Louw off the hook

Louw off the hook

Springbok and Bath flank Francois Louw has been cleared of punching by an RFU judiciary.

Louw received a red card and was subsequently cited following an incident in a Premiership game between Bath and Leicester last Saturday.

The matchday referee ruled that Louw had transgressed the laws of the game, and the citing commissioner clearly felt the flanker deserved further punishment.

But it has since been confirmed that Louw will not be subject to suspension, and the citing has been dismissed.


235 Comments

  • 1.nortierd: Reply to this comment

    Return of the dragonfist

  • 2.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    shocking favouriti at the judiciary

    first Greyling
    now louw??

    SARU must be bribing the officials

    shocking cheating filthy dragon

  • 3.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    a deliberate punch has the capacity to kill

    this decision is another low blow that is ruining the game by allowing bokke players to think they are above the law

    seems the land of thugs are exempt from justice

    for shame IRB, for shame

  • 4.Golden Boy: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-2:

    Our currency is worthless..clearly it is an AB conspiracy to make us SAFFAS believe that the playing fields are equal ;-)

    Hows the arm? I see you calling us handicapped on the other thread!! A bit rich coming from you. hehehe

    But seriously, how is the arm healing?

  • 5.Doughnut: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-3: wow this is a south african site, you still feeling sore about Hore .. poet and i dont know it.

  • 6.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    golden boy
    :) it’s good thanks, long process. can’t start strengthening exercises for amother 4 weeks.

    physio measured my range of motion last week and it was a 40 degree short of being able to extend the arm straight. still quite swollen but will be remeasured tomorrow so hopefully my diligence at doing my exercises will see that figured reduced.

    and just having fun with my earlier posts. it’s rugby, stuff happens.

  • 7.Doughnut: Reply to this comment

    One of the big differences last Saturday was the AB were refereed to the letter of the law .. not this “aw Reeche mate cr*p we get in SH ..”

  • 8.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-2: Stop poking Bakkies Pops……A rabid beast is a dangerous thing.

    @poppa69-6: Long road to recovery. The tricky part is actually motivating oneself to DO all the little rehab exercises on the A4 printouts the physio’s give one to do at home….

  • 9.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-3:
    i dont know where you’re going with this.
    have you even seen footage of the incident.

    @Doughnut-7:
    eeeeeexaclty!!!!

  • 10.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food: Reply to this comment

    @i_love_u_bakkiesbotha-9: :) I warned him…..

  • 11.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    more pedigree. yeah, just takes time. specialist said I would forever have a curve to the arm, but try to do the set of exercises 6 times a day.

    my Bakkies impersonations s.uck huh?

  • 12.Atreides: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-3: Lol

    You have the hand wringing-thing down

  • 13.Golden Boy: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-6:

    That’s serious. Hopefully you get most of your arm extension back. I’m sure it will never be the same. And you will probably become good drinking buddies with your physio over the next few years…and if its your happy ending hand I truly feel sorry for you :-D

    No worries about the rugby banter. It’s the other rubbish I cant stand. But luckily your meds seem to be keeping you in check. :-) Long may it continue, but hopefully the arm heals soon.

  • 14.gonzo: Reply to this comment

    @i_love_u_bakkiesbotha-9: The video editor must have been a saffer immigrant as it looks like the original incident has conveniently not been caught on film. But Louw was attacking a player on the ground, who felt compelled to cover his face.

    Seems like saffer favouritism again. How long must we put up with it? The whole world knows. 1 game for a head butt, 1 game for a flying elbow and now nothing for this savage attack

    http://www.rugbydump.com/

  • 15.Golden Boy: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-8:

    I think Bakkies is tired of posting. He had three threads dedicated to him last week. Must have taken a lot out of him…hehehehehehe…and as I type this up pops the rabid beast!!!!

    Go easy on pops Bakkies, he only has one hand to type with.

  • 16.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @Atreides-12: :D

    @Golden Boy-13: have been off the meds for a while, as for the happy ending hand, it wasnt a wrist fracture but will have to confirm if it is a viable exercise when I see the physio :lol:

  • 17.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-10:
    he belongs in front of a mike on a stage.

    @Atreides-12:

    *nervous chuckle*

    hehehe

    @gonzo-14:
    dont be ridiculous
    there was clearly nothing in it.
    the other stuff was far more serious.

  • 18.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @Golden Boy-15:
    hehehe

  • 19.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @gonzo-14: sickening huh?

    “There was a bit of a scuffle and Louw dropped an elbow on a player and it’s a straight red card. ”

    first matfield with the arm guard, then greyling, now louw? this is rugby not WWE, maybe they are coached to do this?

    :D

  • 20.katman: Reply to this comment

    @gonzo-14: Get your hand off it, bud. What did you want? Did you want the citing commissioner to ban Louw based on the fact that Murphy had his hands on his face? I take it you don’t work in the legal field. Just as the video doesn’t show Louw’s alleged elbow to the head, it also doesn’t show what led to this scuffle. All it shows is Murphy miraculously recovering and leaping to his feet. The ref, touch judge and TMO were red card happy in that match – three, of which all were complete over-reactions.

  • 21.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    after the over reaction to the whole hore gate drama, the defense of Louw on here by some is very hypocritical

    he elbowed a guy in the head.. a very dangerous thing to do, the bloke could have doid

    yet did not suffer a ban at all..

    shocking inconsistency here..

  • 22.katman: Reply to this comment

    “South Africa’s star flank, Bath-based openside Francois Louw, has been cleared on a punching charge by a Rugby Football Union disciplinary hearing.

    Louw is one of several players who faced the RFU hearing, but the only one to be cleared – with the rest handed a range of bans, from one to five weeks.

    Louw appeared before an RFU disciplinary hearing after receiving a red card for punching or striking an opponent, contrary to Law 10.4 (a), in the 12-17 Premiership loss to Leicester Tigers last Saturday, December 1.

    The citing was dismissed in its entirety, suggesting that the referee had erred in sending Louw off in the first place, or at the very least that the incident warranted a lesser penalty.

    The Panel comprised Christopher Quinlan, Nick Dark and John Brennan.”

  • 23.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food: Reply to this comment

    @i_love_u_bakkiesbotha-17: Will you be doing backup vocals? :)

    @Golden Boy-15: Bakkies is an interweb warrior and legend. I will not have people turning him into a frivolous party trick like ‘Pin the tail on the donkey’ or something similar.

    @poppa69-11: :) Only Bakkies can do Bakkies – the angst he exhibits can not be imitated, by anyone, ever :)

  • 24.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-23: yes apologies, to even think I could come close to “the great one” was rather futile and poor form.. :lol:

  • 25.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-24: We pretenders need to know our place. ;)

  • 26.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-25: :D I wonder if he’ll ever go into mass production and offer courses?

  • 27.Predawn: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-25:

    Who…the Stormers?

  • 28.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-26: What would that help?……courses, training, mentorship and more – we would still only be pretenders…..

    When I’m grown up, I want to be a Bakkies :)

  • 29.Predawn: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-3:

    …and a deliberate punch from behind…now that’s something and then some..

