Comments on: Super Sharks will win Currie Cup

By: wing_14

wing_14 — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:01:23 +0000

“The Sharks have been South Africa’s most consistent performer in Super Rugby and Currie Cup, with or without their current Springboks. They play the best rugby and they are South Africa’s best team. They will win the title on Saturday.”

Mark, you are an idiot. First of all they were not the most consistent performers in SR, that was in fact the Stormers. They play the best brand? they are the best team? That’s just your opinion

They WILL win? Really? do you have a crystall ball? They are favourites, sure, they have a great chance, yes. You may think you’re a god but nobody can predict the future. You would have probably bet your house that the blacks will crush the wallabies last saturday but they didn’t now did they?

On paper they have the best team with the most experience but in the end it’s 15 against 15, or 22 against 22 inside 80 minutes. How do you know the Sharks won’t implode? Remember, bounce of the ball, a bit of luck, utter determination may just get WP on top to claim the CC

Why don’t you rather focus on whatever the hell is going on with your friends at EP rugby? Until you can take a step backwards and be realistic, keep away from the keyboard please

By: Brads

Brads — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:41:53 +0000

Well it is nice to see the banter here is all warm and cuddly.

By: Transformation

Transformation — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 04:40:30 +0000

@myth geskop-453: corpus dragons...

By: Jinx2

Jinx2 — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 04:17:31 +0000

@ET.-450: Are you Aaron Crawley from Cheltenham?

By: ET.

ET. — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 03:44:47 +0000

Koos the Doos, you are the one clearly exhibiting failing memory if you do not know who you are.
Find yourself, before you commit yourself ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. to an institution.

By: myth geskop

myth geskop — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 03:28:35 +0000

Maybe you should stop while you behind…first I have no idea who you referring to, second your memory is failing…

• 509. E.T.(ET) :
January 10th, 2011 at 9:17 pm
@Heavens Game(Heavens Game) :
There is NO such word in English or Latin for what your Shark compost is trying to say or is that girlie or pig/swine stuff still affecting your brain?

And lastly and just incase you forgot what an absolute idiot you really are…

“Compos mentis is a term deriving from Latin meaning of a composed mind…”

The exact opposite of what you are…

By: ET.

ET. — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 03:19:53 +0000

Ja, Koos die Doos, you are correct, the reference to Angerman being stupid is right on the money.
Thanks for reminding him of his folly.

By: myth geskop

myth geskop — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 03:13:20 +0000

@ET.-450:

Speaking of stupid…

523. E.T.(ET) :
January 10th, 2011 at 9:48 pm
A stupid remains a stupid.

It is CORPUS moron and not that KAK that you wrote(“compus”).
They were clearly handing out pieces of paper at the ‘Maritzburg campus of UN.

In your own words…a stupid remains a stupid!

By: ET.

ET. — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 02:23:00 +0000

“Domzim” for quite a while now, over a number of mostly S.African issues you have exhibited a lack of earmarking that which is distasteful to a large per centage of ordinary, honest people in a variable, highly differential cultural society.

Glorifying and celebrating absurd acts of human behaviour such as military or rugby player violence(Burgers etc.) and their vile or foul acts or language, cheating with drug use to win global sporting trophies, discussion, with a lack of sensitivity to living victims, of questionable and discredited ‘national service’ activities( against no other nation but fellow S.Africans of colour) seems to escape being deemed obnoxious and ugly by you. Is this the effectiveness of the stubborn ‘verkrampte’ culture revealing itself?

With a question and an analogy and a simple explanation I hope you see how serious this failing is looked upon.

When you have a large number of rotten apples in a large box of apples, discussing which rotten apples are better than other rotten apples is absurdly meaningless and immature.
Will you accept, normally, any of those rotten apples or will you instead get rid of all of them in order to save the good apples?
There are NO degrees of better or worse rotten apples as you will not eat any rotten apples(rotten is not simply blemished)

Absurdly you take joy from a rotten apple( a better cheat from my analogy) beating other rotten apples(worse cheats) by highlighting some, unknown to you (and all but the investigators ), blood drug levels affecting exercise physiological ‘facts’ and performances, as better and worse for many others.

Clearly the Postal Teams, led by LA , won because they had a ‘better’, more physiologically and biochemically and pharmacologically effective cocktail of drug regimens than opposing teams wrt cardiology, respiratory , endocrinology, neuro-muscular and more systems.
In all seriousness is that to be applauded and celebrated and glorified.as you do with your declaration of “best” of a totally rotten lot on a podium for year after year after year?
How happy will you be when you hypothetically learn 2 months from now that the Sharks win on Saturday because they were all on steroids the last 6 weeks even though some WP players may well be consuming numerous bottles of cough mixtures and more(difference is a mere degree)?

