time. Until they have no more players left on the field due to yellow cards.</p>
<p>Thats the only way that you beat the AB&#8217;s.  It is all a pressure game. Huge tightness in defence, massive pressure on attack, keeping it tight. Any looseness is punished. </p>
<p>Their set piece running even from broken play was impressive. Our team needs a month or two together for intensive practice NOW to try and play catch up a bit.<br />
We will not cacth up their 9 years of consistent selections and coaching and systems and their familioarity with their systems ina  few weeks before the RC. We need to put in extra effort at this time.</p>
<p>Otherwise, when will they ever gel as a TEAM? In 6 years? Perhaps SARU should set aside a long period every year for Bok team practice and conditioning exclusively. Twice the amount that the AB&#8217;s set aside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grant10</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2244437</link>
		<dc:creator>grant10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 08:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2244437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am just concerned that HM decides to creep  into the shell and goes back to players like Spies and M Steyn!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just concerned that HM decides to creep  into the shell and goes back to players like Spies and M Steyn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stawm</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2244402</link>
		<dc:creator>Stawm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 07:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2244402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[....and Tacitus had just graced us with his presence after the boks beat the wobblies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.and Tacitus had just graced us with his presence after the boks beat the wobblies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rocco</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2244364</link>
		<dc:creator>rocco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 07:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2244364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We will never catch the ABs. We may achieve parity for fleeting moments as they go through change-of-the-guard periods. But as soon as their team settles, we will remain no match. 
That is until there is a radical mind-set change in our own rugby philosophies. I will continue to hope, as there are signs of such change at domestic level. In the Currie Cup, more and more teams are adopting a ball in hand approach. It is the difficult route to success, but one that promises to take our rugby to a higher level of sustained excellence. For too long we have hoped and prayed for that messianic player that can win a game on his own. For too long have we gone into matches with the mindset of dominating up-front being the be-all-and-end-all. It is time to realize that at the highest level, one can never guarantee upfront dominance for 80 minutes, and even if this were possible, the result is still an uncertainty. 
One difference between NZ and SA rugby philosophy is clearly visible when noting the crowd reaction to drop goals. In NZ it is met with a mixed response, while in SA, especially up north, crowds get all excited as though this were the be-all-and-end-all of the game.
Personal perception is that in SA crowds don’t really care how a win is achieved. It is great to win, but if it all depends on one or two players, anyone can see that sustained success will remain a pipe-dream as players are injured or experience loss of form.
The ball-in-hand approach demands a greater level of team cohesion, taking the game to its ultimate level. One can draw the analogy with soccer, which is dubbed by its fans “the beautiful game”. It is indeed a beautiful game, but only when the teams involved produce seamless passing moves to create scoring opportunities. It becomes something less beautiful when dominated by individuals.
So why have we never really bought into the ball-in-hand approach? Simple, it requires too much work. It requires for players to develop a psychic understanding with their team-mates. It requires for players to believe and be encouraged that creating opportunities for team-mates is as gratifying as scoring the points themselves. It requires for players to develop and master all the skills they should have gained at age-group level. To coaches, this could possibly seem a daunting task, especially when senior players still cannot do something as elementary as passing to both sides. No, the more individualistic crash-ball and kick-and-chase approaches can yield the result, be it that these are non-sustainable. It is the game at its most primitive level…]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will never catch the ABs. We may achieve parity for fleeting moments as they go through change-of-the-guard periods. But as soon as their team settles, we will remain no match.<br />
That is until there is a radical mind-set change in our own rugby philosophies. I will continue to hope, as there are signs of such change at domestic level. In the Currie Cup, more and more teams are adopting a ball in hand approach. It is the difficult route to success, but one that promises to take our rugby to a higher level of sustained excellence. For too long we have hoped and prayed for that messianic player that can win a game on his own. For too long have we gone into matches with the mindset of dominating up-front being the be-all-and-end-all. It is time to realize that at the highest level, one can never guarantee upfront dominance for 80 minutes, and even if this were possible, the result is still an uncertainty.<br />
One difference between NZ and SA rugby philosophy is clearly visible when noting the crowd reaction to drop goals. In NZ it is met with a mixed response, while in SA, especially up north, crowds get all excited as though this were the be-all-and-end-all of the game.<br />
Personal perception is that in SA crowds don’t really care how a win is achieved. It is great to win, but if it all depends on one or two players, anyone can see that sustained success will remain a pipe-dream as players are injured or experience loss of form.<br />
The ball-in-hand approach demands a greater level of team cohesion, taking the game to its ultimate level. One can draw the analogy with soccer, which is dubbed by its fans “the beautiful game”. It is indeed a beautiful game, but only when the teams involved produce seamless passing moves to create scoring opportunities. It becomes something less beautiful when dominated by individuals.<br />
So why have we never really bought into the ball-in-hand approach? Simple, it requires too much work. It requires for players to develop a psychic understanding with their team-mates. It requires for players to believe and be encouraged that creating opportunities for team-mates is as gratifying as scoring the points themselves. It requires for players to develop and master all the skills they should have gained at age-group level. To coaches, this could possibly seem a daunting task, especially when senior players still cannot do something as elementary as passing to both sides. No, the more individualistic crash-ball and kick-and-chase approaches can yield the result, be it that these are non-sustainable. It is the game at its most primitive level…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacoshark</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2244336</link>
		<dc:creator>jacoshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 06:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2244336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[heyneke out!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heyneke out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KiaKahaNZ</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2244257</link>
		<dc:creator>KiaKahaNZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 21:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2244257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said Rex, and I guess the annoying thing is, many of you SA supporters can see this, but those in charge can not.