  • 30.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food: Reply to this comment

    @Predawn-27: Says he who supports the bridesmaids…..

  • 31.Predawn: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-30:

    That I do.

  • 32.ufo: Reply to this comment

    i happened to watch this game and seriously could not see him punch AT ALL…

    linesman said he did but rewinding and replaying in slomo could not show any punch from Flo…

    the linesman obviously got it wrong… but was only too keen to recommend the red to the ref…

    the look of disbelief on Flo’s face said it all…

    it’s no wonder they let him off…

    cause i bet they couldn’t find any evidence whatsoever…

    the linesman should now get a sanction IMO… there has to be some sort of ramification for sending a guy off for no reason…

  • 33.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @Predawn-29: agreed… a minor injury from that type of thing means a wired jaw..

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-28: well, Bakkies would make a fortune and would no doubt ensure that refs are kept in the fashion theyve appatently become accustomed to :shock:

  • 34.Predawn: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-33:

    It happpens in rugby though…whether it be club or higher level. Going back you would find that every single test nation has had such an incident at some stage…boys will be boys.

  • 35.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @Predawn-34: I agree, it is a physical game and every country has had players who have overstepped the boundaries..

    comes with the territory imo… it is one of the modern sports imo that correlates to the gladiators of old, you have to expect that on occasion a player will have a brain explosion…

  • 36.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @ufo-32:
    Strange, what replay did you watch?
    The one i saw was after the fact and they didnt show any others.
    Is there another replay where you see the whole thing?

  • 37.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-36:

    why strange… i watched the game as it was being played… and when they were talking about it i rewound the pvr several times and slomoed it forwards and simply couldn’t see him doing anything of the sort… at all…

    look ive never condoned dirty or thuggish play… from anyone in any side… if a guy get’s involved he deserves what he gets after the game…

    but i simply couldn’t see louw do anything…

  • 38.ufo: Reply to this comment

    would seem the commission saw the same thing i did… :lol:

  • 39.ufo: Reply to this comment

    why can’t our experts here from all countries ever look at these incidents in isolation for what they are…

    it doesn’t matter who did what when how to whom …

    if a player commits acts of foul play and/or thuggery he should be penalized and sentences for what HE did..

    it just become an boring endless circle when everyone starts comparing incidents between players and teams…

    deal with one incident… did the player foul… yes…? punish him… did he not… let him off…

    next player/incident…
    did the player foul… yes…? punish him… did he not… let him off…

    next player… etc…

  • 40.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @ufo-37:
    You saw it on tv?
    Thing is you only see what the cameras see.
    I am not saying he did or didnt but i am not going to say the linesman got it wrong when he was standing right there, surely he saw something.
    And correct. Looks like there was no footage of the incident, thats how i see it.

  • 41.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-40:

    what did you see…?

  • 42.The Rangerman: Reply to this comment

    if he did it at least it wasnt a cowardly attack from behind like that thug hore.

  • 43.i_love_u_bakkiesbotha: Reply to this comment

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-23:
    @poppa69-24:
    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-28:

    you guys are chops.

    :lol:

  • 44.The Rangerman: Reply to this comment

    what was the five week ban for?

    as long a ban as that can only have been for punching from behind like a cowardly pig?

    surely?

  • 45.The Rangerman: Reply to this comment

    then again, maybe the player transgressed against was running an obstructive line?

  • 46.husky: Reply to this comment

    Yeah, yeah poep69; you whine on. The commentary I listened to implied that Murphy had used a bit of gamesmanship to milk the incident and obviously fooled the linesman but not a clinically dissected TV replay. Shades of diving like Kockott flattening Thomson was it who obligingly collapsed; milked the penalty then miraculously recovered.

    Generally the players Bakkies planted stayed planted and battled to make a miraculous recovery. Like those callously taken out by thugs like Mealamu and Umugger.

  • 47.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @ufo-41:
    Post 14 had the link, thats what i saw.

  • 48.J.B. Cowper: Reply to this comment

    @ufo-32:

    Thanks for this clarification – what is ludicrous, utterly ludicrous, is the jibing that somehow SA players get favouritism in these cases, when the opposite has applied for so long (don’t get me going on this, it will take two pages to write it all down) – only one team gets favouritism and that is New Zealand generally and Richie McCaw particularly; the whole English press are finally getting over their political correctness and calling it at long last. This business with Adam Thompson getting a week was the straw that broke the camel’s back – at long, bl*&^y last.

    Which is a good thing – should they somehow squeak past SA to get to the final – which I don’t think they will do, by the way – they won’t encounter a bought ref like Joubert in front of that Twickenham crowd, be if England or France who they face in the final. No person, valuing his life, would be that blatant in front of so many cameras and a crowd that big demanding fairness of play – which is a strong English characteristic.

  • 49.gonzo: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-19: These guys don’t take a sh.t unless they’ve practiced it at training. I guarantee it’s coached into them.

    @katman-20: It happened so far off the ball that the cameras missed it. Think I’ll trust the AR, who was on the spot, rather than someone who didn’t see it on TV.

  • 50.ufo: Reply to this comment

    @J.B. Cowper-48:

    yeah mate…

    look i’m not into this whole conspiracy thing… for or against the ABs, the Boks or any team…

    but of course do question some of the inconsistencies with regard to sentences handed out…

    i blame the irb… they should clarify and tighten up the laws, processes etc so that the commissions have no room or need to interpret anything…

    i also believe ALL the punishments should be much more severe too… a one or two week ban missing one or no matches is pointless…

    guys should be banned for 4, 8, even 12 games (not weeks)… for severe thuggishness… only then will it really hurt the player and his union and fair, honest play may be the norm again…

    punishments have got to disrupt the season/competitions of the player and the team… only then will everyone begin to take foul play seriously…

  • 51.gonzo: Reply to this comment

    @J.B. Cowper-48: Fairness in an English characteristic? You’re a worse wind up merchant than the kiwis on here. Wasn’t it only a few weeks back that everyone on here was accusing an English citing commissioner of picking on Etzebeth?

  • 52.ufo: Reply to this comment

    gotta run…

  • 53.The Rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @gonzo-51: the english sense of fairplay is not only recognised worldwide but where colonies like yours get it from (before you drifted so far away from it with the advent of your independance).

  • 54.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @gonzo-49:
    lol

  • 55.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @gonzo-51:
    Yes, the citing officer was a cheat, thats what i heard on here. lol

  • 56.J.B. Cowper: Reply to this comment

    @gonzo-51:

    Point taken

  • 57.goodstuff: Reply to this comment

    Funny how the opposing coach thought the reds were all stupid.

    “Three red cards in a game where there was a lot of pushing and shoving and a clumsy tackle is madness to me. It was just shenanigans. In a way what went on made the game more interesting. We all live in the playground. Boys will be boys and you shake hands and get on with it,” said Cockerill (Tigers coach).

  • 58.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @husky-46: obviously you dont understand sarcasm do you?

    what about Brussouws gamesmanship, that dive he took would have made any soccer player proud

    I did know it wouldnt be long after Hores incident that another Saffa would front the judiciary, you guys just cant help yourselves :D

  • 59.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @goodstuff-57:
    Well didnt really see the Louw one but the tackle and the aftermath was rubbish. No red card should have been issued there.
    Yellows fair enough…clumsy tackle thats all and a retaliation.