Is it not decidedly ABSURD, the ignorant and stupid claims you make?

By: ET.

ET. — Tue, 23 Oct 2012 00:32:07 +0000

And now I am left to adjudicate this “Domzim” debacle that he deems to be a ‘debate’.
My reading of the relevant posts reveals false claims being later made.
For example, “Domzim’s” post 413 @21.26pm. refers to questions (presumably asked before #413) which are more than answered by Jokers post #415 also @ 21.26pm(so they cross the internet wires in midstream) and evidence is provided by Jokers and he asks for “Domzim’s” evidence which is never forwarded by Dommie
I read one seeming question about lying in “Dommie’s post 401 unless he refers to question/s put days before(last week). Those I know were deemed to be no questions as he (Dommie) made too many suppositions of knowledge he has not an iota of such as blood drug levels of generations of cyclists in all those Tours won by the ‘Army’ Postal Teams
Read post #415 again “Domzim” as I know it requires a lot of intelligent interpretation of some good, somewhat heavy English writing in the US media. It may be just too much for a Stellie ‘boertjie’ with less than average English skills.
I seriously doubt you even read it as you exhibit more concern of a truly false image you have of yourself totally governed by cultural dynamics all self-imposed though.

By: ET.

ET. — Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:55:14 +0000

If putting your ideas together so haphazardly in poor sentence structure is so appalling and you cannot spell a simple word like “succeding”(correct form is SUCCEEDING) why should anyone take note of you?

By: shooter

shooter — Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:44:05 +0000

So many times i see this ant and elephant ego’s here on Keo.

Don’t ask who the elephant is. But these idiots who think they’re blogging fundii and artists of the debate are definitely the ants. Take Et and whatzisface. What are you on about??? You don’t even realise how lame your reasoning sound. Always looking, never succeding evidently, to rid yourself of the inferiority complexes you so obviously suffer from… Especially when you start getting o-so-serious and “….”intellectual”….”

Why don’t you just have normal conversations? Have you asked yourself that question? Agree/ disagree/ have an opinion/ don’t/ reason/ debate… do all that. But why do you strive for attention so much that you have to decieve yourselve so much… ?

why indeed. anyway >>>

By: ET.

ET. — Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:14:56 +0000

Oh Boy! Seems I did cause a stir, a commotion, some chaos with my early morning 7am EST breaking news revelations about poor Lance ‘the Prance’ Army cheater in sports.
There appears to also be a boycott of sorts and Jokers was stoking those fires(good for him as he knows a good boycott).
But Jokers also smashed a ‘ boertjie’ lying ego to the state of loss of control of pissing. Poor soul. Maybe he got that Cheltenham git to insert a catheter for his peeing problems.
He needlessly asked for the thorough dressing down and naked exposure though with all his arrogant lies. lies and more lies(and he dares to call them “questions”).
Jokers, got to hand it to you with that ever so cool name of “Domzim” you christened him with. You have learnt the ploys of the non-racial struggle so very well.
Fun times lie ahead for us in late Nov. when I am there.

By: Jinx2

Jinx2 — Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:50:33 +0000

oi gewaldt

By: Mostofyou

Mostofyou — Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:38:11 +0000

You flourish when you see a testicle? Yet you have never seen one in the flesh?

Shame, poor ‘soul’, you are not ever given a chance it seems.
Have you felt one. It is said to be “velvety to the touch”.

By: Dawn

Dawn — Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:31:09 +0000

That’s why he’s grown an Extra Testicle

By: Dawn

Dawn — Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:27:02 +0000

Extraball has a HISTORY of drug ABUSE

HENCE the obsession

By: Jinx2

Jinx2 — Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:19:43 +0000

Everybody’s hungover. Too many anabolic steroids.

By: skunk

skunk — Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:14:06 +0000

Where is the rugby?

By: Mostofyou

Mostofyou — Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:09:28 +0000

Domzim-413:

How difficult is it for you?
Even when you want to give us a mere modicum of ‘truth’ you cannot as shown here: ” You ask how I know that the others took drugs? Obviously I have not seen the results of all the tests ”
Your sentence structure pre-supposes you saw some.
You saw NO TEST results ever.

Now go shower for an hour for you have so repeatedly aand shamefully wet with your piss that you simply cannot dry yourself any more at all.
Thereafter you may consume a bottle of Tassies to drown your sorrowful , lying sorrows.

If you profusely and manfully apologise for dreadfully but disdainfully harming the sport of cycling (all sport for that matter) by gloryfying drug use for a win then I may seriously save your face for you by giving you a bottle of LE BONHEUR Estate Wine 1995 Prima(it is a Merlot, Cab. blend) within days of that admission.

I will not hold my breath. The wine is saved.