In the bad old days, when we toured in 70, 76 etc, the boks game was all about players 1-10, and for the part it worked, when the game was to merely win by 3 pointers, and the home town refs could always find an excuse to blow the whistle to help achieve this. It disguised the need way back then to play better rugby, more expansive rugby, that appreciated all 15 players. the boks were winning series, albeit narrowly, but a win was a win and thats all that mattered.

Move forward 30 plus years, and those in charge who are now in their 40&#039;s/50&#039;s etc, hang on to that romantic mindset of bullying their way to victory - because it worked back in the 70&#039;s. 

Things have changed.

Rugby is far more dynamic, its professional, players are fitter, and most importantly we now have neutral refs. We play each other more - which suggests 2 key things - that the Boks refuse to embrace the changing nature of the game, and are introspective about seeing where other teams are improving.

The false dawn was set last week against Aus, as Aus allowed the boks to move the ball a bit more creating holes for Habana to wander through. everyone got the hot sweats for Goosen, but all he was doing was flicking it on - the Aus backline was a defensive nightmare.

Your forwards are great at set piece, and spot tackles, gang tackles, but the ball is too slow in the recycle, so when your backs do get it, the pace of the game has slowed right down, the opposition have re-aligned - and your 10 reverts to kicking again. Many SA folk say their forwards are fantastic, their biggest strength etc, but are they? They&#039;re damn good, but they could be better in their jobs by playing quicker, and allowing your backs to play with front foot ball, not static ball. We could then then see a back line playing with zest, skill, flair - as they do in practice. I am sure the desire is there by the players, but it has to start up front.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said Rex, and I guess the annoying thing is, many of you SA supporters can see this, but those in charge can not.</p>
<p>In the bad old days, when we toured in 70, 76 etc, the boks game was all about players 1-10, and for the part it worked, when the game was to merely win by 3 pointers, and the home town refs could always find an excuse to blow the whistle to help achieve this. It disguised the need way back then to play better rugby, more expansive rugby, that appreciated all 15 players. the boks were winning series, albeit narrowly, but a win was a win and thats all that mattered.</p>
<p>Move forward 30 plus years, and those in charge who are now in their 40&#8242;s/50&#8242;s etc, hang on to that romantic mindset of bullying their way to victory &#8211; because it worked back in the 70&#8242;s. </p>
<p>Things have changed.</p>
<p>Rugby is far more dynamic, its professional, players are fitter, and most importantly we now have neutral refs. We play each other more &#8211; which suggests 2 key things &#8211; that the Boks refuse to embrace the changing nature of the game, and are introspective about seeing where other teams are improving.</p>
<p>The false dawn was set last week against Aus, as Aus allowed the boks to move the ball a bit more creating holes for Habana to wander through. everyone got the hot sweats for Goosen, but all he was doing was flicking it on &#8211; the Aus backline was a defensive nightmare.</p>
<p>Your forwards are great at set piece, and spot tackles, gang tackles, but the ball is too slow in the recycle, so when your backs do get it, the pace of the game has slowed right down, the opposition have re-aligned &#8211; and your 10 reverts to kicking again. Many SA folk say their forwards are fantastic, their biggest strength etc, but are they? They&#8217;re damn good, but they could be better in their jobs by playing quicker, and allowing your backs to play with front foot ball, not static ball. We could then then see a back line playing with zest, skill, flair &#8211; as they do in practice. I am sure the desire is there by the players, but it has to start up front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rex</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2244249</link>
		<dc:creator>rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 20:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2244249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Boks backline has been an endemic problem. They never sorted it out even when we had some of the best forwards in the world. The reason we&#039;re &quot;rebuilding&quot; is because there was no foresight to begin with. 

