Serfontein to start against Lions

Serfontein to start against Lions

30 Jan 2013

Baby Boks centre Jan Serfontein has been included in the Bulls’ starting side for Saturday’s Gauteng Cup match against the Lions.

Serfontein will partner new Bulls recruit Lionel Mapoe in the midfield. Coach Frans Ludeke has also included two more former Lions in the pack, with Grant Hattingh and Paul Willemse starting in the second row.

Handre Pollard, another promising player who featured for the Baby Boks in the successful 2012 Junior World Championship campaign, is on the bench.

Bulls – 15 Jurgen Visser, 14 Travis Ismael, 13 Lionel Mapoe, 12 Jan Serfontein, 11 Sampie Mastriet, 10 Louis Fouche, 9 Jano Vermaak, 8 Arno Botha, 7 Jean Cook, 6 Deon Stegmann (c), 5 Grant Hattingh, 4 Paul Willemse, 3 Frik Kirsten, 2 Willie Wepener, 1 Juan Schoeman.
Subs: 16 Bongo Mbonambi, 17 Hencus van Wyk, 18 Wiaan Liebenberg, 19 Cornell Hess, 20 Ruan Snyman, 21 Handre Pollard, 22 Ulrich Beyers, 23 Jacques du Plessis.


331 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 » Show All

  • 251.shooter: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 13:31 pm

    @Sheriff-248: allesbehalwe seergemaak ou broe. jy is die een wat ontgogel klink

  • 252.Sheriff: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 13:31 pm

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-249:

    The beauty of the blog is then to state how you see it and anyone can then agree or disagree.

    People generally don’t like it when others disagree with them. I always welcome it because I value diversity in/of views.

    There is nothing more rewarding to me to read (when I do my sweepers routine) a reply from someone 1000s of kms away, articulating a very point of view from mine.

    As a learning individual I consider those views and then retain the good.

  • 253.Sheriff: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 13:33 pm

    @shooter-251:

    Nou goed. Of dan net ‘oneindig teleurgesteld’ dan :lol:

  • 254.Sheriff: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 13:34 pm

    Later fellas

    Shooter, gaan drink ‘n shooter

  • 255.shooter: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 13:36 pm

    @Sheriff-253: inderdaad…. sien: @gunther-222

  • 256.bryce_in_oz: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 13:42 pm

    @Sheriff-252:

    You need to get out more…

  • 257.Sheriff: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 14:15 pm

    @bryce_in_oz-256:

    Mate. Yeah. Thanks. Time constraints.

  • 258.gunther: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 14:33 pm

    @bryce_in_oz-256:

    That’s up to his parole officer.

  • 259.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 15:20 pm

    http://www.sport24.co.za/OtherSport/Cycling/Rasmussen-to-come-clean-20130131

    Something to draw ET out of the closet :)

  • 260.Dawn: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 15:31 pm

    @bryce_in_oz-256:

    He don’t get it !!!

  • 261.Dawn: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 15:33 pm

    Samsung S3 or Blackberry 10, people?

  • 262.Sheriff: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 15:43 pm

    Something that has impressed me about Ghoenter is that he is becoming more his own man here on keo.

    Growth.

  • 263.bryce_in_oz: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 15:46 pm

    @Dawn-261:

    Without a doubt Samsung and Android…

  • 264.Sheriff: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 15:51 pm

    Dawn again has regressed somewhat.

    But I always say: Look anybody can lose their way …

  • 265.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 16:00 pm

    @Dawn-261: Samsung. By about 20 laps of the pool in ET’s gym…..

    Most def a better bet.

  • 266.gunther: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 16:14 pm

    I see Keo is offering a tutorship in sports writing.

    And is looking for writers for keo.

    I nominate Dawno.

    In other news Keo is also starting a fantasy rugby section.

    I don’t know what fantasy rugby is but I hope it doesn’t involve Grantie lying in his jacuzzi and abusing himself whilst dreaming about Smitty.

  • 267.Sheriff: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 16:22 pm

    I nominate Dawn-no!

  • 268.Sheriff: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 16:27 pm

    I would be considering Gunther, but I’d like to see more all round improvement first.

  • 269.Dawn: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 16:35 pm

    @Sheriff-264:

    And your opinion means squat to me

  • 270.gunther: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 16:36 pm

    @Sheriff-267:

    You don’t get a vote Sharif.

    Not until you prove you can be let out of your house unsupervised.

  • 271.ryecatcher: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 16:38 pm

    @Dawn-39: Hi Dawn

  • 272.Dawn: Reply to this comment
    31 Jan 2013, 16:45 pm

    @ryecatcher-271:

    Hi Rye

  • 273.Slartibartfast: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 04:12 am

    @carol-109:

    :lol: Classic indeed, we call it “I is” English!

    PS Have you gone to see Jack Reacher yet? My son recons it is ok but I think the pretty boy will just spoil it for me.

  • 274.Taahirah: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 08:28 am

    @Slartibartfast-273: I fell asleep in the cinema.

  • 275.stormersboy: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 10:29 am

    @Slartibartfast-273: @Taahirah-274: I just can’t bring myself to see Tom Cruise who is maybe 5’7 even in heels play a burly rough character who is well over 6 ft tall.

    Although Rosamund Pike is worth a watch any day of the week.