  • 60.goodstuff: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-55: Two different scenarios.

    Etsebeth – No card, no penalty, out of the blue citing. The official was lazy as he didn’t even take the time to spot Etsebeth leaving the eyes alone.

    Louw – Was red carded for an elbow, citing is automatic, no camera footage, cannot proceed with ban.

    Both cases show English citing officers being lazy at their jobs. The judges/ commisions on the other hand seem to do their job wit ha bit mor impartiality than the ‘prosecuting’ attitude of the citing officers.

  • 61.goodstuff: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-59: Yup, keep the reds for reptitive punching (assault), headbutts, biting, eye gouging and tackling McCaw/ Carter. ;)

  • 62.goodstuff: Reply to this comment

    @goodstuff-60: Jeez, leaving out letters, my typing skills really suck sometimes!

  • 63.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @goodstuff-61:
    lol
    No one tackles Carter and i mean NO ONE!!!!!!!

  • 64.goodstuff: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-58:

    During the NH tour:.

    Two NZ players cited which resulted in two bans.

    Two Saffa players cited which resulted in no bans.

  • 65.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @goodstuff-64: what about the Rugby Championship? how many of your players were cited there? 2 wasnt it? one got of with a one week ban for an act every bit as disgusting as Hore did..

  • 66.goodstuff: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-63: I think a Hurricans player did that (was not a late tackle in my mind and neither did the NZ commentators think so) in 2011 and got a penalty against him, than Hore (the captain) asked the ref; “Aren’t we allowed to tackle Carter?”

  • 67.goodstuff: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-65: What, are you talking about the loving embrace Etsebeth gave Sharpe? What about the dump tackle Brad THorn made on Jahn Smit off the ball and after the whistle blew that ended up causing John Smit to miss the whole tri-nations (I think is was 2008). But did Thor get banned correctly? No I think he got 1 week while Smit was booked off for 6 weeks.!

    We can do this all day? By the way, what happend to your arm, you try to punch bakkies? ;)

  • 68.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @goodstuff-67:I agree we could do this all day, just thought Greyling should have got more for his efforts… as for Thorn and Smit, John played on until almost halftime and came off with a groin injury, so I contend he injured it seperately from thorn dropping him..

    :lol: I wouldnt punch Bakkies, he has enough to worry about :D I had a spiral fracture of my distal humerus, just above the elbow joint, and have since had a steel plate and 12 screws inserted in my arm to repair it.. end of my sporting days pretty much, which is the hardest part of it all

  • 69.gonzo: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-68: Mate, that sounds damn serious. Sorry to hear. Sounds like you’ll have to take up running or some other non contact sport.

    Hope it’s not affecting your alleged job as a security guard :)

  • 70.The Rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-68: yes yes, old ground.

    our management and cappie had the grace to apologise immediately for greylings elbow charge to cheatie mccheat (which was nowhere near as piggish or cowardly as hores act sonny).

    your lot still havent done so.

  • 71.The Rangerman: Reply to this comment

    @gonzo-69: he is typing one handed though.

  • 72.Horings: Reply to this comment

    Lets talk some rugby:

    3 best cover tackles ever:

    1. Matfield vs Eng World Cup Final 2007
    2. Bakkies Botha vs Eng 2008 Twickenham
    3. George Gregan vs All Blacks 1994 Bledisloe (just to show I am not biased)

  • 73.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    cheers gonzo

    yeah how could I do security with my arm in a sling for 6 weeks. lol

    Ranger. who cares about the apology, both Greyling and Hores acts shouldn’t been seen on a rugby field. an apology doesn’t negate the seriousness of greylings assault. but you keep believing otherwise.

  • 74.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @The Rangerman-70:
    Did greyling apologise on tv?

  • 75.PissAnt: Reply to this comment

    I am going on leave this Friday and unlike other years, I might actually not be around at all online! So just in case I don’t pop in over December and miss any of you and before I forget, hope all of you have a happy, and blessed festive season. Stay safe, stay cool, see you in 2013!

  • 76.gonzo: Reply to this comment

    @The Rangerman-70: If Hore made a public apology we’d be on here listening to you telling us it was a cynical attempt to show regret and have his sentence reduced. As it was, he visited and apologised to Davies. Go on, tell us it was cynical, I know you want to

  • 77.gonzo: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-73: You get called a security guard but the other day Bakkies accused me of being an SS guard at a concentration camp or something like that. Things get crazy around here sometimes :)

  • 78.the authority: Reply to this comment

    The IRB have confirmed that the refs got it wrong and there was no punch thrown.

    So where does this leave us?

    Hore gets to play a full 80 minutes after that disgraceful act of cowardice he exercised against the Welsh.

    Louw gets a red card for nothing.

    Typical.

    Also, Poppa is South African just so everyone knows.

  • 79.goodstuff: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-68: Sorry to hear that hope you make a full recovery.

    Greyling did come off lightly in terms of banning, but he will never play for the boks again, so in that way he has been punished.

  • 80.goodstuff: Reply to this comment

    @Horings-72: You missed JP Peterson against Fiji (WC 07) and both J Fourie and Habana vs. Walabies in 2009 Tri-nations(two seperate tackles) .

  • 81.David: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-78:
    Aren’t you confusing Poppa with Tackler?

  • 82.blik: Reply to this comment

    Eng v NZ game was one of the first games in a long time where the ref in a NZ game did not allow them to get away with their usual obstructing tactics at the maul/ruck as well as playing the ball on the ground as they normally get away with.

  • 83.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @David-81: I don’t know about Tackler but a few bloggers have mentioned now that Pops is actually South African. Don’t know if he grew up in SA or was just born here and then moved but that’s what Ive heard.

    My guess is that he’s a Cape Crusader posing as a Maori.

  • 84.wnbb: Reply to this comment

    Dean Greyling?Ahh,soon it will be time for the Stormers u21′s to peosklap him again.

  • 85.gonzo: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-78: We’ll probably see this more now that the TMO can intervene in foul play. More cheap shots like this so far off the ball that even the TMO misses it. I don’t blame Louw though, he seems like a clean player. Probably even just a coincidence that he just came back from the Bok squad. Must be part of the culture at Bath. I blame the coach. I’m not sure who it is though. I hope he comes out and apologises

  • 86.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @gonzo-85: Coach not to blame. The refs are to blame. The TMO somehow missed the strike on Bradley Davies (how peculiar) but called something that never happened against Louw (again, how peculiar).

    You kiwis have already been caught cheating red-handed with the old “Teach the Jaapies a lesson” scandal. I have no interest in entertaining the continuous excuses you keep coming up with whenever there is an incident favouring the kiwis. As far as I’m concerned rugby (like many other sports) has been disgraced the New Zealanders running the show at the IRB.

    Cowardly and dishonourable cheats. Simple as that.

  • 87.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-86: I am The Authority.

  • 88.gonzo: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-86: There’s no kiwi involved here as far as I’m aware. It’s a South African player striking an English player, spotted by an English AR. Just because it was missed by the cameraman doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.