Has there ever been a &quot;weak&quot; AB team? No. Even when they&#039;re rebuilding, they remain immensely competitive because they&#039;re continuously drafting in new players and managing them well. Graham Henry traveled to the US to learn from the NFL. Even though the ABs were already excellent, he was still looking at other ideas to solidify them and improve them further. 

In SA we keep talking about our &quot;traditional&quot; strengths - which, without innovation are fast turning into our weakness, because it&#039;s all we know. There is no sense of development, no one appearing to take a really hard look at our game and asking &quot;what&#039;s missing?&quot;

And &quot;what&#039;s missing&quot; is abundantly clear. We are one-dimensional, our selections are off, we have no coherent backline nor backline play. We doggedly insist on doing things our way when an injection of techincal nous from someone like Plumtree or Mitchell might really help. Is it a surprise that the Sharks played so well in the Super 15? They have a Kiwi coach and we have players who can offload and play exciting incisive rugby...except when they show up in the Bok team. 

As has been pointed out recently, the Kiwis manage their players better. We have far too many key players injured for it to be merely due to chance. 

Until we rectify these things and add what&#039;s missing, we will continue to stagnate. It&#039;s amazing that we go through the same soul-searching year after year and never really see progress in our game or our approach to it. Everyone is so worried about our inability to play like the ABs, so they default to this nonsense about our &quot;traditional&quot; strengths. 

The definition of a delusion is adhering to the same beliefs against all evidence to the contrary. Our focus on these so-called Traditional Strengths is preventing us from developing new strengths and new traditions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Boks backline has been an endemic problem. They never sorted it out even when we had some of the best forwards in the world. The reason we&#8217;re &#8220;rebuilding&#8221; is because there was no foresight to begin with. </p>
<p>Has there ever been a &#8220;weak&#8221; AB team? No. Even when they&#8217;re rebuilding, they remain immensely competitive because they&#8217;re continuously drafting in new players and managing them well. Graham Henry traveled to the US to learn from the NFL. Even though the ABs were already excellent, he was still looking at other ideas to solidify them and improve them further. </p>
<p>In SA we keep talking about our &#8220;traditional&#8221; strengths &#8211; which, without innovation are fast turning into our weakness, because it&#8217;s all we know. There is no sense of development, no one appearing to take a really hard look at our game and asking &#8220;what&#8217;s missing?&#8221;</p>
<p>And &#8220;what&#8217;s missing&#8221; is abundantly clear. We are one-dimensional, our selections are off, we have no coherent backline nor backline play. We doggedly insist on doing things our way when an injection of techincal nous from someone like Plumtree or Mitchell might really help. Is it a surprise that the Sharks played so well in the Super 15? They have a Kiwi coach and we have players who can offload and play exciting incisive rugby&#8230;except when they show up in the Bok team. </p>
<p>As has been pointed out recently, the Kiwis manage their players better. We have far too many key players injured for it to be merely due to chance. </p>
<p>Until we rectify these things and add what&#8217;s missing, we will continue to stagnate. It&#8217;s amazing that we go through the same soul-searching year after year and never really see progress in our game or our approach to it. Everyone is so worried about our inability to play like the ABs, so they default to this nonsense about our &#8220;traditional&#8221; strengths. </p>
<p>The definition of a delusion is adhering to the same beliefs against all evidence to the contrary. Our focus on these so-called Traditional Strengths is preventing us from developing new strengths and new traditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KiaKahaNZ</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2244240</link>
		<dc:creator>KiaKahaNZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 20:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2244240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2244150&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;i_love_u_bakkiesbotha-32&lt;/a&gt;: you must be the saddest, most miserable &amp; confused person posting on this web site.

You are the optimal myopic bok supporter, so much so, that you have provided an insight as to the psyche of your culture (if you can call it that) that restricts your growth. Your continual envy and accusations towards NZ rugby conveniently hides your problems on dealing with how to play better rugby - youre too worried about us! 