    Oh the decisions……!

  • 276.nortierd: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 10:36 am

    @stormersboy-275:
    I am also one of the Reacher readers who almost got a heart attack when hearing they cast Cruise.
    What is worst is how Lee Child defends the decision, and the even changed the title which should have been One Shot to Reacher after a teenager survey found One Shot to violent.

  • 277.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 10:38 am

    @stormersboy-275: It’s a disgrace. An artistic disgrace. I have my picture of Reacher in my mind, from years of reading the novels……

    And what do they do? Cast a fucking2fthobbit to shatter my dreams.

  • 278.nortierd: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 10:42 am

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-277:
    Every woman wants to be with him and every man wants to be him…..

  • 279.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 10:46 am

    @nortierd-278: Reacher yes…. not Cruise. :)

  • 280.nortierd: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 10:53 am

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-279:
    Ha ha, even Katie Holmes and Nicolle Kidman agrees with you there

  • 281.Robzim: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 10:55 am

    I wonder who would have been the best Jack Reacher.

    Maybe Tom Selleck if he was 30 years younger.

  • 282.Robzim: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 10:56 am

    Tom Selleck is probably the only man ever to look cool with a moustache.

  • 283.nortierd: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 10:58 am

    @Robzim-281:
    From the book description ,a WWE or F or whatever they call themselves lately, wrestler would fit the physical description, but would come up short in the brains department.
    Pierre Spies?

  • 284.gunther: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 10:58 am

    @Robzim-281:

    Liam Neeson

    Harrison Ford

    Fraulein Gunther says Vin Diesel but I think she may have an agenda.

    :lol:

  • 285.nortierd: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 10:59 am

    @Robzim-281:
    Rob, if you look at the silhouette in the books it actually looks like Lawrence Dallaglio.

  • 286.nortierd: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 11:04 am

    @gunther-284:
    Liam, yes, he is big enough, and after Taken can easily take on an action character and pull it off.
    30 years younger Clint Eastwood would have been my choice.

  • 287.Robzim: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 11:06 am

    @nortierd-283:

    Seeing that Jack is a master of the headbutt and dirty fighting I was thinking of Vinny Jones .

    @gunther-284:

    Vin in high heels and without the tattoos might be a fair fit.

  • 288.Robzim: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 11:09 am

    @nortierd-286:

    Ja, Dirty Harry would have been brilliant, he just needed a bit of bulk.

  • 289.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 11:11 am

    @Robzim-287: Master of the headbutt and dirty fighting…..Dean Greyling, Andrew Hore…both more believable than Cruise I must add.

  • 290.nortierd: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 11:12 am

    @Robzim-287:
    Ginny fits the fighting mode for sure.
    Maybe Lee Child can have him grabbing someone by the B.alls in his next book
    :-)

  • 291.Robzim: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 11:12 am

    “I have strong feelings about gun control. If there’s a gun around, I want to be controlling it”.

    Clint Eastwood

  • 292.nortierd: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 11:12 am

    @nortierd-290:
    Vinny not Ginny

  • 293.Robzim: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 11:14 am

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-289:

    Bakkies Botha?

    Perhaps not, as he only headbutts small okes from behind :)

  • 294.nortierd: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 11:15 am

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-289:
    On current players physical description Pierre Spies would fit the bill.
    Dallaglio still the model though, and seeing that Child is an Americanized Brit, maybe he had him in mind, who knows?

  • 295.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 11:26 am

    @Robzim-293: @nortierd-294: Lemme tell you who I would have had a Reacher…’damaged goods’ Christian Bale….bulked up once more to wha the was in the 1st of the Nolan Dark Knight trilogy….

    Edgy, violent and dark…that’s Reacher.

    (Have to say though……another Batman reference, Tom Hardy IS the ultimate action man, legit fight scenes and bulk etc etc….and the man can act, really act)

  • 296.stormersboy: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 11:30 am

    If you think of “Bankable” actors out there a guy like Hugh Jackman (think Wolverine) may fit the bill, he is really tall too, maybe a Gerard Butler (a-la 300) or a Russel Crowe (circa Gladiator) may have fit too.

    My choice would be Joe Manganiello

    He’s rugged enough and at 1.95m certainly tall enough.

    http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0542133/bio

  • 297.The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 11:30 am

    @nortierd-294: If I had to select someone from the blog…..I’m going with HG or Skop….. ;)

  • 298.nortierd: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 11:30 am

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-295:
    6 foot 5 inches, 220 to 250 pounds
    Not many actors fit the bill

  • 299.stormersboy: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 11:31 am

    @The Sharks rugby pedigree is packaged as dog food-295: Have you seen Lawless yet?

    Worth a watch, in spite of Shia le Douche being in it. On the plus side he gets the stuffing beaten out of him which was a bonus :)

  • 300.stormersboy: Reply to this comment
    1 Feb 2013, 11:31 am

    THIS IS SPARTA!!!!!!!!

    :)

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 » Show All

Keo.co.za has always promoted uncensored views, but has never tolerated racist or crass outbursts. Come on guys and girls. If you can't moderate yourselves or each other then I am going to be forced to regulate the posts and enforce a registration process for comments. The choice is yours.

Have your say

You must be logged in to post a comment.