  • 89.Heavens Game: Reply to this comment

    Poops is definitely not a Saffa… I was going to say he can’t possibly be – he ain’t hard enough, a softcocck… But that would be wrong because we got “the” authority here, a “Saffa” who sort of proves that theory wrong – Poops makes him seem like a jellybaby in comparison

    However since this authoritwat is a Capie, maybe the theory of Saffa’s being tougher than Kiwis is safe… Capies aint really Saffas… They don’t really see themselves as part of the rest of the country… They see themselves as “special”, not African…

    Yup, so the theory is safe… Poops aint a Saffa – he’s not hard enough… Neither is authoritwat, he aint Saffa either…

  • 90.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @gonzo-88: I don’t care about the Louw incident. That’s just typical over-strictness on South African players due to reputation. What I care about is the fact that New Zealand referees have been caught cheating. It puts into perspective why the All Blacks keep getting away with murder. I view this type of behaviour as cowardly and have zero respect for all kiwis involved (including the fans who turn a blind eye to it).

    Cheats deserve no respect.

    I am The Authority.

  • 91.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game-89: Dismissed.

  • 92.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-58: Geez – just returned from a business trip. See you guys got the rough, ‘no vaseline’ treatment from the Poms hey ? Damn dude…what happened ? The useless pommies ?

    I am sure your a-holes are more inflamed from that ramming than Jub Jub Maarohanye’s will be for the rest of his life.

  • 93.bokfan1: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-6: Did Doc advise you to cut down on your trolling and posting? Your arm is permanently bent over the keyboard, thats why its only got 40 degrees motion!

    And then of course the furious masturb.a.tion doesnt help either. You got Richie’s book yet? Any topless photos in it?

  • 94.bokfan1: Reply to this comment

    @gonzo-88: Im sure Geordan Murphy is Irish?

  • 95.bokfan1: Reply to this comment

    @Horings-72: Not really a cover tackle, but Bakkies chasing down Rococoko in 2004 was awesome.

    Also JPP’s diving tackle in RWC2007 against Fiji I think.

    Roussouw also made an amazing one – was that against Samoa?

  • 96.gonzo: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-90: Oh my apologies, I thought we were discussing the article above this comments section. Didn’t realise you were talking about some vague unnamed events from the past.

    @bokfan1-94: I couldn’t tell who the player was. His face was obscured by Louw’s elbow so I made a guess that he was English. I stand corrected

  • 97.gonzo: Reply to this comment

    @Horings-72: John Smit tackling Nonu so hard his boot came off, Soweto, 79th minute, 2010

  • 98.Dusky: Reply to this comment

    @Heavens Game-89: I cant believe he is on here after the rogering England gave the All Blacks.

  • 99.uncle oswald: Reply to this comment

    @Horings-72:

    Thee first one on your list was Pakslae, not Victor.

  • 100.skopdiekan: Reply to this comment

    ONE HUNDRED

    Glory f’ng hallelujah clothe me in halo’s I just scooped the big scoop of the 100th post on a blogging bullshit bandwagon…

    I gotta be the bees knees.. who says anything to the contrary is just a stick in the mud spoil sport… without any sense of FUN..

  • 101.katman: Reply to this comment

    @skopdiekan-100: Again I’m going to suggest that you shut up.

  • 102.gonzo: Reply to this comment

    @skopdiekan-100: Congratulations! Let’s see if we can take this thing to 100,000 posts of bullshit

  • 103.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    dusky – we lost one game in twenty one, no big deal. but come see us when your team stops being our Biyatches. you know, one win in the last 8 games against us. hahaha. oh, even the Aussies own you. lmfao. but I understand, your team can’t do it so you take delight vicariously. and unlike you and HG etc, I dont disappear when my team loses.

    bokfan1 – hilarious. I own you and dusky, as your responses prove. yep read Ritchie’s book, he says he can understand why SA is so poor at rugby, something about meatheads and their lack of brain cells coupled with the African heat. I think he termed them the rancid biltong munching knuckle dragging Neanderthals. seems he got you down pat.
    :

  • 104.skopdiekan: Reply to this comment

    @katman-101: why don’t you go fck yourself fckface.. who the fck you slimy little imbecilic nonentity of a putrid little fckface think you are suggesting to anyone to do anything .. you wanna shut the fck up then shut the fck up.. you don’t tell me to do f’all you little self aggrandized piece of trash heap little nonentity punk eyed fckface schmuck.

  • 105.skopdiekan: Reply to this comment

    @gonzo-102: good idea you ready to start.. pisseasy f’ng none relevant simplicity.. just follow the idiot in front of you and its as easy as farting in the lavatory .. as the thread next door shows how easy its done..

    1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, .. and next thing you know you at 100,000 mesmerized brainless posts all stacked up one on top of the brainless brain dead next…

  • 106.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-90:
    NZ referees??
    What a crock ofshit.
    One e-mail from a kiwi suggests that all kiwi refs are cheats?
    So one racist remark on here from a South African bloggers makes all you a pack of racists?
    Dont be so fkn stupid. It was a silly e-mail that was sent by 1 ref and he was reprimanded and apologised to Freek burger and he accepted.
    Over and done with 13 years ago. How far do you want to go back in time to try and prove a dumbass point?
    No you are an idiot and arrogant a$$hole

  • 107.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-78:
    ” The IRB have confirmed that the refs got it wrong and there was no punch thrown. ”

    Where did they say that?
    All i saw they believed a red card was harsh and a lesser penalty should have been given.
    They did not say Louw did not punch or elbow or anything like that.
    The error was a red card

  • 108.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @Dusky-98:
    Unlike you when we once in a blue moon get a hiding, we still show face.

  • 109.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-106: this whole “the refs are against us” and “refs in NZs back pocket” really is tiresome and shows the levels of hurt in the saffa psyche…

    why even when SA had the ref in THEIR pocket for the first 60 minutes at FNB recently we still doubled their total points and embarrassed them at home…like the 19-0 when they were “world champs”

    these boys cant handle the fact that the ABs are doing the title the justice it deserves…they should thank us, as we are actually giving the title some credence, not like their “once in a generation” team or that of the 2003 world champs…

    first time in 9 years that the team with the title has been worthy of it really..

  • 110.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-103:

    Fu k but you are a hating racist knobend of epic proportions……….hope I never run into you somewhere………..

  • 111.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-106:

    How far back do you knunts normally go??

  • 112.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-58:

    Yup, but only bettered by Money Bill Williams…………….

  • 113.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @whatever-110::lol: of course, you didnt read their posts to me did you window licker?

    I’ll let you know when I am travelling to Auckland next internet tough guy, you can come get me alright?

    now run along you apartheid loving murderer..

  • 114.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-63:

    and it appears he can’t tackle either…………got owned by the Poms……..landed on his ars e…………a few times……

  • 115.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    still living through englands victory because your tough neanderthal brothers just cant beat us?