Haha, please, .. your tiresome rhetoric on filth/cheating is brutally ironic considering SA are the biggest thugs in world rugby]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-2244150" rel="nofollow">i_love_u_bakkiesbotha-32</a>: you must be the saddest, most miserable &amp; confused person posting on this web site.</p>
<p>You are the optimal myopic bok supporter, so much so, that you have provided an insight as to the psyche of your culture (if you can call it that) that restricts your growth. Your continual envy and accusations towards NZ rugby conveniently hides your problems on dealing with how to play better rugby &#8211; youre too worried about us! </p>
<p>Haha, please, .. your tiresome rhetoric on filth/cheating is brutally ironic considering SA are the biggest thugs in world rugby</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hurricane</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2244191</link>
		<dc:creator>Hurricane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 19:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2244191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2244150&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;i_love_u_bakkiesbotha-32&lt;/a&gt;: 
So the ref missed 23 penalties?
lol
You had all the penalties in the first half, he was giving you guys a huge break.
Ref had a good game, even though you guys got away with a bit as well seemed to be a fair contest. You think sitting on your couch watching the game and stopping and rewinding back that the ref at the time should have seen what you saw..... shows how dumb you really are.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-2244150" rel="nofollow">i_love_u_bakkiesbotha-32</a>:<br />
So the ref missed 23 penalties?<br />
lol<br />
You had all the penalties in the first half, he was giving you guys a huge break.<br />
Ref had a good game, even though you guys got away with a bit as well seemed to be a fair contest. You think sitting on your couch watching the game and stopping and rewinding back that the ref at the time should have seen what you saw&#8230;.. shows how dumb you really are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i_love_u_bakkiesbotha</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2244150</link>
		<dc:creator>i_love_u_bakkiesbotha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 17:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2244150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[taking a cursory glance at the first half without giving any real, determined observation i have picked up just a few of the new zealanders infringements. of course the second half was / is far, far more littered with filthy play than the first (how else would they win):


1. driving off players without the ball.

2. hands.

3. macaw falling onto the wrong side of the ruck.

4. different players going onto the wrong side of the ruck.

5. hands.

6. offsides.

7. going off feet / to ground at ruck.

8. hands.

9. taking up position ahead of the ruck.

10. ab prop drops bind *should be an immediate penalty*.

11. disengaging early from scrum.

12. lineout distance infringement.

13. macaw blocking at scrum.

14. entering maul from side and continuing to play.

15. hands in ruck playing ball.

16. tackling support player without the ball intentionally - nonu.

17. *spear tackle* - retalick (is this even a debate...?..but i&#039;ll bet you the citing commisioner if a saffa let it go).

18. offsides.

19. macaw slowing ball in ruck blatantly.

20. forward pass read - try.

21. sealing off at ruck.

22. obstructive running.

23. offsides again.

--------------------------------------------------------   

THINGS TO REMEMBER: 
this is just the first half and is by no means a full and final assesment of their filth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>taking a cursory glance at the first half without giving any real, determined observation i have picked up just a few of the new zealanders infringements. of course the second half was / is far, far more littered with filthy play than the first (how else would they win):</p>
<p>1. driving off players without the ball.</p>
<p>2. hands.</p>
<p>3. macaw falling onto the wrong side of the ruck.</p>
<p>4. different players going onto the wrong side of the ruck.</p>
<p>5. hands.</p>
<p>6. offsides.</p>
<p>7. going off feet / to ground at ruck.</p>
<p>8. hands.</p>
<p>9. taking up position ahead of the ruck.</p>
<p>10. ab prop drops bind *should be an immediate penalty*.</p>
<p>11. disengaging early from scrum.</p>
<p>12. lineout distance infringement.</p>
<p>13. macaw blocking at scrum.</p>
<p>14. entering maul from side and continuing to play.</p>
<p>15. hands in ruck playing ball.</p>
<p>16. tackling support player without the ball intentionally &#8211; nonu.</p>
<p>17. *spear tackle* &#8211; retalick (is this even a debate&#8230;?..but i&#8217;ll bet you the citing commisioner if a saffa let it go).</p>
<p>18. offsides.</p>
<p>19. macaw slowing ball in ruck blatantly.</p>
<p>20. forward pass read &#8211; try.</p>
<p>21. sealing off at ruck.</p>
<p>22. obstructive running.</p>
<p>23. offsides again.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;   </p>
<p>THINGS TO REMEMBER:<br />
this is just the first half and is by no means a full and final assesment of their filth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Braders</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2244059</link>
		<dc:creator>Braders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 12:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2244059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2243901&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gumboots-25&lt;/a&gt;: What about the kicking coach?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-2243901" rel="nofollow">Gumboots-25</a>: What about the kicking coach?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Braders</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2244058</link>
		<dc:creator>Braders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 12:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2244058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We really missed Bismark, JP and Frans Steyn. Those two would&#039;ve made a big difference! Taute out of his depth in a position he&#039;s only played in a few times at Currie Cup level?
Some overseas based players with loads of experience would surely help? Bakkies,Guthro,Big Joe, Jacque Fourie, Foure Du Preez.
Surely its the end of the road for Kirshner. Also, Hougaard on the wing is not working!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We really missed Bismark, JP and Frans Steyn. Those two would&#8217;ve made a big difference! Taute out of his depth in a position he&#8217;s only played in a few times at Currie Cup level?<br />
Some overseas based players with loads of experience would surely help? Bakkies,Guthro,Big Joe, Jacque Fourie, Foure Du Preez.<br />
Surely its the end of the road for Kirshner. Also, Hougaard on the wing is not working!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huge</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2244043</link>
		<dc:creator>Huge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 11:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2244043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People over there in SA, check the rankings tomorrow your back to 3, and you came 3rd in the Tournement due to the team that wins more games has a higher ranking if the Tots are equal.
Doesn&#039;t matter we,re all gotta beat the AB&#039;s there the benchmark.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People over there in SA, check the rankings tomorrow your back to 3, and you came 3rd in the Tournement due to the team that wins more games has a higher ranking if the Tots are equal.<br />
Doesn&#8217;t matter we,re all gotta beat the AB&#8217;s there the benchmark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cane</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2243965</link>
		<dc:creator>cane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 08:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2243965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2243913&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Black Power-26&lt;/a&gt;: 

