Boks among top RWC seeds

Boks among top RWC seeds

New Zealand, South Africa, Australia and France will be the top four seeds for the 2015 World Cup draw on 3 December.

The ratings gap between those sides and the rest are too high for results of the two matches on 1 December (England vs New Zealand and Wales vs Australia) to affect their position as a top seed.

The rankings are being used to rank the 12 directly qualified teams for the World Cup into three bands for the draw with the sides ranked one to four in band one – and crucially avoiding each other until the knockout stage – those five to eight in band two and the remaining four in band three.

England and Ireland are in the second band of seeds for the draw (fifth to eighth in the rankings).

If Wales avoid defeat against Australia, Wales and Samoa will take the other two spots in this second band, with Argentina in the third band. However, if Australia defeat Wales, then Samoa and Argentina will fill these two spots in the second band, with Wales joining Italy, Tonga and Scotland in the third band of seeds.

IRB rankings
1 New Zealand 92.91
2 South Africa 86.94
3 Australia 86.31
4 France 85.07
5 England 81.07
6 Ireland 80.22
7 Wales 78.95
8 Samoa 78.709
9 Argentina 78.708
10 Italy 76.24
11 Tonga 76.10
12 Scotland 75.83


177 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] Show All

  • 151.nortierd: Reply to this comment

    @nortierd-149:
    Sorry, should be Mayan not what spellcheck thought it should be

  • 152.mikeybrass: Reply to this comment

    @wnbb-138: Your last comment is out of order. Shame on you.

    As for the remainder of this thread, same old same old.

  • 153.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @wnbb-147:
    look, dont make threats like this ok… its not nice and could lead to someone getting hurt. ask yourself if its worth it.

  • 154.wnbb: Reply to this comment

    @i_love_u_bakkiesbotha-148: *** off placenta face.

  • 155.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @JL1-142:
    True.
    But i do hope Hore does get punished and a good one as well.
    He may not have wanted the outcome of his silly act like the player leaving in the first few minutes but he did it. Time to face up.
    We all know there have been same strange banning in the game over the last few years, and you guys are right, consistency is needed. Thompson was lucky, even though it was a pu$$y ruck it was on a head of a player, needs at least a month, Grayling lucky to get two weeks. IRB needs a to sort out the citings. They need one lot of people to do it fulltime, not picking different people here and there to cite and punish.

  • 156.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @wnbb-154:
    no, f.uck you

    ok

  • 157.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    anyway
    i’m out

  • 158.wnbb: Reply to this comment

    @wnbb-154: You are a real farkin doos and deserve a good peosklapping you farkin pond life scum.stop your shy t if you know what’s good for you.

  • 159.wnbb: Reply to this comment

    @i_love_u_bakkiesbotha-157: then *** off you blue bull pus sy !!

  • 160.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-155:

    All anyone ever asks for is consistancy, no perceived bias because this one was nice to the bloody man in charge of the senence and that one had a clean record, or this one said sorry and the guy he kicked said it did not hurt…………….none of that k uk. Headbutt two weeks (it must connect!!!), punch 3 weeks, tip tackle 4 weeks etc………….no if buts or maybes……….straight non negotiable sentences. Only then will we get rid of all the sh it of bias (perceived or otherwise)

  • 161.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @i_love_u_bakkiesbotha-148:
    Cheers Bakkies

  • 162.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @wnbb-147:

    oh wow a cyber hero……..

  • 163.nortierd: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-155:

    The TMO should be given the authority to intervene if he picks up on field offenses that the ref and assistants miss.
    He can ask the ref to call time out and review and then make a recommendation.

  • 164.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @nortierd-149:
    wow ok.
    Dammit!!!
    Thats all us kiwis need on here is another South African that actually knows his stuff :-)

  • 165.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-110:

    Again with the generalisations, f uk you are a tw at of the highest order!

  • 166.wnbb: Reply to this comment

    Blue bull supporters are nothing but scumbags.they would make for perfect scarecrows because they are so kuk ugly.if you wanna force your children to do something you just show them a picture of a blue bull supporter to scare the living daylights out of them .

  • 167.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @whatever-160:
    Yep, lets get some consistency here.

  • 168.nortierd: Reply to this comment

    @wnbb-166:
    Hey, I must disagree.
    I live in Pretoria ( support the Stormers though ) but I’ve seen some very pretty Bull supporters.
    The amazing thing is when they did so well and reached the finals you would walk into a supermarket and could buy blue bread, blue milk, blue milk tart, blue boere wors I s hit you not.
    I’ve never seen anything like it before.
    The best thing about a Bulls loss is the peace and quiet, better than car horns going off.
    Their supporters are fervent and really get behing the team, I’ll give them that.

  • 169.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @wnbb-166:

    You need to take a chill pill, banter is good but if you actually want to go out and hurt someone because of what they said on an annoymous blog, you need to go and see someone and talk through your childhood! Do some “unpacking” cause it’s not normal.

  • 170.Liewe Luiperd: Reply to this comment

    Hurricane and Te Rangatira are good folk. Cane is a softie deep down, a decent chap.

    NZ people are a friendly bunch generally.

    I like the flavour they bring here.

    I would far rather have them here – and chat rugby with them – than this monotonous and BORING irrationally obsessed Bakkies Loverboy who, frankly, is getting a tad much with his constant whining. It gives the rest of us a bad name.

    Poppa has deep seated mental issues and is a curse to this site. Just like Bakkies Lover I suspect he tarnishes the rest of the good kiwi folk in the eyes of many on this rugby site.

  • 171.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @Liewe Luiperd-170:

    Don’t read the ones you don’t like then…….it’s actually very easy, there are some blokes who ar e just plain boring and arn’t even worth a read. Skoppie for eg……..I only read his short posts, anything past 4 lines is repetitive boring BS :)

  • 172.whatever: Reply to this comment

    Agreed re poppa……..he is just a demented doos, nothing more nothing less.

    Hurri, I think is a good bloke, he just gets caught up in the “poppa syndrome” every now and again………

    Te Rangi has the patience as long as his arm, reminds me of my Dad, although it looks like he has reached the end of his arm….

  • 173.Nils: Reply to this comment

    @whatever-160: Well said. (And Hore should be banned for a quite long time, no argument).

  • 174.gunther: Reply to this comment

    Oh dear.

    The Poodlefucker has gone feral again.

    Filthy little tikkop *****.

  • 175.stormer in a teacup: Reply to this comment

    These rankings wont make too much difference at the top end. It is the third tier that is most important. A team like Wales or Argentina as the third ranked side in a group is where the groups get interesting.

  • 176.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @wnbb-159:
    i really dont want to stoop to your level

    but go ***** yourself

  • 177.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @Liewe Luiperd-170:
    then scroll on by, doos

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] Show All

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.