    1 in the last 8 games

    hahahahahahahaah

    SA rugby us dinosaur k@k

  • 116.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-65:

    No, not really……………..Hore hit an unsusspecting player from behind for no reason………….the Boks smacked a suspecting player from the front because the suspecting player was sitting on his backside in the ruck playing the ball……….he knew he would take some flack…………BIG difference you one eyed racist hating piece of sheet s hit!

  • 117.willievz: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-115: Is, not us.

    Same spelling in Afrikaans and English. Different pronounciation.

  • 118.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-115:

    Not living through anything…………unlike you, just pointing out your racist hating anti Saffa rants………….you are a sick knunt. Actually feel sorry for you…………no f uk it I feel zip for you you piece of ****!

  • 119.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @whatever-110: @whatever-112:

    these two posts prove how much I own you too…

    the fact youve responded to my post 103 and then my post number 58 says it all..

    thanks fishy, keep biting though, it brings me such pleasure to see that so many saffas like you, bokfan abd dusky react every time…its fcken hilarious..

    now, get back on your special needs bus because the windows need cleaning..

  • 120.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-113:

    Go f uk a family member a hole!

  • 121.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-119:

    You own nothing dude, not even your security guard uniform, so think again!

  • 122.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-113:

    “Appartheid loving murderer”?………..really? That family member…..make it your mother………

  • 123.goforthegap00: Reply to this comment

    idiots rule… the new name for keo’s site in honour of the bloggers who go at each other like useless politicians

  • 124.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @whatever-118 like I Said, read the posts of the guys my post was directed at

    but hey, you racist fckpigs lived racism for 40-50 years, now you cry when you get it handed back? gees, I wonder how the many millions felt when they were going through it..

    harden up tough guy, stop crying because you cant handle the treatrment your family profited from for so many years..

  • 125.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    @whatever-122: shame they never pulled the trigger when they had the gun to your head, would have done us all a favour..

  • 126.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    Whatever

    you mum said she had died and gone to heaven when me and all the cuzzies gave it to her, said she had fallen for the dark meat and just couldnt get enough..

    seems she really liked us maori boys… you might have a dark half brother or sister soon, wont that be great?

  • 127.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @whatever-111:
    Here he comes, on his white horse to save the mortal South African blogger.
    Is it a plane….no….is it a bird…..no …… is it…. whatever and who the fk cares.

  • 128.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @whatever-116:
    He was sitting his backside due to a bok player before greyling tried to clean him out.
    lol and justifying Greylings dangerous and could have killed McCaw charge is silly really. Could have killed him :-)

  • 129.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    whatever moral?

    haha too funny hurricane, as proven above, he doesn’t even bother to see if we are responding to comments, just dives in because the red mist rises whenever he sees our names

    it’s fcken hilarious.

  • 130.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-128:

    Not justifying it at all, just showing the difference between the two..

  • 131.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-126:

    Proves my point 100%

  • 132.Johannes_Lombard: Reply to this comment

    Been on here since the start. Barely post anymore. Also now done even just following. Every single time this past week when jumping on I see ‘grown-ups’ insulting each other. Is there anything more sad than people spending hrs per day insulting other ‘people’ in cyberspace?

  • 133.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @whatever-130:
    Come on mate.
    You know there is no difference when it come to cowardly and thugs messing about on the field.
    Lets move on,Greyling and Hore hopefully do not represent there national colours again in rugby

  • 134.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @Johannes_Lombard-132:
    hmm its the way of the world now mate.
    I do not believe how many teens are getting abused on the internet.
    We had one teenager girl here in NZ that committed suicide cos she was bullied so much on facebook etc, and of course there are probably times where bullying has happened over the internet that have contributed to other suicides but never been found,anyway gone a bit off track here.

    It is a sad state of affairs, there is banter but there is sometimes uncalled for personal attacks on here. I am all for the banter and of course sneak in the odd rugby chat :-)

  • 135.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-126:
    Pops, no need man.
    Dont go down that route.

  • 136.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    whatever

    you’re the one who brought mothers into it

    now you think it justifies your stance?

    run along you gutless coward.

  • 137.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @whatever-114:
    Carter didnt have a good game, which is fair. He missed a couple of tackles which every player does, not many around that never miss a tackle.
    But it seems you get pleasure out of his bad game.
    Now why is this? What has Carter done to you?

  • 138.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-136:

    Oh so calling someone an apartheid murderer is ok?

    Turn her over and f uk her again you doos!

  • 139.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-137:

    Actually no………you were putting him on a pedestal and I just reminded you of a few facts so as to deflate your hardon for the man……..no pleasure, just facts

  • 140.whatever: Reply to this comment

    Hurricane, Poppadoos is pulling you down big time……….right now I see you as a clone of the despicable pi g………….maybe you should give it some thought?.

  • 141.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @whatever-139:
    You want facts?
    Whats the bet i could come up with facts that shows Carter as the person i think he is.
    I think he is the best………that is no pedestal, it is what us rugby bloggers do.
    If you dont like me saying he is the best then so be it, but at least try and prove he is not the best instead of pulling up 1 match and say he missed a couple of tackle to prove a point….of some sort.

  • 142.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @whatever-140:
    So where in this thread are you talking about?
    Are you unhappy that i have a say? Or even a different opinion?
    Maybe you should think a bit before calling me a despicable p ig

  • 143.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-141:

    You were saying no-one could tackle carter…………….all I said was carter could not tackle on Sat and got owned………….it does not detract from how good carter is and what kind of a bloke he is………….you are soooo f uking precious

  • 144.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-142:

    I said a clone of the despicable pig……….read the post…………..talk about red mist………precious!

  • 145.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    whatever

    hahahaha what’s the matter you little fat spoilt boy, since your family run away when apartheid was about to end your bitterness has been noted

    you knuckle dragging Neanderthal meathead ( oh that’s right, apparently you think that sentence is racist).

    lol

    again, my initial post was in response, but the red most rose between your fat beady eyes and you couldn’t help yourself

    hahaha what to expect from a window licking scumbag though

  • 146.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    Hurri

    I seen the smiley at the tackle carter post and realised you were joking

    our handicapped friend struggles with this though

  • 147.whatever: Reply to this comment

    @poppa69-145:

    ok, so now I’m fat……………..classic………….your hatred and bile is plain for all to see

    I suggest you take a rest then bang her again…….it seems to bring the worst out of you

    Dooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooos!

  • 148.whatever: Reply to this comment

    so does she move when you f uk her Poppadoos?

  • 149.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    whatever

    lmfao

    keep trying, and don’t look now but you’re every bit the despicable p.ig too

    still, with your apartheid upbringing I’m not surprised, do you still have your white sheets and burning cross?

  • 150.whatever: Reply to this comment

    “you knuckle dragging Neanderthal meathead”

    “you apartheid loving murderer”

    Above are a few generalisations from poppadoos

    So would I be correct in saying you are a tatoo’d, meth smoking, Thurday nite KFC eating (thats when the dol is paid in NZ) gangsta wannabe with 90% of your family in jail?

    Or would that be a generalisation as well ey cuzzie bro?

  • 151.whatever: Reply to this comment

    Go do the rounds, check the doors and windows, I’m finished with you doos

    Consider yourself owned!