;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-2243913" rel="nofollow">Black Power-26</a>: </p>
<p> <img src='http://keo.co.za/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheTackler</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2243960</link>
		<dc:creator>TheTackler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 08:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2243960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any bets on how soon we&#039;ll hear HM utter those immortal words: &quot;Judge us at the World Cup&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any bets on how soon we&#8217;ll hear HM utter those immortal words: &#8220;Judge us at the World Cup&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Power</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2243913</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 07:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2243913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a good nights sleep you Yarpies must be keen to watch the highlights of the test match, click on link below

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/our-experts/7780405/Untouchable-All-Blacks-take-game-to-next-level]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a good nights sleep you Yarpies must be keen to watch the highlights of the test match, click on link below</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/our-experts/7780405/Untouchable-All-Blacks-take-game-to-next-level" rel="nofollow">http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/our-experts/7780405/Untouchable-All-Blacks-take-game-to-next-level</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gumboots</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2243901</link>
		<dc:creator>Gumboots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 06:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2243901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our defensive coach and backline coach need to pack their bags immediately as well... Never seen such shoddy defense either...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our defensive coach and backline coach need to pack their bags immediately as well&#8230; Never seen such shoddy defense either&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gumboots</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2243900</link>
		<dc:creator>Gumboots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 05:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2243900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no doubt that we are light years behind the Kiwis...

Our forwards were immense - problems in the backline...

Game plan not up to standard and HM does not instill any confidence in his team with his strange behaviour during a game.  I can&#039;t see him being with the team for much longer.  Time for the rightful person to take over...

Welcome home Nic Mallet welcome home...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt that we are light years behind the Kiwis&#8230;</p>
<p>Our forwards were immense &#8211; problems in the backline&#8230;</p>
<p>Game plan not up to standard and HM does not instill any confidence in his team with his strange behaviour during a game.  I can&#8217;t see him being with the team for much longer.  Time for the rightful person to take over&#8230;</p>
<p>Welcome home Nic Mallet welcome home&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bok fan</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2243896</link>
		<dc:creator>Bok fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 05:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2243896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Im so sick of Meyers pathetic excuses and contradictions. After 6 months we&#039;ve gone backwards. We were doing better when the players were coaching themselves forfucksakes]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im so sick of Meyers pathetic excuses and contradictions. After 6 months we&#8217;ve gone backwards. We were doing better when the players were coaching themselves forfucksakes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trupisero</title>
		<link>http://keo.co.za/2012/10/06/we-have-a-long-way-to-go/#comment-2243886</link>
		<dc:creator>trupisero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 03:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keo.co.za/?p=109278#comment-2243886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HM must farkoff as far as possible from the boks. Most useless coach sice Strauli. The onlynpeople who believe in him must be Tswane tools. Cant we have a promo-relegation for coach too?

Nothing would give me greater pleasure than seeing him get the boot.

And the bulls lose a promo against the queens ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HM must farkoff as far as possible from the boks. Most useless coach sice Strauli. The onlynpeople who believe in him must be Tswane tools. Cant we have a promo-relegation for coach too?</p>
<p>Nothing would give me greater pleasure than seeing him get the boot.</p>
<p>And the bulls lose a promo against the queens <img src='http://keo.co.za/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