  • 152.whatever: Reply to this comment

    “you’re every bit the despicable p.ig too”

    hahahaha……………..he agrees

  • 153.poppa69: Reply to this comment

    lmfao

    the true whatever reveals himself. knowing exactly when the dole is available and the inherent racism learnt through generations of his family who profited from the misery of so many.

    be proud

  • 154.whatever: Reply to this comment

    which of the cuzzies that rape and bash women are in jail?

  • 155.whatever: Reply to this comment

    the ones that smoke and pedal meth or the ones that rob RSA’s?

  • 156.Atreides: Reply to this comment

    Jeez some sick b astards in cyberspace

    This thread is a pretty nasty indictment of Keo!

  • 157.gonzo: Reply to this comment

    And in rugby news, Cooper has signed with the Wallabies/Reds and Anthony Boric is healthy and ready to train with the Blues. Hopefully he’s picked up some mongrel during his lay off. We need someone to smash Cooper over next time he takes another cheap shot on Richie

  • 158.Skeppie: Reply to this comment

    @gonzo-157: Locks Gonzo, along with hooker the AB’s only weakness

  • 159.bokke baiter: Reply to this comment

    @Johannes_Lombard-132: How dare you come on this site spouting your hypocritical Bull poo. You are scum of the Earth with your pathetic christianesqe hyperbole.
    If you want to talk about rugby,go to a rugby blog. If you want to advance the hatred between Safwits and The chosen race stay here. It’s that simple.
    Take your squashed prune face somewhere it’s appreciated. ‘I love rugger dot com are looking for boring Christian lovies at the moment. Go check them out geek features

  • 160.the authority: Reply to this comment

    Poppa – You are racist and as such, no time will be wasted on you.

    Hurricane – You are Poppa’s little helper. A reasonable person would not associate with someone like Poppa but you have consistently chosen to do just that. I have a zero tolerance policy for racism and I’m afraid you are now deemed a racist by association. No time will be wasted on you.

    Bokke baiter – You are a racist and no time will be wasted on you.

    Whatever – you speak the truth and are a true gentleman. I salute you Sir.

    I am The Authority.

  • 161.bokke baiter: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-160: Thanks for wasting your time,full nappy face

  • 162.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-160:
    So i am a racist now cos i blog on the same thread as Poppa and i defend my country from idiots like you callings us cheats and so on??
    So if one of your friends in SA is a racist and you associate with him…does that make you a racist as well through association?
    You are a fool on here i do not tolerate fools like you…….no more time well be wasted on a racist fool like yourself.
    I am the Hurricane

  • 163.nortierd: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-162:
    Hi
    Is it just as quiet rugby wise in NZ as it is here?

  • 164.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @nortierd-163:
    Yeah mate.
    Very quiet, we all know the players need breaks and all but never remember what it is like when they do have a break,…..its terrible. :-)

  • 165.nortierd: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-164:
    Ha ha
    Agree with that.
    Feels weird knowing a week end is coming up with no matches to look forward to.
    I don’t count the Aviva or Heineken competitions.
    No real interest there.

  • 166.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @nortierd-165:
    Well at least SA ended on a high note….. we ended on a downer.
    Not nice.

  • 167.nortierd: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-166:

    Timely wake up call.
    Still had a very good year.

  • 168.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @nortierd-167:
    Sure was a wake up call but yeah still a good year.
    So easy after a RWC year to watch your team lose direction with players leaving, coaches etc.
    We lost a couple of key players and our main coach from the RWC but majority of our team stayed on and still played well enough…..so still happy

  • 169.nortierd: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-168:
    Yeah, we certainly felt the loss of key players as well.
    You’re transition just seems easier and the new players slotted in very well and certainly made an impact.
    I think we will do better next year, at least I hope so.

  • 170.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @nortierd-169:
    I think we all know SA will have a better next year.
    SA looks to be shaping up quite nicely….too slow for some but i think we can all see the potential is there.

  • 171.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-162: So you admit that Poppa is a racist

  • 172.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-164: @nortierd-165:

    Don’t panic boys, only 70 sleeps left before the kick-off for the S15…

  • 173.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-171:
    No.
    You’re the one accusing me and him of being racists.

  • 174.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-173:

    Don’t tell me, they teach you in school… :shock:

  • 175.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-173: Your answer is No, therefore you do not think it is racist to call South Africans neanderthals and knuckledraggers… Or to generalise South Africans as stupid… Or to use words like “saffa dimwits”… Or to judge each and every South African on apartheid, regardless of whether or not they were for or opposed to apartheid.

    By answering No, you have condoned the above behaviour. Not only this but you associate with Poppa day in and day out which further confirms that you condone the above behaviour.

    I therefore rest my case.

    If you choose to condemn Poppa’s racism, then your own reputation will be redeemed. Until then though, no further time will be wasted on you.

  • 176.damienm: Reply to this comment

    Hurricane, you should disassociate yourself from that rotting pile of exceatment called poppa.

    You may get some mojo back

    Use it, don’t use it

  • 177.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-175:
    We get called wife beaters, cannibals and scum yet you go all out for a kiwi that gives it back.
    Whats the bet i could find a post from you that crosses the line.
    So dont sit in your chair and accuse me of anything.
    The racism word is so ver used on this site it makes you wonder if you clowns know what a racist is.

  • 178.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-175:
    Dint have to look to far

    101.the authority said:
    4 Dec 2012, 03:20 am
    Conspiracy theory = Suzi = new zealand culture

    Incest = new zealand culture

    Wife beating = new zealand culture

    *** with sheep = new zealand culture

    Average wine = new zealand culture

  • 179.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-178:

    Eish, watch out you don’t cut yourself on the broken glass! That glass house must have been flying all over the place…

  • 180.damienm: Reply to this comment

    ” you clowns”…………….I suppose a generalisation of all Safricans?

  • 181.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment

    @damienm-180:

    No man, only if the big red shoes fits ;-)

  • 182.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-178: I condone those words as they are the truth.

    I am The Authority.

  • 183.TooMuchRugby: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-175:
    “Racism is usually defined as views, practices and actions reflecting the belief that humanity is divided into distinct biological groups called races and that members of a certain race share certain attributes which make that group as a whole less desirable, more desirable, inferior or superior” says Wikipedia

    Therefore what you are accusing Hurricane/Poppa of is not racism, but in fact bigotry, since he is directing his comments at all South Africans.

    Bigotry is the state of mind of a bigot, “a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially: one who regards or treats the members of a group with hatred and intolerance.

  • 184.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @TooMuchRugby-183:

    I agree they are bigots but semantics is not adequate defence against racism and prejudice… For example, one cannot justify call all Indians knuckle-dragging Neanderthals by saying that he was referring to the nationality and not the race group… There should be no difference in leniency when dealing with prejudice against race groups or nationalities… If poppa had called all black people knuckle draggers and Neanderthals, there would be outrage yet he feels righteous in calling South Africans the same.

    The only time prejudice is ok is when it is directed towards Kiwis. Everything else is racial slander.

  • 185.TooMuchRugby: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-184:
    I agree it’s still prejudice, but don’t call it racism.
    However if Poppa was a Maori and he was directing his comments at white South Africans, it might be called racism.
    IMO bigotry is a trait most of us display at some time. I would like the man who can honestly say he has never been guilty of bigotry.
    Having said this, I also aknowledge that you ( and poppa) are probably saying everything with tongue in cheek, which is something totally different and not bigotry or racism in my books.

  • 186.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @damienm-180:
    Take it how you like, but you clowns could mean 2 people.
    I understand what you said in post #176 but you have to look at it this way i am getting accused of being a racist from someone that calls all kiwis wife beaters and a people that practice incest and he said after that those words were the truth.
    So you as well should be careful.

  • 187.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-186: Dont twist words… There is a difference between CULTURIAL characteristics and INNATE characteristics.

    If you say South Africans are stupid… That is racist. (Or to keep TMR happy, bigotry).

    However if you say South African culture is very aggressive… That is a statement about the culture and not the people. Ie – not the innate characteristics of people belonging to a group.

    The former is racist, the latter is subjective opinion.

    Say what you like about South African culture or our weather or landscapes, but when you start calling saffas neanderthals etc, its racist (bigotry).

    Don’t forget, I am The Authority and as such, my word is final.

    I am The Authority.

  • 188.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-187:
    So what do you call someone calling all Kiwis wife beaters and cannibals?
    I have shown you where you have posted such a statement, yet you are happy about calling us that. But you then try and teach me the difference.
    Stop being a fool and for a start i never called you knuckle dragging neanderthals at all.
    So you seem to be barking up the wrong tree. But i have proof that you are a slimy fool thats trying to get out of his stupid remarks.
    Your word is pi$$ all and a fool to boot.
    Corretion…You are a fkwit

  • 189.damienm: Reply to this comment

    How old are you hurricane? You come a cross as quite young, either that or you are retarded?

  • 190.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @damienm-189:
    I am not young and i am not mentally challenged ( correct way of saying it )
    Seems odd that you are quite oppossed to me saying anything,when getting accused from someone that finds all kiwis have incest relationships and are wife beaters.
    Do you have a problem with me?
    You happy with defending Authority?
    He has accused me of being a racist…and with what proof?
    You have no problems with one above calling kiwis wife beaters and cannibals?

  • 191.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-188:

    > “So what do you call someone calling kiwis wife beaters and cannibals? I have shown where you have posted such a statement…”

    Wrong, I never called kiwis wifebeaters and I certainly never called them cannabils… I said something about new zealand CULTURE which as I have just explained is subjective opinion.

    Again, don’t twist words.

    I am starting to think you’re not very bright.

  • 192.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-191:
    So again you have called me racist, all this because you are wrong.
    Man up and confess, you got it wrong.
    You have a probelm with poppa cos his opinion of South Africans are neanderthals and knuckledragger…. i never said he was correct, but you called me a racist cos i was an assocate??? lol
    You are going around in circles.
    You have an opinion of Kiwis, incest and wife beaters is your opinion of us.
    Poppa thinks you guys are neanderthals and knuckledraggers…these are all subjective to opinion….now fkoff

  • 193.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-192: Ok that confirms it, you are not very bright. Simple concepts seem to be escaping you.

    Lets try it this way…

    We’ll deal with you first.

    You condone poppa’s racist behaviour and hang around with him day in and day out. As far as Im concerned, your reputation is out the window. Until you come out and say you condemn poppa’s behaviour, you will be considered a racist by association. Simple as that.

    Now we’ll deal with me.

    I spoke about kiwi culture NOT kiwi people and their innate characteristics (do you understand what that means?)… Also, I am The Authority, so what I say goes.

    I cant make it more simple than that. Youre going to have to read this comment a few times until it sinks in.

    Try and push yourself mentally as I am sure these concepts are within your grasp if you focus. If you need someone to explain it to you, thats fine, but just dont post a comment which shows you havent understood. If you do that, I’ll fail you.

  • 194.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-193:
    NO lets try it this way.
    You called me a racist with no proof at all.
    You have a problem with Poppa, stop being an idiot and apologise for you dumb comments.
    And one other thing, i have never seen you stop a South African on here when they have used racial comments. But yet i should stop Poppa for saying what he thinks?
    So kiwi culture. You have studied kiwi culture i see.
    Please tell where you come up with our culture being wife beaters and being a pack of incests?

  • 195.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-194:

    Right on the basis of that weak comment, I’m going to have to fail you.

    You are now a racist (by association) and a failure… Dont say I didnt warn you.

    1) I called you a racist by association. My proof as I have mentioned (several times now) is that you condone Poppa’s behaviour and you associate yourself with him…. This is the first concept you have failed to understand.

    2) Im going to quote you now – “you have a problem with Poppa, stop being an idiot and apologise…”

    So, according to this comment if I have a problem with Poppa I must apologise because Im being an idiot?

    This confirms firstly how committed you are to Poppa’s beliefs and secondly how stupid you must be to hold that view.

    3) youve never seen me stop a South african on here when theyve used racial comments….. That is irrelevant. It does not make it alright for poppa to use racial slur just because some saffa posters do the same. I cant go around murdering people just because someone else does…. Another concept you have failed to grasp.

    Simple, simple concepts which you have failed to grasp.

    What you need to do is post a comment saying that you condemn Poppa’s behaviour and that you don’t agree with racist or offensive behaviour. You need to do this soon because you are losing a lot of credibility on here and many people associate you and Poppa as 2 peas in a pod.

  • 196.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-195:

    1) Would not hold up in court…..
    Lawyer.
    So do you know Poppa?
    Hurricane:
    No

    Laywer: So have you ever met Poppa or have you agreed to what Poppa has said and done?
    Hurricane :No

    Lawyer: So you have never met, agreed or had anything to say about Poppas posts?
    Hurricane: No

    Jury…..Not Guilty

    2)
    “you have a problem with Poppa, stop being an idiot and apologise…””
    Correct, you have the problem with Poppa, so apologise to ME for calling ME a racist.

    For the record i have never said anything i recall that labels me a racist… it is only you that thinks that cos i happen to post on the same times as Poppa and after all the racist comments aimed at Kiwis on here you want one to condone and apologise the ones aimed at South Africans??

  • 197.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    I am done now.
    This has gone on long enough.
    Being called a racist on a blog cos i didnt jump in and stop it seems pathetic and childish.
    Authority, until you jump on some of the posts that racially gets aimed at kiwis, you have not a foot to stand on.
    You are in fact part of the problem.
    You believe Kiwi culture is wife beating and incest…i have not said anything like that about South Africans in this thread…yet you want me to apologise,for posting on the same times as poppa and not saying ” Naughty boy Poppa, just cos they call you scum and cannibals and accuse you of wife beating you should not call them neanderthals and knuckledraggers…..pathetic.

  • 198.Liewe Luiperd: Reply to this comment

    We all know Poppa is pure scum.

    But jeez this ‘authority’ dude is a real class wa*nker, hey?

  • 199.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-196: Poor attempt at an analogy there… You havent met poppa in the flesh so you think you are absolved of responsibility. Nonsense…. This is about your reputation and you have chosen to condone poppa’s behaviour so for that reason, your reputation is out the window.

    I have tried to help you. I have shown you the way to redeem your reputation, but you have failed and as such you are no better than poppa. The accomplice gets sentenced as well.

    Nothing more to say.

    @Liewe Luiperd-198: Dismissed.

  • 200.ryecatcher: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-197: Hi HUrri.I a m taking it upon myself to dissociate bloggers from the opinions of,WhATEVER,SNIVELLING KIWI PRICKS AND THE AUTHORITY>The do not talk for me or for the r est of KEO bloggers.They make me cringe .
    The rest of the bloggers here like you as they do Cane Gonzo NZ inCHINA
    and yes ,even Poppa ,who showed a side to himself that wa s quite
    amusing.
    Please dont let these pricks affect you like this.

  • 201.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @ryecatcher-200: First learn English and then you can post on here.

    Also if you associate with Poppa, then your reputation is also in the gutter.

  • 202.Liewe Luiperd: Reply to this comment

    I’d chat rugby with Hurri any day. He brings a lot to the table.

    But this ‘authority’ dude is just the pits… pure, unadulterated, meaningless drivel.

  • 203.ryecatcher: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-201: @the authority-201: The word according to all dictionaries
    is DISSOCIATE not DISSASOCIATE,And yes ,my keyboard sticks from
    time to time,so there is a Y missing from they.
    Is,nt knowledge grand.?You are disliked by so many here.

  • 204.ryecatcher: Reply to this comment

    @ryecatcher-203: In fact they are both correct.Ergo.Neither is wrong

  • 205.ryecatcher: Reply to this comment

    @ryecatcher-203: DAVID.CAN YOU HELP
    THIS PERSON>?

  • 206.David: Reply to this comment

    @ryecatcher-205:

    He’s quite correct except for the spelling. It’s disassociate.

  • 207.ryecatcher: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-201: My apologies for incorrect spelling.

  • 208.David: Reply to this comment

    @ryecatcher-207:
    By correct, I meant both are correct. I also find current usage a little disconcerting as new words become acceptable. This is the price the English for allowing independence for the 13 colonies in America. :lol:

  • 209.David: Reply to this comment

    @David-208:
    paid.

  • 210.the authority: Reply to this comment

    Luiperd you are dismissed. That means you’re free to go.

    Run along now. There’s a good boy.

  • 211.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @ryecatcher-200:
    Thanks Rye, and noted. I try and not let these guys get to me but i am far from being a racist.
    There are so many good South African bloggers here on keo.
    I try and get on with most but there is only so much you can do, and i admit sometimes i am a bit diffulcult.
    About whatever…i have plenty of time for that guy, we can have a good laugh and not go to far into personal hits.

  • 212.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @Liewe Luiperd-202:
    :-)
    Thanks Liewe

  • 213.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-210:
    Seems your dash has come to an end.
    NIce try but it seems you lost respect with bloggers in the attempt to pulling the racist card on me.
    I authorise you too leave…goodbye

  • 214.damienm: Reply to this comment

    @200 rycatches, obviously no one blogs on your behalf, that’s a given surely? I would have thought, however you disassociating yourself from certain bloggers is your perogative, but I find extremely hypercritical if you do so to some and not the scumbag poppa?? Just shows shallow character IMO.

  • 215.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-213: Haha you get some pandering from ryecatcher and now you think you’ve arrived… Seems you’re even stupider than I thought.

    I’m The Authority son. I’m a bigger name than you and ryecatcher together.

    The truth isn’t always popular but its still the truth… In this case, the truth is that you need to disassociate from Poppa to spare your reputation… And go get yourself a tutor coz youre as thick as bricks.

    The Authority has spoken.

  • 216.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @damienm-214: agreed.

  • 217.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-215:
    Its not only Rye, but if you care too look a bit further, a few have said they would rather have any kiwi on here than have you talking yourself up in the threads.
    You have been found out, move along now Mr no friends

  • 218.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-215:
    ” And go get yourself a tutor coz youre as thick as bricks. ”
    Ok, so it seems you may need help as well….i shall leave it with you to find the error in the sentence

  • 219.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-217: This is just too pathetic for words… Desperately searching for people to take your side.

    I’ll tell you what -you go find as many friends as you can and then when youre all ready, let me know… and I’ll still tell you what Ive been telling you all along.

    Disassociate from Poppa. Condemn his behaviour. Spare your own reputation.

    There are many people on here who dont like you already because of your association with poppa. I read someone saying they were going to piss in your mouth… Youre losing friends fast pal.

    I can only take you to the river of redemption. Up to you whether you want to step inside or not.

    Disassociate from poppa = redemption.

    Keep being poppa’s little helper = keep losing friends.

    Anyway, Im bored of you now. The rest is up to you.

  • 220.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-218: The sentence works… You don’t.

  • 221.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-219:
    Point is i an mot too worried on what you think of me.
    You have been a scab on this website. I was told that you were one of the few that are an embarrassment to the good bloggers here. You have out dont yourself here.
    Funny thing is you have said that i have bored you a few times yet you keep coming back to a losing battle. Leave it now, it is getting rather silly.

    @the authority-220:
    lol
    ok, we shall leave it at that then.

  • 222.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-221:
    dont = done

  • 223.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-220:
    I take it you are a South African that soes not live in SA, going by the times you post.

  • 224.Daddy: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-219: @Hurricane-221:

    ***** you 2 are immature hey.

    Authority you are ridiculously arrogant.

    Hurricane you are ridiculously stubborn. Lots of us think you shouldnt be So close to poppa on here. Gives you a bad rep. So I spose in that way authority has a point. Your not racist though.

  • 225.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-223: Correct

  • 226.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @Daddy-224: You call it arrogance, I call it truth.

  • 227.the authority: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-221: this isnt a battle. Its me giving you advice.

    Take it or leave it… But youre right, we have overtalked this subject, so on that note I bid you farewell.

  • 228.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @Daddy-224:
    :-)
    Thank you. I hate being called a racist and i should not apologise for someone elses posts.
    I have pulled Poppa up a few times, in fact just the other day about one of his blogs, but again it is not my job to tell Poppa to put a lid on it. If Keo cared about anyone on here these blogs would be moderated….but they are not.

  • 229.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @the authority-225:
    You live in NZ?

  • 230.cane: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-228:

    I see you have a Fan Club.

    Cool.

    ;)

  • 231.cane: Reply to this comment

    @Daddy-224:

    Popps is one of Our Faction.

    And we never leave Ours to be savaged by carrion feeders.
    No matter what.

    Popps is now,
    what Your Lot have created.

    The beast in the mirror.

  • 232.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @cane-230:
    :-)
    Wish i could pick my fans though.

  • 233.cane: Reply to this comment

    And fook me , Louw gets off,
    and The Hore gets 5 weeks.

    Where are all the conspiracy theologians now?

  • 234.cane: Reply to this comment

    @Hurricane-232:

    Good shake up here yesterday morning Hurricane.

    Nothing to what you are used to. You probably would have stayed in bed.

  • 235.Hurricane: Reply to this comment

    @cane-231:
    spot on.

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.